In today's modern times, there is a lot of attention given to disability rights and inclusion. Human resource (HR) management, in particular, is constantly updating to make accommodations for people with disabilities in the workplace.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, an employer must make a reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified applicant or employee with a disability unless the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business. As a result, companies must now accommodate disabled workers more than ever before. In HR, employers must now hire people with disabilities to be in compliance with ADA regulations, and companies must provide reasonable accommodations to disabled workers so that they can carry out their job responsibilities.
For example, accommodations may include the use of assistive technology or software, modified work schedules, or additional breaks. These accommodations allow disabled workers to contribute fully to the company and helps create a more inclusive workplace. This ultimately benefits everyone involved and makes for a more diverse and successful company.
To know more about management visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32216947
#SPJ11
which type of justice is concerned with the allocation of society’s resources?
Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of society's resources among its members.
Distributive justice is a term used frequently to describe the type of justice that addresses how resources in society are distributed. The distribution of resources, advantages and burdens among society citizens is the main focus of distributive justice. It addresses concerns about equity and fairness in the distribution of resources, opportunities and other societal goods.
Distributive justice seeks to ensure that resources are distributed in a fair and just way, addressing inequalities and fostering the social and economic well being of all societal members. This idea is frequently contested and given various political, economic and social interpretations.
Learn more about Distributive justice at:
brainly.com/question/32528496
#SPJ4
What is a warranty?
(A) It is a stipulation about the contract.
(B) It is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract
(C) It is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
(D) It is a statement of commendation by the seller.
Answer:
C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money
10
Select the correct answer.
What is physical evidence?
OA
matter
OB
elements
O C.
atoms
OD. compounds
O E mixtures
Describe the role conflict that exists for treatment professionals.
In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:
Unclear Job Expectations.Poor Communication.Toxic Work Environment.What is the concept of role conflict?Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.
A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.
Learn more about role conflict, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13603130
#SPJ1
Justification of 5th amendment and encrypted data. Discuss two
criminal justice cases in which they apply.
Computer Science and Criminal Justice
Answer:
Individuals are protected against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that no one "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." This safeguard applies to numerous types of evidence, including encrypted data. In computer science and criminal justice, the Fifth Amendment can be used to justify not providing decryption keys or passwords for encrypted data. Let's look at two hypothetical situations in which the Fifth Amendment and encrypted data collide in the context of criminal justice.
Case 1: Suspected Drug Trafficking
John is accused of drug trafficking, and authorities have secured a search warrant to search his property for evidence. During the search, they discover a PC with encrypted files suspected of containing incriminating information. They request John's decryption key or password in order to access the files, but he refuses, asserting his Fifth Amendment rights.
Justification: Because the Fifth Amendment protects him from self-incrimination, John's reluctance to reveal the decryption key or password can be justified. By handing over the key, John is basically handing over evidence that could be used against him in a criminal proceeding. Because it demonstrates knowledge or ownership of the encrypted information, the encryption key itself may be regarded testimonial evidence, potentially tying him to the crime. As a result, the Fifth Amendment empowers John to refuse to reveal the key, so protecting his constitutional rights.
Case 2: Alleged Cybercrime
Emily is accused of breaking into a company's computer system and stealing confidential client information. Law enforcement seizes Emily's computer during the investigation, which contains encrypted files that may reveal evidence of her involvement. They want Emily's decryption key or password, but she refuses, invoking the Fifth Amendment.
Justification: Under the Fifth Amendment, Emily's refusal to reveal the decryption key or password is also justifiable. She would be granting access to potentially incriminating evidence that may link her to the cybercrime if she provided the key. The encryption key can be viewed as testimonial evidence because it demonstrates her knowledge and control over the encrypted information, potentially establishing her guilt. As a result, the Fifth Amendment protects Emily's freedom to refuse to reveal the key, shielding her from self-incrimination.
_____
(The Fifth Amendment's application to encrypted data is a complex legal matter with varying opinions on whether disclosing encryption keys or passwords is a Fifth Amendment right. Courts may order non-testimonial evidence or acknowledge testimonial nature, impacting outcomes.)
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
A. Criminal law
B. Administrative law
c. Procedural law
D. Civil law
Answer: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!!
Explanation:
what is the difference between burden of proof and standard of proof?
Answer:
burden of proof is referred to party's duty to present the evidence and the argument to prove the allegations against him or her, as for standard of proof it refers to the degree or the level or the proof demanded to prove a specific type of allegation
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
When a judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom, except for the person testifying, it is called _____.
Answer:
Sequestering
Explanation:
a practice used during the trial whereby the judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom except the person testifying.
Is the agency's interpretation of the law plausible? In a situation where the justices find that the law's text is unclear, the next step is weighing whether the executive's reading of the law makes sense.
In a situation where the justices find the law's text to be unclear, the agency's interpretation of the law may be plausible if it aligns with the legislative intent behind the law and is consistent with the overall structure of the legal framework.
In a legal or regulatory context, an agency's interpretation refers to the way in which a government agency or regulatory body interprets and applies the rules and regulations under its purview. This can be important in cases where there is ambiguity or uncertainty in the language of the rules or regulations, or where new situations arise that were not explicitly covered in the original language. The agency's interpretation provides guidance on how to apply the rules or regulations in a particular situation, and can be used to inform decisions or actions taken by individuals, organizations, or other government bodies. It is also subject to review by courts or other oversight bodies, who may assess the agency's interpretation to determine whether it is reasonable and consistent with the underlying legal or regulatory framework.
Learn more about agency's interpretation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29972706
#SPJ11
How did the colonists respond to the Intolerable Acts of 1774?
A.
They sent the Olive Branch Petition to King George III.
B.
They had British troops arrested for attacking colonial troops.
C.
They wrote a list of compaints at the First Continental Congress.
D.
They created the Sons of Liberty group to boycott British goods.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I think D because the sons of liberty would boycott British goods. This was to show "No taxation without representation"
Successfulness of the competition policy in South Africa
Answer:
The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers.
Explanation:
Despite the laws and regulations created through the U.S. Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, and substantial scientific capacity and diagnostics to monitor drinking water, the U.S. also faces many challenges in safe drinking water provision. Discuss several of the issues that undermine our ability to guarantee safe drinking water in the U.S. For each issue: (a) offer a short-term assessment of our progress, and (b) describe barriers to improving safe drinking access to the most vulnerable communities.
Challenges to safe drinking water in the US include aging infrastructure, contamination, disparities, compliance issues, and emerging contaminants. Barriers include funding, enforcement, and neglect of vulnerable communities.
Despite regulations and technological advancements, the US ability to provide safe drinking water is threatened by a number of issues. Key issues include deteriorating infrastructure, pollution, access disparities, regulatory and compliance problems, emerging contaminants and climate change.
Due to obstacles like insufficient funding, dispersed responsibility, poor enforcement, economic inequality and a lack of infrastructure, short term progress in solving these problems is constrained. In order to guarantee safe drinking water these issues must be resolved through more funding, stricter enforcement, giving marginalized communities top priority and taking preventative measures for new problems.
Government, communities and other stakeholders must work together to ensure that everyone has equitable access to clean drinking water.
Learn more about safe drinking water at:
brainly.com/question/30128990
#SPJ4
what are your thoughts regarding the future of justice in the United States?
The future of Justice in the United States will be about the promotion of justice in pre trial services and practices.
What is justice?It should be noted that justice simply means the prices of using laws to fairly judge people.
In this case, the future of Justice in the United States will be about the promotion of justice in pre trial services and practices. Also, there'll be enhancement of prosecutional integrity.
Learn more about justice on:
https://brainly.com/question/25756666
Which of the following best describes what an associate’s degree is with respect to the criminal justice system? It is the first degree one can achieve after high school. It is associated with fulfilling criminal law tasks. It is the final degree candidates must achieve before applying for a job. It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training. ANSWER ASAP
Answer:
The Correct Answer Actually is :
It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training.
Explanation:
Just took the test 100%
What is the main theme of Crime and Punishment?
The main theme of Crime and Punishment is morality and the struggles of a young man trying to live in an immoral world. He struggles to reconcile his beliefs of what is morally right and wrong with the realities of the world he lives in. His ultimate realization is that he must take responsibility for his own actions, no matter the consequences.
The main theme of Crime and Punishment is guilt and redemption.
Throughout the novel, the protagonist, Raskolnikov, grapples with the guilt of committing a heinous crime and the consequences that come with it. He initially believes that he is above the law and can justify his actions, but as the story progresses, he realizes the weight of his guilt and seeks redemption.
This theme is explored through Raskolnikov's relationships with other characters, such as the prostitute Sonia, who represents the possibility of redemption through love and forgiveness, and the detective Porfiry, who represents the consequences of one's actions.
Overall, Crime and Punishment examines the complexities of guilt and the struggle for redemption in the face of one's own actions.
For more such questions on Punishment.
https://brainly.com/question/8801970#
#SPJ11
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.
1.What would you do?
Things to consider as you prepare
Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.
One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.
One should do what is best for everyone.
One should do one’s duty.
Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.
What is an ethical duty?An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
why might a teenager confess to a crime they didn’t commit
Answer:
Teens are more likley to be influcened by social influence.
Explanation:
The police make the teenager feel as if denials are absurd, and confessing is the only avalible option. The police might try to be the suspect's friend and will claim to show more forgivness if they confess (which in the end persuades them to confess falsley).
wendell, new to the area, selects a doctor from the telephone book and visits that doctor to have a splinter extracted. unbeknownst to wendell, the doctor has never passed the state licensing exams. later, when wendell discovers the truth, he refuses to pay his bill. if the doctor sues for recovery of the fee, will the court support the doctor's claim?
No, the court is likely to take the position that it is not in the public's best interests to enforce contracts with unlicensed doctors.
On January 23, 2010, Bendiken observed his preliminary put-up. In this publication, he explained that the Unlicense is based on the copyright waiver of SQLite with the no-assurance declaration from the MIT License. He then walked through the license, commenting on each part. In a publish posted in December 2010, Bendiken similarly clarified what it method to "license" and "unlicensed" software. In December 2010, Mike Linksvayer, the vice president of innovative Commons on the time, wrote in an identi.Ca conversation "I just like the movement" in speaking of the Unlicense effort, considering it compatible with the dreams of the CC zero, released in 2009. On January 1, 2011, Bendiken reviewed the development and adoption of the Unlicense, pronouncing it became "hard to present estimates of present day Unlicense adoption" but there were "many loads of projects the use of the Unlicense".
Learn more about unlicensed here
https://brainly.com/question/28498855
#SPJ4
true or false? justification defenses provide that acts that are ordinarily criminal are justified or carry no criminal liability under certain circumstances.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What does it mean to “establish the principle”?
Answer: establish a principle (=make it accepted)Establish the principle that when your office door is shut you must not be disturbed. lay down a principle (=describe a principle and make it accepted)The report lays down general principles for the teaching of English.
Identity theft may
lower credit interest
reduce credit balances
affect the credit score
cancel debt-to-credit ratio
Why did Congress have so much trouble passing laws under the terms of
the Articles of Confederation?
what is the qualification required to become a Hotel Manager
Answer:
Managers of larger or full-service hotels typically need a bachelor's degree in hospitality or hotel management. However, hotels with fewer services and less complicated operations may hire candidates with an associate's degree or a certificate in hotel management.
Explanation:
Answer: Job Description. Hotel managers need specific skill sets to handle the many facets of the job. ...
Education Requirements. Managers of larger or full-service hotels typically need a bachelor’s degree in hospitality or hotel management.
Industry Salaries. Hotel management jobs are available in many types of lodging. Salaries vary according to industry, level of responsibility and geographic location.
Experience and Training. Hotel management isn’t a job that students land right out of undergraduate school. Most properties prefer managers with on-the-job experience in a series of increasingly responsible positions.
Explanation:
Write a submission letter for a client PR under the Canadian Experience Class
Writing a submission letter for a client PR under the Canadian Experience Class requires detail and accuracy. To ensure the submission letter meets the necessary requirements, start by introducing the client and their purpose for the Canadian Experience Class.
Provide details regarding the client's education, work experience, and any other qualifications they may have to support their application. Then, provide any relevant documents or information that support their application. Lastly, conclude with a closing statement and provide any additional contact information.
See more about letter in:
https://brainly.com/question/29382762
#SPJ11
which of the following statements about the American legal system is not true?
A) each branch has a seperate sphere of authority (checks)
B) Each branch of government is subject to review by the other branches (balances)
Answer:
A. Each branch has a separate sphere of authority (checks)
why is American horror story’s cast so hot ?
Answer:
American horror story’s cast so hot because they are celebrities and famous people. Like if you are the director, you wouldn't hire someone unattractive. This answer goes to any other movies/series .
What does a plaintiff need to file if they want the defendant to stop performing an action?
Answer:
If you were wronged, you have the right to sue. But, there are things you have to know before you sue, like:
Who to sue,
Where they are,
What you need to do before you sue them,
Where you should sue them, and
If you should sue them.
These are hard questions to answer, even in an easy case like a slip-and-fall in a store. For example, if you slip on the floor in a supermarket, you have to figure out if the store is part of a chain or just one store, if falling was partly or totally your fault, etc.
In a complicated case, like if the same slip and fall happened on land that the county owns, but that a government agency rents, you have to figure out who was responsible for slippery ground, and follow the laws for suing the government. If you sue a government agency, you have to follow the laws for notice. This is a fancy way of saying that before you sue a government agency you have to fill out papers that say that you’re suing them.
There’s a time limit to give notice. After you file your notice, you don’t have much time to file your lawsuit. Claim limits like this protect hospitals and other businesses. If you do not follow these rules, get ready to fight. If you don’t do things on time, you may lose your right to sue. You could ruin your lawsuit.
Even more important are time limits called "statute of limitations." These statutes, or laws, say when you can file your action. If you don’t file on time, you lose automatically. For example, if you are in a car crash, you have 2 years to file a lawsuit. This might not be true for your case. You have to check the time limit yourself. But in general this is the case. If you wait one day after the time limit, the Court won’t let you sue, except in very special circumstances.
This means that even if you have a good case, you lose because you didn’t file on time. The person you sue can challenge you at any time. They can appeal and win. That’s because the statute of limitations says if the Court can hear and decide the case at all. If you wait too long, you take away the Court’s jurisdiction to hear your case.
What are Summons and Complaint:
A general civil lawsuit starts when the plaintiff files 2 forms.
A Summons is a notice that says there’s a lawsuit.
A Complaint is a form that says how the person was hurt, who hurt them and how much the damages are.
Where do I file my lawsuit?
There are a lot of things to think when you decide where to file your complaint. For example:
Jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction can mean more than one thing. The Court has to have “jurisdiction” over the defendant. This means that the Court has the right to hear and decide a case for the person you are suing. In general, you have to file your lawsuit where the injury happened, or where the contract was supposed to happen, or where the defendant lives.
There can be other requirements. Check the California Code of Civil Procedure .
Then, the Court also has to have jurisdiction over how much money you want. You have to file your lawsuit in the right court:
Small Claims Court,
Limited Jurisdiction Superior Court, or
Unlimited Jurisdiction Superior Court.
Venue:
Jurisdiction says in what State and what Court you file your lawsuit. Venue is the County where you file your action. Usually, this is the County where the defendant lives or where the injury happened. But, sometimes you can change the Venue. See Law and Motion.
Court locations/hours/maps:
See the list of courthouses. Click on each court to see the hours and maps.
Unlimited Jurisdiction cases:
If you have a case worth more than $25,000, you have an unlimited jurisdiction case. For these cases, you have to give the Clerk:
The Complaint, or petition,
A Civil Case Cover Sheet ,
The filing fee (see the local fee schedule ), and
An original copy of the Summons.
The Clerk will endorse the Complaint, the Cover Sheet and the Summons, and give them back to you with something called a “Civil Lawsuit Notice”. This tells the date and time of your first Court hearing, and which Department (courthouse and courtroom) and Judge your case is assigned to.
You’ll also get an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Information
Explanation:
When considering indeterminate sentencing,
which of these does not
apply.
A. The trial judge has great discretion,
B. Correctional authorities have the power to
release a prisoner before completion of the
maximum sentence imposed by the judge.
C. Prisoners may be released back into society
when rehabilitave goals have been reached.
D. Judges must follow strict sentence guidelines.
Answer:
Indeterminate sentencing is a system of sentencing in which there is more flexibility in deciding what an individual's sentence will be. Usually, the sentence is given in the form of a range, with a minimum and maximum amount of time to be served.
Explanation:
I hope this helps but you could've googled what is considered in indeterminate sentencing and what ever wasn't included is your answer
You're welcome though!
Considering indeterminate sentencing, Judges must follow strict sentence guidelines is not correct. Thus, option D is correct.
What is indeterminate sentencing?A sort of custodial sentence known as a "indeterminate sentence" is one in which the condemned person's release date is uncertain and consists of a range of years (for example, five to 10 years).
The state parole board performs a hearing to decide whether a prisoner is eligible for parole after serving a predetermined amount of time. The idea behind an indeterminate sentence is that some inmates will be rehabilitated while in jail, and those who demonstrate progress will be granted parole (conditional release) and may not serve out the remainder of their sentence behind bars.
Therefore, we can conclude that option D is correct.
Learn more about indeterminate sentencing here:
https://brainly.com/question/7202734
#SPJ2