Answers
Answer: Common Law
Explanation:
Related Questions
a record in writing of the entire trial proceedings including the testimony of all the witnesses and any discussions between the judge and the attorneys that must be prepared and forwarded to the appeals court is called a
Answers
A record in writing of the entire trial proceedings, including the testimony of all the witnesses and any discussions between the judge and the attorneys, that must be prepared and forwarded to the appeals court is called a "transcript."
A transcript is a set-up account of the whole preliminary investigation, including all the declarations of the observers and any conversations between the judge and the lawyers. It is ready and sent to the requests court to audit the preliminary court's choice.
The requests court depends on the transcript to assess the legitimate issues raised on a claim, including whether the preliminary court applied the law accurately and whether there were any mistakes made during the preliminary that require inversion or alteration of the judgment. A transcript is a significant record of the preliminary procedures, and it is vital to guarantee that it precisely reflects what occurred in the preliminary court.
Learn more about preliminary investigation:
https://brainly.com/question/31449385
#SPJ4
Describe three factors that comtributes to financial crime
Answers
Financial Incentives, Weak Regulatory Frameworks and Technological Advancements are three factors that comtributes to financial crime.
Three factors that contribute to financial crime are:
Financial Incentives: The potential for financial gain is a significant motivating factor for individuals or organized groups to engage in financial crimes. This can include activities such as fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or insider trading. The allure of illicit profits, whether through theft, manipulation, or illegal transactions, entices individuals to engage in unlawful activities.
Weak Regulatory Frameworks: Inadequate or weak regulatory frameworks create loopholes and opportunities for financial crime. Insufficient oversight, lax enforcement, and gaps in legislation can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system. This includes inadequate know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, insufficient monitoring of transactions, and limited regulatory supervision, which can facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit financial activities.
Technological Advancements: While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits to the financial industry, they have also opened new avenues for financial crime. The rapid growth of digital transactions, online banking, and cryptocurrencies has created opportunities for cybercrime, identity theft, and hacking. Criminals leverage technology to carry out sophisticated fraud schemes, phishing attacks, and data breaches, exploiting vulnerabilities in systems and networks.
These factors highlight the importance of robust regulations, effective enforcement mechanisms, and technological safeguards to combat financial crime. It requires a comprehensive approach involving collaboration between financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with financial crime and protect the integrity of the financial system.
To know more about Financial crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/31388410
#SPJ11
the allotment act intended to impose upon the native americans the european concept of
Answers
The Allotment Act intended to impose upon the Native Americans the European concept of private property.
What is the Allotment Act?
The Allotment Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1887. This law was also known as the Dawes Act, named after Senator Henry L. Dawes of Massachusetts, who created the bill. The act aimed to dissolve the communal landholding system of Native American tribes and to allot individual Native Americans a plot of land for farming, a practice known as the allotment.
The Allotment Act aimed to make Native Americans more like European Americans. The European concept of private property was imposed upon the Native Americans through the Allotment Act. It was thought that, by doing so, the Native Americans would be more willing to adopt the habits of farming and ranching that had made European Americans so successful.
The law was disastrous for many Native American tribes. Instead of receiving the benefits they were promised, many Native Americans were left without a source of income. Their land was too small to farm, and it was often of poor quality.
However, many Native Americans were forced to sell their land for less than it was worth, and some were left homeless.
Hence, the Allotment Act intended to impose upon the Native Americans the European concept of private property.
Read more about Allotment Act at https://brainly.com/question/32327605
#SPJ11
The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable
Answers
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
What are some of the pros/cons of each of the four correctional ideologies?
Answers
1. Rehabilitation:
Pros:
- Rehabilitation aims to address the root causes of criminal behavior and help offenders reintegrate into society.
- It can reduce recidivism rates and prevent future crimes.
- It is based on the principle of individualized treatment, which takes into account the unique needs and circumstances of each offender.
Cons:
- Rehabilitation programs can be expensive and time-consuming.
- There is no guarantee that rehabilitation programs will be effective for all offenders.
- Critics argue that rehabilitation can be too lenient and fail to hold offenders accountable for their actions.
2. Deterrence:
Pros:
- Deterrence aims to prevent crime by punishing offenders and sending a message to others that crime will not be tolerated.
- It can be cost-effective, as it does not require extensive rehabilitation programs.
- It is based on the principle of swift and certain punishment, which can be a powerful deterrent.
Cons:
- Deterrence may not be effective for all offenders, especially those who are impulsive or have substance abuse issues.
- Critics argue that deterrence can be too harsh and fail to take into account the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
- There is debate over whether the threat of punishment is a strong enough deterrent to prevent crime.
3. Incapacitation:
Pros:
- Incapacitation aims to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community.
- It can be effective in preventing repeat offenses by high-risk offenders.
- It is based on the principle of public safety, which is a primary goal of the criminal justice system.
Cons:
- Incapacitation can be expensive, especially for long-term sentences or for the elderly or sick.
- Critics argue that incapacitation can be too harsh and fail to address the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
- Overreliance on incapacitation can lead to overcrowded prisons and strain on the criminal justice system.
4. Retribution:
Pros:
- Retribution aims to punish offenders in proportion to their crimes and to provide a sense of justice to victims and society.
- It can be based on the principle of desert, which holds that offenders deserve to be punished for their crimes.
- Retribution can be seen as a necessary aspect of a just and fair criminal justice system.
Cons:
- Retribution can be too harsh and fail to take into account the individual circumstances and needs of offenders.
- There is debate over whether retribution is an effective deterrent to crime.
- Overreliance on retribution can lead to a punitive and harsh criminal justice system that does not prioritize rehabilitation or prevention.
Overall, each of these four correctional ideologies has its own strengths and weaknesses, and there is ongoing debate over which approach is most effective in reducing crime and promoting public safety.
Policing in the United States primarily exists at the ______________ governmental level, usually as an administrative department that is always part of the _____________ branch of that government
Answers
Answer:
- goverment
Explanation:
big brain
Answer:
federal- legislative
Explanation:
Educated Guess
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answers
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
FASTT PLZZ!! -
Which of these is NOT the same thing as a limited access highway (LAH)?
A. freeway
B. interstate
C. expressway
D. byway
Answers
Byway is not the same thing as a limited access highway (LAH). Thus, option D is the correct option.
What is limited access highway (LAH)?Highways that the Commissioner identifies as having limited access are ones that only permit access at specific locations, such as junctions, with the advice and permission of the Governor and the Attorney General. Section 13b-27 of the Connecticut General Statutes makes provision for this. Limited access highway refers to a section of a highway containing rest areas or service stations for drivers of cars and trucks.
Includes freeways or Interstate roadways, which are roadways with limited access from surface roads. The level of separation from neighborhood traffic that is permitted varies between nations and areas. Every jurisdiction has a different interpretation of these phrases. The Bronx River Parkway in New York was the country's first limited-access road when it opened in 1907.
Learn more about highways here:
https://brainly.com/question/17308859
#SPJ2
What is the difference between principals in the first degree and principals in
the second?
Answers
Answer:
A principal in the first degree is a person who is charged with actively carrying out criminal actions, one who commits the act “with his own hand.” A principal in the second degree is a person present during a criminal action who knowingly helps the crime occur but does not actively participate.
Answer:
one it charge longer than the other
Explanation:
the minimum size criminal jury approved by the u.s. supreme court is
Answers
The minimum size for a criminal jury approved by the U.S. Supreme Court is six members.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution's Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant in a criminal trial the right to a trial by an impartial jury.
While the Constitution does not specify a minimum jury size, the Supreme Court has held that a jury must have at least six members to satisfy the constitutional requirements.
The Court has recognized that a smaller jury may still be capable of providing a fair and impartial trial.
However, going below six members could potentially compromise the jury's ability to reach a well-rounded and diverse decision, thereby undermining the principles of a fair trial.
Learn ore about criminal here: brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ11
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the military intelligence strategies with their descriptions.
information engagement
command and control warfare
operations security
military deception
an integrated strategy of physical attacks, electronic warfare, and
computer network operations against an opponent's control station
>
all activities to mislead an adversary about military capabilities, plans,
strategies, and operations
preventing opponents from discovering critical Department of Defense
information
attempting to influence the opinion and attitudes of an opponent through
non-lethal means
Answers
Explanation:
right option according to me b d c a
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answers
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
How do I explain the role of technology in local government operations, revenue collection, and spending?
Answers
Answer:
Government policies pertaining to science and technology
Related policies—with respect to educating the public, issuing patents, and developing human capital by nurturing a new generation of professionals and scientist with energy expertise—also have a critical role to play
Answer:
Technology is also an essential ingredient in our country's ability to achieve important public objectives and government missions in areas such as public health, environmental protection, defense, space, and energy.
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Answers
Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
What informs firearms and their projectiles?Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.
From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.
From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.
Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650
#SPJ1
How many justices serve on the Supreme Court?
O9
O 10
0 11
O 12
Answers
Answer:
9
Explanation:
There can never be an even number because the decisions would never be made.
Answer:
There are 9 justices that serve on the supreme court.
Explanation:
These 9 justices have been serving their whole life in the Supreme Court. There were 9 justices in Supreme Court since 1869.
in addition to encouraging settlement, judge smith calls parties before the court for a pretrial conference to hammer out blank details, such as how long the trial will take and how many witnesses the parties may call. multiple choice question.
Answers
In addition to encouraging settlement, Judge Smith calls parties before the court for a pretrial conference to hammer out logistical details, such as how long the trial will take and how many witnesses the parties may call.
The option (A) is correct.
The purpose of the pretrial conference is to streamline the trial process and ensure a smooth and efficient trial. During this conference, the judge can clarify any legal issues, set deadlines for submitting evidence, and address any procedural matters.
By discussing these details beforehand, the court can better manage the trial proceedings and ensure that both parties have a fair and organized trial experience.
Learn more about pretrial conference:
https://brainly.com/question/32911930
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question.
In addition to encouraging settlement, judge smith calls parties before the court for a pretrial conference to hammer out blank details, such as how long the trial will take and how many witnesses the parties may call. multiple choice question.
(A) will take and how many witnesses the parties may call.
(B) The judge tries to get the parties’ attorneys.
(C) None.
PLEASE HELP !!! With any question !!!
1: what evidence let the police to arrest Clarence Gideon ?
2: at the beginning of the trial why did Gideon not have a lawyer ?
3: how did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
4: how did Gideon‘s case get to the Supreme Court ?
5: why did the Supreme Court a sept Gideon‘s case ?
6: what was the supreme court ruling and Gideons?
7: what was the vote on the ruling
8: what ultimately happened to Clarence earl Garden?
Answers
Answer:
1.Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested after a nearby resident told police he had see Gideon walking away from the pool hall about 5:30 AM. When police arrested Mr. Gideon, he had a pint of wine and a pocketful of change.
Explanation:
It is illegal for a minor to: drink beer in the visible
Answers
Why was the food safety modernization act passed? check all that apply.
Answers
The purposes of the Food Safety Modernization Act were:
Many citizens are in danger of contracting a food-borne illness.More people are living with chronic illnesses.Pathogens are becoming stronger and harder to defeat.What is the Food Safety Modernization Act?The Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted to prevent food-borne illnesses and ensure food safety.
The Food Safety Modernization Act overhauled food production regulations, giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more authority in overseeing and enforcing food supply chains.
Thus, the Food Safety Modernization Act prevents food-related problems from arising from the production stage to the consumption stage.
Learn more about the Food Safety Modernization Act at https://brainly.com/question/13653111
Congress enacted legislation intended to protect children from unsafe car seats. The act established a commission to supervise the manufacturing and sale of car seats, and empowered the commission to promulgate car seat safety regulations. The commission members were also required to investigate safe and sound methods of installing child car seats. The commission's chairperson was designated as an Undersecretary of Health and Safety; the President appointed two commissioners from child safety groups; and the three major car seat manufacturers chose one commissioner each, who were then appointed by Congress to the commission. For its violation of the commission's rules with regard to car seat manufacturing, a car seat manufacturer was fined $5,000, to be paid immediately without a trial on the merits. The manufacturer files suit in the federal court to enjoin the commission's enforcement of this rule. Which of these is the manufacturer's best argument in support of its contention that the rule was illegal?
A. Regulations concerning criminal conduct cannot be made by agency rules, but must be made by federal statute.B. The appointment of the commissioners was illegal; therefore, the rules promulgated by the commission are invalid.C. Because the fine was potentially $5,000 for violation of the rule, the manufacturer had a right to a trial by jury.D. The presumptive fine violated the manufacturer's rights of equal protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Answers
The manufacturer's best argument in support of its contention that the rule was illegal would be option B: The appointment of the commissioners was illegal, making the rules promulgated by the commission invalid.
The manufacturer's best argument in support of its contention that the rule was illegal would be option B: The appointment of the commissioners was illegal; therefore, the rules promulgated by the commission are invalid.
The argument would be based on the notion that the appointment of the commissioners to the commission was unlawful. The manufacturer could assert that the composition of the commission violated the principles of separation of powers or lacked proper representation, rendering the rules issued by the commission invalid.
The argument would likely focus on the fact that the three major car seat manufacturers chose one commissioner each, who were then appointed by Congress to the commission. This arrangement could be deemed as providing undue influence to the manufacturers, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromising the objectivity of the commission.
To support this argument, the manufacturer would need to demonstrate that the appointment process deviated from legal requirements or constitutional principles, thereby invalidating the commission's authority to enforce the rules and impose fines.
It is important to note that the specific legal details and applicable laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction and legislation in question. Consultation with legal experts is advised for a thorough analysis of the manufacturer's argument in this case.
Learn more about commissioners
https://brainly.com/question/29950923
#SPJ11
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
Answers
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Answers
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
Property taxes are problematic because the value of property and property ownership varies among counties and cities.
True
False
Answers
Which term means "the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and private life?" Oa. lien Ob. metes and bounds Oc. curtflage 0 d. encroachment
Answers
The Correct answer is Option C. Curtilage is the term that denotes "the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and private life."
It refers to the immediate surroundings of a dwelling that are intimately connected to the residential property and where activities related to privacy and domestic life take place. The concept of curtilage encompasses various spaces, such as the yard, garden, patio, or any other structures adjacent to the home. The legal significance of curtilage lies in the protection it receives under the law.
Similar to the home itself, curtilage is afforded certain legal rights and protections, particularly in relation to privacy. For example, the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and this protection extends to curtilage. Law enforcement generally needs a warrant or a recognized exception to enter and search the curtilage without violating an individual's constitutional rights.
Understanding the boundaries of curtilage is crucial in legal contexts, such as determining the scope of a search warrant or evaluating whether certain activities or intrusions are within the protected zone. Courts consider factors like proximity to the home, the nature of the use, measures taken to protect privacy, and societal expectations in determining the extent of curtilage.
In summary, curtilage refers to the area surrounding a dwelling where intimate activities associated with the sanctity of home and private life occur. It enjoys legal protection similar to the home itself and is crucial in defining privacy rights and boundaries in legal matters.
To know more about Curtilage, visit : brainly.com/question/32553716
#SPJ11
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues?
Answers
Answer:
One personal trouble I have encountered that may also be a public issue is the increasing cost of healthcare. Even with health insurance, many people are struggling to pay for necessary medical treatments due to rising costs. This issue affects a large number of people, making it a public issue.
Explanation:
- The American Medical Association classifies alcohol as:
Answers
Answer:a disenfectant?
Explanation:alcohol disenfects wounds
Which of the following is true about police use of force against citizens?
Most of the injuries citizens receive as a result of use of force are quite serious
Less than lethal weapons are used in most incidents
Most police-citizen encounters do not include force
The majority of use of force by police is improper
O At least half of all arrests involve use of force
Answers
Answer:
Most police-citizen encounters do not include force.
Force is only used in certain situations.
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answers
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
What is the exception to pharmacist to pharmacist-intern ratio 1:1?
Answers
This exception may vary depending on the state or jurisdiction, so it is always best to consult with local regulations and guidelines to ensure compliance.
In most cases, the pharmacist to pharmacist-intern ratio is 1:1, meaning that for every pharmacist on duty, there must be one intern working under their supervision. However, there is an exception to this ratio, which allows a pharmacist to supervise up to two pharmacy interns at a time. This exception is only allowed in certain circumstances.
The exception applies when the second intern is a pharmacy school graduate who has not yet passed their licensure exam. In this case, the pharmacist can supervise the graduate as well as a current intern. This exception is only applicable for a limited period of time, typically up to 90 days after graduation from pharmacy school, or until the graduate has passed their licensure exam, whichever comes first.
For more such questions on jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/29550391
#SPJ11
Patricia Bell (63) shared a home all year with her son, Anthony (41), and Anthony's son, Damonte (20). Patricia and Anthony worked full-time. Damonte was a part-time student during the year; he took one class at the local community college. He had no income. No one else lived in the home. Patricia and Anthony each have earned income and an adjusted gross income of more than $20,000, but less than $30,000. Who is eligible to claim and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Ua
Anthony is eligible to claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit.
To claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit, the individual must meet the following criteria:
Have an income of less than 40,000 if not married.Have at least one child, student, aged between 19-24 years old.Living with this child in the same house.Have a job that can be partial or full time.As we can see from the question above, only Anthony fits all the requirements, he is the only one who can apply for and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit.
More information about tax credit:
https://brainly.com/question/2135349