Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 created new criminal codes criminalizing intentional bodily injury in hate crimes.
What is the Shepard-Byrd Act?As an addendum to the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was enacted on October 22, 2009, and President Barack Obama signed it into law on October 28, 2009. The legislation, which was developed in reaction to the 1998 killings of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr., extends the federal hate crime statute of 1969 to cover acts motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or handicap.
Because of the victim's real or alleged race, color, religion, or national origin, wilfully inflicting physical harm or attempting to do so with a hazardous weapon is illegal under the Shepard-Byrd Act. Hence, the correct answer is Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009.
To learn more about Shepard-Byrd Act, click
https://brainly.com/question/30004845
#SPJ1
that ""the will of people"" ought to guide public policy is a concept that is defined as
The concept that "the will of people ought to guide public policy" is a fundamental principle of democracy. Public policy decisions should be based on the collective needs and desires of the people, rather than the interests of a select few.
The will of the people can be expressed through various means, such as elections, public opinion polls, and grassroots movements. Public policy should reflect the values and priorities of the community, and address issues that affect the common good. In this way, public policy can be seen as a tool for social justice and equity, and can contribute to the well-being and prosperity of society as a whole.
The concept that "the will of the people" ought to guide public policy refers to the idea that public policy should be developed and implemented based on the collective desires, needs, and preferences of the citizens. In a democratic system, this principle emphasizes the importance of representing and responding to the public's interests and concerns when creating policies that impact society. This approach seeks to ensure that policy decisions are made with the best interests of the majority in mind, fostering transparency, inclusiveness, and accountability in the policymaking process. Overall, the will of the people serves as a crucial foundation for effective and just public policy development.
To learn more about public policy click here, brainly.com/question/14616070
#SPJ11
The u.s. supreme court enabled which government practices to continue in its ruling in plessy v. ferguson?
Answer:
The u.s. supreme court enabled which government practices to continue in its ruling in plessy v. ferguson?
racial segregation
what are examples of government legislation designed to protect the consumer?
Some examples of government legislation designed to protect the consumer are the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the Consumer Product Safety Act.
1. Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act): Established in 1914, the FTC Act created the Federal Trade Commission to protect consumers against unfair and deceptive trade practices. The commission is responsible for enforcing antitrust laws and ensuring that companies do not engage in fraudulent or misleading advertising.
2. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA): Passed in 1977, the FDCPA is designed to protect consumers from abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices.
This legislation provides guidelines for debt collectors, including how and when they can contact a debtor, and prohibits the use of harassment, false statements, or unfair practices to collect a debt.
3. Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA): Enacted in 1972, the CPSA established the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to regulate the sale and manufacture of consumer products to ensure they are safe for use. The CPSC has the authority to set safety standards, require product recalls, and ban dangerous products from the market.
These are just a few examples of government legislation designed to protect the consumer. These laws aim to ensure fair business practices, protect consumers from harmful products, and create a safer marketplace for everyone.
To know more about government legislation refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12561643#
#SPJ11
In what way could an American citizen lose their citizenship?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Question options:
Expatriation
Being convicted of certain crimes
Refusing to vote
Denaturalization
Answer:
Being convicted of certain crimes
A _____ is a document in which the signer asks to be allowed to die rather than be kept alive by artificial means if disabled and there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Select one: a. Codicil b. Power of attorney c. Living will d. Guardian ad litem
A living will is a legal document in which the signer states their wishes regarding medical treatment.
In a living will, the signer can request to be allowed to die naturally rather than being kept alive by artificial means such as ventilators or feeding tubes. This document can provide clarity and guidance to family members and healthcare professionals who may be making medical decisions on behalf of the signer.
A living will can be an important component of an individual's overall estate plan. It can ensure that their wishes are respected in the event of a serious illness or injury, and can provide peace of mind to both the signer and their loved ones. It is important to note that a living will is not the same as a power of attorney or a guardianship arrangement. A power of attorney grants someone else the authority to make medical and financial decisions on behalf of the signer, while a guardian ad litem is a court-appointed representative for a person who cannot make decisions on their own.
Learn more about court :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
Choose the response that correctly describes a due diligence...Choose the response that correctly describes a due diligence requirement a paid tax preparer should take when preparing a return for a taxpayer claiming the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC).
To ensure that a party is not held legally responsible for any loss or harm, due diligence is the process or effort of gathering and analyzing information prior to making a decision or carrying out a transaction. The phrase is used in a variety of contexts, particularly economic transactions.
Before buying an issuer, an underwriter audits its operations and company. Before starting a merger, one company thoroughly assesses another to see if it is a wise investment. Online reviews are examined by customers before making a purchase of a good or service.
A thorough review of all relevant contracts, such as partnership agreements, license agreements, guarantees, loan agreements, and agreements for bank funding, is often part of legal due diligence. In your next deal, guard against important risks.
To learn more about due diligence
https://brainly.com/question/29807625
#SPJ4
should Muslims be allowed to build a me
near ground
When it comes to Muslims being allowed to build a mosque near a playground, this depends on the people of the city or town and some things they can consider include:
Religious freedom Noise levels Zoning of the area Concerns of residents What should be considered in building a mosque near a playground?Muslims hold the right to religion and worshipping as desired. Hence, building a mosque near a playground should not be deemed inappropriate merely based on location.
However, it is integral to consider various factors such as potential noise level disruptions, traffic congestion caused by increased footfall and any danger posed for children frequenting the area. Through careful planning and adherence to local regulations, these issues can be addressed adequately.
Find out more on Muslims at https://brainly.com/question/18213891
#SPJ1
the national association of Realtors code of ethics was written in
Answer: do u want my love
Explanation:
After reading the cases African American Cases--Part I--Brown Trilogy Turning Point and Part II--Historical Cases and watching the video "The Road to Brown". tell whether or not the legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) today. why and why not?
The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
What is a political Conservative?Conservatism in the United States is seen as a form of a political and social philosophy that is known to be based on traditionalism as well as republicanism, and hindered by the federal governmental power in association to U.S. states.
Note that The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
Learn more about Supreme Court from
https://brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ1
Unlike statutes, administrative regulations do not have a binding effect. true or false.
False. Administrative regulations do have a binding effect, as they are rules created by government agencies to implement and enforce statutes.
Administrative refers to matters or activities related to the management and organization of tasks, operations, and resources within an organization or government body. It encompasses the implementation and coordination of administrative policies, procedures, and functions to ensure the smooth functioning of an entity. Administrative tasks may include record-keeping, scheduling, budgeting, decision-making, communication, and overseeing day-to-day operations. Administrators are responsible for supervising staff, managing resources, and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations and policies.
These regulations carry the force of law and must be followed by individuals and organizations within the agency's jurisdiction.
To learn more about Administrative
https://brainly.com/question/31064555
#SPJ11
darcy's law group of answer choices is used to theoretically model the direction of groundwater flow in an aquifer. is a method to determine the degree of water saturation at any specified depth. states that discharge equals the hydraulic conductivity coefficient multiplied by the hydraulic gradient multiplied by the area involved. cannot be used to decide practical issues, such as whether sufficient groundwater exists to supply a city's needs.
According to the fluid mechanics theory known as Darcy's Law, the hydraulic gradient and the permeability of a porous media determine how quickly a fluid flows through them.
The direction of groundwater flow in an aquifer can be theoretically predicted using this rule, but it cannot be used to resolve practical problems, such as whether there is enough groundwater to meet a city's needs. As the amount of water that can be kept in the aquifer is related to its permeability, it is also a method to assess the level of water saturation at any given depth.
Darcy's Law can be expressed as follows in its simplest form:
Q = -KA∇H
where A is the area of flow (m2), Q is the volumetric discharge rate (m3/s), K is the hydraulic conductivity (m/s), and ∇H is the hydraulic gradient (m/m).
To learn more about Darcy's Law please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/27005987
#SPJ4
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
What I learned about an Influence, an Attitude, and an Action
Answer: REWORD BELOW
Understanding the interplay between influence, attitude, and action is important in the legal field, as it can help explain why people behave in certain ways and can inform legal decision-making.
Explanation:
In the context of law, influence, attitude, and action are important concepts to understand. Here's what you need to know about each:
Influence: Influence refers to the ability of a person or entity to affect the decisions, behaviors, or opinions of others. In the legal context, influence can be both positive and negative. Positive influence might be the ability to inspire others to do good or make ethical decisions, while negative influence might involve using power or coercion to manipulate others into doing something harmful or illegal. In some cases, influence can be illegal or unethical, such as in cases of bribery or extortion.
Attitude: Attitude refers to a person's mindset, beliefs, or emotional disposition toward a particular topic, person, or situation. Attitudes can be positive, negative, or neutral and can influence a person's behavior and decision-making. In the legal context, attitudes are important because they can help explain why a person acted a certain way, and they can be used to assess a person's credibility as a witness.
Action: Action refers to a specific behavior or activity that a person engages in. In the legal context, actions are often what is being evaluated, as they can be used to determine whether a person has violated a law or committed a crime. Actions can be intentional or unintentional, and they can be influenced by a person's attitudes, beliefs, and external factors such as social pressure or environmental conditions.
Clint and Carlina are lifelong friends who have decided to open a bakery together. They are both experienced bakers who specialize in artisanal cheesecake, and they feel the world is in need of their creamy and decadent desserts. They are concerned about protecting their assets in case the business fails, about being able to pay the taxes for a business that is just starting out, and about the difficulty of setting up and maintaining the business.
What are the pros and cons of the different business entities they could form? (Go through the four (4) main types of business entities we have learned about). Which type of business entity do you think would be their best option and why?
The merger is the best option that they can get would be their best option.
The ownership of businesses, other businesses, or various units may be passed to or combined with yet another firm in a move known as a merger.
Clint and Carlina have decided to open a bakery together. They are both experienced bakers who specialize in artisanal cheesecake and feel the world is in need of their desserts.
The couple is concerned about protecting their assets in case the business fails, and about the difficulty of running a business then they will merge and the asset and the business can both be managed in the same manner.
Learn more about mergers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16557059
#SPJ1
hich latent print detection technique is used to detect prints on a non-porous surface?
A.
silver nitrate
B.
iodine fuming
C.
ninhydrin
D.
superglue fuming
D is the right answer got it right!
in Historical Archetypes and Mythology, what is Call to Adventure?
Answer:
adventuring duh hey you sup
5. "When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of
magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate
should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. "
In this quote from The Spirit of the Laws (1748), Montesquieu was clearly advocating for
a. Popular sovereignty
b. Separation of powers
c. Checks and balances
d. Federalism
The correct option is b. Separation of powers. In this quote, Montesquieu is arguing that when the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of magistrates, there can be no liberty because there is a risk that they will enact tyrannical laws and execute them in a tyrannical manner.
This suggests that the separation of powers, which allows for the division of authority among different branches of government, is an important safeguard against tyranny and oppression. Montesquieu's emphasis on the importance of separation of powers has been a influential idea in the development of modern democratic systems.
Learn more about legislative
https://brainly.com/question/27698726
#SPJ4
differences of a peace officer's authority to make an arrest compared to a citizen's authority to make an arrest.
Making a citizens arrest may vary my state, but we will use California as a reference.
California Penal Code 837 PC allows any private individual to make a citizen's arrest However, the private individual witnessed the crime.
Examples of when a citizens arrest can occur: When a public crime/offence is committed in their presence, a person has committed a felony, and the person has reasonable cause to believe that they committed this act.
An example of a citizens arrest: You are shopping in a store when you notice a woman steal and walk out. You may then detain her until the police arrive.
When making a citizens arrest, you CANNOT:
- Use force to detain the suspect
- Create danger that may harm others or the suspect
- Search the suspect
- Chase the suspect in risky situations
However, when Police are considered to make an arrest they need probable cause. This does not need to be witnessed by the officer(s).
When Police have enough evidence to make an arrest, they can:
- Use force to arrest the suspect
- Search the suspect
- Use lethal force if needed
- Chase after the suspect
These reflect a few differences law enforcement and citizens can do when arresting a suspect.
Nationally, every state has enacted this Tim-related law, which is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside:
The Tim-related law that is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside, and has been enacted in every state, is Move Over Law.
What is the Move Over Law?
The Move Over Law requires that motorists change lanes or slow down if they are driving near a stopped emergency vehicle with its emergency lights activated. The law was established to safeguard emergency responders who are at risk of being hit by vehicles while working at the roadside.
In addition to emergency responders, the law often applies to other sorts of vehicles, such as sanitation, utility, and maintenance crews, among others. If drivers do not follow the Move Over Law, they risk receiving a ticket and, in some cases, having their license suspended.
In conclusion, the Move Over Law is designed to safeguard emergency responders and other personnel working on the roadside. The law requires motorists to change lanes or slow down when driving near stopped emergency vehicles with their emergency lights activated.
Learn more about the Move Over Law:
https://brainly.com/question/11470617
#SPJ11
How does this map reflect the legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson?
what are the form of forensic person identification using in the america?
Can the decision-making model help you avoid saying things you regret later?
Answer:
yeah because they try to help you think of the consequences later
g the original patriot act and its subsequent renewals, passed since the terrorist attacks of 2001, bestow incredible power on security agencies and the executive branch. as a result, the right to privacy has been radically altered, and in some cases eliminated, for american citizens and others living in north argue that privacy violations are morally wrong only when there are demonstrable harms related to the violation of privacy, while others hold that violation of privacy is itself a moral wrong, whether or not it leads to additional harms. hobbes believes it is the primary role of the government to insure safety, and therefore might approve of sacrificing liberty in the way the patriot act demands. what do you think? is insuring safety the most important job of the government, or are should we safeguard liberty, as rousseau suggests? why do you take this position, and can you foresee any undesirable consequences of this position?as you consider these questions, review the position of journalist glenn greenwald on privacy and the patriot act
As an AI language model, I do not hold personal beliefs or positions on political matters. However, I can provide an objective analysis of the issues at hand.The debate on whether insuring safety or safeguarding liberty is the most important job of the government is a complex and ongoing one. The original Patriot Act and its subsequent renewals have certainly given security agencies and the executive branch immense power, leading to concerns about privacy violations and potential abuses of power.
Some argue that violating privacy is only morally wrong if it leads to demonstrable harms, while others believe that privacy violations are inherently wrong regardless of their consequences. Hobbes' philosophy emphasizes the government's primary role in ensuring safety and security, which could be interpreted as justifying the sacrifice of some individual liberties to achieve that goal.
On the other hand, Rousseau's emphasis on safeguarding individual liberties reflects a belief that government power should be limited to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens. Both perspectives have their merits and potential drawbacks, and the debate between them is likely to continue. Journalist Glenn Greenwald has been a vocal critic of the Patriot Act and its impact on privacy rights. He argues that the act represents a significant overreach of government power and a violation of basic civil liberties. He has also warned about the potential for abuses of power and the erosion of democratic principles in the name of national security.
To know more about national security Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2639721
#SPJ11
The debate on whether insuring safety or safeguarding liberty is the most important job of the government is a complex and ongoing one. The original Patriot Act and its subsequent renewals have certainly given security agencies and the executive branch immense power, leading to concerns about privacy violations and potential abuses of power.
Some argue that violating privacy is only morally wrong if it leads to demonstrable harms, while others believe that privacy violations are inherently wrong regardless of their consequences. Hobbes' philosophy emphasizes the government's primary role in ensuring safety and security, which could be interpreted as justifying the sacrifice of some individual liberties to achieve that goal.
On the other hand, Rousseau's emphasis on safeguarding individual liberties reflects a belief that government power should be limited to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens. Both perspectives have their merits and potential drawbacks, and the debate between them is likely to continue. Journalist Glenn Greenwald has been a vocal critic of the Patriot Act and its impact on privacy rights. He argues that the act represents a significant overreach of government power and a violation of basic civil liberties. He has also warned about the potential for abuses of power and the erosion of democratic principles in the name of national security.
To know more about national security Visit:
brainly.com/question/2639721
#SPJ11
A crowbar is found at a crime scene. The crowbar has the potential to contain the suspect's fingerprints and/or DNA on the handle, the victim's blood/DNA on the weapon, and trace evidence from the victim's shirt on the one of the crowbar's end fissures. To which lab units should the crowbar be submitted? Mark all that apply. a. firearms and tool marks b. DNA analysis c. trace evidence unit d. latent print unit
What did the USA Patriot Act empower law enforcement agencies to do?a. Convict U.S. citizens without trial.b. Wiretap and spy on citizens without their knowledge.c. Detain family members to secure the surrender of a suspect.d. Employ physical torture to extract evidence from suspected gang members.e. Prevent defendants from learning the charges brought against them.
In what year did the most executions take place? How many executions?
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Which statements pertain to civil law? Select all that apply.
purpose is to protect society
won on the basis of likelihood
won on the basis of near certainty
purpose is to uphold law and order
purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals
The statements that pertain to civil law are: the purpose is to uphold law and order, and the purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals.
The purpose is to uphold law and order: Civil law plays a role in upholding law and order within a society. It provides a framework for resolving disputes between individuals or entities and seeks to maintain order and fairness in the application of legal principles.
The purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals: Civil law is designed to protect and uphold the rights of individuals. It provides a legal mechanism for individuals to seek remedies and redress for violations of their rights, whether it's related to contracts, property, torts, or other civil matters. Civil law aims to ensure that individuals have access to justice and that their rights are respected and enforced.
In conclusion, civil law serves the purpose of upholding law and order and protecting the rights of individuals. It provides a mechanism for resolving disputes between parties and seeking justice based on the preponderance of evidence.
know more about civil law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31361988
#SPJ8
victimisation refers to a person's violation of a human rights as well as a disturbance of their what
1. The economic cost nationwide of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes annually is between __________ billion dollars.
A. 15 and 20
B. 25 and 30
C. 35 and 40
D. 50 and 55
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's actually 44 billion but the answer you put says 40, so go with 35 and 40.