Answer Byzantines
Explanation: Im from gwinnet county we took a test and i picked that and got it correct
Which statement best completes this diagram about the
elements included in the Compromise of 1850?
The Compromise of 1850
California enters the union as a free state.
New Mexico and Utah voters decide on slavery in their states.
Washington, D.C., ends the local slave trade.
?
A. Southern leaders succeed in acquiring lower tariffs on crops.
B. Antislavery petitions are allowed to be presented to Congress.
O C. Southern states accept the concept of popular sovereignty.
O D. Northern states accept the Fugitive Slave Act.
The laws set a boundary between Texas and the United States, abolished the slave trade in Washington, DC, and revised the Fugitive Slave Act in addition to calling for the admission of California as a "free state" and territory governments for Utah and New Mexico.
What is the Compromise of 1850?
The Compromise of 1850 did not create a concept that could be applied unambiguously to regions outside the Mexican Cession and did not resolve the conflicts that continued to divide the country for the following 10 years. The Agreement infuriated extremists in both factions.
The laws resolved a border dispute with Texas, forbade the slave trade in the District of Columbia, introduced a stronger fugitive slave act, and stipulated that the issue of slavery would be handled by popular sovereignty when new states were admitted.
The Fugitive Slave Law, which was passed last and is the most contentious, imposed legal penalties on Northerners who failed to return runaway slaves to their owners. The Missouri Compromise was overturned by the Compromise of 1850, leaving the subject of slavery as a whole unresolved.
Learn more about Compromise of 1850:
https://brainly.com/question/29761975
#SPJ1
Answer: It's D
Explanation: Just took the test :)
Need help ASAP
Answer the following questions in one paragraph.
(A) Why does Alexander Hamilton in Federalist, no. 84 caution against attaching a Bill of Rights to the Constitution?
(B) Based on what you’ve learned about the expansion of rights in the Bill of Rights via selection incorporation, do you agree or disagree with Hamilton’s reasoning? Why or why not?
Question: which of the following is a primary source in the American revolution?
A: a diary entry from a British soldier, 1777
B: an article about the revolution in newsela
C: a book written in 2019 about the revolution
D: a textbook passage explaining life in 1776
1For what reason is the judicial branch separate from the other two branches of government?
O so it can provide a neutral interpretation of laws
O so it can provide financial decisions for the government
O so it can made decisions about military forces
O so it can create treaties with other countries
Answer:
So it can provide a neutral interpretation of laws
Explanation:
The other three are specifically for the executive and legislative branches of government.
the american federation of labor weakened during the 1920’s in part because?
Answer:
The AFL focused on winning economic benefit for its members through collective bargaining. As a federation, it represents several National crafts unions that each retained autonomous operations. The Knights, by contrast, represented both craft and unskilled workers in a single National Union.
Which choices represent the purpose for the Committees of Correspondence?
A)
It was formed to negotiate the terms of the Treaty of Paris of 1783.
B)
It was a meeting to help draft the first constitution of the United States of
America.
C)
It was a series of governmental groups to maintain communication
throughout the colonies.
D)
It was suggested by Thomas Jefferson on the eve of the American
Revolution to unify the colonies.
E)
It was designed to be a secretive society of the Loyalists so that they could
unify against the Patriots.
Answer: C) It was a series of governmental groups to maintain communication throughout the colonies.
Explanation:
In 1764, Boston formed the first Committee of Correspondence with the other colonies in order to gain support for its opposition to the British prohibition of American paper money. New York followed in 1765 and used theirs to update the colonies on how they were resisting the Stamp Act.
Subsequent developments followed with the Committees that allowed the maintenance of communication throughout the colonies which brought about such unity that they were able to meet and coordinate actions starting with the First Continental Congress in 1774.
Theranos portable blood analyzer controversy
|
The consumer law case and it's title is given below: Title: The David vs. Goliath Battle: A Landmark Consumer Law Case
The consumer law case and effective hook
Hook: Imagine a small, struggling family-owned business taking on a corporate giant in a high-stakes legal showdown. This gripping tale of justice and triumph will leave you inspired and empowered to understand the importance of consumer protection.
Description: In this compelling consumer law case, John and Sarah Williams, owners of a quaint bakery, took on a multinational food corporation responsible for misleading product labeling.
The Williams family's relentless pursuit of justice not only exposed the corporation's deceptive practices but also highlighted the power of consumer rights.
Prepare to be captivated as we delve into the intricate legal strategies and the profound impact this case had on shaping consumer law. Get ready to witness how a brave underdog paved the way for a fairer marketplace, holding corporations accountable for their actions.
Read more about consumer law here:
https://brainly.com/question/27317480
#SPJ1
You are answering the question:
Should the President of the United States be elected by the Electoral College (the current process) or should it be changed so that the person with the largest number of popular votes is elected President?
You must include the following to receive full credit:
A description of the current process to elect the President using the Electoral College
A clear statement of your opinion about using the Electoral College to elect the President
2-3 reasons that support your opinion (supporting evidence)
1-2 reasons against your opinion (counterargument)
At least 300 words
If you copy your response directly from the Internet, you will receive no credit for your answer.
An optional writing organizer has been provided for you below. If you use the organizer, make sure your writing is in paragraph form. Do not simply fill out the organizer, as you will not receive any credit.
Optional Government Outline:
Introduction (4-5 sentences)
Hook: start with something to get the reader interested
Background information: a description of the current Electoral College process.
Your personal opinion: state the position you are arguing in your essay.
Reasons that support your opinion (7-10 sentences)
First Reason
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Second Reason
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Third Reason (optional)
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Conclusion Sentence: summarize your reasons again
Reason(s) that oppose your opinion & Conclusion (4-6 sentences)
Opposing Reason
State the evidence that opposes your point of view
Point out a weakness in the evidence
Conclusion
Reinforce your position as the most reasonable point of view
End with a positive note by retelling the ways that we can benefit from your argument
While there are valid arguments both for and against the Electoral College, I believe that it should be maintained as the process to elect the President of the United States. It provides representation for smaller states, promotes stability, and helps maintain a two-party system. However, discussions and potential reforms to address the concerns raised by the popular vote vs. electoral vote discrepancy should be encouraged to ensure a fair and democratic electoral process.
The current process to elect the President of the United States is done through the Electoral College. This means that instead of being directly elected by the popular vote, the President is elected by a group of electors who are chosen by each state. Each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on its representation in Congress, with a total of 538 electors nationwide.
In my opinion, the President of the United States should continue to be elected by the Electoral College for several reasons. Firstly, the Electoral College ensures that the interests of smaller states are not overshadowed by larger states. This is because each state is given a minimum of three electoral votes, regardless of its population size. This system prevents candidates from focusing solely on densely populated areas and neglecting the concerns of rural or less populated regions.
Secondly, the Electoral College promotes stability and prevents hasty decision-making. It serves as a buffer between the popular vote and the final decision, allowing for a more deliberative and thoughtful process. This is especially important during times of crisis or uncertainty, as the Electoral College can act as a safeguard against impulsive or uninformed choices.
Thirdly, the Electoral College encourages a two-party system and helps to maintain political stability. Due to the winner-takes-all nature of most states' electoral votes, third-party candidates face significant challenges in gaining enough electoral support to win. This promotes a more unified and coherent political landscape, which can enhance the effectiveness of governance.
However, it is important to acknowledge the counterarguments against using the Electoral College to elect the President. One main argument is that it can lead to a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the electoral vote, as seen in the 2000 and 2016 elections. This can be seen as a flaw in the system, as it goes against the principle of majority rule.
For more such questions on two-party system, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/26695072
#SPJ8
Pleaseeee Which of the following is an absolute modifier??
A.tired
B.total
C.angry
D.expensive
Answer:
I Believe it would be D. Expensive
Explanation:
I would think that because "expensive" has no room for improvement in its meaning.
Hope my answer has helped you.
If its wrong and didnt help, im so sorry <3
:)
How many colonies did English control at the start of the French and Indian war?
Answer:
Explanation:
At the start of the French and Indian War (1754-1763), the English (also known as the British) controlled thirteen colonies in North America. These colonies were located along the eastern seaboard of what is now the United States and included Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
what is something that happens because of new technologies! On I ready
Explanation:
New technologies can bring about a range of changes and impacts on society, including:
Improved efficiency and productivity in various industries, as well as the creation of new industries and job opportunities.
Increased access to information and knowledge through the internet, which has facilitated communication, education, and research.
Transformation of social norms and behavior, such as the rise of social media and the impact it has had on communication, socialization, and activism.
Changes in cultural values, as new technologies have the potential to alter the way people think, interact, and perceive the world around them.
Environmental impacts, as new technologies can have both positive and negative effects on the natural environment, such as reducing carbon emissions or contributing to pollution.
Overall, new technologies have the potential to bring about significant changes and advancements in various aspects of society, but they can also have unintended consequences that need to be carefully monitored and addressed.
Answer:
People start undertaking new professions as a result of new technology, while old jobs perish.
Explanation:
Which statement most accurately describes a major difference in emphasis between the two speeches? A. The speech to the American public has a more formal tone than the speech to Congress. B. The speech to the American public places more blame on Japan than the speech to Congress. C. The speech to the American public emphasizes Japan's deceit more than the speech to Congress. D. The speech to the American public uses more emotional language than the speech to Congress.
The statement that accurately describes a major difference in emphasis between the two speeches is D. The speech to the American public uses more emotional language than the speech to Congress.
What is the main difference in emphasis between Roosevelt's speeches?
In his speech to Congress, Roosevelt focused on defending the United States against treachery and ensuring that such an attack would never happen again. He spoke with a formal tone which reflects the gravity of the situation.
In contrast, his radio address to the American people emphasized the emotional aspect of the war effort. He emphasized that every single person in the country was a partner in the undertaking, sharing both the good and the bad news of the war.
Missing excerpt "Read the following excerpts from two speeches given by Franklin D. Roosevelt at the onset of America's entrance into World War II in 1941. The first speech was given to Congress and the second was a radio address to the nation: 1. I believe that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us. 2. We are now in this war. We are all in it — all the way. Every single man, woman and child is a partner in the most tremendous undertaking of our American history. We must share together the bad news and the good news, the defeats and the victories — the changing fortunes of war"
Read more about Franklin Roosevelt
brainly.com/question/832342
#SPJ1
In at least 150 words, discuss how Freneau's “The Wild Honeysuckle” and "The Indian Burying Ground" deal with the
theme of nature and how
reflects popular attitudes of the time.
Through the contact that man of the period had with nature, Freneau's "The Wild Honeysuckle" and "The Indian Burying Ground" deal with the theme of nature and reflect the prevalent attitudes of the time.
What is the concept of the excerpt?The poem expresses thoughts about mortality while describing a remote honeysuckle. Freneau's "The Wild Honey Suckle" was complimented for its "unearthly loveliness" by Paul Elmer More, who added that "even a skilled journeyman's hand could modify a word here and there for the better."
Freneau demonstrates the "enlightenment" idea that nature, and not God, provides revelations about who we are and what we should do. There are no secrets or mysteries in nature; it is accessible to all.
Thus, Through the contact that man of the period had with nature.
For more information about concept of the excerpt, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28295327
#SPJ9
what restrictions on equality and opportunity existed for women in the 1960s and the 1970s
Answer:
Explanation:
Gender-based discrimination in employment: Women often faced discrimination in hiring, promotion, and pay in the workplace. Many jobs were explicitly advertised for men only, and women were often relegated to lower-paying and lower-status jobs, with limited opportunities for advancement.
Limited access to education and training: Women's access to education and vocational training was often limited, with many societal norms and expectations promoting traditional gender roles that emphasized domesticity and caregiving over careers and professional development. This limited women's opportunities to acquire the skills and qualifications necessary for higher-paying and higher-status jobs.
Provide examples of how Cold War fears may have over amplified international events.
During the Cold War, fears of communist expansion and nuclear war often led to over-amplification and exaggeration of international events, as politicians and the media sought to portray the Soviet Union and its allies as a constant threat to the United States and its allies.
One example of how Cold War fears may have over-amplified international events is the case of the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964, which was used as a pretext for the United States to escalate its involvement in the Vietnam War. The incident involved an alleged attack by North Vietnamese naval vessels on American warships in the Gulf of Tonkin, which was later found to have been greatly exaggerated and possibly fabricated. The incident was used as justification for the passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized the use of military force against North Vietnam.
Another example of how Cold War fears may have over-amplified international events is the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. The crisis was a result of the Soviet Union's deployment of nuclear missiles to Cuba, which the United States viewed as a direct threat to its national security. The crisis led to a tense standoff between the two superpowers, with the world on the brink of nuclear war.
To know more about Cold War, click here
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ1
What fueled the United States growth in the late 1800s?
Responses
Answer:
A surge of technological innovations and inventions, like Thomas Edison's incandescent lightbulb and Alexander Graham Bell's telephone, fueled this economic growth. The economic boom made the rich richer and the poor poorer, widening the already large economic gap between the two groups.
Answer:
A surge of technical innovations, like Thomas Edison's incandescent lightbulb and Graham Bell's telephone, fueled this economic growth. The economic boom made the rich richer and the poor poorer, widening the already large economic gap between two groups.
Explanation:
the answer is above, everything is stated clearly.
Who were the powerful rivals of China during the Song dynasty
Answer:
These rivals were the Khitan Tartars of Manchuria and Mongolia,
Explanation:
These rivals were the Khitan Tartars of Manchuria and Mongolia, kept at bay only through costly bribes, and the Jurchen people of Central Asia, who were intent on conquering China but could not be influenced by payoffs.
Which statement is true about slaveholding in North Carolina in the mid-1800s?
A. More than half of farmers were slaveholders.
B. The majority of farmers were slaveholders.
C. Only a few farmers were slaveholders.
D. No farmers were slaveholders.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Just took it ;)
Answer:
C. Only a few farmers were slaveholders.
Explanation:
I just did it got 90%
Which statement is true?
The contemporary Democratic Party follows its roots back to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. In the 1800s, that party separated into several groups.
The contemporary Democratic Party follows its roots back to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. In the 1820s, that party separated into several groups.
The contemporary Democratic Party follows its roots back to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. In the 1810s, that party separated into several groups.
The contemporary Democratic Party follows its roots back to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. In the 1860s, that party separated into several groups.
Explanation:
The contemporary Democratic Party follows its roots back to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. In the 1800s, that party separated into several groups.
what would be one quote that a writer shows his view point
"Words have the power to shape worlds, and as a writer, I wield that power to unveil my perspective, challenge the status quo, and inspire change."
Consider whether the American Revolutionaries were primarily motivated by constitutional principles, ideals of equality, or simply economic self-interest. Discuss whether or not the American Revolution was really radical or conservative, remember to include evidence for your position including people, places, events, and any else that seems important from the book “The American Yawp” !
Do not simply summarize. Show your thinking, support your ideas with evidence adding the book The “American Yawp” in your argument !
The American Revolutionaries were primarily motivated by constitutional principles, ideals of equality, and economic self-interest. The Revolution was a result of the colonists' frustration with their lack of representation in the British government, which they perceived as a violation of their constitutional rights.
Additionally, the colonists believed that the British government had failed to protect their economic interests, leading to increased taxation and decreased economic opportunities. The ideals of equality were also a significant motivator for the Revolutionaries. They believed that all men were created equal and were entitled to certain inalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The colonists felt that the British government was denying them these rights and was treating them as second-class citizens. The American Revolution was a radical and conservative event. On the one hand, it was radical in that it challenged the established order and overturned traditional power structures. The Revolutionaries sought to create a new society based on principles of liberty, equality, and democracy. On the other hand, it was also conservative in that it sought to preserve certain elements of the existing social order. The Revolutionaries were not seeking to create a completely new society but rather to reform the existing one. They sought to build a society that was more democratic, but still retained many of the traditional social structures. Overall, the Revolution was a complex event that was motivated by a variety of factors, including constitutional principles, ideals of equality, and economic self-interest. It was both radical and conservative, seeking to challenge the established order while also preserving certain elements of it. The “American Yawp” provides further evidence of the Revolution’s complexities.For such more question on Revolutionaries
https://brainly.com/question/28123253
#SPJ8
What is a moral? Moral is the main idea of a story. A moral is a main character who does the right thing. A moral is a summary of the important events in a story. A moral is a lesson or teaching about how to live or behave.
Answer:
A moral is a lesson or teaching about how to live or behave
Explanation:
A moral is a lesson or teaching about how to live or behave. Thus option (d) is correct.
What is moral?The morals are the prevailing standards of behavior that enable people to live cooperatively in groups. Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable.
Most people tend to act morally and follow societal guidelines. Morality often requires that people sacrifice their own short-term interests for the benefit of society.
The people or entities that are indifferent to right and wrong are considered amoral, while those who do evil acts are considered immoral.. Morality describes the particular values of a specific group at a specific point in time.
A moral is a lesson or teaching about how to live or behave. Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about moral here:
https://brainly.com/question/10492351
#SPJ6
What covert method did Levitt use to limit racial diversity in the communities that he built?
William Levitt covertly employed redlining practices to limit racial diversity in the communities he built.
William Levitt, a real estate developer known for his large-scale suburban housing projects, employed a covert method known as "redlining" to limit racial diversity in the communities he built. Redlining involved the practice of denying or restricting loans, mortgages, or insurance to individuals based on their race or ethnicity. Levitt and his company selectively targeted white buyers and implemented restrictive covenants that prohibited the resale or rental of properties to people of color. These discriminatory practices effectively segregated communities, perpetuating racial inequality and reinforcing the systemic racism prevalent during that era. Levitt's use of redlining contributed to the creation of racially homogenous suburbs and hindered the progress of racial integration.In conclusion, William Levitt employed covert redlining practices to intentionally limit racial diversity in the communities he developed, perpetuating racial segregation and inequality in housing.
For more questions on William Levitt:
https://brainly.com/question/22925088
#SPJ8
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendme
The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and
present danger to society.
The Court upheld the conviction of several individuals for circulating materials supporting their political views.
The Court ruled the Sedition Act was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Rights to freedom of speech.
The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war.
The Court ruled that controlling printed and spoken words is a violation of freedom of speech and unconstitutional
according to the First Amendment.
Answer:
The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society.
The Court upheld the conviction of several individuals for circulating materials supporting their political views.
Explanation:
It should be noted that two reasons that explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendme are;
The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society.The Court upheld the conviction of several individuals for circulating materials supporting their political views.According to the question, we are to discuss the why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendme.
As a result of this we can see that it was because Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear.
Therefore, The Court upheld the conviction of several individuals for circulating materials supporting their political views.
Learn more about Schenck v United States Supreme Court at;
https://brainly.com/question/25950911
QUESTION 17
As a result of the German invasion of France in May 1940, the British Army became encircled by the German Army along
the northern coast of France. Despite this, the British were able to organize a massive fleet of ships and boats to evacuate
their army, along with 100.000 French troops, and transport them across the English Channel. The successful evacuation
took place from the French port city of
Le Havre
Marseilles
Calais
Dunkirk
Answer:
The answer is Dunkirk.
Explanation:
British troops were right near the Belgium-France border where the Germans encircled them through the Ardennes Forest.
What event symbolized the fear of immigrants
during the Red Scare?
Answer:World War I
Explanation: World War I, which led many to embrace strong nationalistic and anti-immigrant sympathies;
The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which led many to fear that immigrants, particularly from Russia, southern Europe, and eastern Europe, intended to overthrow the United States government;
Trace the development of corporations
and trusts.
To accomplish these goals, the "corporation" and the "trust" were created. Businesses are provided by corporations, which also make a large pool of cash available.
Who established the first businesses?The First Businesses
The Boston Manufacturing Co., which was founded in 1813, was the first significant industrial corporation, according to the majority of historians. It adopted its business model from Britain, where textile companies contributed to the first Industrial Revolution some thirty years earlier.
By "corporation," what do you mean?Stockholders are not seen as being legally a member of a firm. Corporations have many of the same legal rights and duties as humans. They are able to sign contracts, grant and receive loans, bring legal actions, hire employees, possess property, and submit taxes.
To know more about corporations and trusts visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/4408707
#SPJ13
Based on the article, you can reasonably infer that black South Africans
who participate in land takeovers are doing so to .
Answer:
build wealth for themselves.
Explanation:
Black South Africans suffered under apartheid for most of the 20th century, a system of strict racial segregation enforced by the government. One of South Africa's most murky unresolved problems is of land reform. A latest government survey revealed that 70 percent of the land is held by white farmers. Resentment over that basic inequity is the reason that led to land confrontations such as the recent takeover of Stefan Smit's Stellenbosch farm. Black South Africans were desperately want to build some wealth for them.
Alexis de Tocqueville would most likely agree with which of the following conclusions? OA. The United States and France both were born of violent revolution and achieved democracy after decades of political turmoil. OB. France relied on its laissez faire economic system to keep its democratic government in power after overthrowing its former rulers. OC. Americans had a strong populist tradition that prepared them to accept and uphold representative democracy after the Revolution. O D. The American Revolution would not have succeeded without French society as a model of how a democratic system should operate.
Alexis de Tocqueville would most likely agree with the conclusion that A. The United States and France both were born of violent revolution and achieved democracy after decades of political turmoil.
Who was Alexis de Tocqueville?Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer, political scientist, historian, and politician.
Alexis de Tocqueville is best known for writing a masterpiece, "Democracy in America."
Thus, Alexis de Tocqueville would most likely agree with the conclusion that A. The United States and France both were born of violent revolution and achieved democracy after decades of political turmoil.
Learn more about Alexis de Tocqueville at https://brainly.com/question/19293152
#SPJ1
How did the end of the Cold War affect United States foreign policy in the 1990s?
A.It prompted a return to a policy of isolationism.
B.It led to greater international involvement in regional conflicts.
C.It forced the United States to continue fighting communism.
D. It allowed the United States to disregard human rights issues worldwide.
The end of the Cold War had a significant impact on United States foreign policy in the 1990s. .It prompted a return to a policy of isolationism.
One of the most significant changes was a move away from the policy of containment that had defined the United States’ approach to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. With the Soviet threat eliminated, the United States was free to pursue a more expansive and interventionist foreign policy. The United States became more involved in regional conflicts, such as the Gulf War in 1991 and the Balkan conflicts in the mid-1990s.
The end of the Cold War also prompted a shift in the United States’ relationship with China. With the Soviet Union no longer a factor, the United States saw China as a rising power and began to engage with it more closely, including granting China Most Favored Nation trading status in 1992.
Human rights issues also became a more prominent concern for the United States in the post-Cold War era. With the Soviet Union gone, the United States could no longer justify support for repressive regimes on the basis of fighting communism. Instead, the United States began to advocate for democracy and human rights around the world, even if it meant challenging traditional allies such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
for more such questions on Cold War
https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ11