Answers
Two attorneys operate their practice as a partnership. they want to start a program through their practice that will provide retirement benefits for themselves and three employees. they would likely choose Keogh Plan.
About Keogh Plan
A Keogh plan is indeed a tax-deferred pension option accessible for retirement from self-employed people or unincorporated firms. Although most plans are set up as the latter, a Keogh plan could be set up either as a defined-benefit plan or even a defined-contribution plan. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has the authority to adjust the relevant absolute limitations in U.S. dollar terms each year. Contributions are typically tax deductible up to a specific percentage of yearly income.
For sole proprietorships and other unincorporated enterprises like partnerships and self-employed persons, Keogh plans were retirement plans. An individual cannot establish and utilize a Keogh plan for retirement if they are an independent contractor.
To know more about Keogh Plan:
brainly.com/question/27916548
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which are examples of independent regulatory agencies? (Select all that apply.)
A) National Aeronautics and Space Agency
B) U.S. Coast Guard
C) Environmental Protection Agency
D) Securities and Exchange Commission
Answers
Answer:
NASA, SEC are the 2 i think
If a female indentured servant became pregnant while still under servitude, the master typically
Question 26 options:
extended her term by two years.
fired her immediately. x
sold her contract to the highest bidder x
did nothing, because pregnancy was considered an inevitable part of life. x
Answers
If a female indentured servant became pregnant while still under servitude, the master typically fired her immediately.
During the time when indentured servitude was prevalent, if a female servant became pregnant, it was seen as a breach of the terms of the contract. Pregnancy could disrupt the work and productivity expected from the servant, and it was often seen as a violation of the moral expectations of the time. As a result, the master would typically terminate the female servant's contract and dismiss her from their service. This decision was driven by practical and social considerations, as well as the desire to maintain control over the labor force. The master would then need to find a replacement for the female servant to fulfill the remaining term of the contract or hire a new servant altogether.
To learn more about female indentured servant, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30656036
#SPJ11
4. How are interviews and interrogations distinguished from each other?
Answers
Answer:
The goal of an interview is usually to get a job and have very reasonable and formal questions about one's expertise, such as why should we let you in on this job or what is your level of experience in this area of expertise. However, it can also be to film a documentary or get to know somebody better, and both are conducted by people who have interviewed people many times. Interrogations are also formal and performed by experts, but they are usually strict and operated as a punishment or asking questions with the consequence of a penalty if answered suspiciously or incorrectly.
A narrative case report consists of the following elements:
Select one:
a. Introduction, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), conclusion
b. Face sheet, witness statement(s), facts of the case,
conclusion
c. Introduction, your opinion, facts of the case, suspect
statement(s), conclusion
d. Face sheet, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), your opinion, facts of the case
e. Face sheet, introduction, reporting party/victim statement,
witness statement(s), facts of the case, suspect statement(s),
conclusion
Answers
2)Case presentation: This section describes the patient's symptoms, physical examination findings, and any diagnostic tests that were performed.
3)Diagnosis: This section presents the diagnosis or differential diagnoses based on the patient's history and examination.
4)Treatment: This section describes the treatment plan and any interventions that were performed.
5)Follow-up: This section includes information about the patient's response to treatment and any subsequent follow-up visits.
6)Discussion: This section provides a discussion of the case and its implications for clinical practice or research.
7)Conclusion: This section summarizes the key points of the case report and its importance.
It is important to note that the structure and content of a narrative case report may vary depending on the intended audience and the specific requirements of the journal or publication in which it is being submitted.
the declaration of independence intented to end the british rule in the colonies ,and grant citizens
Answers
The Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 1776, was a pivotal document in American history that aimed to sever the political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain. Its primary purpose was to declare the colonies' intention to form an independent nation, free from British rule. While the declaration marked the beginning of a revolution, it also laid the groundwork for the fundamental rights and principles that would shape the newly emerging United States of America.
The Declaration of Independence outlined the grievances of the colonists against the British government, asserting that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It stated that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that when a government fails to protect the rights of its citizens, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.
By declaring independence, the Founding Fathers aimed to establish a government based on the principles of self-governance, equality, and individual rights. The declaration was a bold assertion of the colonists' determination to create a society where citizens had the freedom to govern themselves and pursue their own happiness. It laid the foundation for the formation of a democratic republic and inspired future movements for liberty and equality around the world.
While the immediate impact of the Declaration of Independence was the severance of ties with Britain and the initiation of the American Revolutionary War, its long-term significance was in shaping the principles that would guide the American nation. It influenced the drafting of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which enshrined the rights and liberties of American citizens, including freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial.
Overall, the Declaration of Independence was a revolutionary document that set forth the principles of self-determination, individual rights, and government by consent that formed the basis for the United States of America and continues to resonate as a symbol of freedom and independence.
for more questions on Great Britain
https://brainly.com/question/30054989
#SPJ11
How might social media be better than traditional media?
A) It is written by professionals
B) It covers only the majority opinions
C) It is fact checked before publicaction
D) It may report news faster
Answers
Answer:
D) It may report news faster
Explanation:
Web 2.0 can be defined as a collection of internet software programs or applications which avails the end users the ability or opportunity to share files and resources, as well as enhance collaboration over the internet.
Basically, it's an evolution from a static worldwide web to a dynamic web that enhanced social media. Some of the examples of social media platforms (web 2.0) are You-Tube, Flickr, Go-ogle maps, Go-ogle docs, Face-book, Twit-ter, Insta-gram etc.
Hence, social media might be better than traditional media such as newspapers, magazines, etc., in the dissemination of news, information or stories in that it may report news faster through the use of interconnected network devices.
there have been a multitude of court cases surrounding the legality of frisks. which is the best explanation for the repeated visitation of the matter in the courts?
Answers
In a landmark ruling known as Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it is legal for American police to "stop and frisk" someone they have a good basis to believe is carrying a weapon and committing a crime.
What took place in the case of Illinois v. Wardlow?Wardlow's conviction was overturned by the Illinois Appellate Court because Officer Nolan lacked the justification required by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, for an investigative stop, and the pistol should have been suppressed (1968).
How does Kansas vs. Glover affect things?What happened: In an 8-1 decision, the court overturned and remanded the Kansas Supreme Court's decision, holding that when an officer lacks information rebutting an inference that the vehicle's owner is operating the vehicle, an investigative traffic stop made after running a vehicle's license plate and discovering.
To learn more about Kansas Supreme Court's from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28701457
#SPJ4
Why companies limited by guarantee must have constitution?
Answers
Answer:
A company limited by guarantee does not have any shares or shareholders (like the more common limited by shares structure) but is owned by guarantors who agree to pay a set amount of money towards company debts.
The defendant wanted to borrow his neighbor's car to go shopping for lawnmowers. Knowing that the neighbor was out of town for the weekend, the defendant opened the neighbor's garage door and took a car key that the neighbor hid in an old coffee can for emergencies. Once inside, the defendant, mistakenly believing that larceny applied only to the taking of items valued at over $100, decided to take the neighbor's lawnmower (worth $75) in order to trade it in on a new mower. However, on the way to the store with the mower, he was involved in an automobile accident, totaling the car. In a common law jurisdiction, of what property is the defendant guilty of larceny
Answers
Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
in the context of a court case process, what is the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt?
Answers
In the context of a court case process, beyond a reasonable doubt is defined as the legal standard that the prosecution must meet in order to secure a conviction in a criminal case.
This standard requires that the evidence presented by the prosecution must be so convincing that there is no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors as to the guilt of the defendant.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof in criminal trials, and it is designed to protect the rights of the accused by ensuring that they are not convicted based on insufficient evidence or mere speculation. To meet this standard, the prosecution must present evidence that is both credible and compelling, and must be able to refute any potential defenses raised by the defendant
Learn more about reasonable doubt at
https://brainly.com/question/31262898
#SPJ11
On April 15, a seller entered into a valid written agreement to sell her home to a buyer for $175,000. The provisions of the agreement provided that closing would be at the buyer's attorney's office on May 15, and that the seller would deliver to the buyer marketable title, free and clear of all encumbrances. On the date of closing, the seller offered to the buyer the deed to the house, but the buyer refused to go ahead with the purchase because his attorney told him that a contractor who had done work on the house had recorded a lis pendens on May 1 against the property regarding a $10,000 contract dispute he had with the seller. The seller indicated that she was unaware of the lien, but that she was willing to go ahead with the sale and set aside funds from the purchase price to cover the contractor's claim until the dispute was resolved. The buyer still refused to proceed, stating that the seller had breached the contract. If the seller brings an action against the buyer for specific performance, what is the probable result?
A. The buyer prevails, because the title to the property was not marketable as of the date of closing.B. The buyer prevails, because an encumbrance was on the title as of the date of closing that was subject to litigation.C. The seller prevails, because under the doctrine of equitable conversion, the buyer was the owner of the property when the lis pendens was recorded, and therefore it was invalid.D. The seller prevails, because an implied term of their contract was that she could use the proceeds to clear any encumbrance on the title.
Answers
The buyer prevails, because an encumbrance was on the title as of the date of closing that was subject to litigation. Option (B)
Specific performance is an order given by a court that compels a party to follow through on the terms of a contractual commitment. A seller can request specific performance if the buyer has failed to follow through on the terms of a sales agreement.
Lis Pendens: A Lis pendens is a notice filed with the county recorder's office indicating that a property is the subject of a lawsuit. A Lis pendens notifies potential buyers or lenders that the property's title is in question and may be transferred or encumbered only subject to the outcome of the pending lawsuit.
In the given scenario, the buyer refused to go ahead with the purchase because his attorney told him that a contractor who had done work on the house had recorded a Lis pendens on May 1 against the property regarding a $10,000 contract dispute he had with the seller. On the date of closing, the seller offered to the buyer the deed to the house, but the buyer refused to go ahead with the purchase because his attorney told him that a contractor who had done work on the house had recorded a Lis pendens on May 1 against the property regarding a $10,000 contract dispute he had with the seller. The seller indicated that she was unaware of the lien, but that she was willing to go ahead with the sale and set aside funds from the purchase price to cover the contractor's claim until the dispute was resolved. The buyer still refused to proceed, stating that the seller had breached the contract. If the seller brings an action against the buyer for specific performance, the probable result will be the buyer prevails because an encumbrance was on the title as of the date of closing that was subject to litigation.
Learn more about Litigation
https://brainly.com/question/15284945
#SPJ11
The probable result of the seller bringing an action against the buyer for specific performance is that the buyer prevails because the title to the property was not marketable as of the date of closing.
In this scenario, the buyer refused to proceed with the purchase because a lis pendens had been recorded against the property regarding a $10,000 contract dispute. The seller was willing to set aside funds to cover the contractor's claim until the dispute was resolved, but the buyer still refused to proceed. The buyer's refusal to proceed with the purchase is justified because the lis pendens create an encumbrance on the title. Marketable title, free and clear of all encumbrances, was a provision of the agreement.
To know more about lis pendens, visit
https://brainly.com/question/33377801
#SPJ11
Question 9
The filibuster
Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
Judge
Grand jury
Prosecuting attorney
Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
Cabinet
White House Staff
Executive office of the president
Department of the InteriorTop of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A frequent annoyance
Weekly Ramblings
Fireside Chats
Happy times
Answers
The filibuster was seldom utilized all through a large portion of American history however has turned into a much of the time involved strategy in the U.S. Senate during the most recent 20 years. Option B is correct .
Filibusters became more common toward the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, prompting serious consideration of amending Senate rules to end the practice. At that point, the Senate had grown in size and became more active. Because of the amount of work that needed to be done each session, a senator who chose to filibuster might make it hard for the body to move forward and get concessions from senators who wanted to approve their measures.
10 : Grand jury is the role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a Judge , Option B is correct .
The federal criminal case prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, presents evidence to a grand jury. If there is "probable cause" to suspect the defendant of committing a crime, the grand jury decides whether a trial should be held.
11 : Chief office of the president is the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the Cabinet . Option C is correct .
The White House Office, the Public safety Gathering, the Committee of Monetary Counselors, and the Workplace of The board and Financial plan are the four associations that make up the Leader Office of the President , which gives the president guidance in significant approach regions.
12 : Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as Fireside chats . Option C is correct .
Throughout the 1930 s and 1940 s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave radio addresses that were referred to as "fireside chats." FDR gave radio broadcasts to calm the nation during a turbulent time and explain things in a way that most people could understand.
Learn more about filibuster :
brainly.com/question/29551874
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
The filibuster
A. Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
B. Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
C. Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
D. Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
A. Judge
B. Grand jury
C. Prosecuting attorney
D. Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
A. Cabinet
B. White House Staff
C. Executive office of the president
D. Department of the Interior Top of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A. A frequent annoyance
B. Weekly Ramblings
C. Fireside Chats
D. Happy times
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
Answers
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4
What has research into the success of probation and parole concluded?
Answers
Answer:
parole is so a prisoner can enjpy some freedom but probation is like being free but you can do anything
Explanation:
how can discussions, projects, campaigns, and events support victims of GBV
Answers
Discussion, projects, campaigns, and events provide a supportive base for the victims of GBV by creating awareness and platforms for voicing out grievances.
What is GBV?GBV means gender-based violence.
GBV refers to the physical, s-xual, mental, or economic harm inflicted on a person because of socially ascribed power imbalances between males and females.
All GBV activities are human rights violations.
Thus, by spreading awareness, communicating gender-based violence, and giving the victims a platform to report their grievances and get mass support, discussions, projects, campaigns, and events support victims of GBV.
Learn more about GBV at https://brainly.com/question/16923564
#SP J1
Joan is a white-collar offender. She has been convicted of embezzlement and given a prison sentence. In terms of security levels, which type of prison should Joan be sent to
Answers
Answer:
Minimum security prisons. These violators are not at risk of violence therefore the security is comparatively low in terms of security than others.
Explanation:
why are the trees green
Answers
Answer:
because of chlorophylls
Explanation:
chlorophyll absorbs light in the red and the blue regions of the visible light spectrum. Green light is not absorbed but reflected, making the plant appear green.
Answer:
chlorolphil makes the tree green
Explanation:
The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that ______ can cause in tort law.
Answers
The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that false statements and product disparagement can cause in tort law.
Defamation is a tort that encompasses false statements about a person or entity that harm their reputation. In this case, the false claim of finding a finger in the chili caused damage to Wendy's brand image, leading to a decline in sales and public trust.
Moreover, the false statement also constitutes product disparagement or trade libel, which involves making false statements about a business's products or services to harm their reputation and economic interests.
The Wendy's chili incident highlights the potential harm caused by false statements in tort law, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and the need for legal recourse to seek compensation for the damages suffered.
Learn more about Defamation here:
https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
How does an appellate court differ from a trial court?
A. An appellate court usually has a jury.
B. An appellate court decides issues of fact.
C. An appellate court examines more witnesses.
D. An appellate court reviews another court’s decisions.
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answers
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not
a courtâs subject-matter jurisdiction may be limited by all of the following except
a. The subject of a lawsuit
b. The sum in controversy
c. Whether the proceeding is a trial or an appeal
d. The prior experience of the court in deciding similar disputes
Answers
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the prior experience of the court in making decisions on similar disputes is an exception by which the subject-matter jurisdiction of a court may be limited. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The jurisdiction of a court is a similar concept that determines the powers and the extent up to which the powers and authorities of a court are limited to. The subject of a lawsuit, trials and appeals, and the sum involves in the case are essential points that determine the jurisdiction of a court.
Learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
Agent Alice has received an offer that she believes is not in the sellers’ best interest. What should Alice do?
Answers
Answer:
Make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own. Tell the sellers exactly how she feels and why she thinks the offer is not a good one.
Alice should make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own.
The above is an example of agent-seller relationship. Although, the seller had contracted the right to sell to an agent; he must allow the sellers decide on their own whether or not to sell if such will not favor them.
This is important because any loss on sale made by an agent on behalf of a seller, which is not in the seller's best interest will be solely borne by the agent.
While the agent is empowered to act on behalf of the seller , he or she must at all times act in the best interest of the sellers.
It therefore means that Alice should make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own.
Learn more about agent-seller relationship here : https://brainly.com/question/25305843
Which of the following is the lowest category for an offense resulting in the death of another person?
- Manslaughter
- Murder
- Capital murder
- Criminally negligent homicide
Answers
Answer:
Criminally negligent Homicide
Hope this helps
Explanation:
What are the 3 elements of communication dynamics?
Answers
Answer:
Dynamic and that It and you will get your answer
Nashville, Tennessee, passes an ordinance to regulate waste disposal. The disposal of waste may also be regulated by
Answers
A detailed answer to your question is that while Nashville, Tennessee may pass an ordinance to regulate waste disposal within its city limits, waste disposal may also be regulated by other entities.
For example, the state of Tennessee may have its own regulations regarding waste disposal, as well as federal regulations set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Additionally, certain types of waste, such as hazardous waste, may be subject to specialized regulations and requirements.
To provide a long answer, waste disposal is a complex issue that involves various factors, including public health, environmental protection, and economic considerations. Waste can take many forms, such as solid waste, hazardous waste, medical waste, and electronic waste, and each type of waste may require specific methods of disposal to prevent harm to people and the environment.
To regulate waste disposal, local governments may establish ordinances that set rules for how waste should be collected, transported, and disposed of within their jurisdiction. For example, Nashville's waste disposal ordinance may require residents and businesses to use certain types of waste containers or to separate recyclable materials from non-recyclable waste.
However, these local regulations are often supplemented by state and federal regulations that set minimum standards for waste disposal. For instance, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation oversees the state's solid waste program, which includes regulations for landfill operations, waste reduction, and recycling. Meanwhile, the EPA regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which establishes rules for how hazardous waste must be handled, transported, and disposed of.
In summary, waste disposal can be regulated by multiple entities, and regulations can vary depending on the type of waste and the location where it is generated. A comprehensive understanding of waste disposal regulations requires an explanation of the different types of waste and the regulatory agencies involved, as well as an in-depth analysis of specific regulations that apply to a particular situation.
Learn more about waste disposal
https://brainly.com/question/2724332
#SPJ11
Jake, the CEO of WinWest Inc., launches a new product. Despite the product's persistent failure, he is unwilling to withdraw it from the market because he believes that the product will be profitable in the long term. This scenario is an example of _____.
Answers
This scenario is an example of "escalation of commitment" or "sunk cost fallacy." It is the situation where where an individual or organization continues to invest resources.
The term "escalation of commitment" refers to a situation where an individual or organization continues to invest resources, such as time, money, and effort, into a failing project or course of action despite evidence indicating its lack of success. This commitment escalation often occurs due to the fear of losing previous investments or a belief that future outcomes will improve.
In the given scenario, Jake, the CEO of WinWest Inc., launches a new product that consistently fails in the market. However, he is unwilling to withdraw it because he believes that it will eventually become profitable in the long term. This demonstrates an escalation of commitment because Jake is persisting with the failing product despite negative feedback or evidence.
The underlying rationale behind this behavior can be attributed to the sunk cost fallacy. The sunk cost fallacy occurs when individuals or organizations consider past investments (sunk costs) in a project as a reason to continue investing, even when it no longer makes logical sense. They perceive the investment as irrecoverable and believe that by continuing to invest, they can somehow recoup or justify their previous losses.
In Jake's case, he may feel that withdrawing the product from the market would mean accepting the loss of resources, such as time, money, and effort already invested. By holding onto the belief that the product will eventually become profitable, he falls into the trap of the sunk cost fallacy, leading him to continue investing in a failing venture.
It's important to recognize the sunk cost fallacy and understand that future decisions should be based on the product's current performance, market feedback, and potential for success, rather than past investments that cannot be recovered. Evaluating the situation objectively and making informed decisions based on present circumstances can help avoid the escalation of commitment and mitigate the negative impact on the organization.
To know more about escalation of commitment, click here:https://brainly.com/question/30482641
#SPJ11
based on previous supreme court rulings, the form of speech in the image could be limited if it
Answers
The kind of speech in the photograph might be restricted if it takes place at a certain location, time, or in a particular way, according to past Supreme Court decisions.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the top court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution directly calls for. The number of Supreme Court justices is not clearly forth in the Constitution; rather, Congress determines the number. Along with the Chief Justice, the President of India has appointed 30 more judges to the Supreme Court of India. Judges of the Supreme Court begin their retirement at age 65. The supreme court is the highest court in the majority of legal systems. The terms "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal" are also used to refer to these courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/28046758
#SPJ4
Each of the three branches of government play a role in policy modification. True False
Answers
Answer:
true because in total all three branches makes political decisions.
Complete the following sentence.
The diverse roles of eligibility interviewers require these professionals to be knowledgeable, compassionate,
and___.
Answers
Answer:
Knowledgeable, compassionate, and responsible
Explanation:
Answer: diligent
Explanation:
i went through the notes
An officer grabs a reluctant suspect by the arm and escorts the suspect to the police
vehicle. In the use of force continuum, this is an example of
non-verbal
command
hard hand
soft hand
Answers
Answer:
hard hand
Explanation: