the united states of america is one of few countries in the world that never implemented eugenic related laws in the 1900s.

Answer:

Explanation:

Any defacement or window smashing or anything which does harm to a person and harm to property is not protected by the 1st Amendment.

The only answer that is acceptable is C. No one or nothing is being harmed. The rights granted by the first amendment are enforced.

God help America if that ever changes.

the Pleading document is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court.

Parties must submit pleadings, which are formal legal documents, to the court in order to begin a case. Pleadings frequently include statements of claim and defense. These kinds of records offer specifics regarding your unique claim or defense and the proof in support of it. Important points of the case should be raised in the pleadings and communicated to the court and other parties. This article explains the intent behind pleadings and the specifics they contain. In the pleadings, all relevant factual accusations that the parties will need to substantiate at trial are made. Always keep in mind that the opposing party's pleadings must contain any truth or information that could surprise the other party or undermine that party's case.

To know more about the pleading document visit:- brainly.com/question/20814132

#SPJ4

Answer:

the answer is criminal motivationnnnnnn

Explanation:

It is TRUE that the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.

In Philadelphia, the proper ratio for the supervision of minors is one supervisor for 5 minors.

However, in the remaining states, one supervisor can supervise up to twenty minors.

Thus, it is TRUE that when not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.

Learn more about the supervision of minors at https://brainly.com/question/23509933

#SPJ1

Answer:

The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Does this help?

Answer:

The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims

Explanation:

Considering the recent concern of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and violations against women, there are huge ramifications for the police, the courts, and correctional administrations.

The police should focus on preparing and responsiveness towards casualties, guaranteeing appropriate treatment of cases and offering help. The courts will confront expanded caseloads, requesting productive and fair settlement, as well as the requirement for defensive measures. Restorative administrations should address the recovery and wellbeing of culprits while safeguarding casualties' freedoms.

Cooperative endeavors and changes around there are critical to battle IPV actually and guarantee equity, assurance, and backing for ladies impacted by these wrongdoings.

Learn more about police, from:

brainly.com/question/2166731

#SPJ7

Answer:false

Explanation:

Answer:

False would be correct

Answer:

assembly & petition

Explanation:

personification type of metaphor/simile

Answer:

The judge has the power to determine the quantity of bail based upon factors on the severity of an alleged criminal offense, the  possibility of the defendant will escape the  jurisdiction prior to trial, and the likelihood of the defendant will commit more crimes following their release.

Answer:

borrowing money on credit

Explanation:

The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.

Answer:

It can be alcohol abuse or alcoholism.

A legal document that the Supreme Court sends to a lower court ordering it to send up a complete record of a case is known as a writ of certiorari.

This is a formal request for the lower court to provide all documents, transcripts, and other materials related to the case in question so that the Supreme Court can review them and determine whether or not to hear an appeal.

The writ of certiorari is an important tool for the Supreme Court to exercise its jurisdiction over cases that have been decided in lower courts, and it allows the Court to carefully review the facts and legal arguments presented in each case before making a final decision.

Overall, the process of granting a writ of certiorari is an essential part of the Supreme Court's role as the ultimate arbiter of legal disputes in the United States, and it ensures that justice is served in the fairest and equitable manner possible.

Know more about the Supreme Court here:

Supreme Court

#SPJ11

The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.

Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.

While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.

Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27571970

#SPJ1

Answer:

I would assume

"The Executive Branch". Can you give the drop down options so I can answer the next one?

Explanation:

Answer:

First Box: Executive

Second Box: Congressional, or The Advisors.

Explanation:

The reason I say congressional because it is made into 2 Section the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Presidential Level, doesn't really have two, but he can have 2 Advisers

Answer:

Idrk depends

Explanation:

Is there an answer you need help on?

Answer:

i am brainless.

Thx for the free pts, have a wonderful day/night, stay safe, happy holidays, and merry christmas!

The reasons Bruce gives for why Malians migrants still maintain a strong a connection with their faraway hometown are cultural identity, social networks, economic ties, and sense of belonging.

Cultural identity: Malian migrants maintain a strong cultural identity that is rooted in their hometown. They continue to speak their native language, practice their customs and traditions, and celebrate their festivals and rituals.
Social networks: Malian migrants maintain strong social networks with their family, friends, and other members of their hometown community. They stay in touch through phone calls, social media, and other means of communication, and they often send remittances to support their families and communities.
Economic ties: Malian migrants often invest in their hometown by building houses, starting businesses, or supporting local development projects. They see their hometown as a place where they can still make a positive impact and contribute to their community.
Sense of belonging: Despite living in a different country, Malian migrants still feel a strong sense of belonging to their hometown. They view it as their home and a place that will always be a part of their identity and personal history.
These factors help to explain why migration is not always a complete break from one's past, but rather a complex and multifaceted experience that can involve both continuity and change.

To read more about cultural identity, click on https://brainly.com/question/5591199

#SPJ4

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), passed by Congress in 2002, operates as a federal safety net for certain insured losses resulting from large-scale terrorist activities for selected property and casualty insurance lines, including workers' compensation.

In response, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was approved by the US Congress in 2002. To allow the federal government to split financial losses with insurers on commercial property/casualty (P/C) losses brought on by a terrorist attack, TRIA was first developed as a temporary, three-year federal program.

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) established a temporary government program that offers a clear mechanism of shared public and private compensation for some insured damages brought on by a certified act of terrorism.

Learn more about TRIA here:

https://brainly.com/question/27461800

#SPJ1

The question was incomplete. Kindly refer here:

Which of the following statements regarding the Terrorism Insurance Program is correct?

1. TRIA was passed in the year 2002.

2. TRIA was developed as a permanent plan.

3. As a result of a terrorist attack, this statute prohibits the federal government from sharing financial losses with insurers for commercial property and casualty (P/C) losses.

Answer:

The Russian one :))

[it's my opinion only]

Answer:

Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples

Answer:

He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract. Illumination: Options are generally concerned with only two things: time and price. He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract

You can sort an array with the standard library’s qsort function, using various programming languages.  

Qsort has the following formal syntax: qsort (,sizeof (),compare_function. Using the quick sort algorithm, the qsort function sorts an array. The array to be sorted, the number of elements in the array, the size of each element, and a comparison function that establishes the order of the elements are the four arguments required by the function1.

To sort an array in C++, use the sort() method offered by STL. Sort (arr, arr + n);23 is the syntax.

The sort() method in JavaScript allows you to sort an array while it is already open and returns a reference to the sorted array. The elements are converted to strings and their sequences of UTF-16 code units values are compared to determine the default sort order, which is ascending.

To know more about programming languages, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/16936315

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes and they are inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more

Explanation:

The speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes was approximately 43.4 mph.

To determine the speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes, use the formula:

v² = u² + 2as

where:

v = final velocity (impact speed of 15 mph)

u = initial velocity (what we want to find)

a = acceleration

s = distance

First, we need to find the acceleration (a) of the vehicle on the asphalt surface. Apply the formula:

a = F/m

where:

F = force (100% braking)

m = mass of the vehicle

The mass of the vehicle is unknown, but apply the drag sled experiment to estimate the coefficient of friction between the grassy shoulder and the vehicle:

μ = F/N

where:

μ = coefficient of friction

F = average pull force on drag sled (17 Ibs)

N = weight of the drag sled (30 Ibs)

Assume that the coefficient of friction between the asphalt surface and the vehicle is the same as the coefficient of friction between the grassy shoulder and the drag sled. Therefore:

μ = F/N = 17/30 = 0.57

Now, use the formula for acceleration:

a = μg

where:

g = acceleration due to gravity (32.2 ft/s²)

a = 0.57 x 32.2 = 18.37 ft/s²

Next, we can calculate the distance (s) that the vehicle skidded on the asphalt surface:

s = longest recorded skid mark = 43 feet

Finally, use the formula for final velocity:

v^2 = u² + 2as

15² = u² + 2 x 18.37 x 72

u² = 15² - 2 x 18.37 x 72

u = 63.6 ft/s

To convert to miles per hour:

u = 63.6 x 3600 / 5280 = 43.4 mph

Therefore, the speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes was approximately 43.4 mph.

learn more about speed: https://brainly.com/question/13943409

#SPJ1

Answer:

The question of whether considerations of justice should be limited to the bounds of a given state or should reach further is a complex and debated topic. Different perspectives exist on this matter, each with its advantages and disadvantages.

1. Limiting considerations of justice to the bounds of a given state:

Advantages:

a. Practicality and Manageability: Focusing on justice within a specific state allows for a more manageable approach to addressing societal issues. It is easier to develop and enforce laws, policies, and institutions within a defined jurisdiction.

b. National Self-Determination: Prioritizing justice within a state respects the principle of national self-determination, allowing each state to determine its legal system and policies based on the will of its citizens.

c. Cultural and Contextual Relevance: Justice systems often reflect the values, customs, and traditions of a particular society. Limiting considerations of justice to a state acknowledges the importance of cultural and contextual relevance in defining and implementing justice.

Disadvantages:

a. Global Interconnectedness: In today's interconnected world, issues such as climate change, human rights violations, and global poverty transcend national boundaries. Limiting justice considerations to a state may ignore the interconnected nature of these problems, hindering effective solutions.

b. Inequality and Injustice: Restricting justice to the state level can perpetuate global inequalities, as states with more resources and power may prioritize their interests over the needs of others. This can result in systemic injustice and exploitation, especially in relations between wealthy and poorer nations.

c. Transnational Crimes and Challenges: Crimes such as terrorism, human trafficking, and cybercrime often operate across borders. Limiting justice considerations to the state level can make it more challenging to address these transnational issues effectively.

2. Extending considerations of justice beyond the bounds of a given state:

Advantages:

a. Addressing Global Injustices: Expanding justice considerations beyond state boundaries allows for a more comprehensive approach to addressing global injustices, such as human rights violations, environmental degradation, and economic inequality.

b. Shared Responsibility: Recognizing that justice is a global concern encourages collective responsibility among nations to work together towards fairer and more equitable outcomes for all.

c. Moral Imperative: Many argue that justice should not be limited by arbitrary borders and that fundamental rights and values should extend to all individuals, regardless of their nationality or place of residence.

Disadvantages:

a. Sovereignty and Autonomy: Extending justice considerations beyond state bounds can raise concerns about encroachment on state sovereignty and autonomy. Some argue that states should have the right to determine their justice systems and priorities without external interference.

b. Complexity and Implementation Challenges: Implementing justice on a global scale is complex and challenging. Diverse legal systems, cultural differences, and conflicting interests among nations can complicate efforts to establish a unified approach to justice.

c. Unequal Influence: Expanding justice considerations beyond the state level may lead to the domination of more powerful nations or organizations in shaping global justice frameworks, potentially disregarding the voices and needs of less influential or marginalized states.

Explanation:

In conclusion, the question of whether considerations of justice should be limited to a given state or should reach further involves weighing practicality, sovereignty, global interconnectedness, and moral imperatives. Both positions have their advantages and disadvantages, and striking a balance between national self-determination and addressing global challenges is an ongoing challenge in the pursuit of justice.

Answer: mala prohibita

Explanation:

Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.

Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.

The racial admissions policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina appear to be on the verge of being overturned by the Supreme Court. This policy will certainly have an effect on college admissions in the U.S.

In two cases, Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, the Supreme Court is debating whether to uphold colleges' right to take race into account when making college admissions decisions. In both instances, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an anti-affirmative action activist group led by Edward Blum, is pushing for the abolition of all racial admissions procedures after prior failed attempts.

To know more about Supreme Court:

brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ4

If a bill is given to the president, he/she has three options: sign the bill into law, veto the bill, or take no action (in which case the bill becomes law after ten days unless Congress has adjourned).

If the president vetoes the bill, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
If a bill is given to the president, his/her options to do with the bill include:

1. Sign the bill: The president can choose to sign the bill, which means he/she approves of it and it becomes a law.

2. Veto the bill: The president can also decide to veto the bill, which means he/she disapproves of it and sends it back to Congress with his/her objections. If the bill receives a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the bill can become law despite the president's veto.

3. Pocket veto: If the president neither signs nor vetoes the bill, and Congress adjourns within ten days of presenting it, the bill will not become a law. This is called a pocket veto.

4. Allow it to become law without a signature: If the president neither signs nor vetoes the bill and ten days pass (excluding Sundays) while Congress is in session, the bill becomes law without the president's signature.

Know more about the president here:

https://brainly.com/question/924435

#SPJ11

Option 1 is Correct. Following are a few examples of regional laws from other nations and the punishments they entail that fall under diplomatic immunity.

As the main court of the United Nations, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was established in 1946. (UN). One of the four major categories you could run into is common law. The other two are civil law, religious law, and customary law. A hybrid system is used in several nations by combining more than one of these systems at once.

The laws and guidelines that control how states interact with one another, with other states and individuals, and with other international organisations collectively make up international law.

Learn more about penalties Visit: brainly.com/question/28605893

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Which of the following are examples of local laws in other countries and their associated penalties? (check all that apply.):

1. diplomatic immunity

2. prohibition against genocide

3. regulation of antitrust law

4. prohibition against price fixing