Answer:
humans
other
Explanation:
The two words from the passage that help the reader understand the term 'organisms' are DNA and humans.
What is an organism?A living being that is made of at least one cell and is able to successfully survive and continue to live its life by carrying daily activities is known as an organism. Each organism has a few traits, which are common to all.
DNA is a characteristic of an organism, which is unique for each and every organism, whereas, humans are a type of multicellular organisms.
Hence, the significance of an organism is aforementioned.
Learn more about an organism here:
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ2
In which of these publications would you expect an informal style?
Sports Illustrated
Kim Kardashian’s blog
Time Magazine
The New York Times (newspaper)
In which order are entries listed on a Works Cited page?
A
Chronological
B
Numerical
C
Alphabetical
D
By page count
After World War II, technological advancements radically changed how people viewed themselves, humanity, and the world. For example, rockets carried people into space, the splitting of atoms tapped into nuclear power, and the television provided a new medium for sharing information. Imagine being in the shoes of a postmodernist writer.
Required:
How would technological advancements influence your writing and literature in general?
Technology provides access to diverse sources of information, enabling writers to research and incorporate a wide range of perspectives into their work.
As a postmodernist writer, technological advancements would undoubtedly have a significant impact on my writing and literature in general. The advent of new technologies opens up a vast array of possibilities for storytelling, narrative structures, and thematic exploration. It allows for innovative forms of expression and challenges traditional notions of literature.Technological advancements can be incorporated into writing by exploring the effects of technology on individuals, societies, and the human condition. Themes such as the blurring of reality and virtuality, the dehumanizing aspects of technology, and the consequences of rapid progress can become central to narratives. Postmodernist writers may experiment with non-linear storytelling, fragmented narratives, and intertextuality to reflect the fragmented and interconnected nature of the digital age.
Furthermore, technology provides access to diverse sources of information, enabling writers to research and incorporate a wide range of perspectives into their work. It also offers new platforms for publishing and distribution, allowing for alternative forms of storytelling and reader engagement.However, as a postmodernist writer, I would also critically examine the implications of technology and its potential to shape our lives. I would question the power structures and inequalities embedded in technological advancements and explore their impact on identity, relationships, and society at large.In summary, technological advancements would inspire postmodernist writers to embrace experimentation, challenge traditional forms, and delve into the complex intersections between technology, humanity, and the world. The incorporation of technology into literature would provide a rich landscape for exploring new ideas, engaging readers, and critically examining the evolving nature of our modern existence.
Learn more about postmodernist visit:
brainly.com/question/32749871
#SPJ11
select the phrases that illustrate the ethical principle of ensuring anonymity.
Answer: first one
Explanation:
Phrases illustrating anonymity include: maintaining full anonymity in research, journalists' privilege to protect sources' identities, and using anonymity in psychological studies to elicit honest responses.
Explanation:Several phrases illustrate the principle of ensuring anonymity. One such phrase is: 'At the highest level, full disclosure and signed permission as well as complete anonymity of the subjects involved in the project are required.' This emphasizes the importance of protecting the identity of research participants. Another illustration comes from the practice of journalism: 'The practice of granting anonymity to sources is sometimes referred to as reporter's privilege.' This example demonstrates how anonymity can protect individuals from unlawful prosecution. Finally, within psychological studies, the phrase 'People are more likely to share honest answers if they can respond to questions anonymously' shows how anonymity can contribute to more accurate data by making participants feel safer and more comfortable.
Learn more about anonymity here:https://brainly.com/question/35128003
#SPJ11
Question 11(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) (06.05 LC)
Select the sentence that properly incorporates an internal citation using MLA formatting.
A. Franklin reiterates his point by stating "… like him who, having a garden to weed, does not attempt to eradicate all the bad herbs at once, which would exceed his reach and his strength, but works on one of the beds at a time …" (Franklin 112).
B. Emerson proves this point by stating, "The breadth of the problem is great, for the poet is representative. He stands among partial men for the complete man, and appraises us not of his wealth but of the commonwealth" (308).
C. Laozi transcribed the following proverb: "The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step" (Laozi 45).
D. The purpose was made well-known to the audience when the following was stated, "It has become the subject of revolution and civil war, and so tonight I am not here to advocate woman suffrage. American suffragists can do that very well for themselves (2)."
Answer:
A. Franklin reiterates his point by stating "… like him who, having a garden to weed, does not attempt to eradicate all the bad herbs at once, which would exceed his reach and his strength, but works on one of the beds at a time …" (Franklin 112).
Which of the following is an important difference between criminal and civil cases? O a. In criminal cases, the standard of determining guilt is a preponderance of evidence, in civil cases, the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. O b. Civil cases involve the concept of responsibility rather than guilt. O c Civil cases involve the state prosecutor initiating the case. d. Civil cases involve violations of the penal code. O e. Criminal cases involve breach of contracts.
The important difference between criminal and civil cases is that civil cases involve the concept of responsibility rather than guilt.
Civil cases and criminal cases are different types of court proceedings. Civil cases are disputes between two or more people or entities, such as corporations, that typically involve monetary damages or injunctions to cease certain activities.Criminal cases are brought by a governmental entity, such as a state or federal prosecutor, and are intended to punish a person for a crime they are believed to have committed, such as robbery or murder.
Furthermore, they may result in jail time, fines, or both. Defendants in criminal cases are found guilty or not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas defendants in civil cases are found responsible or not responsible by a preponderance of the evidence. Based on this information, option (b) is the right choice since civil cases involve the concept of responsibility rather than guilt.
To know more about criminal visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14329973
#SPJ11
According to Kohlberg, when 3-year-old Sara thinks about herself,
she can label herself as a girl.
she understands that sex is stable.
she understands that gender does not change over situations and time.
she knows that gender roles are flexible.
According to Kohlberg, when 3-year-old Sara thinks about herself, she understands that sex is stable forecast method Therefore, the correct option is: she understands that sex is stable Kohlberg was an American psychologist.
Who studied moral development. He's best known for his theory of moral development, which suggests that children undergo a sequence of moral reasoning that's influenced by their cultural environment the idea that a person's sex is stable or fixed is referred to as sex stability. This means that once you are born male or female, your sex is fixed for life. It cannot be changed by situations or even personal preference. Therefore, according to Kohlberg, when a 3-year-old girl, Sara, thinks about herself, she understands that her sex is stable.
To know more about Forecast method visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31760882
#SPJ11
4. Other Modes: How does Momaday use narration and comparison to develop
his description?
Momaday weaves his personal reflections and memories into the folklore and other sections of the text to develop his description.
N. Scott MomadayIn her book The Way to Rainy Mountain, N. The Kiowa people have a mythic, traditional, familial, and historical culture, as Scott Momaday describes. The author, a Native American who is Kiowa and partial Cherokee, grew up primarily in Arizona and New Mexico. Along with having Kiowa ancestry, he was raised on Apache and Navajo reservations where he had firsthand contact with tribal life and saw how cultural changes were affecting the Native American community. Momaday talked with his father, looked up historical details, and gathered family anecdotes in order to prepare for this brief piece. He built together a history of Kiowa civilization from its beginnings to its decline in modern times using his memories of his own travels, historical notes, and Kiowa tales.To learn more about N. Scott Momaday refer:
https://brainly.com/question/23947743
#SPJ9
Who is Gary Ridgway son?
Gary Ridgway, also known as the "Green River Killer," has a son named Matthew Ridgway. Matthew was born in 1975 and is the only known child of Gary Ridgway.
Matthew has largely stayed out of the public eye and has not spoken publicly about his father's crimes. In an interview with ABC News in 2003, Matthew's mother, Marcia Winslow, stated that she had not seen or spoken to Gary Ridgway since their divorce in 1981 when Matthew was just six years old.
She also expressed shock and disbelief upon learning of Gary Ridgway's crimes, stating that she had never suspected him of wrongdoing during their marriage.
To learn more about Gary Ridgway, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30399292
#SPJ4
"Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master.”
Christian Lous Lange, Historian
1. Write your reflection (2 or 3 sentences)
Armed with limitless access to contemporary destructors and a military mindset, the autonomous state's weaponry pose a threat to both the state and to others.
What is the meaning of being a servant?A servant is a professional who is hired to perform domestic duties, such as cleaning or gardening, at the residence of another person. a big Victorian household with several servants. The word "servant" can be used to describe someone or anything that helps others or that they can use.
What is the rule of servant?According to the master-servant rule, employers are accountable for the conduct of their employees. It applies to all acts an employee makes while working for an employer that fall inside the purview of such obligations.
To know more about Servant visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10854124
#SPJ1
Soon people will be looking at him and calling him a strong man. No doubt he is for one who has had rickets. Lets give it to him. Lets call him great when the water shall have been all drawn off. Lets build a monument and set it in the ooze where he goes down.
–Cane,
Jean Toomer
Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences.
This use of the word “ooze” adds to the idea that a monument to Rhobert would be
.
This most suggests a
tone in the passage.
can someone put the word partisan in this sentence Abigail Williams from the Crucible
Answer:
Abigail Williams a partisan from the crucible.
Explanation:
an argument for or against thsi statement: "That line between good and evil is permeable" zimbaro said. any of us can move across it I argue the we all have capacity for love and evil
The thing that makes good people do bad things is their capacity in them to be good or evil.
What is good and evil?
The lines between good and evil are highly permeable, thus we must embrace Zimbardo's claim that anyone can be either good or bad in accordance with the question's instructions.
As a result, and in line with the reasoning, we can observe that a person's personality and upbringing can determine whether they are good or terrible.
Therefore, the ability for good or evil to exist within them is what causes good people to do awful things.
To learn more about good and evil, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/21346996
#SPJ1
The question is incomplete. Your most probably complete question is given below:
Make an argument for or against this statement: "That line between good and evil is permeable," Zimbardo said. "Any of us can move across it. I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out. " Consider the characters from "A Good Man is Hard to Find" and "Spunk. " Based on Zimbardo's claim in "What makes good people do bad things?", how did the characters' different situations influence their behavior? Do you think the characters in these stories have the capacity for both good and evil
the rising and falling of vocal pitch across phrases and sentences is termed:
The rising and falling of vocal pitch across phrases and sentences is termed intonation.
Intonation is a way of speaking in which the pitch or tone of the voice is raised or lowered. It is how the voice goes up and down in different places while speaking. Intonation can change the meaning of a sentence. Intonation has the potential to indicate a speaker's mood or attitude about a subject.
The way a person speaks may reveal information about their ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status, and other characteristics. A listener's understanding of a speaker's message is aided by intonation patterns.
know more about intonation here
https://brainly.com/question/14249233#
#SPJ11
20 POINTS Part A – Plan Your Expository Essay
First, plan how you will organize and structure your expository essay. In the table, describe the details, information, and textual evidence you will include in each section of your essay. Include your plan for the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion of your literature analysis.
TIP: If you need to directly reference the texts from this unit, you can access them in the Activity Resources.
Organizing and structuring an expository essay can be a daunting task, but with proper planning, it becomes manageable. The introduction section should start with a strong thesis statement that highlights the purpose of the essay. It should be followed by a brief background information of the literature work being analyzed.
The body paragraphs should have a topic sentence that connects to the thesis statement, followed by supporting evidence from the literature work.
In the first body paragraph, the focus should be on the characters and their development, including their traits and actions that reveal their personalities. The textual evidence used should be from the literature work to support the argument.
In the second body paragraph, the focus should be on the setting and how it influences the plot of the literature work. The textual evidence used should demonstrate how the setting plays a significant role in the story.
The third body paragraph should focus on the themes and literary devices employed in the literature work. The textual evidence used should show how these elements enhance the story's meaning and how they are connected to the thesis statement.
Finally, the conclusion should summarize the main points in the essay and restate the thesis statement. It should also include a personal reflection or a call to action to encourage the reader to think about the literature work beyond the text.
In conclusion, organizing and structuring an expository essay requires proper planning, including a well-crafted thesis statement, clear topic sentences, and ample textual evidence to support the argument.
The essay's introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion should all work together to convey the message clearly and cohesively.
For more such questions on expository essay
https://brainly.com/question/29989182
#SPJ8
What is poverty according to Parker?
hey
According to Parker, poverty is about lack of having enough money for necessities, better foodstuffs, very little education and little or no access to health care. It is like an acid that destroys pride, honour, health and future.
\( \: \)
hope it helps :)
Which adjective best describes the atmosphere in this passage?
Which excerpt from the passage best reveals this atmosphere?
How does the atmosphere help convey the author’s meaning?
Answer:
passive, here or elsewhere, what did it matter?, it shows he has given up
Explanation:
just did it on edge
Answer:
passive
here or elsewhere, what did it matter?
it shows he has given up
Explanation:
edge 2020
But does everyone on earth have an equal right to an equal share of its resources? The spaceship metaphor can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify
suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. In their enthusiastic but unrealistic generosity, they confuse the
ethics of a spaceship with those of a lifeboat.
Which words from the passage most suggest that the author wants to appeal
to the reader's emotions?
A. lifeboat, earth, right
B. earth, resources, metaphor
C. policies, immigration, aid
D. dangerous, misguided, uncontrolled
Answer:
Answer is D
Explanation:
If your doing pex learning that should help
C. Policies, Immigration, Aid.
What is policy?The term "policy" means a set of ideas or plans that is used as a basis for making decisions.
What is immigration?The term "immigration" means the coming of people into a country in order to live and work there.
What is aid?The term "aid" is money, equipment, or services that are provided for people, countries, or organizations who need them but cannot provide them for themselves.
As the crisis of uncontrolled immigration is mentioned in the text which leads to the lack of implementation of policies.
To know more about immigration here
https://brainly.com/question/14649102
#SPJ3
compare Bronx Masquerade and The Outsiders book
Answer: Bronx masquerade and The Outsiders are both excellent books which are bursting with similarities and differences.
Bronx Masquerade and The Outsiders are both similar in writing style, and both take place in first person.
The Narrator of Bronx Masquerade has a similar internal conflict as Ponyboy does in The Outsiders, both feel misunderstood. Ponyboy and Devon both enjoy reading, which isn't a big thing in their friend groups or families.
Both books involve poetry. In the Outsiders Roberts Frost poem is a major theme in the book. In Bronx Masquerade Poetry is also imprtant.
Both are YA fictions.
In The Outsiders Ponyboy gets involved in a murder wrap unlike in bronx masquerade
Explanation:
you do not need to use citations for information that has been paraphrased or summarized
-true
-false
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Citations in any academic or research papers are to be made so as not to fall under the issue of plagiarism or any wrongful conduct. And as such, there are numerous dos and don'ts in the styles and rules that signify the correct format of writing any piece of work.
It is common knowledge that citations are a must if the work has any direct quotation from the original source or from another source. Likewise, paraphrasing and even summarizations also need to be cited as they also fall under the same issue of being taken from another source. Summaries and paraphrases have the same motive, the same meaning, and provide the same interpretation even if they were written in one's own words. They still fall under the theme of 'quotation' as the ideas were taken from another source and the meanings still stay the same.
Thus, it is false to say that citations are not needed for information that has been paraphrased or summarized.
what figurative language is used in the story Arachne?
Answer:
. The figurative language used in this story includes metaphors such as “spinning” and “weaving” which are used to describe storytelling.
Explanation:
____ alien spaceship landed in my front yard. *
whats the missing word?
Answer: multiple words could be used
for example-
The
A
What is the key difference in the purpose of the articles by Susan Glaspell?
While Midnight Assassin offers a commentary on the events as they happened in the past, the articles follow the Hossack trial as it developed.
What is an article?An article is a shot piece of writing that is meant to provide factual and objective information about an incident or a concept. Articles often uses charts and graphs to explain their point. This can be contrasted with an essay which is often subjective and always has a conclusion as part of its format.
Who is Susan Glaspell?Susan Glaspell (1876–1948 was a Pulitzer Prize–winning writer, actress, novelist, and journalist. She also co–founded the Provincetown Players, the first modern American theatre group. She was raised in Iowa, which is where the majority of her works are situated. Her one-act play Trifles (1916, which is based on the murder trial she covered as a young reporter, is regarded as one of the best pieces of American theatre and an essential work of feminist writing.
To learn more about Pulitzer Prize visit:
brainly.com/question/3039815
#SPJ1
[CASSIUS.] Two mighty eagles fell, and there they perched,Gorging and feeding from our soldiers’ hands; Who to Philippi here consorted us. This morning are they fled away and gone, And in their steads do ravens, crows, and kites Fly o’er our heads and downward look on us...MESSALA. Believe not so.CASSIUS. I but believe it partly; For I am fresh of spirit, and resolved To meet all perils very constantly.How does the use of the word fresh affect the meaning of the passage?a. it reveals cassius’s sense of optimism in spite of the dark omens. b. it exposes cassius’s feelings of regret for murdering caesar. c. it shows cassius’s renewed respect for the armies of lepidus. d. it reveals cassius’s humble dedication to caesar’s memory and the people of rome.
The use of the word "fresh" in the passage affects the meaning by revealing Cassius's sense of optimism in spite of the dark omens. Option (a) is correct.
Cassius acknowledges that the eagles, which were considered to be good omens, have disappeared and have been replaced by ravens, crows, and kites. However, he says that he only partly believes this and declares that he is "fresh of spirit" and "resolved to meet all perils very constantly."
The word "fresh" here indicates that Cassius is still full of hope and determination, even in the face of unfavorable signs. This suggests that Cassius is willing to remain positive and fight for his cause despite the ominous signs. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer as it best reflects the meaning conveyed by the use of the word "fresh" in this context.
To learn more about dark omens, here
https://brainly.com/question/27932755
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Read the excerpt from act 5, scene 1, of Julius Caesar.
[CASSIUS.] Coming from Sardis, on our former ensign
Two mighty eagles fell, and there they perched,
Gorging and feeding from our soldiers' hands;
Who to Philippi here consorted us.
This morning are they fled away and gone,
And in their steads do ravens, crows, and kites
Fly o'er our heads and downward look on us,
As we were sickly prey. Their shadows seem
A canopy most fatal, under which
Our army lies ready to give up the ghost.
How does the use of the word fresh affect the meaning of the passage?
(a) it reveals Cassius's sense of optimism in spite of the dark omens. (b) it exposes Cassius's feelings of regret for murdering Caesar. (c) it shows Cassius's renewed respect for the armies of Lepidus. (d) it reveals Cassius's humble dedication to Caesar's memory and the people of Rome.PLEASE ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Answer:
The second choice.
Explanation:
Constructive criticism is written to help you improve while just criticism is just telling you how bad some parts are.
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
I think it's B
constructive criticism point out weaknesses while offering suggestions; ordinary criticism comments on weaknesses only.
a combining vowel is often added to a word root. what is a combining vowel, and why would it be added to the word root?
The vowel 'O' is a combining vowel which is generally added to make the constructed term (word either long or short) easier to pronounce.
Vowel are the sounds which are pronounced without any blockage or restriction while speaking. There are five vowels in English alphabets namely A, E, I, O and U. All other letters/ alphabets are known as consonants. When we study technicality of English, it is found that there are four basic sounds from ten basic vowel. A word part which is added to the end of the word root and thus modifies or accentuates the meaning of the root word, then such part of words are known as suffix. These words are generally made up of vowels and are sometimes incomplete.
For example: Consider the word beautiful which is converted into beautifully by adding 'ly' suffix.
Learn more about root word at:
brainly.com/question/10240140
#SPJ4
a) State why the writer went to the coast
The poison arrow frog, which resides in the tropical forests of South America, has enough toxicity on its skin that a dart rubbed across the surface of the body can kill a small mammal.
Which of the following sentences uses an ellipsis correctly?
A. "The poison arrow frog … has enough toxicity on its skin … "
B. "The poison arrow frog … has enough toxicity on its skin that a dart rubbed across the surface can kill a small mammal."
C. "The poison arrow frog, which resides in the tropical forests of South America … has enough toxicity on its skin that a dart rubbed across the surface of the body can kill a small mammal."
D. "The poison arrow frog, which resides in the tropic forests of South America, … that a dart rubbed across the surface of the body can kill a small mammal."
The sentence that uses an ellipsis correctly is this:
B. "The poison arrow frog … has enough toxicity on its skin that a dart rubbed across the surface can kill a small mammal."
What is an ellipsis?An ellipsis refers to the three dots in a text that can be used to describe the omission of some text. In the sentence above, we can see that in the place of the three dots was some text that added further meaning to the poison arrow frog.
So, the aim of the ellipsis is to show that there is some information at that point. However, it is important to know that the usage of the ellipsis does not make the meaning of the sentence incomplete.
In fact, the sentence maintains its original meaning because what was omitted is not really important. The ellipsis is an important denotation that is often used in the English language.
Learn more about an ellipsis here:
https://brainly.com/question/450229
#SPJ1
which best describes the monro kellie principle?
The Monroe-Kellie principle is a medical concept that states that the skull is a rigid container with limited capacity for the brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood.
According to the principle, any increase in the volume of one of these components must be compensated by a decrease in the volume of the other two to maintain intracranial pressure within normal limits.
In simpler terms, the Monroe-Kellie principle means that the total volume of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain tissue inside the skull must remain constant.
Any increase in the volume of one component must be balanced by a decrease in the volume of another. For example, if there is an increase in the amount of blood flowing to the brain, the brain may respond by reducing the volume of cerebrospinal fluid.
The principle is important in the management of conditions that can cause an increase in intracranial pressure, such as traumatic brain injury, brain tumors, and stroke. Treatment may involve reducing the volume of one component, such as draining excess cerebrospinal fluid or reducing blood flow to the brain, to prevent dangerous increases in intracranial pressure.
To learn more about monro kellie principle click here
brainly.com/question/31753771
#SPJ11
What is the structure of the excerpt from The Iliad?
The text compares and contrasts the Trojans and Achaeans.
The text uses descriptive language and details to explain a battle.
The text explains why the fighting ends and tells what happens next.
The text reveals characters' perspectives about the war.
Answer:
the text compares and contrasts the Trojans and Achaeans