Like hitler, how were the new dictators in eastern europe able to gain power?.
Answers
Answer:
Comparing the rise of dictators in Eastern Europe to Hitler is a complex and sensitive topic. It's important to approach historical events with care and avoid oversimplification. However, I can provide a general overview of factors that could contribute to the rise of dictators in Eastern Europe during certain periods.
Political Instability: After World War I and the collapse of empires, Eastern Europe experienced significant political turmoil and instability. Weak or newly formed democratic institutions, economic challenges, and social unrest created an environment where strong leaders could exploit the situation.
Nationalism and Ethnic Tensions: Ethnic and national tensions were prevalent in Eastern Europe, and dictators often manipulated these divisions to gain support. They presented themselves as defenders of a specific ethnic or national group, exploiting grievances and promising solutions to perceived injustices.
Economic Crisis: Economic instability and hardships can fuel dissatisfaction and resentment among the population. Dictators often capitalized on these conditions by promising economic stability, improved living standards, and job opportunities.
Propaganda and Manipulation: Dictators typically employed sophisticated propaganda machinery to control information, manipulate public opinion, and create a cult of personality. They used mass media, rallies, and various forms of communication to spread their ideology, scapegoat certain groups, and maintain control over the narrative.
Repression and Fear: Once in power, dictators consolidated their rule through the suppression of dissent, censorship, and the establishment of secret police forces. They created an atmosphere of fear, eliminating opposition and controlling key institutions, including the judiciary and the media.
External Factors: In some cases, external factors such as geopolitical tensions, foreign interference, or the aftermath of wars played a role in the rise of dictators. These factors could create power vacuums or provide opportunities for ambitious leaders to exploit.
Explanation:
Related Questions
What is the song “I think my dogs a Democrat” by Bryan Lewis about? AWARDING POINTS AND BRAINLIEST ASAP
Answers
Answer:
His latest song is poking fun at politics, and his dog
Explanation:
These are notes taken by a student in class.What is the best title for these notes?
A The Marshall Plan
B The Truman Doctrine
C The United Nations
D The Warsaw Pact
The Warsaw Pact
Answers
Answer:A The Marshall Plan
Explanation:
Nevada has just passed a statute that conflicts with the U.S. Constitution. Which one takes priority, and why?
A. Nevada's statute because states are sovereign
B. The U.S. Constitution because the U.S. is a democracy.
C. Nevada's statute because the U.S. is a democracy
D. The U.S. Constitution because of the Supremacy Clause.
Answers
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw ]. The supremacy cause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation.
During the early parts of the 17th century, voting requirements in the colonies included being a ______.
Answers
During the early parts of the 17th century, voting requirements in the colonies included being a free, white, male property owner.
The requirement for voting in the early colonies included owning property. The colonies' founding fathers believed that those who owned property had a stake in the system, so they were the ones who had a voice in the process. The requirement that one had to be a white, male property owner was primarily in the southern colonies.
However, as the 18th century progressed, many colonies abolished the property requirement, allowing a more significant number of people to participate in the political process. Women and people of color were unable to vote in early colonial America.
African Americans were barred from voting in all colonies, while women were only allowed to vote in a few colonies. Native Americans were also not allowed to vote, and they were often exploited by colonists who took their land and resources.
To learn more about the property owner
https://brainly.com/question/6216322
#SPJ11
Why did Mexican officials arrest Stephen F. Austin?
He suggested that Texans form a new state government.
He insulted Santa Anna during one of their meetings.
He brought cholera to Mexico City.
He encouraged the United States to declare war on Mexico.
Answers
Answer: He suggested that Texans form a new state government
Explanation:
Believing that he was pushing for Texas independence and suspect that he was trying to incite insurrection, Austin was arrested by the Mexican government in January 1834 in Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. He was taken to Mexico City and imprisoned. No charges were filed against him as no court would take jurisdiction.
Answer:
A . He suggested that Texans form a new state government.
What is the difference between checks and balances and separation of powers? Congress (legislative
branch) overriding a veto from the President (Executive branch) is an example of which of the 2?
Answers
Answer:
Checks and Balances- Refers to the checks each branch has over one another, to stop one from accumulating too much power, for instance the veto (E), impeachment (L), and judicial review (J).
Separation of Powers refers to different governmental functions being delegated to different branches. It is intended to prevent too much power being concentrated in one branch, for instance, Congress (L) has the power to declare war, and the President (E) is the Commander-in-Chief of the military.
Therefore, the veto override is an example of a check and balance.
The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trado Nogotiations accomplished which of the following? (x) It achioved cuts in tariffs but not in nontanift trado barriers (y) It led to an agreement among many nations to bind, or cap. a signiticant portion of their tariffs, giving up. the possibility of future rate increases above the bound lovelsi (z) It eliminated tariffs entrety in steel. medical equipment and phamaceuticals and made extensive ettorts to eliminate quotas on agricultural ptoducts A. (x),(y) and (z) B. (x) and (y) only C. (x) and (z) only D. (y) and (z) only E. (2) only
Answers
The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations accomplished the following:
(x) It achieved cuts in tariffs but not in non-tariff trade barriers.
(y) It led to an agreement among many nations to bind, or cap, a significant portion of their tariffs, giving up the possibility of future rate increases above the bound levels.
(z) It eliminated tariffs entirely in steel, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals and made extensive efforts to eliminate quotas on agricultural products.
The correct answer is option A. (x), (y), and (z) because all three statements are true. The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations resulted in reduced tariffs (statement x) and an agreement to cap tariffs at specific levels (statement y). Additionally, it eliminated tariffs completely in certain industries like steel, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals, and made significant efforts to eliminate quotas on agricultural products (statement z).
To know more about pharmaceuticals visit:
brainly.com/question/30134373
#SPJ11
How is the British sale of opium to China a double standar
Answers
Answer: I'm pretty sure opium use was outlawed in GB during the time. So they didn't allow their own subjects to use it but got another country hooked on it
What were the two primary accomplishments of Chavez and the United Farm Workers in the 1960s and 70s as described in the article?
Answers
Answer:
What were the two primary accomplishments of Chavez and the United Farm Workers in the 1960s and 70s
Explanation:
The UFW and Chávez had many accomplishments - establishing minimum wage standards, wage contracts, safer working conditions, child labor reform, and advancement in civil rights for Chicanos and other farm workers. Chávez's dedication to farm workers and civil rights grew out of influential childhood experiences.
( Chavez founded the National Farm Workers Association (later the United Farm Workers of America) and won important victories to raise pay and improve working conditions for farm workers in the late 1960s and 1970s)
Plessy V. Ferguson
List 3 important facts or questions that the Supreme Court needed to consider when hearing this case.
Answers
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the 3 important facts or questions that the Supreme Court needed to consider when hearing this case are:
The fact of Thirteenth Amendment that talks about the issue of slavery.The fact of the Fourteenth Amendment that talks about the issue of the equal right of citizenship.And then the fact of the Fifth Amendment that talks about the issue of freedom of movement.Plessy vs Ferguson is the case that was centered on the issue of racial segregation.Hence, in this case, the correct answer is the fact of the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/21274617
which of the following is the correct pairing of powers found in the articles of confederation and powers found in the constitution?
Answers
The pairing includes that Congress could not tax the states directly and its was a unicameral body.
The Article of confederation was the first written constitution which contains law and regulation of the United State while practicing the Confederation style of government.
The Confederation style is characterized by given the States greater power than the Central government.The United States Constitution however prioritize Federalism over Confederacy and it created 3 distinct branch of governmentIn conclusion, the power which were both found in the Article of confederation and Constitution is that the "Congress could not tax the states directly" and the "Congress is a unicameral body".
Read more on Article of confederation here
brainly.com/question/22546180
What did newmexico do in the cold war?
Answers
New Mexico helped in the Cold War by providing men to fight in the Cold War.
Also, New Mexican civilians employed people from national labs.
Answer:
New Mexico provided men to fight in the Cold War. Also, spanish-speaking soldiers of New Mexico sacrificed, fought and many died to end the Civil War that was headed west. This victory by the New Mexico Volunteers secured the victory of the Union Army giving Abraham Lincoln the strength and authority to write and enforce the Emancipation Proclamation.
Explanation:
Have a great rest of your day
#TheWizzer
how did democrat john f. kennedy's and republican richard nixon's positions on civil rights reverse themselves during their campaigns in the 1960 election?
Answers
John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon both campaigned on civil rights during the 1960 election, but their positions reversed themselves throughout the course of the election.
At the beginning of the election, Kennedy was seen as a moderate on civil rights, while Nixon was seen as a staunch supporter of civil rights. Nixon was actually endorsed by the NAACP, a civil rights organization. However, in order to appeal to the Southern vote, Nixon began to distance himself from civil rights, taking a more conservative stance.
Meanwhile, Kennedy took the opportunity to increase his support for civil rights, appealing to a larger base of voters. He promised to appoint African American judges and promised to push for civil rights legislation. This shift in positions resonated with voters and Kennedy won the election.
Thus, the positions of Kennedy and Nixon on civil rights reversed themselves throughout the course of the 1960 election. Kennedy went from being a moderate on civil rights to a strong supporter, while Nixon went from being a strong supporter to a moderate. This shift in positions helped Kennedy win the election.
To learn more about John F. Kennedy link is here
brainly.com/question/13721861
#SPJ4
County, state, and local committees all choose a chairperson. However, the party's presidential candidate chooses the chairperson at the ____ level.
A. local
B. state
C. county
D. national
Answers
Answer:
National
Explanation:
hope this helps :D
Answer:
D) National
Explanation:
Do you think Douglas presented a valid
argument for a mix of free and slave states? Explain?
YALL I NEED THIS NOWWWWWW
Answers
Douglas believed that the federal government should not interfere with the decision-making process of individual states, as it would undermine the principles of democracy.
Douglas presented a valid argument for a mix of free and slave states. His argument was based on the principle of popular sovereignty, which allowed the people of each state to decide whether to allow slavery or not. Douglas believed that the federal government should not interfere with the decision-making process of individual states, as it would undermine the principles of democracy. He argued that the expansion of slavery should be left to the discretion of the people living in each state. However, he did not support the expansion of slavery into new territories, as he believed that it would undermine the principles of democracy. Therefore, Douglas's argument was that there should be a mix of free and slave states, but the decision on whether to allow slavery should be left to the people of each state. In conclusion, Douglas's argument for a mix of free and slave states was valid as it was based on the principle of popular sovereignty and the belief that the expansion of slavery should be left to the discretion of individual states.
To know more about democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30078994
#SPJ11
Which work was investigated by the Roman Inquisition on charges that it was heretical in its inappropriate treatment of the subject matter
Answers
The work that was investigated by the Roman Inquisition on charges that it was herectical was :
Artemisia Gentileschi painting five different versions of the biblical story of Judith and Holofernes.
Who was Artemisia Gentileschi ?Artemisia Gentileschi was an Italian painter in the 17th century, she was known for her expertise in her Baroque paintings. she was was an accomplished user of chiaroscuro, while placing more focus women stories during her paintings.
Her painting of five different versions of the biblical story of Judith and Holofernes was investigated by the Roman inquisition on grounds of heresy.
Hence we can conclude that The work that was investigated by the Roman Inquisition on charges that it was herectical was : Artemisia Gentileschi painting five different versions of the biblical story of Judith and Holofernes.
Learn more about Artemisia Gentileschi : https://brainly.com/question/4080916
#SPJ1
Which groups were fighting at the constitutional convention
Answers
Answer:
james town and new york
Explanation:
G
How did the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo finally achieve the idea of Manifest Destiny? A. It ended the Mexican American War and ceded land to the United States that gave it access to the Pacific Ocean. B. It ended the War of 1812 and ceded land to the United States that gave it access to the Colorado River. C. It moved all Native Americans from the southwestern United States to reservations in the midwest. D. It authorized the Lewis and Clark expedition to explore the Louisiana Territory.
Answers
Answer:
A. It ended the Mexican American war and ceded land to the United States that gave it access to the Pacific Ocean
Explanation:
What do nations need because of trade? (4 points)
More foreign workers
A way to exchange currency
Plans to fight pollution
Fewer government rules
Answers
Answer:
A way to exchange currency
Answer:
More foreign workers is my infer
Explanation:
Approximately how many American marriages end in divorce?
one in two marriages
one in five marriages
one in ten marriages
one in twenty marriages
Answers
Research shows that about one in two marriages end up in divorce in the United States.
What led to divorce rate in U.S.?
The major contributors of divorce includes lack of commitment, infidelity, conflict, arguing, domestic violence, substance use etc
All the factor led to the reason for more than 50% of all marriages in the US ending up in a divorce.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about divorce rate
brainly.com/question/27253191
#SPJ2
What would Englund's thesis be in "Beijing's power play in the South China Sea may be killing coral reefs"?
Answers
In the article "Beijing's power play in the South China Sea may be killing coral reefs," Englund's thesis could be that China's military expansion in the South China Sea is contributing to the destruction of coral reefs.
In the article "Beijing's power play in the South China Sea may be killing coral reefs," Englund suggests that China's military expansion in the South China Sea is causing harm to coral reefs. This expansion has resulted in the construction of artificial islands, the development of ports, and other similar activities, all of which may be having a negative impact on the surrounding coral reefs.
Englund cites studies that suggest that dredging and other related activities, such as the installation of pylons to support artificial islands, can disrupt sediment and nutrient flows, which are critical for maintaining healthy coral reef ecosystems.
He notes that these impacts may be felt not only in the immediate vicinity of the construction, but also in surrounding areas due to the way in which ocean currents can carry sediment and nutrients over long distances. Further, he notes that while China has made commitments to protect coral reefs and other marine ecosystems, these commitments may be more difficult to uphold given its expanding military presence in the region.
To know more about Beijing visit :
brainly.com/question/700545
#SPJ11
how did the federal government implement the indian removal act in 1838?
Answers
President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830, giving him the power to exchange Indian territories inside of current state lines for uninhabited territory west of the Mississippi. Many tribes opposed the concept of removal, however a few tribes left quietly.
What about Andrew Jackson?American lawyer, planter, general, and statesman Andrew Jackson presided over the country as its seventh president from 1829 to 1837. He rose to fame as a U.S. Army general and served in both houses of Congress before being chosen to the presidency. Jackson, a major general in the War of 1812, won national acclaim for defeating the British at New Orleans. Some state political factions supported Jackson in 1824; by 1828, enough had allied with "Old Hickory" to win a number of state elections and take over the federal government in Washington.During the War of 1812, Andrew Jackson led the Tennessee militia in a crushing victory over the Creek Indians (allied with the British).To learn more about Andrew Jackson, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15647756
The Indian Removal Act was implemented by the U.S. government in 1838 through a forceful relocation of Native American tribes from the Southeast to the 'Indian Territory'. This led to the Trail of Tears, a journey marking the suffering of Native Americans during relocation.
Explanation:The federal government implemented the Indian Removal Act in 1838 through a series of measures designed to forcibly relocate Native American tribes living in the southeastern United States to designated 'Indian Territory' in the West (now Oklahoma). This policy was largely driven by the desire of white settlers to expand their agricultural enterprises into Native American lands. The enforcement of the act is perhaps best remembered for the brutal journey known as the Trail of Tears, during which thousands of Native Americans died from disease, exposure, and starvation.
Learn more about Indian Removal Act here:https://brainly.com/question/476650
#SPJ2
Summarize the two oaths. What is the main difference between the two? How
important is that difference? What are the implications of swearing an oath to an
individual leader rather than to a nation
Answers
Answer:
One is swearing to serve only the supreme court of the nation, the other the individual is swearing an oath to serve only the governor of their state.
Explanation:
"One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of a hereditary right in kings is that nature disapproves it, otherwise, she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an donkey for a lion." - Thomas Paine's Common Sense
What does this quote mean?
Answers
It means that the distinction of men into kings and subjects is not approved by the nature. Nature has not given the kings and the rich any right to become above the other people and a misery to mankind.
All men are equal as they are created equally in the order by the nature. But this equality is destroyed by the manmade status of living by being rich and poor. Being poor means to be oppressed and by rich mean who oppresses the poor. The rich treat them like slaves and unequal to them.
The great distinction which is not assigned by any religion or natural phenomena is the distinction of men into Kings and Subjects. Nature differentiated physically between a male and a female. There is no right to a race of men to become above the rest and rule them.
To know more about nature here
https://brainly.com/question/25917497
#SPJ1
Giving brainliest
The rise of the cattle kingdom coincided with the spread of the ? across the country. In 1866, Texas
ranchers drove their herds of longhorn cattle north to... Sedalia, Missouri, for shipment to the slaughter and
packinghouses in the East. As the
?
moved west, the end of the long drive moved with them. The
famed Chisholm Trail went from San Antonio to Abilene, Kansas, while the Western Trail ended in Dodge City. These
trails covered approximately 800 miles and took about two months; the Goodnight-Loving Trail, which swung through
west Texas and then north into New Mexico and Colorado, was considerably longer.
Which of the following completes this excerpt?
O railroads
buffalo
range wars
American Indians
Answers
Answer: the answer is railroads
Explanation:
.
Railroads of the following complete this excerpt. The correct option is A.
How did railroads impact the ranchers of the West?By connecting western farmers and their farms to American cities and markets, the railroads benefited them the most. Now, farmers could quickly and easily transport their produce and other farm products to urban areas for sale, as well as import finished, manufactured goods from the industrial east.
Raising cattle on the Great Plains became economically viable with the development of the railroad. Five million longhorn cattle were grazing in the Lone Star state in 1860. At railroad shipping points in Abilene or Dodge City in Kansas, cattle that could be purchased for $3 to $5 per head in Texas could be sold for $30 to $50.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Railroad in the Cattle Kingdom here:
https://brainly.com/question/7317610
#SPJ2
Answer the following question in 2-3 paragraphs
Analyze one political and one economic benefit of the Industrial Revolution
I need help please!!
Answers
An agrarian economy gave way to an industrial economy during the Industrial Revolution, where things were no longer exclusively manufactured by hand but also by machines.
What was the Industrial Revolution's greatest political and economic gain?The US becoming a major world power was among the American Industrial Revolution's most significant political effects. The economy was bolstered by additional chances for internal and international trade, which also prompted the government to engage in more international affairs. This resulted in an uptick in output and efficiency, as well as decreased prices, a growth in goods and services, higher earnings, and a migration of people from rural to urban regions.
To know more about Industrial Revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ1
ow did illustrator george cruikshank retain a sense of dynamic movement and spontaneity in his drawings when he transferred them for mass reproduction? a. he commissioned the hand-coloring of each image
Answers
To retain a sense of dynamic movement and spontaneity in his drawings when he transferred them for mass reproduction, George Cruikshank used a printing technique called lithography. Option b is correct.
Lithography is a printing method that is used to produce high-quality reproductions of original artworks. It is a printing process that depends on the repulsion between water and oil to create clean and crisp images.
The process of creating a lithograph involves several steps, including preparing the stone or plate, drawing the image using a grease pencil or crayon, applying a chemical solution to the surface of the stone or plate, and then printing the image onto paper.George Cruikshank was a famous illustrator who lived in the early nineteenth century. He was well-known for his ability to create illustrations that were both dynamic and spontaneous. To retain these qualities in his drawings when he transferred them for mass reproduction, he turned to lithography.Lithography allowed Cruikshank to create clean and crisp images that were faithful reproductions of his original drawings. By using this printing technique, he was able to retain the sense of dynamic movement and spontaneity that was characteristic of his work.George Cruikshank's illustrations were widely popular in his time, and his use of lithography was instrumental in making his work accessible to a wider audience. Today, his illustrations are considered to be important examples of the art of lithography and continue to be admired by art lovers all over the world.Therefore the correct answer is option "b".
The question should be:
How did illustrator George Cruikshank retain a sense of dynamic movement and spontaneity in his drawings when he transferred them for mass reproduction? a. he commissioned the hand-coloring of each image b. Lithography technique c. Flexography technique d. Embossing
Learn more about lithography:
https://brainly.com/question/9350953
#SPJ11
3. According to Madison, what is one of the greatest principles of a strong federal government?
Answers
Answer: A strong central government
Explanation:
Just wanna make sure I’m right ??!!!!
Answers
According to this cartoon, what would giving women the right to vote do to
politics?
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
To make politics cleaner
Explanation:
It says it on the poster..
I just put that answer and got it right.