joe lives in iowa. iowa law requires three witnesses for a will to be valid. after riding in a car with mark driving cross country, joe is afraid that he will die in a car accident. joe writes a will in a bar and has it signed by two witness in kentucky (assume for the question joe and all the witnesses are sober... although i've honestly never seen joe sober at a bar... or apparently driving a boat, thus the previous arrest). kentucky law requires only two witnesses for a will be to valid. miraculously, joe survives the trip home. three years later joe dies in iowa. the will signed is admitted to probate. is the will valid?

yes she will  because she made an appointment to do so

She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.

According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.

As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

Learn more about on Law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6534668

#SPJ5

Merton would classify a person who rejects society's goals and norms and becomes a drifter and drug addict as being in the "retreat" mode of adaptation.

According to Merton's theory of strain, people feel pressure or strain when their objectives and ways of achieving them are out of sync with social expectations. Merton would categorise someone as being in the "retreat" mode of adaptation when they reject society's ideals and standards and end up as a vagabond and drug addict.

In this method, the individual isolates themselves from both the purposes and institutions of society and establishes their own counterculture. This behaviour is seen to be a reaction to both the failure to use legal means to attain aims and the rejection of cultural standards.

Learn more about the retreat:

https://brainly.com/question/31007984

#SPJ4

Answer:  do u want my love

Explanation:

Answer:

neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers

Answer:

D.Strength

ALL done

Answer:

White nationalist terrorist groups

Explanation:

examples include

KKK and the American Nazi Party

Answer:

displaced left-turn lane

Justifications are otherwise criminal acts that society approves and encourages under the circumstances. In the legal context, justifications refer to situations where an individual's actions, which would typically be considered criminal, are deemed lawful and acceptable due to specific circumstances.

These circumstances justify the behavior and provide a legal defense against criminal liability. Justifications are different from excuses or defenses. Excuses acknowledge that the individual committed the act but argues that they should not be held responsible due to a lack of intent or capacity. Defenses, on the other hand, admit that the act was committed intentionally but argue that it should not be considered criminal because of specific legal requirements or principles.

Justifications, such as self-defense or defense of others, allow individuals to use reasonable force to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. Necessity is another justification where an individual commits a criminal act to prevent a greater harm or danger.

To learn more about Justifications, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23939271

#SPJ11

Justifications are otherwise criminal acts that society approves and encourages under the circumstances. In the legal context, justifications refer to situations where an individual's actions, which would typically be considered criminal, are deemed lawful and acceptable due to specific circumstances.

These circumstances justify the behavior and provide a legal defense against criminal liability. Justifications are different from excuses or defenses. Excuses acknowledge that the individual committed the act but argues that they should not be held responsible due to a lack of intent or capacity. Defenses, on the other hand, admit that the act was committed intentionally but argue that it should not be considered criminal because of specific legal requirements or principles.

Justifications, such as self-defense or defense of others, allow individuals to use reasonable force to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. Necessity is another justification where an individual commits a criminal act to prevent a greater harm or danger.

To learn more about Justifications, click here:

brainly.com/question/23939271

#SPJ11

Answer:

My idea human is has a heathy lifestyle as well as a good family history. This would effect my decision of selling kidneys by making sure i am up to that standard. If i were buying a kidney i wouldn’t want an old persons kidney because it’s been around .... years.

Explanation:

Answer:

I am writing on principal of disclosure in business ethics. As per the principal, a finance professional shall not disclose his or hr clients personal information to someone other, for his or her own personal benefit. This concept directly relates to general morality as one should not use others confidential and resources for personal gain.

Although this code prohibits disclose but in case, the professional gets to know something illegal happening, then he or she is obliged to disclose that data to concerned authorities.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is a expansionary fiscal policy designed to stimulate the economy through increased government spending and tax cuts.

The ARRA was enacted in response to the Great Recession of 2008-2009, which caused a significant downturn in the economy and led to high levels of unemployment and low levels of economic growth. The ARRA provided funding for infrastructure projects, such as road and bridge repairs, as well as funding for education and healthcare. Additionally, the ARRA included tax cuts for individuals and businesses, which were designed to increase consumer spending and investment.


Overall, the ARRA was a significant expansionary fiscal policy that played a key role in stimulating the economy and helping to mitigate the impact of the Great Recession. While the effectiveness of the ARRA remains a topic of debate among economists, it is clear that the policy helped to prevent a much more severe economic downturn and provided critical support to millions of Americans during a difficult time.

Know more about ARRA  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1339831

#SPJ11

When it comes to discussing causation and correlation, one of the biggest problems is that people often confuse the two concepts. A correlation exists between two variables if they are related in some way. For instance, research has found that there is a positive correlation between income and education level; that is, people with higher levels of education tend to have higher incomes. On the other hand, causation refers to the relationship between two variables in which one variable causes the other.

One specific example of correlation related to criminal justice is the relationship between race and crime. Studies have shown that there is a correlation between race and crime, with some racial groups being more likely to be involved in criminal activity than others. However, this correlation does not necessarily mean that race causes crime. There are many other factors that could contribute to this relationship, such as poverty, social disadvantage, and discrimination.

An article from The Guardian, "The science of why police officers shoot young black men," discusses some of the possible factors that contribute to this relationship. While the article does not claim that race causes crime, it does explore some of the possible reasons why black men are more likely to be shot by police officers than white men.

Overall, the article is well-written and accurate in its portrayal of the relationship between race and crime, as well as the possible reasons why black men are more likely to be shot by police officers. However, it is important to note that correlation does not equal causation, and more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between race and crime.

Another example of causation in criminal justice is the relationship between drug use and crime. Research has consistently shown that there is a causal relationship between drug use and crime. Drug use can lead to criminal activity in a number of ways, such as drug-related violence, drug trafficking, and property crimes. An article from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, "Drugs and Crime," discusses the causal relationship between drug use and crime in detail. The article provides a clear and concise explanation of the ways in which drug use can lead to criminal activity, as well as the impact of drug use on the criminal justice system. The source accurately conveys the findings and the type of relationship. The article provides multiple examples and references to research that support the causal relationship between drug use and crime.

To know more about causation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31543685

#SPJ11

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The options available are:

a) Must file annual and quarterly financial reports

b) Requirement to file depends on the company’s assets and shareholder base.

c) Not required to report information to the SEC.

d) Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.

Answer:

d) Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.

Explanation:

It is expected that firms or companies who regularly trades in securities on a national exchange is required by law under the United States security and exchange commission to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports using form 10-K and form 10-Q made available by the security and exchange commission.

This is done by the filling the Form 10-K for yearly reports while Form 10-Q for their quarterly reports, and report the business advancement, for example, budgetary exchange, mergers, procurement and so forth to them consistently

Hence, Fancorp is required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.

Answer:

1) They need to be at least 23 yet under 37

2) A four year minimum degree from an american college/university

3) valid driver’s license

4) must be a US citizen

5) must have completed at least two years of professional work experience, or one year for those that hold a master’s or higher degree.

6) must comply with the FBI Drug Policy and meet the physical fitness standards described below.

7) must be able to be cleared for Top Secret SCI (Secure Compartmentalized Information).

Answer:

A bachelors degree

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In 1648, what was the role of the four fire wardens in New York?

O walk the streets at night

O inspect chimneys for flammable spark deposits

O carry wooden rattles to notify citizens volunteers of a fire starting

make sure there were buckets of water on every front stoop

Answer:

B.  inspect chimneys for flammable spark deposits

Explanation:

Congress determines campaign finance laws for federal elected positions. And the Federal Election Campaign Act determines campaign finance laws for state and local elected positions.

Campaign contributions made to candidates for federal office are subject to restrictions that Congress has passed in an effort to prevent corruption in the political process. By establishing caps, limiting the sources from which contributions can be made, and requiring transparency, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) restricts contributions in three main ways. The main federal legislation in the United States governing political campaign spending and fundraising is the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. The law's original goals were to impose disclosure standards for federal political campaigns, set expenditure caps on political advertising, and strengthen the criminal code's existing sanctions for violating election laws. President Richard Nixon ratified the Act on February 7, 1972. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) was established and further campaign finance laws were added to the statute in 1974. In response to the Buckley v. Valeo ruling, the act was amended once more in 1976 to remove the FEC's organizational structure and the spending caps on political campaigns, and once more in 1979 to permit parties to spend as much hard cash as they want on initiatives like boosting voter turnout and registration. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) decided that political parties might use unrestricted or "soft" funds for non-federal administrative and party-building activities in 1979. Later, this money was put to use for issue-based candidate advertisements, which sharply increased the amount of soft money contributions and expenditures during elections. As a result, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (abbreviated as "BCRA") was passed and went into effect on January 1, 2003, outlawing the use of soft money by political parties.

Learn more about Federal Election Campaign Act here

https://brainly.com/question/14940526

#SPJ4

Answer:whats the question

Explanation:

Answer:

A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).

In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.

Explanation:

A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).

In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.

Answer:

that's a iffy question

Explanation:

there is so many views on it its like it won't cause you can look at someone and say oh he's bad oh he's good without even knowing then like there are people staring at you looking at your every move even though you have done nothing now I'm not saying it will ever end cause it can if everyone had the same perspective on thing shut we don't so thats what makes it hard

Answer:

false

Explanation:

because a six pack is six extract arrange in two rows of three

When liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as strict liability.

The term strict liability refers to liability that is determined without regard to guilt mind. A person can be held legally accountable for losses or harms brought on by their actions, regardless of what they intended or felt at the time. This legal principle is known as strict liability.

It is not necessary to demonstrate the defendant's negligence or malicious intent when there is strict liability. The focus should be on the act itself and whether it was harmful. Strict liability is frequently used in situations involving inherently risky activities, such as managing wild animals, producing hazardous materials, or engaging in risky activities.

Learn more about strict liability at:

brainly.com/question/32157948

#SPJ4

Answer:

(Might not be right) B. medical directive

Explanation:

An advance healthcare directive, also known as living will, personal directive, advance directive, medical directive or advance decision, is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Determine whether the following scenarios are a violation of or are in compliance  with the United States Constitution and label them accordingly, being sure to include  the constitutional amendment related to the situation.

Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence.

Answer: In compliance  with the United States Constitution. Sixth Amendment.

Explanation:

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures the rights of criminal offenders. One of those rights is to "have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor," which is what Tyrell has done in this scenario.

Other guaranteed rights are having a public trial, a lawyer, an impartial jury, and the knowledge about the accusers, the charges, and the evidence.

The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.

What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.

It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.

Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110

#SPJ11

Law and morality are two normative systems that control and regulate behaviors in a human community so as to allow harmonious and effective intersubjectivity between individuals who recognize one another as bearers of rights. The values of any society are its own law. One of the purpoess of law is to provide a list of "norms" which constitute obligatory rules of behavior for the members of the society. These legal norms are closely related to various social values, being either a direct expression of them or serving them in a more indirect way.

Answer:

values of any society is its law. By its very nature, law consists of a number of norms which constitute obligatory rules of behavior for the members of the society. These legal norms are closely related to various social values, being either a direct expression of them or serving them in a more indirect way.

Explanation: there really is no explanation in this answer

The federal initiative that is designed to encourage organizations to address how critical operations will continue under a broad range of negative circumstances is:

D. COOP (Continuity of Operations).

COOP stands for Continuity of Operations. COOP is a federal initiative that aims to ensure that organizations can maintain essential functions and continue operations during and after various disruptive events, such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or other emergencies.

The purpose of COOP is to minimize downtime, mitigate risks, and enable organizations to quickly recover and resume critical operations in adverse conditions. It involves developing comprehensive plans, strategies, and procedures to address potential threats and disruptions, including backup systems, alternate work locations, and communication protocols.

Learn more about federal initiatives: https://brainly.com/question/28301283

#SPJ11

True, focused deterrence is a strategy used in law enforcement to reduce crime, particularly violent crime.

The strategy involves identifying the most violent or repeat offenders in a particular community, and then bringing them together for a "call-in" meeting.

At the meeting, the offenders are confronted with the consequences of their actions and given a clear message that further violence will not be tolerated. This message is reinforced by the presence of law enforcement, community leaders, and social service providers.

The focused deterrence strategy is based on the idea that most violent crimes are committed by a small number of people, and that by targeting these individuals with a combination of law enforcement and community-based interventions, it is possible to reduce the overall level of violence in a community.

Learn more about focused deterrence here: https://brainly.com/question/13966266

#SPJ1

Answer:

Because she was there to greet immigrants when they entered the country from New York.

Explanation: