In Ohio and all of the United States, a criminal charge must first be based on a violation of criminal law.
Criminal charges are brought against individuals who have allegedly committed a crime, which is defined as an act or omission that violates a criminal law. In the United States, criminal law is defined by state and federal statutes and codes that establish what actions are considered criminal and what the penalties are for those actions.
Before someone can be charged with a crime, the government must have evidence to support the allegation that a crime has been committed.
The evidence is typically gathered by law enforcement officers, who then present it to a prosecutor. The prosecutor reviews the evidence and determines whether there is enough to support a criminal charge.
If the prosecutor determines that there is enough evidence to support a charge, they will file a criminal complaint or information with the court. The defendant is then notified of the charges and the legal process begins.
In summary, criminal charges are based on violations of criminal law and must be supported by evidence before they can be brought against an individual.
For more questions like Government click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ11
What is the name of the legal principle that "ensures that the judicial system is the same for every defendant?"
Answer:
Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.
Explanation:
3. How does state sovereignty limit attempt to create formal global governance organizations?
Answer:
State sovereignty refers to the idea that each state has supreme authority within its own borders and is free from external interference. This can limit attempts to create formal global governance organizations in several ways.
Firstly, states may be reluctant to cede their sovereign powers to a global governing body. This is particularly true for powerful states that may feel they have more to lose than gain from such an arrangement.
Secondly, formal global governance organizations may struggle to gain legitimacy if they are seen as undermining state sovereignty. This can lead to resistance from both state actors and the general public.
Thirdly, the diversity of states in terms of their political, economic, and cultural systems can also pose a challenge to the creation of global governance organizations. Finding consensus on issues such as human rights, trade, and environmental protection can be difficult when states have fundamentally different approaches to these issues.
In summary, state sovereignty poses significant challenges to efforts to create formal global governance organizations. These challenges are rooted in the reluctance of states to cede their authority, questions of legitimacy, and the diversity of states' political, economic, and cultural systems.
Questions for Analysis What did the court of appeals do with the trial court’s interpretation of the contract between Norcold and Gateway? Explain. Has the court of appeals in this case used textualism or pragmatism in its interpretation of the phrase the "basis of the bargain"? Explain. Does the warranty included in the contract between Norcold and Gateway have to be "relied upon" to be included in the agreement? Explain. Why does the court return to the comments section of the UCC to determine what warranties must be relied upon? Explain. Is the tap tee refrigerator unit developed by Gateway "unsafe" or "dangerous"? Explain. Did Gateway fulfill its "duty to warn" in relation to Norcold? Did Gateway fulfill its "duty to warn" in relation to the customers of Norcold who were sold a defective piece of equipment? Explain. A complex adaptive system is a network of interacting conditions that reinforce one another, while at the same time adjusting to change from agents outside and inside the system. In what way does the case of Norcold, Inc., v. Gateway Supply Company reinforce the idea that the law works like a complex adaptive system? Explain.
In the case of Norcold, Inc., v. Gateway Supply Company, the court of appeals disagreed with the trial court's interpretation of the contract between Norcold and Gateway. They ruled that the trial court's interpretation was incorrect.
The court of appeals in this case used textualism in its interpretation of the phrase "basis of the bargain." Textualism is an approach to interpreting the law that focuses on the plain meaning of the text.
The warranty included in the contract between Norcold and Gateway does not necessarily have to be "relied upon" to be included in the agreement. The court determined that the warranty was an integral part of the contract regardless of whether it was actually relied upon.
The court returned to the comments section of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to determine what warranties must be relied upon because the UCC provides guidance on the interpretation of contracts related to the sale of goods.
Whether the tap tee refrigerator unit developed by Gateway is "unsafe" or "dangerous" is not explicitly stated in the given information and would require further analysis of the case.
Regarding Gateway's duty to warn, the court found that Gateway did fulfill its duty to warn both Norcold and the customers who were sold a defective piece of equipment.
The case of Norcold, Inc., v. Gateway Supply Company reinforces the idea that the law works like a complex adaptive system because it involves the interaction of various legal principles and interpretations that adapt to changing circumstances and outside influences.
To know more about Trial Courts Interpretation visit:
brainly.com/question/33984826
#SPJ11
Setting events happen immediately before a behavior occurs
The idea that setting events happen immediately before a behavior occurs is not entirely accurate. In behavior analysis, a "setting event" is an environmental condition that alters the value of a particular consequence and makes it more or less reinforcing.
How to explain the informationSetting events can be either "setting conditions" or "motivating operations." Setting conditions refer to environmental factors that affect behavior by changing the value of a specific consequence at that moment. For example, if someone is hungry, food becomes more valuable to them and they are more likely to engage in behaviors that will result in obtaining food.
Motivating operations refer to environmental factors that affect behavior by altering the value of a particular consequence for a more extended period. For example, if someone has not slept well, their behavior might be affected in a way that makes certain consequences more or less reinforcing for a longer period.
Therefore, setting events can happen immediately before a behavior occurs, but they can also occur hours or even days before a behavior. It is essential to understand the role of setting events in behavior to develop effective interventions that target the root cause of problem behaviors.
Learn more about setting on
https://brainly.com/question/23846596
#SPJ1
According to Benson and Simpson, which is one of the three main techniques used by white-collar criminals to carry out their crimes?
a. deception
b. violence
c. threats
d. physical force
According to Benson and Simpson, deception is one of the three main techniques used by white-collar criminals to carry out their crimes. The Correct Option is A.
Deception is a technique used by white-collar criminals that involves tricking victims into providing money or personal information through fake investment opportunities, phishing scams, or other fraudulent schemes. By deceiving victims, white-collar criminals can obtain large sums of money without the need for physical force or violence.
White-collar crime is a type of crime that is typically committed by individuals in positions of power or authority. These crimes are non-violent and typically involve financial fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, or other forms of illegal activity committed for financial gain. Therefore option A is correct.
Learn more about Deception
https://brainly.com/question/30672201
#SPJ11
Which branch of the military requires their law enforcement officers to complete a Single Source Background Investigation (SSBI)?
OA. Navy
OB. Coast Guard
OC. Army
OD. Air Force
What was the primary reason the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved the Acquisition of Luxottica Group S.p.A. by Essilor International?
Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, the fundamental law the agency upholds, gives it the authority to look into and stop unfair business practises, unfair or deceptive acts or practises, and unfair methods of competition. As a result, the Agency's two main objectives are established: protecting consumers and the competition.
The first Essilor store opened its doors in Paris's Marais neighbourhood in 1849. The business was formerly called Société des Lunetiers, abbreviated to SL, and produced eyeglass frames. In order to become a preeminent lens producer in Paris, SL acquired skills in glass cutting in 1861. one of the government institutions in charge of maintaining healthy corporate competitiveness in the country and the consumer protection agency of the country.
To learn more about produced, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30698459
#SPJ4
U.S Government posters during World War II often displayed:
-slanted language
-ethnic biases
-nationalistic biases
-all of these choices are correct
2.1 Describe five factors that should be taken into consideration to select a suitable search method at the scene of a crime.
Which would be an example of a crime in most areas?
Answer:
what are the options? i don't see any. please list them
Explanation:
Which word would be used to describe the impact of a news report that causes people to
change their opinions?
Answer:
The word used to describe the impact of a news report that causes people to change their opinions is "influential."
Why should a matriculant be aiming to achieve a bachelor's pass, regardless of what they plan for 2023 ?
The reason why a matriculant has to achieve a pass in their bachelor's regardless of the plans that they have in 2023 are:
To achieve fulfillment To be able to apply for jobs.What is a Bachelors?This is the degree that students who are able to fulfill all of the university requirements are awarded at the end of their school.
The person who is awarded this degree must be able to fulfill all of the school requirements by passing all of the required courses.
Read more on bachelors here:
https://brainly.com/question/17496239
Eighty percent (80%) of all accident happen within
Answer:
A 5 mile radius
Explanation:
Answer yes it is tight 80 percent
The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure states that the primary duty of a(n) _________ ___________ is not to convict, but to see that justice is done.
The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure states that the primary duty of a prosecutor is not to convict, but to see that justice is done.
The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is a set of laws that govern the criminal justice system in Texas. It is essential to understand that the primary duty of a prosecutor is not to convict but to ensure that justice is done. Prosecutors have a significant responsibility to uphold the law and seek justice in every case. They must ensure that defendants receive a fair trial, and their rights are protected. Prosecutors must present all the evidence, whether it supports or contradicts the prosecution's case. They must not withhold any information that might be beneficial to the defendant. Prosecutors must act in the interest of justice, even if it means not securing a conviction. It is essential to recognize the importance of a prosecutor's role in the criminal justice system and the impact they have on ensuring that justice is done.
A prosecutor plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system, ensuring that the legal process is followed correctly and fairly for all parties involved. Their focus should be on promoting justice, which includes safeguarding the rights of the accused and seeking appropriate outcomes for each case. In doing so, prosecutors contribute to the overall integrity of the criminal justice system, ensuring that it operates effectively and in accordance with the principles of fairness and due process.
To know more about justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14830074
#SPJ11
Explain the difference between state laws and guidelines.
identify some of the implications of the recent expansion of marriage to gay and lesbian couples.
Expansion of marriage to gay and lesbian couples promotes equality, legal rights, social acceptance, and challenges traditional marriage norms.
The recent expansion of marriage to gay and lesbian couples has several implications. Firstly, it promotes equality by granting same-sex couples the same legal rights and privileges as heterosexual couples, such as tax benefits, inheritance rights, and healthcare decision-making.
This expansion also fosters social acceptance and reduces discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community. Furthermore, it challenges traditional norms surrounding marriage, opening up conversations about the evolving definition of family and relationships.
However, it may also face opposition from conservative groups, leading to political and social debates on the nature and purpose of marriage.
For more such questions on legal rights, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/15864068
#SPJ11
nick is a passenger in a car driven by owen, whose reckless driving causes an accident, injuring himself. nick is uninjured but accompanies owen to parkside hospital in the ambulance. the ambulance is hit by a car driven by george, and nick is now injured. nick files a suit against owen, alleging negligence. the elements nick will have to prove to win are:
Duty of care: According to the law, Owen had a duty to drive the automobile with reasonable caution, which meant that he had to do so without endangering other road users. Owen drove recklessly, which is a
The driver of the vehicle that was involved in the collision that wounded Nick is Owen. He is accused of operating his vehicle carelessly, which caused the crash. Owen was hurt in the collision as a result of his activities. Nick is most likely going to sue Owen to get financial recompense for his harms and other losses.Nick's injuries and damages may be Owen's responsibility if it is shown that he was driving recklessly. This can entail covering Nick's medical bills, missed earnings, and other losses and damages. To avoid collisions and injuries, it is crucial for all drivers to drive with moderate caution.
Learn more about Owen here:
https://brainly.com/question/1656673
#SPJ4
What are the three intelligence roles of the local government?
The three intelligence roles of the local government include:
Building capacity to access information.Collecting and analyzing threat information.Disseminating decisive information to check security threats.What is an intelligence role?Intelligence refers to strategic and security information to ensure societal survival and improvement.
To play an intelligence role is to act so one can gather, evaluate, and report relevant information and data to the appropriate agencies to identify and mitigate security threats.
Thus, at the local government level, as well as the state, governmental agencies should be on alert to play their intelligence roles.
Learn more about the roles of intelligence at https://brainly.com/question/22302247
Examples of agreements that violate government statutes and are unenforceable by the courts are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributers. True False
It is a false statement that an examples of agreements that violate government statutes are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors.
What is a government statutes?This refers to the law that is enacted by a legislature which guides some states affairs such as Civil right Act etc
However, the statement that an examples of agreements that violate government statutes are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors is a false statement.
Read more about government statutes
brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ1
Contracts for the selling of alcohol by licensed distributors are not examples of agreements that violate government statutes, as stated.
What is the agreement?The term 'agreement' in legal terms refers to a promise/commitment or a series of reciprocal promises that serve as consideration for the parties to a contract.
However, the idea that contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors are examples of agreements that violate government statutes is False.
Learn more about Agreements:
https://brainly.com/question/27245732
#SPJ1
Most of the people in the line of presidential succession serve in which body?
The House of Representatives
The Cabinent
(gradpoint)
Answer:
The Cabinent
Explanation:
Only a couple are not in the President's Cabinet
why am i going to prison i am only 17 years old i got 20 years
A 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes.
What is a heinous crime?A heinous crime is a misconduct that involves some form of personal injury or death committed by a minor who has passed the age of discretion.
Some of the most prominent crimes that attract a long sentence in jail include:
M.rderForcible r.peS.xual assaultR.bberyFirst-degree ars.n.Thus, a 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes, especially when it results in serious injury or death.
Learn more about serious crimes at https://brainly.com/question/25973385
if you refuse to submit to a breathalyzer or blood test for the amount of alcohol in your system, in cannot be introduced in court.
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
24.
Most police academies strive to blend training with education.
25.
Generally, basic preservice training is academy-based training that introduces recruits
to police work, provides an overview of the justice system, and includes classes on
specific skills and knowledge areas related to police work.
In addition to the traditional skill-based subjects (e.g., firearms, defensive tactics) and
concepts (e.g., criminal law) taught in basic pre-service training, recruits should be
required to master subjects related to
26.
27.
Obedience-oriented, military-style, stress recruit training programs
28.
Stress-related training in police academies, where it exists, should
29.
The Field training officer (FTO) is a knowledgeable, seasoned, and competent officer
trained in adult education and evaluation procedures, who supervises recruits' on-the-job
(field) training
Answer:
29 the field training officer fto
Choose which law enforcement official typically performs the service of overseeing the behavior
and improvement of the offender.
What’s the answer?
Answer:
Probation officer
Explanation:
One of the duties of a 9-1-1 dispatcher is to pass information to first responders and dispatch them to the scene of the emergency. Is the previous statement true or false
True, One of the duties of a 9-1-1 dispatcher is to pass information to first responders and dispatch them to the scene of the emergency.
911 dispatchers are often the unsung heroes of emergency response teams.
Collecting critical information from callers and dispatching appropriate first responders to the scene, these professionals must be able to manage chaotic, heartbreaking, stressful, disorganized and hectic situations.
A 911 dispatcher's job description may vary slightly depending on the position. Affects the duties associated with the position, such as Dispatcher I, Dispatcher II, and Dispatcher III (Supervisor).
911 dispatchers are required to answer emergency and non-emergency calls for assistance and information. Must provide police, fire, emergency and related services dispatch and communications support services.
To learn more about dispatcher, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11626662
#SPJ4
ny what does the cpl require the court to order (to do) if it thinks the defendant may be an incapacitated person?
The Court must order an examination of the defendant to determine if they are an incapacitated person if they believe they may be.
An examination is an assessment of the person's physical and mental abilities and an assessment of their financial affairs. This includes but is not limited to an evaluation by a doctor and/or a social worker.
This is required by the Court Procedures and Litigants in Person (CPL) which is an Act of Parliament that governs the procedural law in civil courts in England and Wales.
The purpose of the examination is to determine the defendant’s capacity and to protect the interests of those who may be affected by the defendant’s incapacitation, such as dependants and creditors.
The examination should include medical information, a report of the defendant's assets, liabilities and financial affairs, and any other relevant information. The results of the examination should be reported to the court so that it can make an appropriate order concerning the defendant's legal capacity.
To know more about financial affairs click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11565654#
#SPJ11
Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
What is the consequence of a finding that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent in a negligence action?
Question 1 options:
A)
The plaintiff will recover 50% of his or her damages.
B)
The plaintiff's claim will be dismissed
C)
The defendant can sue the plaintiff for damages.
D)
Responsibility for the losses will be apportioned between the plaintiff and defendant.
Who would the law consider to be the 'reasonable person' for the purposes of the tort of negligence?
The consequence of a finding that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent in a negligence action is that responsibility for the losses will be apportioned between the plaintiff and the defendant.
This means that the plaintiff will still be able to recover damages, but the amount will be reduced to account for their own negligence.To understand this concept better, let's consider an example. Imagine a scenario where a pedestrian is crossing the road without using a designated crosswalk, and a car hits them. In this case, both the pedestrian and the driver may be found to have contributed to the accident. The pedestrian's contributory negligence might be due to jaywalking, while the driver may have been speeding.
Instead of completely dismissing the plaintiff's claim, the court will assign a percentage of fault to each party involved. For instance, if the court determines that the pedestrian is 30% responsible for the accident and the driver is 70% responsible, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced by 30%. So, if the damages were initially assessed at $10,000, the plaintiff would be awarded $7,000 ($10,000 - 30%).
In summary, the consequence of finding the plaintiff contributorily negligent in a negligence action is that responsibility for the losses will be shared between the plaintiff and the defendant, resulting in a reduction of the plaintiff's damages.
To know more about Plaintiff, visit : brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ11