Create
create a timeline showing major events between 1871 and 1917 that are associated with the shifting
balance of power in europe and in the world. include at least six items. label each item with a short title.
(6 points)
timeline
date
1871
event

German politician Adolf Hitler, who was born in Austria, ruled Germany as its dictator from 1933 until he committed in 1945. He became the chancellor in 1933 and the Führer und Reichskanzler in 1934 when the Nazi Party's leader grew to prominence.

The name Adolf returned to popularity in Nazi Germany after Adolf Hitler took office, particularly in the years 1933–1934 and 1937. Since the 1940s, the name has lost used as a male given name due to unfavourable connections with Hitler.

Learn more about Hitler here:

https://brainly.com/question/32438707

#SPJ1

Answer:

violated a basic civil right

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

When you choose to spend your money now instead of investing it so it's worth more in the future, you've experienced an opportunity cost.  By spending money now, you are giving up the potential future benefits that could have been gained from investing it, such as earning interest or capital gains.

Opportunity cost refers to the cost of forgoing the next best alternative when making a decision. In this case, the opportunity cost of spending money now is the potential return on investment that could have been earned if the money had been invested instead of spent.

By choosing to spend the money now, you are giving up the potential return on investment, which is the opportunity cost of your decision. It's important to consider opportunity costs when making financial decisions to ensure that you're making the best use of your resources.

To know more about Opportunity cost:

https://brainly.com/question/13036997

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

6. Organelles

7. Cell wall

8. Cell membrane

9. Nucleus

10. Cytoplasm

11. Mitochondria

12. Endoplasmic reticulum

13. Ribosomes

14. Endoplasmic reticulum

15. Chloroplasts

16. Vacuole

17. Lysosomes

I got endoplasmic twice, but all the other ones should be correct.

Answer:

the Iroquois Confederacy and the Huron

Source:

Answer:

The people learned how to plant there own food so they didn't have kill animals, or follow there herds so they could stay one spot rather then moving around all the time, Hope I helped :]

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is:

People learned how to plant their own seeds to produce food. They no longer had to follow animal herds and were able to settle in one spot for an extended period of time.

Hope that helps :)

Explanation:

Answer:

In haciendas, the workers were not classified as slaves, yet their employment would certainly be called 'forced labor' in today's terms. Along with land grants, patrons would be allotted a certain number of 'natives', who would learn Spanish and be converted to Catholicism in return for their labor on the land.

hope this helps!

Answer:

The Trans-Alantic Stlave trade increase was a result of the global (mainly European) demand for sugar. That meant more slaves were shipped from Africa across the Alantic to work in sugar plantations.

Answer:

Some believe that government should have a limited role in business, allowing for free market competition and minimal regulation. Others argue that government intervention is necessary to protect consumers and ensure fair practices.

Explanation:

One general statement that can be made about the role of government in business is that it should strike a balance between promoting economic growth and protecting the public interest. This means creating an environment where businesses can thrive while also preventing monopolies, ensuring workplace safety, and protecting consumers from fraud.

Additionally, government policies should aim to promote social responsibility among businesses. This includes encouraging environmentally sustainable practices, promoting diversity and inclusion in hiring practices, and supporting ethical labor standards.

Ultimately, the best approach to the role of government in business will depend on various factors such as industry-specific regulations and societal values. However, finding a balance between economic growth and public interest remains crucial for a thriving economy.

No. The Ancient Roman economy was actually based on the private land ownership and the slavery. It was nothing like any form of the socialism.

The economy of the Ancient  Roman Empire was to be predominantly agrarian: the Roman landowners, the agricultural laborers, and also the small tenant the farmers were they highly dependent upon one of the another for assuring stability. Agriculture was the basis of there economy. There were mostly little of the farmers but also the wealthy landowners that was employed so many peasants and the slaves to work on their huge lands. The main crops were, that logically, the Mediterranean triad of the wheat, grapes and the olives.

To know more about Ancient  Roman visit:

https://brainly.com/question/765845

#SPJ1

An account, historical, political, and statistical of the United Provinces of Rio de la Plata refers to a comprehensive record detailing the historical, political, and statistical aspects of the region known as the United Provinces of Rio de la Plata.

The United Provinces of Rio de la Plata was a historical entity that encompassed present-day Argentina, Uruguay, and parts of Bolivia and Paraguay during the early 19th century. An account, historical, political, and statistical of this region would provide a detailed narrative of its history, including events such as the Argentine War of Independence and the formation of the United Provinces.

It would also cover the political structure, governance, and institutions of the United Provinces, shedding light on the formation of its government and the dynamics of power within the region. Additionally, such an account would present statistical data related to population, economy, resources, and other relevant factors that influenced the development of the United Provinces of Rio de la Plata.

To learn more about Provinces click here:

brainly.com/question/28700550

#SPJ11

Truman's assumption that the United States would maintain its containment policy through a monopoly on nuclear weapons was undercut by the Soviet Union matching the United States' development of atomic and hydrogen bombs.

Truman's assumption that the United States could maintain its containment policy through a monopoly on nuclear weapons was based on the belief that the United States would possess superior nuclear capabilities compared to other nations, including the Soviet Union. However, this assumption was undercut by the Soviet Union's successful development of its own atomic and hydrogen bombs. The Soviet Union's ability to match the United States' nuclear capabilities created a state of nuclear parity between the two superpowers, known as "mutually assured destruction." This meant that both the United States and the Soviet Union had the capability to inflict catastrophic damage on each other in the event of a nuclear conflict. The Soviet Union's acquisition of nuclear weapons challenged the United States' belief that it could maintain a dominant position in nuclear deterrence and significantly altered the strategic balance between the two countries. This development heightened tensions during the Cold War and forced the United States to reevaluate its containment strategy.

Learn more about containment policy at:

https://brainly.com/question/30629447

#SPJ11

The complete question is:

Truman's assumption that the United States would maintain its containment policy through a monopoly on nuclear weapons was undercut by __________.
a. The Soviet matching each atomic and hydrogen bomb development.

b. Checking the nuclear development of each country

Answer:

Akbar (reigned 1556–1605) was born Jalal-ud-din Muhammad in the Rajput Umarkot Fort, to Humayun and his wife Hamida Banu Begum, a Persian princess. Akbar succeeded to the throne under a regent, Bairam Khan, who helped consolidate the Mughal Empire in India.

In order to get the proper information about the incident and the surroundings of the scenario so they are able to get precise information about the happenings.

Knowing that the people who developed materials may have had thoughts and beliefs that varied greatly from what we now consider "normal" is known as historical context.

Understanding historical context enables us to practice historical empathy, which is the ability to comprehend historical sentiments without passing judgment on them.

For instance:

Romans in antiquity might use exceedingly disparaging language regarding slaves while writing letters. Knowing the historical setting enables us to understand that slavery was common at the time and that other Romans did not view the statements as being "bad." Because of this, even while we do not support slavery today, understanding the context enables us to understand the main source's point of view.

Knowing the significant historical events that occurred at the time the source was created is another aspect of the historical context. People frequently were inspired to produce sources in a particular way by unique circumstances. Because of a recent incident, the creator might have expressly addressed certain persons or events, or utilized specific terminology.

Therefore, historical content of when was document made is extremely important as it helps the historians to verify the information, infer more about the incidents and help them prepare proper research-driven material.

For more information on historical content, refer to the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/17301943

#SPJ4

Answer:

The United States played a major role in fighting in Europe during World War 2 as one of the leading Allied powers.

American forces played a significant role in the North African campaign, the invasion of Sicily, and the landing in Italy. US troops also played a key role in the D-Day invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944 and the subsequent liberation of France. American troops also participated in the Battle of the Bulge, the last major German offensive on the Western Front, and the eventual defeat of Germany in May 1945.

Explanation:

John F. Kennedy was able to carry Texas and win the presidency in 1960 due to a combination of strategic campaigning, his appeal to certain demographics, and the influence of his running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson.

In the 1960 presidential election, Texas played a significant role in Kennedy's victory. Kennedy and his campaign team recognized the importance of winning the state and strategically focused their efforts on appealing to Texas voters. Kennedy's running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson, a native Texan and well-known figure in the state, played a crucial role in mobilizing support and securing votes.

Additionally, Kennedy's campaign made significant efforts to connect with various demographics in Texas. He targeted urban areas, where he had strong support among African American voters and young people. Kennedy also appealed to the growing Hispanic population in Texas, recognizing their influence and addressing their concerns. By focusing on key issues such as civil rights, economic growth, and national security, Kennedy was able to resonate with a broad range of Texas voters.

Furthermore, Kennedy's charisma, youthful energy, and effective use of media, particularly televised debates, helped him gain popularity and sway undecided voters in Texas and across the country. His performance in the debates, along with his overall campaign strategy, positioned him as a fresh and dynamic alternative to his opponent, Richard Nixon.

In conclusion, Kennedy's ability to carry Texas and win the presidency in 1960 can be attributed to strategic campaigning, the influence of his running mate, and his appeal to diverse voter demographics in the state.

Learn more about John F. Kennedy.

brainly.com/question/1577421

#SPJ11

D) The state of Massachusetts ordered farmers to pay their debts or face jail time.

Answer:

xttisdtidtiddiyouyoddiydd55dgkxf6d8ddyf6if68couf68fcco696do6dylco7f69d

Answer:

Whites and blacks could not eat at the same restaurants.

Explanation:

The aparthied encouraged segregation between black and white people.

Answer:

Prohibited discrimination in public accommodations and federally funded programs.

Explanation:

The Act prohibited discrimination in public accommodations and federally funded programs. It also strengthened the enforcement of voting rights and the desegregation of schools. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the nation's benchmark civil rights legislation, and it continues to resonate in America.

Answer:

the answer would most likely be B

Explanation:

the reason it would be B is because the enlightenment was a widespread form of political views looking more and democracy then monarchy which lead many countries to replace religious leaders with a form of democracy.

Cárdenas' decision to nationalize the oil industry had significant political and economic implications for Mexico. It helped to establish a strong national identity, strengthened the government's control over the economy, and provided the country with the financial resources it needed to develop and modernize. Today, the state-owned oil company, PEMEX, continues to play a vital role in Mexico's economy, providing jobs and revenue for the country.

The main reason President Lázaro Cárdenas decided to nationalize the oil industry in Mexico was to gain control over the country's most significant natural resource. In 1938, after the oil companies failed to comply with Cárdenas' demands for better labor rights and worker conditions, he ordered the nationalization of the oil industry, which had been controlled by foreign companies for decades.

By nationalizing the oil industry, Cárdenas was able to ensure that the oil profits would benefit the Mexican people, rather than foreign companies. The government could use the oil profits to fund social programs, build infrastructure, and invest in the economy.

Furthermore, nationalization was seen as an act of sovereignty and a way of asserting Mexico's independence from foreign powers. At the time, Mexico was still recovering from years of economic exploitation by foreign companies, and nationalizing the oil industry was seen as a way to reclaim control over the country's resources.

For more such questions on Mexico's economy, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28839253

#SPJ8