Values and Laws
Directions: For each of the following laws, indicate whether moral, economic, political,
or social values are involved. Explain your responses.
A. All drivers must stop at stop signs

Answer: Starting a new business.

         Buying an existing business.

                  Buying a franchise.

        Taking over a family business.

Explanation: you could just look it up and read about it !! :) <3

A criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf (2005)

If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

The benefits of plea bargains are:

The drawbacks of plea bargains.

In the case,"

The  court was said to have concluded that Stumpf  is one that has pleaded guilty to aggravated murder without knowing  that particular intent to cause death.

Hence, If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf  ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

Learn more about plea bargaining from

https://brainly.com/question/19557127

#SPJ1

Answer: B.

Explanation:

Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.

Answer:

USAjobs.gov is the best online job board to use for federal job searches

Answer:

Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.

Answer:

The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.

Answer:

After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."

Introduction

In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6

This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.

I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.

Explanation:

Judicial processes can vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system, but in general, they include the following stages: Pretrial,Trial,Verdict,Sentencing,Appeals,Post-appeal

1. Pretrial: This is the stage before a trial begins and includes activities such as investigation, arrest, booking, and bail hearings. During this stage, the prosecution and defense gather evidence and build their cases.

2. Trial: This is the stage where the case is presented to a judge or jury. Witnesses are called, evidence is presented, and arguments are made by the prosecution and defense.

3. Verdict: Once the trial is over, the judge or jury delivers a verdict of guilty or not guilty. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge will typically schedule a sentencing hearing.

4. Sentencing: During this stage, the judge determines the appropriate punishment for the defendant based on the severity of the crime and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

5. Appeals: If the defendant is found guilty, they may have the right to appeal the verdict to a higher court. The appeals court will review the case to determine if any legal errors were made during the trial that may have affected the outcome.

6. Post-appeal: If the defendant is unsuccessful in their appeal, they may have limited options to challenge the ruling, such as filing a habeas corpus petition or seeking executive clemency.

These stages of the judicial process can involve numerous legal procedures, rules, and requirements that are designed to ensure that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.

For more such questions on jurisdiction

https://brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ11

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits the sale of guns to persons under the age of 18. Thus, option A is correct.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 is a federal law in the United States that regulates the firearms industry and firearms owners. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968, in response to a series of high-profile assassinations, including that of President John F. Kennedy.

The law aims to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, minors, and other prohibited persons, establishing a system of licensing and regulation for firearms dealers. It prohibits the sale of firearms to certain categories of individuals, including convicted felons, fugitives, and those who have been committed to a mental institution.

The law also imposed restrictions on the importation and sale of firearms, and required the marking of firearms with serial numbers for tracking and tracing purposes. The Gun Control Act of 1968 has been amended several times, most notably by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, which established background checks for firearm purchasers.

Learn more about the Gun Control Act of 1968 here:

https://brainly.com/question/29311933

#SPJ2

Answer:

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof".

Explanation:

sampled from goo..gle ( better elxsplanation than mine)

After analyzing the scenario, the Division of Litigation Technology and Analysis can help her interpret the accounting records provided by the bank. Thus, option 'D' is the correct option.

The Division of Litigation Technology and Analysis oversees the technology tools used by the Bureau to conduct investigations and litigate consumer protection cases, as well as analyse and integrate emerging technologies.

It collaborates with attorneys to determine the case's demands. The Division consists of: The purpose of the digital forensic unit is to locate, gather, examine, and preserve electronically stored material for use in legal proceedings.

Learn more about the Division of Litigation Technology and Analysis, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15973694

#SPJ1

Answer:

False

Explanation:

$ stands for dollars, or money.

Answer:

it stands for money

Explanation:

I have $5.

Answer:

Self protection

mental disorder

Explanation:

Answer:

Jury service helps to support fairness in trials; jury service is able to give impartial viewpoints on cases that are presented in court. Jury service is a civic duty and an honored privilege bestowed upon ordinary citizens. We are accountable through our participation in jury service.

Explanation:

Answer: Parole is conditional freedom for a prison inmate. The prisoner (called a "parolee") gets out from behind bars, but has to live up to a series of responsibilities. A parolee who doesn't follow the rules risks going back into custody.

Explanation:

Urban violence refers to any violent or criminal behavior that occurs in urban areas, such as cities or towns. It can include gang violence, drug-related violence, robbery, assault, and homicide, among other types of violent crimes. Other names for urban violence include street crime, inner-city violence, and community violence.

Urban violence matters because it can have a significant impact on individuals, communities, and society as a whole. It can lead to physical harm, loss of life, and psychological trauma for victims and their families. It can also create a sense of fear and insecurity, which can lead to decreased economic activity, reduced property values, and a decline in quality of life. Furthermore, urban violence is often linked to larger societal issues, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education and opportunities.

When Mr. Abt says that "Urban Violence is Sticky," he means that violence tends to concentrate in certain areas and is difficult to eradicate once it becomes entrenched. This is due to a variety of factors, including the presence of criminal networks and the normalization of violence within certain communities. This concentration of violence can have a ripple effect, leading to more violence and criminal activity over time.

The law of crime concentration is a principle that states that crime is not evenly distributed throughout a city or community, but rather tends to be concentrated in specific areas or "hot spots." Researchers have found that a small percentage of locations in a city are responsible for a disproportionately high amount of crime. Understanding the law of crime concentration is important for developing effective strategies to combat urban violence, as it allows law enforcement agencies and policymakers to focus their resources on the areas that are most in need.

Research has shown that a combination of strategies is most effective in achieving results in cities. These strategies include community-based policing, targeted enforcement, and prevention and intervention programs. Community-based policing involves building relationships between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve, which can help to establish trust and improve communication.

Learn more about urban on:

https://brainly.com/question/12007420

#SPJ1

Answer: yes

Explanation: The UDHR, article 11, states: "Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense."

Answer:34+35 me all night ok thanks for the 5 brainly points

Explanation:

Answer:

you tell them personal information to make them sympathize, tell them about your family

Explanation:

Answer:

i would umm... punch him in the face etc and the place that private...

Explanation:

if your trying to ask like one on one you have to go to messages and press add new on brainly and you can pick someone to talk to

Answer:

Explanation:

1. I think its A.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

A and D would seem as a threat to the people inside the car and B is unsafe for the officer.

C allows the officer to act fast, swiftly, and more easily if there is a situation where the driver or passengers assault him/her or try to escape.

An officer should stand in an advantageous position when talking to a violator.

In conclusion, the correct option is C

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/24456517

Answer:Nigeria is a troubled federation. Its federal character has been a subject of debate since the return to democratic rule in 1999. Various groups have claimed to be marginalised and not sufficiently represented in the central offices of the national government. Some say it’s not even a federation so much as a unitary state, created by the military.

The oil-producing communities of the Niger Delta are among the groups that have militated for change. They feel neglected in development and dissatisfied with environmental degradation. Their call is for control of the wealth from resources in their region.

Some state governors who felt shortchanged by the federal structure have also called for ‘true federalism’. These states, largely from the southern part of the country, argue that the federation favours parts of the country that produced key actors in the military regimes. Even President Muhammadu Buhari has made this call.

Other groups, like the Arewa Consultative Forum (Hausa-Fulani), Afenifere (Yoruba) and Ohaneze (Igbo), also insist on federal restructuring. Some have called for a return to the regions of the 1950s, others for secession and the establishment of Biafra or Oduduwa republics.

The Conversation is a news organization dedicated to facts and evidence

Calls for federal restructuring have become a way of expressing dissatisfaction with poor economic performance and misgovernance in Nigeria. On the other hand, even elite groups, who mobilise as ethnic factions and compete for power and resources, point to the country’s poor performance as evidence that the federal structure is not working.

Misgovernance and poor economic development are visible in deplorable infrastructure, high youth unemployment, widespread poverty and conflicts. In 2018, Nigeria overtook India as the country with the highest number of poor people. Banditry, insurgency and religious extremism have multiplied.

Nigerians may agree that the federal system hinders the country’s progress. But they haven’t agreed on how to change it. No structural changes have been made since the return to democratic rule in 1999.

Explanation:

What list are you talking about?

Answer:

Lobbyist do not care about the voters. (The voter is outside, looking in through the window)

Explanation:

A lobbyist is a person who is employed by and acts for an organized interest group or corporation to try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and legislative branches.