Answer:
d) Maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is all that matters, morally speaking.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 and he died in 1804. He was a German modern philosopher who was known for some of his unique views on taste, sensation, respect, pleasure and pain. Jeremy Bentham was an English philosopher, who was born in 1748 and died in 1832.
Jeremy Bentham wrote in his utilitarian principle that, 'actions are right if they produce pleasure and avoid pain'. He believes that all actions of man are subject to and detected by pain and pleasure. Immanuel Kant agrees with him in the believe that the morality of our actions are right if they produce the feeling pleasure, when he said in the Groundwork, that "man's reason have the capacity to induce a feeling of pleasure or of delight in the fulfillment of duty"
So both philosophers agree that there are moral backing for our actions, and they are aimed at limiting the pain we suffer and maximizing pleasure.
Answer:
E
Explanation: Bentham and Kant agree on which of the following?
a) Incorrect. Kant does not believe that the only thing that is good without qualification is pleasure. Rather, Kant believes that the only thing that is good without qualification is the good will ("Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will." I. Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, First Section, Transition from the common rational knowledge of morality to the philosophical).
b) Incorrect. While Kant believes that individual rights limit what can be done in the name of maximizing aggregate happiness, Bentham does not.
c) Incorrect. While Kant believes that the good will is the only thing that is good without qualification, Bentham believes that the good is best characterized in terms of pleasure.
d) Incorrect. While Bentham believes that maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is all that matters, morally speaking, Kant does not (Kant is not a utilitarian).
e) Correct. Both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or her self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if it is in one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one should maximize everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
Among the categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment is "fighting words."
Which of the following statements is not true when it comes to regulation of fighting words?
response - correct
A
Fighting words—words or epithets that, when addressed to an ordinary citizen, are inherently likely to incite immediate physical retaliation—may be punished.
B
Fighting words statutes are often struck down for overbreadth.
C
True threats—statements meant to communicate an intent to place an individual or group in fear of bodily harm—may be punished.
D
Hate crime statutes may limit fighting words sanctions to cases in which the words seek to insult or provoke on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.
The statement that is not true when it comes to the regulation of fighting words is:
D. Hate crime statutes may limit fighting words sanctions to cases in which the words seek to insult or provoke on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.
The correct statement is that hate crime statutes may enhance penalties for crimes motivated by bias or prejudice based on race, religion, or sexual orientation, but they do not necessarily limit fighting words sanctions to those specific categories. Hate crime statutes typically focus on the motivation behind the crime, rather than the specific content of the speech itself.
To know more about true
Visit https://brainly.com/question/33522612
#SPJ11
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
in united states versus verdugo urquidez, the supreme court has held that constitutional protections do not obtain in u.s. government actions against foreign nationals on ______________.
In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, the supreme court held that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
What happened in the case of United States v Verdugo Urquidez?In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, a Mexican national was arrested and his property was searched by U.S. agents. He was then brought to the United States to face drug charges. The defendant contended that his Fourth Amendment rights of the Constitution had been breached by the search and seizure of his house in Mexico, as well as by the search of his vehicle in the United States, without a warrant.
The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution does not cover illegal searches and seizures carried out by US government officials on foreign soil and that the protections under it do not extend to foreign nationals outside the United States. As a result, the search did not breach the Fourth Amendment.
Henceforth the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v Verdugo Urquidez, that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
Learn more about U.S. constitutional protections at: https://brainly.in/question/5984704
#SPJ11
Discuss how our intention detector coupled with the power of projection can lead us to accept unreasonable ideas as valid
Our intention detector coupled with the power of projection can lead us to accept unreasonable ideas as valid because we often project our own values and beliefs onto others.
When we do this, we tend to interpret the intentions of others in a way that fits with our own beliefs and values. For example, if we have a certain expectation about how someone should behave, we might interpret their behavior as being in line with that expectation even if it isn't.
This can lead to us accepting ideas that are actually unreasonable, because we are basing our acceptance of them on our own beliefs rather than the facts. Ultimately, this can lead to us making decisions that are not in our best interests.
To know more about intention detector, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13155639
#SPJ4
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
can Nevada count those votes any slower jeez
right? like nevada please hurry up ;;
how to engage in a protest
In my opinion I would have proof and have statements to back up my opinion for the protest. I would also make sure that what I am doing is not going to leave anybody injured or hurt. This is what kind of protest I would do.
In cities, about _____ of every _____ _______ killed by motor vehicle crashes are ___________; in rural areas, the rate is about ______ of every ____.
jurisdiction means the authority to hear and rule on a certain type of case ruling or outcome of any criminal or civil court case selection of judges for the federal judicial branch petitioning of cases to the highest federal court
T/F
The statement "jurisdiction means the authority to hear and rule on a certain type of case ruling or outcome of any criminal or civil court case. It involves the selection of judges for the federal judicial branch and petitioning of cases to the highest federal court." is true.
Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a court to hear and decide cases. Different courts have jurisdiction over different types of cases, such as criminal or civil cases. In the federal judicial branch, judges are selected to serve on various levels of courts, including district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court.
These judges are responsible for interpreting and applying the law to specific cases within their jurisdiction.
When a party is dissatisfied with the outcome of a case, they may petition for their case to be reviewed by a higher federal court, such as the Supreme Court, which has the ultimate authority to hear and decide cases. Overall, jurisdiction plays a crucial role in the functioning of the judicial system.
To know more about federal court click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31037815#
#SPJ11
The Fourteenth Amendment provides that no person shall be deprived "of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The due process clause has multiple aspects. What are the aspects of due process? Choose two answers.
Equal protection due process—People must be treated the same.
Procedural due process—Any government decision to take life, liberty, or property must be made equitably.
Federal due process—The national government must treat everyone fairly.
Substantive due process—Limits what the government may do in its legislative and executive capacities.
The Fourteenth Amendment states that no one shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Due process clause consists of various aspects, two of which are:Substantive due process- This principle limits what the government can do in its legislative and executive roles.
This aspect restricts the government's power to enact legislation that impinges on a citizen's life, liberty, or property without reasonable justification. Procedural due process- This principle guarantees procedural protections before the government deprives any person of life, liberty, or property.
In this aspect, the government must adhere to a fair procedure to avoid depriving individuals of their rights. For instance, a person is accused of a crime; he or she has the right to an attorney, a fair trial, and an unbiased jury.
To know more about Substantive, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30562013#
#SPJ11
Water rights are acquired under law and identify the privilege to use the water accruing in surface or groundwater for a specified purpose in a given manner and usually within the limits of a given time period. Question 2 options: True False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Water rights are acquired under law and identify the privilege to use the water accruing in surface or groundwater for a specified purpose in a given manner and usually within the limits of a given time period.
Basically, it is a legal right accorded to owners of landed properties to have the exclusive rights and permission to use or have access to a body of water from sources such as a stream, river, groundwater etc., which are based on state and national laws.
Some examples of specific purposes a water right may cover are irrigation, drinking, bathing and other domestic use.
True or false. To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and sign ig.
To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False
When something needs to be notarized, what does it mean?A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.
What is a certificate from a notary?A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.
What is a notarized stamp?When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.
Learn more about notarizing document :
brainly.com/question/14477099
#SPJ1
Alcohol is a factor in _______ % of Florida crash costs.
Alcohol is a factor in
A. 15
B. 20
C. 30
D. 40
The correct option is C). 30. Alcohol is a factor in 30% of Florida crash costs.
What is the major factor in Florida crash?Alcohol is the major factor that contributes in 25% of Florida's crash costs.
Alcohol-related crashes in Florida cost estimated around $7.8 billion to the public in 2000, including $3.5 billion in terms of monetary costs and around $4.3 billion in terms of life losses.
However, Florida has adopted "no-fault" car insurance state, that makes insurance claim process more efficient after a car accident.
Learn more about the Florida crash here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13378093
#SPJ2
What is the minimum blood content of a controlled substance that is considered proof of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in indiana?
Answer:
I believe it is 0.08
Explanation:
Do you think we should have a separate system for processing juvenile offenders?
Answer:
Since the 1970s, the juvenile justice system has sought to place juveniles in separate facilities to shield them from the criminogenic influences (those tending to produce crime or criminals) of older, adult offenders. Removing children from jails is an ongoing reform initiative. The primary goals of the juvenile justice system, in addition to maintaining public safety, are skill development, habilitation, rehabilitation, addressing treatment needs, and successful reintegration of youth into the community. Learn more about the juvenile justice process.
Why does the U.S. Supreme Court continue to debate states' rights? Because the Constitution can be amended. States' rights are not mentioned in the Preamble. States' rights are not enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Because the Constitution allows judicial review.
The reason why the supreme court continues to debate the states rights is because States' rights are not enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
What is the bill of rights?This is the term that is used to refer to the first ten rights that are contained in the constitution of the United States. These are the rights of the citizens of the United States mostly especially when it has to do with the government that is in power so that their rights are not taken away ever by the government.
Hence we would say that The reason why the supreme court continues to debate the states rights is because States' rights are not enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
Read more on Bill of rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
In summary, how does lobbying work? (This should be a long answer.)
Answer:
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.
Explanation:
What is the prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime? Can a corpus delicti be proven by a confession or admission of a defendant? Explain your response.
Answer:
The prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime is to provide sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.
According to the EVIDENCE § 640 (11th ed. 1935), corpus delicti cannot be proven by a defendant's confession or admission. It remains the responsibility of the prosecution to provide enough evidence for the commission of a crime. It is only a defendant's voluntary confession that can be admitted as evidence. However, each judge is expected to weigh the confessional evidence.
Explanation:
Corpus delicti refers to a criminal justice principle that requires sufficient facts to be gathered as evidence to prove that a crime had been committed. This implies that corpus delicti is the body of evidence or facts and not a dead body as wrongfully construed sometimes.
John smith was born on January 1, 1965. Which customer listing is considered PII?
The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.
What constitutes PII?Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).
What is PII, and what are some examples?PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.
To know more about PII visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30023988
#SPJ1
What are 3 requirements to become a naturalized citizen?
Answer:
The five requirements for becoming a naturalized U.S. Citizen:
- A basic knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of United States history and government.
- Continuous residence in the United States for at least five years.
- The ability to read, write, and speak ordinary English.
- Applicants should be at least 18 years of age at the time of filing. Certain exceptions exist, however, for the children of other permanent residents who are seeking naturalization.
- An affinity for the principles of the United States Constitution.
Which of the following is true in regards to alcohol abuse?
A. It is the result of just one bad experience.
B. It happens by accident
C. It involves intentional overuse.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i took it it should be right
It involves intentional overuse is true in regard to alcohol abuse. Hence, option C is correct.
What is alcohol abuse?Alcohol abuse can be both psychological and physical.It is primarily caused by excessive alcohol consumption on a regular basis, which becomes the person's habit of consuming alcohol on a regular basis and becoming abusive to the other person.
Secondary alcohols are produced when alcohols interact with other atoms. These secondary alcohols include methanol, isopropanol, and ethanol, the three forms of alcohol that people regularly consume.
drinking more frequently or for a longer period of time than expected. persistent desire to reduce or control drinking, or one or more failed attempts to accomplish so. Significant social, professional, or recreational activities curtailed or discontinued as a result of drinking.
Thus, option C, intentional overuse, is correct.
For more information about alcohol abuse, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2526379
#SPJ2
What parties actually take part in a criminal act
Answer: principles, accomplices, and accessories
Explanation:
The parties who actually take part in a criminal act are classified into two as follows:
PrincipalAccessoriesWhat is a crime party?The principal can be classified into:
Primary principalSecondary principal.A primary principal engages in a criminal act that causes offense to another individual. On the other hand, the secondary principal is a witness and supports the crime.
Accessories do not participate in the crime but help the principal. Accessories may be classified into:
Accessories before the factAccessories after the fact.Thus, the parties who actually take part in a criminal act are classified into Principal and Accessories.
Learn more about parties to a criminal act at https://brainly.com/question/6203610
Question 2
State e general principles of succession in terms of onginal comary law. (10) Question 3
Evaluate the following statemen's
1.According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, the recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.
2.When the Constitution of South Africa of 1996 became effective courts of Traditional leaders were discontinued. (5)
3.In terms of African customary law, a child is not criminally liable (5)
From the question given we evaluated statements concerning the recognition of traditional communities in South Africa, the discontinuation of courts of Traditional leaders, and the criminal liability of children under African customary law.
According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, what is recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.1. The statement is correct. Section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 provides that traditional communities must meet certain criteria to be recognized by the state. The Act specifies that traditional communities must have a distinct cultural identity, a traditional leader, and a system of governance that is recognized by the community members.
2. The statement is incorrect. The Constitution ofb recognizes traditional leadership and courts, and provides for their continued existence. Traditional leaders have a role to play in the administration of justice, and the Constitution recognizes their jurisdiction in certain areas.
3. The statement is incorrect. In terms of African customary law, a child can be held criminally liable for their actions. However, the age of criminal responsibility varies between different African countries and cultures. In South Africa, for example, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally liable, while children between the ages of 10 and 14 are presumed to lack criminal capacity unless it can be proved that they knew the wrongfulness of their actions.
Learn more on traditional governance here;
https://brainly.com/question/30374769
#SPJ1
president boyd k. packer compared the members of the first presidency to ________ and said they need our sustaining vote because they sometimes feel ________ in their callings.
President Boyd K. Packer compared the members of the First Presidency to pilots and said they need the sustaining vote of the members because they sometimes feel turbulence in their callings.
In his teachings, President Boyd K. Packer, an influential leader in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, used the analogy of pilots to describe the members of the First Presidency, which consists of the President and two counselors.
He likened their role to that of pilots guiding a plane through turbulence. The sustaining vote refers to the practice in the LDS Church where members publicly express their support and sustain the leaders during church meetings.
President Packer emphasized that despite their divine callings, even the leaders may face challenges and difficulties, and the sustaining vote serves as a source of strength and unity within the church community.
To learn more about Boyd K. Packer click here brainly.com/question/28136089
#SPJ11
a wanton disregard by corrections personnel for the well-being of inmates is known as
A wanton disregard by corrections personnel for the well-being of inmates is known as "deliberate indifference."
It occurs when corrections officials or staff knowingly fail to take action to prevent harm to inmates, despite being aware of a substantial risk of harm.
Deliberate indifference can be demonstrated through evidence of a pattern or practice of neglect or disregard for inmate safety or through evidence of specific instances of harm caused by staff inaction or indifference.
Deliberate indifference is a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
Inmates who have suffered harm as a result of deliberate indifference may bring civil lawsuits against corrections officials or staff for damages. Additionally, the Department of Justice may investigate and bring criminal charges against corrections personnel who engage in deliberate indifference or other forms of misconduct.
Learn more about wanton disregard here:
https://brainly.com/question/15092762
#SPJ11
Is Carry a firearm a civil right or civil liberty
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
when presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so:
When presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so by providing their reasons and any background information they have.
In a bid to ensure clarity in their interpretation of the new laws, they aim to provide detailed explanations. In the United States, presidents are allowed to provide interpretations of new laws before they are implemented. They do so using signing statements. Signing statements are formal written declarations that accompany a bill signed into law. Most of the time, the president uses them to explain how they see the law or what the administration thinks about the issue is. Signing statements were mostly used by the US Supreme Court in the beginning. However, presidents have issued more signing statements than ever before in recent history. One such instance was President George W. Bush's issuance of more than 150 signing statements, which drew criticism from Congress and some legal scholars.
Learn more on laws here:
brainly.com/question/370944
#SPJ11