The court is likely to preclude the car driver from relitigating the question of whether she was negligent due to issue preclusion.
Hence, the correct option is C.
Issue preclusion, also known as collateral estoppel, is a doctrine that precludes the relitigating of an issue that has already been determined in a prior proceeding.
The issue was litigated in the prior case. The party against whom the doctrine is asserted had fair opportunity to litigate the issue.
In this scenario, the first three elements are met: the issue of whether the car driver was negligent for speeding is the same issue in both cases, it was actually litigated in the first case, and it was essential to the jury's verdict in favor of the truck driver. The fourth element is also likely met because the car driver had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first case.
Therefore, the court is likely to preclude the car driver from relitigating the question of whether she was negligent due to issue preclusion.
To know more about issue preclusion here:
https://brainly.com/question/30657846
#SPJ4
according to the national institute of corrections what percentage of probation officers (who directly supervise offenders) have been victims of a hazardous incident where their safety was endangered
The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is a federal agency that provides training and technical assistance to correctional agencies in the United States.
According to the NIC, probation officers who directly supervise offenders are at risk of experiencing "hazardous incidents" that can endanger their safety. However, the NIC does not provide a specific percentage of probation officers who have been victims of such incidents.
Probation officers may be at risk of experiencing hazardous incidents due to the nature of their work, which often involves working with individuals who have a history of criminal behavior. These individuals may be prone to violent outbursts or other dangerous behaviors, and probation officers may be required to deal with them on a regular basis.
Learn more about hazardous incidents
https://brainly.com/question/30418524
#SPJ4
Which Amendment grants someone the right to sue another person in a court of law even in the absence of a crime being committed?
a.)Fifth
b.)Sixth
c.)Seventh
d.)Eighth
Answer:
answer of this question is Fifth
Explanation:
May this answer is helpful for you
any one pls give me a gogle play gift card of 25 pls?
Answer:
k
Explanation:
Explanation:
sorry I can't. I'm broke
What is order of precedence in law?
An order of precedence in law is a sequential hierarchy which is of nominal importance and which can also be applied to individuals, groups, or organizations.
The order of precedence is considered to be a ranking of the items by a chosen attribute, which is especially through a sequential hierarchy of nominal importance of the people in royal courts and in governments.
The order of precedence which is in the event of any conflict, contradiction, or the ambiguity is said to be between the terms and conditions of this Agreement in respect of the products or services.
Hence, a diplomat is thus concerned with four orders of precedence.
To learn more about the order of precedence here:
https://brainly.com/question/28142263
#SPJ4
Finance Bank receives a check drawn on the account of Enterprise Inc., one of the
bank's customers, at 3 P.M. Friday. Dora, the presenter of the check, is not one of
the bank's customers. The bank uses deferred posting with a 2 P.M. cutoff hour. If it
decides to dishonor the check, it must do so by midnight
a. Saturday
O b. Sunday.
O c Monday
Od Tuesday
Answer:
Tuesday
Explanation:
Which of the following is not an instruction that would be given to witnesses to prepare them for trial?
If asked to give exact times or measurements, "approximate" your responses.
It is best to elaborate and give detailed answers to questions.
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand.
Always tell the truth and testify with confidence.
Answer:
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand
Explanation:
Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.
Which rehabilitation programme would you apply to mr x if he were to be incarcerated and why do you think that programme will be effective in rehabilitation
The most recently developed theory of punishment is that of rehabilitation, which holds that the goal of punishment is to provide the offender with therapy and training so that he would be able to reintegrate into society and function as a law-abiding member of the community. I would prefer this type of rehabilitation programme for Mr.x.
Why is rehabilitation better than incarceration?Addicts who are in recovery usually conduct less expensive crimes. They are also typically arrested less frequently. The cost of obtaining addiction treatment is becoming more accessible thanks to healthcare reforms. Reduced expenses for law enforcement and the courts will result from declining crime rates and fewer arrests.
To know more about rehabilitation programme visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22182314
#SPJ9
under the system, inmates were loaned to contractors who provided the prisoners with food and clothing in exchange for their labor.
Under the Lease system, inmates were loaned to contractors who provided the prisoners with food and clothing in exchange for their labor.
What does a contract labor system entail?Workforce Contracting System. a system in which the machinery and raw materials used inside the facility were supplied by private employers who purchased the inmates' work on a contractual basis.
What was the purpose of the prisoner lease system?Convict leasing, a system wherein Southern states leased inmates to for-profit railroads, mines, and sizable farms, was one way that slavery survived the Civil War. Prisoners worked under brutal, hazardous, and frequently fatal conditions for no compensation while states reaped the benefits.
To know more about Lease system, visit:
brainly.com/question/9111812
#SPJ4
Everything you Already Know About Court Cases...
Everything you Already Know About Murder Trials…
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
What is a document filed with government that outlines wages, taxes paid and reconciliation?
U.S. taxpayers utilize form 1040 to submit an annual income tax return to the government that lists wages, taxes paid, and reconciliation.
What is meant by annual income tax?An income tax is a charge levied against people or organizations (taxpayers) in relation to their earnings (commonly called taxable income). In most cases, income tax is calculated as the sum of the tax rate and the amount of taxable income. All sources of taxable income earned during a tax year must be added up in order to determine your income tax liability. The following step is to determine your adjusted gross income (AGI). Once you've done that, take your AGI and any deductions you are qualified for.Income taxes make up about 80% of all federal revenue, which is the primary source of funding for social programs like Social Security and Medicare. Payroll taxes are another important source of funding for the federal government.To learn more about annual income tax, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
The number of federal government employees has
There are 18.83 federal government employees.
The federal government is the highest authority in the United States. It is a federal republic with 50 states, a city inside a federal district, five significant autonomous territories, and several island possessions. Washington is the colloquial name for the federal government's legislative, executive, and judicial branches. According to the U.S. Constitution, these branches are each under the control of the president, the Congress, and the federal courts. Acts of Congress, such as the establishment of executive agencies and courts that are subordinate to the Supreme Court, further clarify the roles and responsibilities of these bodies.
Learn more about government from
brainly.com/question/220248
#SPJ4
the process of selecting police officers can often extend for
Answer:
Six months
Explanation:
Just took quiz
Which of the following statements bout alcohol consumption is correct
Answer:vomiting is a sign of the body getting toxic
Explanation:
Many of you may remember when Target decided to allow those who identified as a different gender to use the restroom of the gender they identified with. After this decision, Target's stock prices dropped dramatically. After reading the section on The Business Judgment Rule, please tell me in your own opinion if you think a decision that devastates a stock price like this one did is a breach of the executive officer's duty to their shareholders? Explain your answer.
Answer:well its kina,hard ro explain my thought ands opinion on this but,as in diffrent genders could be a dif but not as well
Explanation:
The business judgment rule is a legal principle that gives executives and directors of a corporation a presumption of good faith and reasonableness in their business decisions, provided that they act in the best interests of the corporation and with a reasonable amount of care and diligence.
What is the business Judgement rule principle?The business judgment rule states that if a director's actions can be proven to have been taken logically, a court will not pursue them. with good intentions. knowing they were acting in a way that was advantageous to the company.
The rule recognizes that business decisions often involve risks and uncertainties and that decision-makers should be allowed to exercise their judgment without undue interference or second-guessing.
In the case of Target's decision to allow individuals to use the restroom of the gender they identify with, it can be argued that the decision was made in the best interests of the corporation, as it reflects the company's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.
While the decision did result in a drop in stock prices, it is important to note that stock prices can be affected by a variety of factors beyond the control of the executives, such as market conditions, competition, and global events. Moreover, the long-term effects of the decision on the company's reputation and customer loyalty may offset the short-term drop in stock prices.
Learn more about the business Judgement rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/31194690
#SPJ2
credit repair organizations are now subject to federal law and disclosure requirements. True or false?
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Credit repair businesses are governed by federal law and must make certain disclosures. The Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) is a federal statute that governs credit repair businesses. It establishes certain requirements and provisions that credit repair companies must follow when providing services to clients. The legislation compels these organizations to give customers with specific disclosures, such as information about their services, fees, and consumer rights. It also forbids some misleading activities and gives consumers certain rights and remedies in the event of a breach. As a result, credit repair companies MUST follow these federal rules and disclosure standards.
Which statement alligns with the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs board of education
Answer:
Separate treatment based on race is inherently unequal.
Explanation:
The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
Disseminating false or misleading advertising is what type of violation of F.S. 475?
A. Second-degree misdemeanor
B. Second-degree felony
C. Third-degree felony
D. First-degree misdemeanor
Disseminating false or misleading advertising is a type of violation of F.S. 475 and it is a Second-degree misdemeanor. Option A.
In the state of Florida, real estate professionals must follow specific rules and regulations when advertising their services, properties, and listings. The Florida Administrative Code, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Real Estate Commission govern advertising rules and regulations. Real estate agents or professionals who violate these advertising rules or regulations may be subject to fines, penalties, or even criminal charges.
Some common advertising violations include: Disseminating false or misleading information Failing to disclose the nature of the relationship between the agent and the buyer or seller Failing to include the name of the brokerage or agent in the advertisement Using a name in the advertisement other than the one registered with the state or the brokerage name. Therefor, option A is correct.
Learn more about misdemeanor
https://brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ11
While researching the surrealist movement what important film should be included?
When researching the surrealist movement, an important film that should be included is Luis Buñuel and Salvador Dalí's "Un Chien Andalou" (1929).
Surrealism is a cultural movement that emerged in the early 1920s and was based on the philosophy of the subconscious mind. It had a significant influence on the fields of art, literature, film, and music, among others. The movement aimed to break free from rationalism and reality by exploring the imagination's irrational depths.
In the arts, surrealism utilized a range of creative approaches, including automatic drawing and writing, collage, and frottage. The movement's artists sought to express the irrational and the subconscious, often using shock and surprise as a means to jolt the viewer's emotions and consciousness.
Un Chien Andalou (An Andalusian Dog)Un Chien Andalou is a 1929 silent short film directed by Luis Buñuel and co-written with Salvador Dalí. The film is a masterpiece of surrealist filmmaking, featuring a series of nonsensical, dreamlike scenes that explore the irrational depths of the subconscious. It's an essential work of the surrealist movement and a ground-breaking film in cinema history.
The film is notorious for its shocking and bizarre images, including a man slicing open a woman's eye with a razor, a dead donkey lying in a piano, and ants crawling out of a hole in a man's hand. It's an important example of the surrealist movement's interest in the irrational and the unconscious mind.
Know more about surrealism here :
https://brainly.com/question/29465976
#SPJ11
What are the different types of probation condition violations? Select all that apply.
General
Legal
Technical
Specific
Answer: Common probation violations include: Missing appointment with a probation officer. If you are on supervised probation, you will be required to meet with your probation officer on a regular schedule set by him. If you miss an appointment, this is considered a probation violation, and your probation officer could report this to the court.
Explanation:
Water rights are acquired under law and identify the privilege to use the water accruing in surface or groundwater for a specified purpose in a given manner and usually within the limits of a given time period. Question 2 options: True False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Water rights are acquired under law and identify the privilege to use the water accruing in surface or groundwater for a specified purpose in a given manner and usually within the limits of a given time period.
Basically, it is a legal right accorded to owners of landed properties to have the exclusive rights and permission to use or have access to a body of water from sources such as a stream, river, groundwater etc., which are based on state and national laws.
Some examples of specific purposes a water right may cover are irrigation, drinking, bathing and other domestic use.
Although getting a better education is generally a good thing, it may __________.
Answer:
Although getting a better education is generally a good thing, it may be expensive
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The current model that most organizations typically use for dealing with fraud is: fraud incident, investigation, action, resolution. The last step of the fraud fighting model is follow-up.
The last stage in the current (default) model that most organizations typically use for dealing with fraud is the: resolution stage. The correct option is B.
In this stage, the organization takes necessary steps to resolve the fraud incident after conducting a thorough investigation. During the resolution process, the organization may implement corrective actions, recover any financial losses, and revise their internal controls and policies to prevent future occurrences of fraud. The resolution stage is crucial in restoring trust and maintaining the reputation of the organization.
It also emphasizes the importance of learning from the fraud incident and improving the organization's fraud prevention measures.
To know more about fraud, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30593865#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
What is the last stage in the current (default) model that most organizations typically use for dealing with fraud?
a. Fraud incident
b. Resolution
c. Investigation
d. Action
did you know firefighter uniforms can withstand up to 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit
Answer:
Wait is that true? if so thats freakin gnarly. They must be freakin hot under all that
Answer:
yes ik that and all the gear they have to wear 75 pounds
Explanation:
Discuss and explain your expectations as to how the police
as an institution are to navigate through all these
expectations. Can we (the public) have it all – safety and
perfect policing? If not, why not? If yes, how do you think it
can it be accomplished?
Answer:
Since the United States was established there was always a great importance to maintain a relationship between both the states and the nation, both politically and economically. In the late 1700's to the early 1800's, George Washington's treasurer, Alexander Hamilton, had opted for a "Bank of the United States", which was fully within Congress's authority. He was wanting the bank to circulate and print paper money and expand economic development. This was eventually signed into legislation and a national government was created. The Bank taxed both the states and the nation as a whole. The Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, did not support the national bank nor did his supporters, the Jefferson Democratic-Republicans. The bank's charter expired in 1811, and the supporters along with Jefferson wanted to block its renewal. This lead to various questions and conflicts such as "Could Congress charter a national bank?" or "Could the federal government tax the states?" The Barron vs Baltimore case ("James McCulloch, an agent for the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay a tax that Maryland had imposed on all out-of-state chartered banks") declared that the Bill of Rights could NOT restrict the powers of the state governments. After this, there was a rise of dual federalism. Dual federalism was the states and national government exercising exclusive authority in distinctly delineated spheres of jurisdiction. Then there was a rise of cooperative federalism, which was when both levels of government coordinated their actions to solve national problems, such as the Great Depression. Then came an era of new federalism which is what the nation uses today. By decentralizing policies, authority can blend between the national, state and local governments.
Explanation:
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?
-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.
-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.
-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.
Answer:
-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
Explanation:
There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.
In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?
The prayer took time away from instruction.
The prayer was considered a religious activity.
The prayer promoted one religion.
The prayer was required in the school.
The court ruled In Engel v. Vitale that prayer in schools was unconstitutional because prayer was considered a religious activity.
Despite that there is freedom of religion, the constitution does not recognized it as legal practice.
Hence, the court ruled In Engel v. Vitale that prayer in schools was unconstitutional because prayer was considered a religious activity.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about freedom of religion
brainly.com/question/81196
During the course of an audit, an auditor finds evidence that an officer has entered fraudulent transactions in the financial statements. The fraudulent transactions can be adjusted so the statements are not materially misstated. What should the auditor do?
Communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
The auditor should do to Communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
What is financial statements?The financial actions and position of a company, individual, or other entity are formally recorded in financial statements.A systematic and understandable format is used to show pertinent financial data. The business operations and financial performance of an organization are described in financial statements, which are written records. Financial statements are regularly audited by governmental entities, accountants, firms, etc. to guarantee correctness and for tax, financing, or investing purposes. For the vast majority of users, the income statement—which shows a company's capacity for making a profit—is the most crucial financial statement. A decent level of accuracy is also shown by the fact that the majority of the data on the income statement is presented in relatively current dollars.The financial condition and actions of a corporation are documented in its financial statements throughout a given time period. A company's financial health and success are shown via its financial statements. The income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement are considered to be the three fundamental financial statements.To learn more about financial statements refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29728490
#SPJ4
Giao tiếp sư phạm đạt hiệu quả, người giáo viên cần lưu ý gì
Answer:
bus what languages not able to understand jio to Baramma that he looked another jio your Venum Kan Lulu gi