1 point
The speed of light is about 3 . 10^8 meters/second. How far is a lightyear?
(How many meters does light travel in one year?)
3.1 x 10^11
6.1 x 10^13
9.5 x 10^15
4.2 x10^16

False.

An argument with premises "p ---> q" and "q ---> r" is valid only if its conclusion follows logically from the premises.

An argument with premises "p ---> q" and "q ---> r" is valid only if its conclusion follows logically from the premises.

For example, if the conclusion is "p ---> r," then the argument is valid because:

- If p ---> q and q ---> r, then by transitivity of implication, p ---> r.

However, if the conclusion is "r ---> p," then the argument is not valid because:

- If p ---> q and q ---> r, we cannot infer that r ---> p.

Therefore, the validity of an argument with premises "p ---> q" and "q ---> r" depends on the specific conclusion being drawn, and not all conclusions are valid.

Visit to know more about Premises:-

brainly.com/question/30466861

#SPJ11

At point P (2, π/4, 2), vector A in Cartesian coordinates is A = <1, 2.5, 2>.

To express vector A in Cartesian coordinates, we can use the following conversions between cylindrical and Cartesian coordinates:

x = ρ * cos(θ)

y = ρ * sin(θ)

z = z

Given vector A = cos(θ) - ρ * sin(θ) + 2 * cos(θ) * sin(θ), we can substitute the corresponding expressions for ρ, θ, and z:

x = cos(θ) * cos(θ) - ρ * sin(θ) * sin(θ) + 2 * cos(θ) * sin(θ)

y = cos(θ) * sin(θ) + ρ * cos(θ) * sin(θ) + 2 * cos(θ) * sin(θ)

z = 2

Simplifying these expressions, we get:

x = cos^2(θ) + 2 * cos(θ) * sin(θ) - ρ * sin^2(θ)

y = cos(θ) * sin(θ) + ρ * cos(θ) * sin(θ) + 2 * cos(θ) * sin(θ)

z = 2

Now, we can evaluate vector A at point P (2, π/4, 2):

x = cos^2(π/4) + 2 * cos(π/4) * sin(π/4) - 2 * sin^2(π/4)

y = cos(π/4) * sin(π/4) + 2 * cos(π/4) * sin(π/4) + 2 * cos(π/4) * sin(π/4)

z = 2

Simplifying further, we have:

x = (1/2) + 1 - (1/2) = 1

y = (1/2) + 1 + 1 = 2.5

z = 2

For more questions like Coordinates click the link below:

brainly.com/question/22261383

#SPJ11

The volume of the cheese is 14,000 cubic centimeters (cm³).

We have,

The cheese is similar to a cylinder.

So,

To calculate the volume of cheese with a given base area and height, you can use the formula:

Volume = Base Area × Height

In this case,

The base area is given as 700 cm² and the height is 20 cm.

Let's substitute these values into the formula,

Volume

= 700 cm² × 20 cm

= 14,000 cm³

Therefore,

The volume of the cheese is 14,000 cubic centimeters (cm³).

Learn more about cylinder here:

https://brainly.com/question/15891031

#SPJ1

The complete question.

What is the volume of a cheese that has a base of 700 cm2 and a height of 20 cm?

the profit-maximizing quantity is 12.5 units and the corresponding price is $3912.5.

From the given information, we have the inverse demand function:

p = 775 - 375Q

The marginal revenue function can be obtained by taking the derivative of the inverse demand function with respect to quantity (Q):

MR = d(p) / dQ = -375

The marginal cost is given as MC = 30.

To determine the profit-maximizing quantity, we equate marginal revenue to marginal cost:

MR = MC

-375 = 30

Solving for Q, we find:

Q = -375 / 30

Q = -12.5

However, since negative quantities do not make sense in this context, we disregard the negative value and take the positive quantity:

Q = 12.5

Substituting this value of Q back into the inverse demand function, we can find the corresponding price (p):

p = 775 - 375Q

p = 775 - 375(12.5)

p = 775 - 4687.5

p = -3912.5

Again, since negative prices do not make sense, we disregard the negative value and take the positive price:

p = 3912.5

To know more about function visit:

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Add the segments together to get the total length:

7. x + 1

8. d + 4

9. y + 3

Answer:

plot between 1/3 and 2/3 or 1/2.

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

3*4 is 12 and if you divide 12 by 3(the divisor) you will get 4

The dividend of the given divisor and quotient is 36.

The dividend is the number that is being divided in a division problem. In this case, we can use the formula:

Dividend = divisor × quotient

Here is the step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, if the divisor is 3 and the quotient is 12, the dividend is 36.

Learn more about Dividend here: brainly.com/question/18296505

#SPJ11

Answer:

2 congruent sides are ab=mn, be=np and ea=pm

congruent angles are a=m, b=n and p=m

3 congruent sides are qr=jl,ry=ls and yq=sj

congruent angles are q=j,r=l and y=s

4 a LM

b SU

c TS

d U

e L

f angle thing MKL or angle K

g MKL

h LMK

5 a - 11 b - 13 c - 8 d - 45 e - 32 f - 103

Step-by-step explanation:

27/8 is the smallest value of f(x, y) pursuant to the specified constraint.To tackle this problem, we must use the Lagrange multipliers technique. Starting off, let's define the Lagrangian function L(x, y):

L(x, y, λ) = f(x, y) - λg(x, y)

where f(x, y) = 3x^2 + 3y^2 and g(x, y) = x + 6y - 5.

We must employ the Lagrange multipliers method to resolve this issue. Let's define the Lagrangian function L(x, y, λ) as follows:

L(x, y, λ) = f(x, y) - λg(x, y)

where f(x, y) = 3x^2 + 3y^2 and g(x, y) = x + 6y - 5.

Taking partial derivatives of L(x, y, λ) with respect to x, y, and λ and setting them equal to zero, we get:

∂L/∂x = 6x - λ = 0

∂L/∂y = 6y - 6λ = 0

∂L/∂λ = x + 6y - 5 = 0

When we simultaneously solve these equations, we obtain:

x = 3/2

y = 1/4

λ = 9/8

To find the minimum and maximum values of f(x, y), we need to plug these values into the function f(x, y) and evaluate it:

f(3/2, 1/4) = 27/8

fmin = 27/8

Since f(x, y) is an unbounded function, there is no maximum value. Therefore, fmax = DNE.

As a result, 27/8 is the smallest value of f(x, y) pursuant to the specified constraint.

Learn more about function :

https://brainly.com/question/30331180

#SPJ4

The solution is, 13/78 reduced to its simplest form is 1/6.

Simplify simply means to make it simple. In mathematics, simply or simplification is reducing the expression/fraction/problem in a simpler form. It makes the problem easy with calculations and solving.

here, we have,

given that,  13/78

now, we know that, 13*6 = 78

i.e. 13/ 13*6

=1/6

Hence, The solution is, 13/78 reduced to its simplest form is 1/6.

To learn more on simplification click:

brainly.com/question/28996879

#SPJ2

The unconditional mean E(Y) of the autoregressive model AR(1) is 10.5.

To compute the unconditional mean E(Y) of the autoregressive model AR(1) given by 1.05 + 0.9Y + ε, we can use the property of linearity in expectation and solve for the mean value.

The model can be rewritten as:

Y = (1.05 + ε) / (1 - 0.9)

Since ε follows a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 0.01, we know that E(ε) = 0.

Using the linearity of expectation, we can compute the unconditional mean E(Y) as follows:

E(Y) = E((1.05 + ε) / (1 - 0.9))

= (1.05 + E(ε)) / (1 - 0.9)

= 1.05 / (1 - 0.9)

= 1.05 / 0.1

= 10.5

Learn more about Autoregressive model here, https://brainly.com/question/29933730

#SPJ11

The limit below is equal to 1:limx→9(√x−3)sin(√x−3)8=1.

To evaluate the limit below;limx→9(√x−3)sin(√x−3)8, we will use the product rule of limits.

Let us begin by rewriting the limit to;

limx→9(√x−3)sin(√x−3)8=limx→9(√x−3)limx→9sin(√x−3)8

Notice that the left limit above is equal to limx→9(√x−3), while the right limit is equal to limy→0sin(y)y=1.  

Therefore;

limx→9(√x−3)sin(√x−3)8=limx→9(√x−3)limy→0sin(y)y

=1

=1.

We can, therefore, conclude that the limit below is equal to 1:limx→9(√x−3)sin(√x−3)8=1.

Know more about product rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/847241

#SPJ11

Answer:

1498.17

Step-by-step explanation:

formula A = P\((1 + \frac{r}{100} )^{n}\) where r is the rate of interest compounded and n is the number of times compounded.

r = 4.5 / 12 = 0.375 since it is compounded monthly thus need to divide by 12 months

n = 9 x 12 = 108 ( 9 years in months)

A = 1000\((1 + \frac{0.375}{100})^{108}\) = 1498.167

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A = I(1+r/n)^nt

A = ?

I = $1000

r = 4.5% = 4.5/100 = 0.045

n = 12

t = 9

A = 1000(1+0.045/12)^108

A = 1000(1.00375)^108

A = $1498.17

Website A

$5 rental fee + $12registration fee

Website B

$2 rental fee + $24 registration fee

Let x represent the number of videogames you have to rent, tyou can calculate the total cost for renting videogames at each website as:

To calculate the number of videogames you have to rent for the total cost to be the same regardless the web site, you have to equal both expressions:

And now what's left is to calculate for x:

You have to rent 4 videogames in each website for the total cost to be the same.

Lucy has $7 less than Kristine and $5 more than Nina together, the three have $35. Lucy has $11.

Let's denote the amount of money that Kristine has as K, the amount of money that Lucy has as L, and the amount of money that Nina has as N.

According to the given information, we can form two equations:

Lucy has $7 less than Kristine: L = K - 7

Lucy has $5 more than Nina: L = N + 5

We also know that the three of them have a total of $35: K + L + N = 35

We can solve this system of equations to find the values of K, L, and N.

Substituting equation 1 into equation 3, we get:

K + (K - 7) + N = 35

2K - 7 + N = 35

Substituting equation 2 into the above equation, we get:

2K - 7 + (L - 5) = 35

2K + L - 12 = 35

Since Lucy has $7 less than Kristine (equation 1), we can substitute K - 7 for L in the above equation:

2K + (K - 7) - 12 = 35

3K - 19 = 35

Adding 19 to both sides:

3K = 54

Dividing both sides by 3:

K = 18

Now we can substitute the value of K into equation 1 to find L:

L = K - 7

L = 18 - 7

L = 11

Finally, we can find the value of N by substituting the values of K and L into equation 3:

K + L + N = 35

18 + 11 + N = 35

N = 35 - 18 - 11

N = 6

Therefore, Lucy has $11.

Learn more about Kristine from

https://brainly.com/question/27244350

#SPJ11

The inequality that represents the given statement is "negative one fifth is greater than or equal to negative two sevenths y " is   and the solution is y ≥ 7/10.

The statement for the inequality is given as : "negative one fifth is greater than or equal to the product of negative two sevenths and a number" .

Let the number be "y" .

Negative one fifth means = -1/5

Negative two sevenths means = -2/7 .

So, according to the question,

The inequality can be represented as

-1/5 ≥ (-2/7)×y

To solve the inequality multiplying both sides by -1

1/5 ≤ 2/7×y

So , y ≥ (1/5) × (7/2)

y ≥ 7/10 .

Therefore, the correct option is (c)

-- The given question is incomplete , the complete question is

"Write and solve the inequality that represents "negative one fifth is greater than or equal to the product of negative two sevenths and a number".

(a) negative two sevenths is less than or equal to negative one fifth y where y is less than or equal to two thirty fifths

(b) negative two sevenths is greater than or equal to negative one fifth y where y is less than or equal to negative seven tenths

(c) negative one fifth is greater than or equal to negative two sevenths y where y is greater than or equal to seven tenths

(d) negative one fifth is less than negative two sevenths y where y is less than or equal to negative two thirty fifths." --

Learn more about Inequality here

https://brainly.com/question/28863781

#SPJ4

cos^2(x) - cos^4(x)

sin^2 (x) cos^2 (x) can be written as sin^2 (x) cos^2 (x) = (1-cos^2(x)) cos^2(x)Expanding (1-cos^2(x)) cos^2(x) gives - cos^4(x) + cos^2(x)Therefore, sin^2 (x) cos^2 (x) in expanded form, with no powers, parentheses or products is cos^2(x) - cos^4(x).

Learn more about cosine

brainly.com/question/29114352

#SPJ4

Answer:

x=9 ⇒AC=24

Step-by-step explanation:

vì DE//B C⇒ΔABC  Tương ung ti tỉ lệ vớiv  ΔADE

⇒DB/AB=EC/AC

⇒AC=(EC.AB)/DB

⇒AC=24

To write the equation that represents the situatio, as y is in function of x, you multiply the rate by the number of minutes (x):

In 7.5 minutes he can type:

Answer:

from what my calculator is saying, there are no values of x that make the equation true. so no solution. unless of course someone smarter finds it if there is one I mean.

Answer:

No solution (0= -15)

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Rearrange the terms

7-3x=x-4(2+x)

-3x+7=x-4(2+x)

2. Rearrange again

-3x+7=x-4(2+x)

-3x+7=x-4x-8

3. Distribute

-3x+7=x-4(x+2)

-3x+7=x-4x-8

4. Combine like terms

-3x+7=x-4x-8

-3x+7=-3x-8

5. Subtract 7 frome both sides

-3x+7=-3x-8

-3x+7-7=-3x-8-7

6.Simplify

-3x=-3x-15

7. Add 3x to both sides NOT -3x, 3x!

-3x=-3x-15

-3x+3x=-3x-15+3x

8. Simplify

0= -15, therefore it's a no solution

The ratio of cleaning product to water for the condition is 1/5

Comparing two amounts of the same units and determining the ratio tells us how much of one quantity is in the other. Two categories can be used to categorize ratios. Part to whole ratio is one, and part to part ratio is the other.

Given it is recommended that 4 ounces of the product are diluted using 20 ounces of water.

to find the ratio of cleaning products to water

ratio = cleaning product/water

cleaning product = 4 ounce

water = 20 ounces

ratio = 4/20

4/20 is equivalent to 1/5

ratio = 1/5

Hence option A is correct.

Learn more about ratios;

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ1

Answer:

How much of it was sold at $5.60 per pound? The question cut off on that part.

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:

Plug x = 0 into the equation.

y = 2x-3

y = 2*0 - 3

y = 0 - 3

y = -3

The input x = 0 leads to the output y = -3.

The point (0,-3) is on the line. This is the y-intercept, which is where the line crosses the vertical y axis. We can say the "y-intercept is -3" as shorthand.

Between 1750 and 1900, the share of global manufacturing attributed to Europe and the US significantly increased, while the share of the Middle East, South Asia, and East Asia declined.

During the period between 1750 and 1900, Europe and the US experienced rapid industrialization and technological advancements, which led to a substantial increase in their share of global manufacturing. These regions witnessed significant growth in industries such as textiles, iron and steel, machinery, and manufacturing. The Industrial Revolution played a crucial role in driving this transformation. On the other hand, the Middle East, South Asia, and East Asia experienced a relative decline in their share of global manufacturing. Factors such as colonial rule, economic disparities, and limited access to technological advancements contributed to their slower industrialization and less significant contribution to global manufacturing during this period.

Learn more about industrialization  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28715220

#SPJ11

By using Algebraic methods It will take 5 seconds for the rock to hit the ground when dropped from a building that is 64 feet tall, given the equation y = -16t^2 + 400.

The equation is y = -16t^2 + 400, where y represents the height of the rock in feet and t represents the time in seconds.
To find out how many seconds it will take for the rock to hit the ground, we need to set the equation equal to zero because the ground is at a height of zero.
0 = -16t^2 + 400
Now, we can solve for t using  Algebraic methods.
First, we can subtract 400 from both sides of the equation:
-400 = -16t^2
Next, we can divide both sides by -16:
25 = t^2
Finally, we can take the square root of both sides:
t = ±5
Since we can't have negative time, we know that it will take 5 seconds for the rock to hit the ground.
So, to summarize, it will take 5 seconds for the rock to hit the ground when dropped from a building that is 64 feet tall, given the equation y = -16t^2 + 400.

For more questions on Algebraic methods.

https://brainly.com/question/29114368

#SPJ11

The correct simplification would be \(18x^4 - 36x^3 + 9x^2\) (option a).

To simplify the expression \(9x^2(4x - 2x^2\) - 1), we need to perform the multiplication and combine like terms.

1. Start by distributing the 9x^2 to each term inside the parentheses:

  \(9x^2 * 4x = 36x^3 9x^2 * (-2x^2) = -18x^4 9x^2 * (-1) = -9x^2\)

2. Now we can combine the terms obtained from the distribution:

\(36x^3 - 18x^4 - 9x^2\)

3. Rearranging the terms in descending order of exponents:

\(-18x^4 + 36x^3 - 9x^2\)

4. However, we can simplify this expression further by factoring out a common factor of \(-9x^2\):

\(-9x^2(2x^2 - 4x + 1)\)

5. Thus, the final simplified expression is:

\(18x^4 - 36x^3 + 9x^2\)

For more such questions on simplification, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ8

Correct option is C and the angle D and F are complementary angles.

∠D+∠E+∠F=180⁰

 ....Angle sum property

∵∠E=90⁰

⇒∠D+∠F=180⁰

−90 ⁰

⇒∠D+∠F=90⁰

To learn more about supplementary angles refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/12919120

#SPJ1

There is an 80.8% chance that the installation time for a single computer falls within the confidence interval computed in part (a).

a) To compute the 95% confidence interval for the population mean installation time, we can use the formula:

CI = x ± z* (σ/√n)

where x is the sample mean installation time, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size, and z* is the z-score associated with the desired confidence level (in this case, 95%).

Substituting the given values, we have:

CI = 42 ± 1.96 * (5/√64)

CI = 42 ± 1.225

CI = (40.775, 43.225)

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the population mean installation time is between 40.775 minutes and 43.225 minutes.

(b) If the population mean installation time is 40 minutes, the probability that a randomly selected installation time falls within the confidence interval computed in part (a) can be calculated using the standard normal distribution. We first convert the interval to z-scores:

Lower bound z-score: (40.775 - 40) / (5/√64) = 1.39

Upper bound z-score: (43.225 - 40) / (5/√64) = 4.29

Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find the probability that a z-score falls between 1.39 and 4.29. This probability is approximately 0.808.

Learn more about confidence interval at: brainly.com/question/13067956

#SPJ11

In the experiment studying the flow rate through a solenoid valve in an automobile's pollution-control system, two factors were considered: spring load and bobbin depth.

Three different levels (low, moderate, and high) were chosen for each factor. To determine the total number of observations in the resulting data set, we multiply the number of levels for each factor. Therefore, the data set consists of a total of nine observations.

In the experiment, there are three levels for each factor: low, moderate, and high. Since there are two factors, we need to multiply the number of levels for each factor to find the total number of observations.

Number of levels for spring load = 3 (low, moderate, high)

Number of levels for bobbin depth = 3 (low, moderate, high)

Total number of observations = Number of levels for spring load × Number of levels for bobbin depth

= 3 × 3

= 9

Therefore, the resulting data set consists of nine observations in total.

To learn more about multiply click here:

brainly.com/question/30875464

#SPJ11