you are dispatched emergent to an mvc involving a city bus. when you arrive on scene you see a man sitting on the sidewalk holding his ankle. while you are treating this patient, your partner tells you there is an elderly patient inside the bus with a severe bleed. you leave the patient with an ankle injury in the care of a first responder on the scene. what type of lawsuit could you be at risk for?
Answers
Related Questions
1. Explain how an agency relationship is usually created. When
can a principal be bound if the agency agreement is void?
2.How is the doctrine of vicarious lability relevant to an
agency relationship?
Answers
1. An agency relationship is typically created through either express agreement, implied agreement, or by operation of law.
2. The doctrine of vicarious liability is relevant to an agency relationship as it holds the principal responsible for the actions or omissions of the agent performed within the scope of their employment.
1. Express agreement occurs when both the principal and the agent explicitly agree to establish an agency relationship, usually through a written or oral contract. Implied agreement arises when the actions and conduct of both parties indicate an intention to create an agency relationship. Finally, an agency relationship can be created by operation of law when circumstances necessitate the appointment of an agent to protect the interests of the principal. If the agency agreement is void, meaning it lacks the legal requirements or is against public policy, the principal can still be bound if they ratify the actions of the agent or if the agent had apparent authority, which leads others to believe that the agent had authority to act on behalf of the principal.
2. Vicarious liability means that even if the principal did not directly commit the wrongful act, they can still be held liable for the agent's actions. This doctrine recognizes that the agent acts as an extension of the principal's authority and therefore imposes responsibility on the principal for any harm caused by the agent's negligent or wrongful conduct. It provides a legal basis for holding employers accountable for the actions of their employees or agents while acting within the course of their employment.
Learn more about Express agreement
https://brainly.com/question/8200887
#SPJ11
The Indian Removal Act involved all of the following EXCEPT
- Euro Americans individual gaining plots of lands where Natives resided prior to the Indian Removal
- Establishing the removal of Natives in the South East to West of the Mississippi during the winter
- American Indian sovereignty and treaty rights being recognized
- Indians resisting the removal by using the legal system
Answers
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a major step in the US Government’s continued expansion westward and enabled the relocation of American Indian populations to west of the Mississippi River.
The Act authorized the negotiation of land exchange treaties with the various Native American nations and set in motion the forced removal of thousands of Native Americans across the country. The Removal Act stipulated that the relocation process would be voluntary, however, it failed to recognize American Indian Tribal sovereignty and treaty rights, leaving many individuals and families emboldened to resist.
This resistance was often done through the legal system, however, it proved futile in many cases in the face of US Government authority. Unfortunately, the Act also allowed Euro Americans to gain access to lands where Native populations resided prior to the Indian Removal, which resulted in further displacement for many Indigenous communities.
To know more about Indian Removal Act , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28824802
#SPJ4
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
Under the law, discrimination charges must be filed within __________ days of the alleged unlawful practice. a. 180 b. 60 c. 120 d. 90
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
In general, you need to file a charge within 180 calendar days from the day the discrimination took place. The 180 calendar day filing deadline is extended to 300 calendar days if a state or local agency enforces a law that prohibits employment discrimination on the same basis.
Who was Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca? A. He funded the Nárvaez expedition. B. He started a revolt against Nárvaez which lead to his death. C. He lead an expedition to find the cities of gold. D. He was one of the few survivors in the Nárvaez expedition. Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answers
Answer:
D. He was one of the few survivors in the Nárvaez expedition.
Explanation:
Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca was a Spanish explorer. He was on board the ship that would send out Narváex in 1527. This expedition was made by Spaniards who wished to explore and establish colonies in America. The trip was exhausting and traumatizing since there were countless deaths, where only 4 people survived, including this Cabeza de Vaca that landed where today the city of Mexico is located.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
since the landmark case brown v. board of education (1954), how has integration of schools in texas played out?
Answers
Since the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the integration of schools in Texas has been a complex and ongoing process with both progress and challenges.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, Texas, like other states, faced the task of desegregating its schools. The integration process in Texas has been marked by both advancements and difficulties. While significant progress has been made in promoting racial integration and providing equal educational opportunities, there have been challenges and persistent disparities in achieving full integration. Factors such as residential segregation, socioeconomic disparities, and complex legal battles have influenced the pace and extent of school integration in Texas. Efforts to achieve racial and educational equity continue to be ongoing and require ongoing commitment and attention from policymakers, educators, and communities.
To learn more about Brown v. Board of Education, refer:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ11
Which of the following is a good indication that a website information is questionable
Answers
A website is an online source which is responsible for the data content it has and some websites are questionable, while some others are verifiable.
Questionable WebsiteWith this in mind, the following are characteristics to know a questionable website:
They post personal opinions They do not use factsThey are biasedThey do not post truthful informationCredible WebsiteThe characteristics of a credible website include:
They post factual information They are either a government owned or scholarly website. They do not use personal opinion over factsRead more about website integrity here:
https://brainly.com/question/3733655
Kira forges Lew’s name as the drawer of a stolen check, drawn on Metro Bank, and makes the item payable to Kira. Lew is liable to pay the amount to
a.
no one.
b.
ordinary holders only.
c.
HDCs only.
d.
ordinary holders, HDCs, and holders through HDCs.
Answers
Lew has been liable to reimburse the amount to the holder due in course, it related parties and the actual holders of the check.
Option D is correct.
Who is a drawer?A drawer is referring to person who has created a check in the name of another person or any financial institution like banks.
According to the situation, the drawer of the stolen check is found to be Lew due to forged name put up by Kira. This shows that Lew is now become obligated towards all the parties in connection with the payment of amount being stated in the check.
Therefore, the ordinary holders, Holder due in course and its related parties are beneficial to be get reimbursed by Lew.
Learn more about the bank checks in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/9892102
#SPJ2
A polygraph test is conducted, and the findings indicate that there is an 80 percent chance of deception. What does this mean for the investigation?
a) The suspect is guilty and should be arrested for the crime.
b) The suspect is probably just nervous since 80 percent is a pretty high number and usually indicates a false positive.
c) The suspect might be guilty, but more information is needed from other parts of the investigation.
D)There has been a mistake in the polygraph test, and the test should be conducted again to get better results.
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The Latin term for providing services without payment is
O Verdict
O Pro bono
O Plaintiff
O Deposition
Answers
Write five ‘would-you-rather’ questions about life and law in early America. Please help me come up with some ideas!!
Answers
Would you rather live in a small colonial town where everyone knows each other's business, or in a bustling 18th century city where anonymity is possible?
The four Questions are seen below
What are the ‘would-you-rather’ questions?Generally, Would you rather be a wealthy plantation owner with slaves, or a poor white farmer with few opportunities for upward mobility?
Would you rather be a member of a religious minority in early America, facing persecution and discrimination, or a member of the dominant religious group?
Would you rather be a colonial woman with limited legal rights, or a Native American facing forced displacement and cultural genocide?
Would you rather be a member of a colonial militia fighting in the American Revolution, or a loyalist forced to flee to Canada after the war?
Read more about colonial town
https://brainly.com/question/13459134
#SPJ1
In the citation 42 USCS § 1983, what does the 42 refer to?
A) Section
B) Volume number
C Page number
D) Title
Answers
In the citation 42 USCS § 1983, the number "42" refers to the D. Title.
What is the USCS ?The United States Code is a collation of federal laws, categorized into various titles based on respective themes. One such division is Title 42 covering "The Public Health and Welfare." It encompasses legislation related to social security, public health, civil rights, among others.
Section 1983 is explicitly mentioned in Title 42. This provision grants individuals the right to file legal proceedings against state and local government officials and entities who have violated their constitutional rights under color of law.
Find out more on the USCS at https://brainly.com/question/30692685
#SPJ1
Explain the process that economist use to conduct a cost benefit analysis for a high speed rail
Answers
Answer:
The procedure is straightforward. Identify, quantify, and total the related benefits and costs for each decision or path in consideration. The benefit-cost ratio for that particular decision is then calculated by dividing the overall benefits by the total expenses.
Explanation:
Borrower Patti exercised her statutory right of reinstatement after her lender initiated a foreclosure suit. What must Patti's lender do now
Answers
Answer:
Patti's lender will accept the Reinstatement and continue the mortgage till the loan is paid fully.
Explanation:
Foreclosure is a term that describes a legal process, in which lender, in the bid to recover the remaining of his or her loan from a borrower who has stopped making payments, forces the sale of the asset used as the collateral for the loan.
On the other hand, Reinstatement is also a legal process that seek to stop a foreclosure, this allows the borrower to meet up on payments in default, as well as fees and expenses incurred as a result of the default.
Hence, in this case, Patti's lender will accept the Reinstatement and continue the mortgage till the loan is paid fully.
____ and ____ are the two forms of contracts.
Answers
Answer:
fixed price contracts and cost-reimbursement contracts
which of the following executive branch functions are most commonly performed by the secretary of state?
Answers
The executive branch functions are most commonly performed by the secretary of state is President proposes legislation to Congress.
The govt is the branch of the presidency chargeable for the implementation of legal guidelines and rules adopted by the legislature. The government is frequently concerned with the framing of policy. The respectable designations of the government vary from u. s. a . to u. s ... some nations have presidents, whilst others have chancellors.
An executive is a powerful person who is answerable for making things run easily. if you emerge as an executive, you might be in fee of a company, an enterprise, or maybe a whole u. s. The government of an organization has a satisfactory office and works on methods to make their commercial enterprise greater a success.
Learn more about executives here https://brainly.com/question/26909217
#SPJ4
mary wollstonecraft a vindication of the rights of women
Answers
The foundational English language women's activist message by Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the of Lady 1792, was delivered in Britain the next year. She challenged the idea that ladies exist just to fulfill guys by pushing for equivalent chance for the two genders in school, the labor force, and governmental issues.
As per Wollstonecraft, ladies should get schooling comparable to men for them to contribute on similar limit as men. Ladies wouldn't progress socially or mentally in the event that they were not allowed this opportunity.
She argues that conceding ladies similar freedoms as men will help the two genders since it will permit ladies to bring up Youngsters that are devoted will improve male companions. She fights that since ladies are similarly basically as objective as guys, they ought to have similar privileges.
Learn more about vindication:
https://brainly.com/question/9369170
#SPJ4
This question is not complete , Here I am attaching the complete question:
What is Mary Wollstonecraft vindication of women's rights Summary?
why do an increasing number of Americans, the same people who admire slender look so often featured in the media, exercise too little and eat too much?
Answers
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
Which of the following acts protect an employee from retaliation when the employee report fraud against the government?
Multiple choice question.
The Securities Act
The Securities and Exchange Act
The False Claims Act
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
Answers
The act that protects an employee from retaliation when the employee reports fraud against the government is the False Claims Act. Thus, Option C is correct.
What is the False Claims Act?The False Claims Act is a US law that imposes civil liabilities on individuals and firms (including companies) who defraud government programs. Individuals who knowingly submit or cause to be submitted false claims to the government are subject to penalties that can range from $5,000 to $10,000 per false claim (or more), plus three times the actual damages sustained by the government.
The False Claims Act also allows individuals who report fraud against the government to file a lawsuit (known as a "qui tam" lawsuit) on behalf of the government, and they may be rewarded a portion of the damages that the government recovers as a result of the lawsuit. So, the correct option among the given choices is the False Claims Act.
Learn more about False Claims Act https://brainly.com/question/29483810
#SPJ11
examination of bill of entry is done to vouch
Answers
Answer:
What? I Don't understand
Explanation:
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Always unload a firearm before:
Answers
Answer:
Storage, cleaning and travel
Explanation:
took a course
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
Answers
What is the common term for a political party that exists that is not the Republicans or Democrats?
a
Outside Force
b
There is not such thing.
c
Third Party
d
Dealbreaker
Answers
Answer:
Third Party.
Explanation:
The other common term is 3rd party.
C). Third party
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
Jessica and Emma are full-time employees at the Benjamin Limited Liability Company. They went to a coffee house named New Heaven Café near their office in the lunch time. Jessica ordered one coffee for her and a bottle of beer for her friend. Emma drank about half of the bottle, which was made of dark glass and labelled with white bold words.
When Emma poured the remainder of the beer into a tumbler, she found a stranger. At this point, the decomposed remains of a snail floated out. She was shocked and suffered a severe painful stomach. She had to spend a week in hospital. The doctor confirmed that her stomach problems might have been caused by the inferior quality beer.
The Western Beverages company which manufactured and supplied beer to New Heaven Café confirmed that their manufacturing process was controlled strictly, which had never caused any incidents like that.
Emma’s boss was very angry when she had a week leave in busy days at work. She explained that she had an urgent health problem. However, the boss was insistent with his intention; she was fired on the first day she was back to work. Emma is so upset and needs some legal advice.
Requirements:
Emma has approached you for some legal advice. Write a report outlining the following:
Explain the above legal issues with reference to the English legal system, decided and recorded case law.
The assignment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Emma confuses as to whether there is a contract between her and the beer
manufacturer. Explain the essential elements of contract.
2. Advise Emma whether she may successfully sue the Western Beverages company
for negligence. Explain the essential elements to claim for negligence.
3. Advise Emma of her legal position with regards to Benjamin Limited Liability
Company. Explain the different types of dismissal.
Answers
Contract refers to an agreement between two or more party to carry out a duty in return for consideration
1. Yes, there is a contract between him and the beer company because he paid a sum for the beer and the company is responsible for producing good and healthy beer.
2. Yes, Emma can sue the company because she has suffered damage from use of the beer. She suffered health-wise and loss her job because of health issue arising from use of the beer.
3. Since the dismissal is done harshly, he can seek for resolution with the management to retain him back.
Read more about Contract element
brainly.com/question/8116487
Which of these le an example of eminent domain?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.
what are three supporting evidence for the topic "A person seeking
to protect their property will seek out and often obtain, a lien on
thst property"
This is regarding Secured Transactions
Answers
The three key supporting evidence for the topic "A person seeking to protect their property will seek out and often obtain, a lien on that property" in the context of secured transactions are,
1. Legal Protection
2. Creditor's Security Interest
3. Priority and Protection against Other Claims
1. Legal Protection: The law recognizes and supports the concept of liens as a means of protecting property interests. In many jurisdictions, specific statutes govern the creation, perfection, and enforcement of liens. For example, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States provides a comprehensive legal framework for secured transactions, including the creation and enforcement of liens on personal property. This legal recognition and protection incentivize individuals to seek liens as a way to safeguard their property.
2. Creditor's Security Interest: Obtaining a lien can provide security to creditors who extend credit or loans to individuals. By establishing a lien on the debtor's property, the creditor has a legal claim on the property, which serves as collateral for the debt. If the debtor defaults on the loan, the creditor can enforce the lien by foreclosing on the property, selling it, and using the proceeds to satisfy the debt. This security interest encourages creditors to provide loans and credit on more favorable terms, as their risk is mitigated by the lien.
3. Priority and Protection against Other Claims: A lien can also establish priority over other claimants who may have an interest in the property. In secured transactions, the order of priority determines which creditor gets paid first from the proceeds of the collateral in the event of default or bankruptcy. By obtaining a lien, a person can secure their position as a priority creditor, ensuring they have a better chance of recovering their debt or obligation from the property's value ahead of other claimants. This priority status provides a strong incentive for individuals to seek liens to protect their property.
In conclusion, the legal recognition and protection of liens, the security they provide to creditors, and the establishment of priority over other claims are three supporting pieces of evidence highlighting why a person seeking to protect their property will often obtain a lien. Liens serve as an effective tool in securing property interests and ensuring repayment of debts or obligations.
Know more about Legal Protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/30362023
#SPJ8
how to be smart like beetleguese
Answers
Answer:
that’s a hard one