You are asked to advise your client Mary on the following issues; please do subheading for each answer:
Mary; Mary has stolen an 18ct diamond ring worth €17,000 from a jewellery shop and has been arrested. She is unsure what court she will have to attend and if she isn’t satisfied with the outcome what court she can appeal to. She is unsure about the potential public profile her case will attract, principally if the court case details can be published in the paper and if a public gallery can attend the court hearing. She also wants to know will she face a criminal or civil case; could the presiding judge give her a jail sentence; and how will the judge come up with her sentence or fine or how will it be determined.
1. Which court will she attend and how can she appeal the decision
2. Will the case be a matter of public knowledge and/or can the public attend the court
3. Is this a Criminal or Civil case. Explain why and give an example of a civil offence and a criminal offence.
4. Describe the court proceedings that will arise in this case i.e. what is the role of the judge, will the case be heard before a jury, what type of sentence could apply

The document that serves the general public while also addressing distinct groups such as stakeholders is typically a public report or a public statement.

This document aims to provide information and communicate important details about a particular subject or issue to a wide range of audiences.

Public reports or statements are often used by organizations, government agencies, or businesses to share information about their activities, achievements, or plans. These documents are designed to be accessible to the general public, providing transparency and accountability. They may cover topics such as financial performance, corporate social responsibility initiatives, environmental impact, or public policy positions.

the purpose of such a document is to ensure that both the general public and specific stakeholder groups are informed and engaged, promoting transparency, communication, and accountability.

To know more stakeholders, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30241824

#SPJ11

The act of eating food is an essential human activity that has been debated on its ethical implications. However, the question of whether eating is an ethical issue is relatively complex as there are several ethical issues surrounding food consumption. In this regard, ethical issues regarding eating have been a significant concern in recent years and have become a critical topic in contemporary society. This essay aims to discuss the ethical issues regarding eating, the perspectives of people on food consumption, and what they eat.

One of the ethical issues surrounding food consumption is the exploitation of animals. There are various types of exploitation, such as slaughtering animals for human consumption, forced labor in the food industry, and the use of harmful chemicals in food production. Such practices raise ethical concerns as they cause suffering and pain to animals. People have different perspectives on the use of animals for food, with some supporting animal rights activists, while others support the use of animals for food as a way of maintaining cultural practices.

Another ethical issue is the impact of food consumption on the environment. The production of food is a significant contributor to environmental degradation, including deforestation, water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and soil degradation. Consequently, environmentalists and food activists advocate for sustainable food practices that are environmentally friendly. People's perspectives on food consumption vary, with some supporting sustainable food practices, while others prioritize convenience and price.

Additionally, food consumption raises ethical concerns regarding access to food. The global food system is unequal, with a significant population suffering from hunger and malnutrition. This raises ethical questions on food distribution, access to food, and affordability. Many organizations advocate for food justice, which aims to ensure that people have access to healthy, affordable, and nutritious food. People's perspectives on food consumption vary, with some prioritizing convenience, taste, and affordability over food justice.

In conclusion, ethical issues regarding food consumption have become a significant concern in contemporary society. The three ethical issues discussed above regarding eating are the exploitation of animals, the impact of food consumption on the environment, and access to food. People have different perspectives on food consumption, and this is influenced by various factors such as cultural practices, environmentalism, and convenience.

However, it is crucial to maintain ethical considerations in food consumption practices, to ensure sustainability, animal welfare, and food justice. The way we eat has a significant impact on the environment, animal welfare, and human health, and it is essential to consider the ethical implications of our food choices. This will help us make informed choices on what we eat and contribute to ethical food consumption practices. This answer is approximately 150 words long.

Learn more about consumption from:

https://brainly.com/question/13282888

#SPJ11

Answer: Marks States We are constantly told that conflict is bad that compromise is good; that conflict is bad but the consensus is good; that conflict is bad and collaboration is good. But in my view, that's far too simple a vision of the world. We cannot know whether conflict is bad unless we know who is fighting, why they are fighting ,and how they are fighting. And compromises can be thoroughly rotten if they harm people who are not at the table, people who are vulnerable, disempowered, people whom we have an obligation to protect.

Explanation:

Answer & Explanation:

Case 1: No. The child's blood type is O, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and O. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 2: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents.

Case 3: No. The child's blood type is B, which cannot be produced from the combination of two B parents. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 4: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of O and O blood types from the parents.

Case 5: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and A blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A or AB.

Case 6: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of O and O blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A, B, or AB.

Case 7: Yes. The child's blood type is A, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents. The genetic make-up for the child in question would be AO, which can be produced from the combination of AB and B blood types from the parents.

The laws passed by England's government to make sure it made money from trade by the colonies are known as the Navigation Acts. These acts were a series of laws passed between 1651 and 1696 that aimed to regulate colonial trade and maximize profits for England.

The Navigation Acts required that all colonial trade must be carried on English ships, and that certain goods, such as tobacco, sugar, and indigo, could only be exported to England or other English colonies. The acts also imposed duties on certain imports and required that all goods imported into the colonies must first pass through England. While the Navigation Acts were intended to benefit England, they often had negative effects on the colonial economies and were a source of resentment among colonists. The acts played a significant role in the lead up to the American Revolution and were ultimately repealed in the 19th century.
The laws you're referring to are known as the Navigation Acts, a series of regulations enacted by England's government between 1651 and 1696 to control and profit from colonial trade. The primary goal of these acts was to ensure that England benefited economically from its colonies by maintaining a favorable balance of trade and fostering economic dependence.

The Navigation Acts had several key provisions. First, they required that all goods being shipped to and from the colonies must be carried on English or colonial ships, ensuring that England controlled and profited from shipping. Second, they specified that certain "enumerated" goods, such as tobacco, sugar, and cotton, could only be exported to England or its colonies. This created a monopoly for English merchants, as the colonies were not allowed to trade these goods with other nations.

Additionally, the Navigation Acts stipulated that European imports to the colonies had to pass through England first, allowing England to collect taxes and duties on these goods. Finally, the acts prohibited the colonies from manufacturing goods that would compete with English products, ensuring the colonies remained dependent on England for many necessities.

Overall, the Navigation Acts were designed to protect England's economic interests and maximize profits from its colonial trade while suppressing potential colonial competitors. These regulations played a significant role in shaping the colonial economy and eventually contributed to growing tensions between the colonies and England, culminating in the American Revolution.

To know more about laws visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13093596

#SPJ11

Answer:

Lighter is correct

Explanation:

it contains butane

Biden because he's gonna fight climate change and raise taxes which will stop forest fires and other bad things in the world

So Biden 2020

no questions

Answer:

what is the house in question

Explanation:

do yo have a screen shot

Answer:

By keeping them out of hazardous jobs

a. Criminal act and criminal intent are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent-based crime

The physical or exterior component of a crime, such as the act of stealing, assault, or murder, is referred to as the criminal act. The accused must have done something that is regarded as unlawful. Contrarily, criminal intent refers to the psychological component of a crime. When committing a crime, a person must be in this frame of mind or have this mental attitude. Depending on the exact crime, criminal intent may be explicit or inferred and vary.

Crimes with a definite intent or state of mind are known as intent crimes. Crimes with intent include homicide, theft, and fraud. A defendant must have committed unlawful conduct as well as the necessary criminal intent in order to be found guilty of an intent offence. But, criminal intent is not necessary for all crimes. A person may be found guilty of certain crimes even if they did not intend to do them since they are deemed strict liability crimes.

Complete Question:

Which two elements are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent crime?

A) criminal act and criminal intent

B) victim and criminal intent

C) criminal act and proof of gain

D) motive and criminal intent

Read more about Criminal act on:

https://brainly.com/question/3788903

#SPJ4

Answer:

National security is important because it's for the safety of the people living in a certain country, for them to be secured from any danger that might happen to them.

Explanation:

hope it helps you po.

Answer:

D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code

The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is best example of statutory law.

Statutory instruments that have been authorized by a legislator, either a state or federal government, are known as statutory laws.

Regulations may mandate particular acts, ban them, serve as statements of purpose, or specify how the government will behave in specific situations.

So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/19769037?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) was amended to divide trafficking into option (a). H. Sex Trafficking and Labor Trafficking.

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) established plans to prosecute traffickers, prevent trafficking, and protect victims and survivors of trafficking.

The law organizes human trafficking and related crimes as related crimes. Human trafficking includes the use of force, deception, or coercion to obtain certain types of labor or to market sex.

The three most common types of human trafficking are male or female trafficking, slave employment, and debt bondage.

Forced labor, also known as automated slavery, is a significant area of ​​human trafficking worldwide, according to the US State Department.

To learn more about 'trafficking', here:

https://brainly.com/question/18798596?

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority

Explanation:

Have a great day! :)

The  democracy, protect minority rights  by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Thus option (D) is correct.

Democracy is a system of government in which laws, policies, leadership, and major undertakings of a state or other polity are directly or indirectly decided by the “people,”

The States with democratic governments prevent rule by autocrats, guarantee fundamental individual rights, allow for a relatively high level of political equality, and rarely make war on each other.

The hallmark of democracy is that it permits citizens to participate in making laws and public policies by regularly choosing their leaders and by voting in assemblies or referendum.

The  democracy, protect minority rights  by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Therefore, option (D) is correct.

Learn more about democracy here:

https://brainly.com/question/17627950

#SPJ2

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The first amendment allows not only the freedom of assembly but also the freedom of speech, religion, the press, and the right to protest.

These cases are related to the criminal justice system of United States. The founding's of the supreme court in the form of constitutional arguments is highlighted.

Furman v. Georgia 1972 - The main constitutional question in this case was whether the death penalty was being applied in a way that violated the eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment by being applied in a discriminatory manner. The Supreme Court ruled that all current death penalty laws are unconstitutional after concluding that the death penalty is being used arbitrarily and capriciously.

Gregg v. Georgia 1976 - Whether the death penalty, as modified by the state of Georgia was constitutional was at issue in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that the revised death penalty statute was constitutional and did not contravene the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment because it provided for a segmented trial process with specific aggravating and mitigating factors.

The constitutional question in Coker v. Georgia (1977) was whether the death penalty was an appropriate sentence. The death penalty was deemed to be an excessive punishment for serious crimes by the Supreme Court, and it also violated the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The main constitutional question in McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) was whether statistical proof of racial bias in the execution of death sentences was sufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove a constitutional violation.

Arizona v. Ring (2002) - In this case, the legal issue was whether the fact based determinations required to impose the death penalty must be made by a jury rather than a judge. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to impose the death penalty, factual findings must be made by a jury, not a judge, in accordance with the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial.

In 2002 Atkins v. Virginia The Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment was at issue in this case's constitutionality which involved the execution of defendants who had intellectual disabilities. Such executions, according to the Supreme Court, violated the Eighth Amendment and were therefore unconstitutional.

The main constitutional query raised in Roper v. Simmons 2005 was whether the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment applied to defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes. According to the Supreme Court it is unconstitutional to execute defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes.

The legal question in Witherspoon v. Illinois 1968 was whether potential jurors who expressed opposition to the death penalty could be barred from a capital trial. According to the Supreme Court, such jurors cannot be automatically disqualified rather, they can only be disqualified if their stance on the death penalty would prevent them from upholding the law and applying the death penalty when necessary.

Florida v. Hurst (2016) - The Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial was at stake in this case and it was unclear whether Florida's death penalty sentencing policy was constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the plan was unconstitutional because it gave a judge the authority to determine the facts necessary to impose the death penalty rather than a jury.

Learn more about supreme court at:

brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ1

Explanation:

I think yes

True

hmmmmmm

Answer:

Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.

Explanation:

Gideon v. Wainright

Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.

A lease agreement may include various provisions that grant rights to the tenant, such as the right to renew the lease, the right to purchase the leased property, or the right of first refusal if the landlord decides to sell the property.

These provisions are negotiated between the landlord and tenant and are often included in the lease agreement to provide the tenant with some security and stability in the use of the property.

The specifics of these provisions can vary widely depending on the terms of the lease agreement and the needs and desires of both parties. A lease is an agreement between a tenant and landlord that grants the renter the right to occupy a rented property for a predetermined amount of time, usually six or twelve months. The lease is a binding agreement between the landlord and the renter.

Learn more about lease agreement Visit: brainly.com/question/30237244

#SPJ4

The process of exercising the powers and functions, which are available in the hands of a body or an institution authorized by the government, is known as legislation.

For the purpose of passing of a legislation, it is important for someone to have an authority. A legislation can be passed, brought into effect, amended, modified or debarred by the bodies of a legislative assembly.

Hence, the significance of a legislation is aforementioned.

Learn more about legislation here:

https://brainly.com/question/782960

#SPJ1

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.

The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.

The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.

The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.

To learn more about competency examinations, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/31646918

#SPJ4

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________

All laws are formulated to satisfy the highest ethical standards. This statement is False.

Laws are not only made to frame to meet the highest ethical standards in each and every case. They are made for the goal of establishing a framework of justice and defending the basic rights of persons within a specified society but they can vary across different countries.

The creation and implementation of laws is in the hands of government which involves intricate concerns. Sometimes these laws go beyond ethics and they can be affected by other factors like political power, society, and historical context and they might be controversial.

To learn more about ethical standards

https://brainly.com/question/17774751

#SPJ4

In the case of Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez, the parties involved in the dispute are the Garden City Boxing Club (GCB) as the plaintiff and Luis Dominguez as the defendant.

The facts associated with the case are as follows: Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, which installed a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant.

Antenas mistakenly listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. According to the contract, a commercial establishment could show the boxing match if it was authorized by GCB and paid the appropriate fee based on the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment.
Mundelein Burrito, although classified as a residence, showed the boxing event to its patrons without paying the proper fee for a commercial establishment. As a result, GCB filed a lawsuit against Luis Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match.
The legal issue in question is whether Dominguez, as a sole proprietor, should be held personally liable for the actions of Antenas Enterprises.
In this case, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. Under the principle of "piercing the corporate veil," a court may disregard the legal entity of a corporation or business entity and hold the individual owner personally liable if it is proven that the individual has not properly maintained the separation between their personal and business affairs.
In this case, Dominguez, as the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, failed to correctly classify Mundelein Burrito as a commercial establishment, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without paying the required fee. By neglecting to follow the contract terms and incorrectly representing the establishment, Dominguez can be held personally liable for the lost fees.
The appropriate rule of law that supports this decision is the principle of piercing the corporate veil, which allows the court to hold the individual owner personally liable for the actions of the business entity when they have not maintained proper separation between personal and business affairs.
While it is essential to consider other perspectives, in this case, the judgment would be in favor of GCB. By failing to classify Mundelein Burrito correctly, Dominguez breached the contract terms, resulting in financial loss for GCB. Dominguez's responsibility as the sole proprietor includes ensuring the correct classification of establishments and complying with contractual obligations.
In summary, based on the facts and legal principles involved, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. The principle of piercing the corporate veil supports this decision, as Dominguez failed to maintain the separation between personal and business affairs, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without the required fee.

To know more about contractual visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27899951

#SPJ11

The answer to the problem is A. Bill of Rights.

The Bill of rights are the first ten amendments in the constitution, then follows the other amendments the constitution holds.

Hi there! The answer is: option A.

The Bill of Rights and the amendments create the Constitution. In line IX of the Constitution, it states that "The Bill of Rights and amendments." The answer is option A.

Plan A = -$2.30 billion; Plan B = -$2.09 billion (Select Plan B), To calculate the present worth of each plan, we need to discount the cash flows to their present values using the given interest rate of 10% per year and a 10-year study period.

For Plan A, the cash flows are as follows:

Years 1-4: -$0.5375 billion per year

Years 5-6: $0 (no expenditure)

Years 7-10: -$0.5375 billion per year

Discounting each cash flow to its present value and summing them up, we get:

Present Worth of Plan A = (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^1) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^2) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^3) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^4) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^7) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^8) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^9) + (-$0.5375 billion/1.1^10)

= -$2.30 billion

For Plan B, the cash flows are as follows:

Years 1-10: -$0.43 billion per year

Discounting each cash flow to its present value and summing them up, we get:

Present Worth of Plan B = (-$0.43 billion/1.1^1) + (-$0.43 billion/1.1^2) + ... + (-$0.43 billion/1.1^10)

= -$2.09 billion

Comparing the present worth of each plan, we find that Plan A has a present worth of -$2.30 billion, while Plan B has a present worth of -$2.09 billion. Since the objective is to minimize costs, Plan B is selected as it has the lower present worth. Therefore, the correct answer is:

Plan A = -$2.30 billion; Plan B = -$2.09 billion (Select Plan B)

Learn more about Cash flows

https://brainly.com/question/27994727

#SPJ11

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

Yes, Goyo Lawyers is located in Fishponds.

Goyo Lawyers is indeed located in Fishponds, a suburban area in Bristol, England. Fishponds is known for its diverse community and vibrant atmosphere.

The law firm specializes in various areas of law, such as immigration, family, employment, and personal injury.

The team of lawyers at Goyo Lawyers is dedicated to providing high-quality legal services to clients in Fishponds and the surrounding areas.

They strive to ensure that clients receive the best possible outcomes for their legal issues.

Goyo Lawyers is easily accessible by public transport, with several bus stops located nearby.

For more such questions on Lawyers, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29731616

#SPJ8