Answers
Answer:
Where did you hear this
NGTL that is real creepy tho
Explanation:
Related Questions
Who is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in thr State of California???
Answers
Answer:
Attorney General Becerra
What is the maximum amount of personal funds a broker can place in the property management escrow account
Answers
how did brown v. board of education differ from roe v. wade with respect to relations of the court to the executive branch?
Answers
Troops had to be sent in by two presidents to implement Brown v. Board, whereas Republican presidents have sought to reduce the impact of Roe v.
After Vinson died in September 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as Chief Justice. Warren had supported the mixing of Mexican-American students in California faculty systems following Mendez v. Westminster.
President Eisenhower failed to fully aid Brown's choice. The president didn't like managing racial troubles and failed to speak out in the choice of the courtroom's ruling. Although the president typically prevented comment on courtroom choices, his silence in this example may have endorsed resistance.
Learn more about Republicans here https://brainly.com/question/543079
#SPJ4
What is the purpose of the identification doctrine?
Answers
Answer:
The doctrine of identification was a principle used in old English law which stated that a person who gets injured while traveling due to another's negligence cannot claim damages if the driver of the conveyance is contributorily negligent.
Explanation:
i read about it
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
Answers
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
3. List and explain three methods used to enforce a judgment. 4. Do the legal principles presented in this chapter 29 favor creditors or debtors? Explain.
Answers
Three methods that are used to enforce a judgment include garnishment, property liens, and wage assignments. The legal principles presented in Chapter 29 favor creditors over debtors.
Following is a brief explanation of each method:
Garnishment: A creditor can obtain a court order to seize money from a debtor's bank account. The creditor must provide notice of the garnishment to the debtor's employer or bank.Property Liens: A creditor may place a lien on a debtor's property, meaning that the creditor has a right to sell the property to recover the debt owed. A lien on real estate is a common method of securing a judgment.Wage Assignments: A court can order a debtor's employer to withhold a certain percentage of the debtor's wages to repay a debt that is owed.The legal principles presented in Chapter 29 favor creditors over debtors. This is because they provide creditors with several methods for enforcing judgments against debtors. For example, creditors can garnish wages, place liens on property, and take other legal actions to collect debts owed. These legal principles ensure that creditors have a means of recovering the money owed to them by debtors.
Learn more about Garnishment:
https://brainly.com/question/28636835
#SPJ11
Does it make sense to you to allow an employee to bring a sexual harassment cause of action if the employee suffered no adverse tangible employment action?
Answers
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Each Year about 200 children under the age of six are killed while playing in the family drive way true or false?
Answers
Explanation:
More than six hundred
Answer:
correct answer is on a up
what did the judge revoke or deny derek chauvin?
Answers
Answer:
The judge revoked Derek Chauvin's bail and said he would be sentenced in eight weeks. ... Chauvin was convicted on all three charges he faced at trial — second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter
The state of Texas enacts a law that prohibits Asian men from saying the word "God" on any day that is not Sunday. Discuss all of the potential Constitutional law violations that are at play with this law, and how they are at play based on the facts in the prompt.
Answers
Answer:
Never will i answer your quesTimon dolt
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
When a responder fails to take action when they have a legal responsibility to act, this is called:
A.
Neglect
B.
Abandonment
C.
Good Samaritan
D.
Consent
Answers
Answer:
A, neglect
Explanation:
All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.
As an early childhood education caregiver, what would be a challenge of working with a helicopter parent
Answers
Answer:
As a caregiver you can't always do that because you are busy with other children but you can tell the parent that you can give them a review at the end of the day when they will pick up their child.
hope this helps!
llanhon
Lame an
F
RS, ADA AND WAIVERS
1. The nature and scope of one's property Interest in a trademark generally is the right to prevent
consumer confusion. U
2. Rights in a registered trademark exist indefinitely as long as the mark continues to be used.
3. Public policy dictates that in the United States free market capitalist system, any entrepreneur may
profit by registering a domain name (cybersquatting) that is confusingly similar to a registered or
unregistered mark, or dilutes, a famous mark without liability.
т
Jotes' Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men's Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the "author of
the work" -- without their performance on the field there wouldn't be a game to broadcast. DF
7. The trademark laws are put in place to protect more the public rather than the trademark. BD
8. A waiver is a contract that releases an organization from liability for harms caused by ordinary
negligence in exchange for the ability to participate in an activity.
Otection under the Lanham
untenable claim. ETW aks
talking trademark. Images
nark because they do not
not distingunh and identify
irk because there are unde
ken by countless photograph
hich have been published in
it the world. No reasonable
do.
F
9. Waivers never hold up in the court of law.
F
v. Maomillan, Inc., 894
fledged that "lu]nder vor
trademark -- if, for ex
ecific goods."
10. A parent who signs a waiver for their child has signed away the right of the child to sue.
T
11. An athlete with a disability will always have a claim to participate as the Supreme Court has
determined that sport is a major life activity.
F
Organize all these with which answers do you think it's right and correct them need this ASAP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Jotes’ Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men’s Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the “author of
the work” — without their performance on the field there wouldn’t be a game to broadcast. DF
What is the overdose immunity act and who does it protect?
Answers
Answer:
They "generally provide immunity from arrest, charge or prosecution for certain controlled substance possession and paraphernalia offenses when a person who is either experiencing an opiate-related overdose or observing one calls 911 for assistance or seeks medical attention."
It is a Good Samaritan law regarding people helping those who they believe have overdosed.
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answers
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are commonly known as "local content laws" or "local ownership requirements."
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
can students get Married To school Teachers
Answers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answers
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
As a result of having no power to collect taxes under the Articles of Confederation, the confederal government could only raise funds by doing which of the following?
Select one:
A. borrowing money on credit
B. taxing the individual states
C. regulating internal trade
D. raiding Canadian mines
Answers
Answer:
borrowing money on credit
Explanation:
The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.
Which decision rule establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards?
Answers
The decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards is the lexicographic decision rule.
Lexicographic decision rule is a type of decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards.
The decision rule is often used in situations where a company is seeking to make a decision among a number of options that are all acceptable, but which differ in terms of their performance levels on various evaluative criteria.
In the lexicographic decision rule, the decision maker sets a minimum standard for each criterion and selects the option that performs best on the most important criterion, without considering the performance levels of the other criteria.
If there is a tie, the decision maker moves to the second most important criterion and selects the option that performs best on that criterion, and so on, until a decision is made. This rule is also known as the priority rule or the lexicographic ordering rule.
To know more about lexicographic decision rule, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29839779#
#SPJ11
per se violations in antitrust law refer to multiple choice violations that are alleged but not yet proven. antitrust cases that are pending resolution. activities that are illegal in and of themselves. cases that are subject to the rule of reason.
Answers
The correct response is C. Activities that are illegal in and of themselves. Antitrust law refers to actions that are prohibited in and of themselves as per se breaches.
Any individual who entered a nation without authorization is considered to be an illegal immigrant or alien. Any behaviour that violates the law is considered illegal, and this includes any anti-competitive or collusive behaviour that is outlawed by rules or laws such as the Commerce Act of 1986, the Fair Trading Act of 1986, and any statutes that were subsequently passed in their place. In contrast, every activity that is classified as a criminal activity is always prohibited; not every criminal behaviour is illegal. For instance, exceeding the speed limit while driving is prohibited but not criminal. A product is said to be prohibited if it cannot legally enter the country. Examples of restricted things include hazardous toys, unsafe automobiles, bush meat, and illegal narcotics like absinthe and Rohypnol.
Learn more about illegal here
https://brainly.com/question/10971830
#SPJ4
why shouldn't the police be defunded?
Answers
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
he American Law Institute publishes and revises explanations and examples of the law in various areas of the law, known as: ______.
Answers
Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash
What happened in Tennessee v. Garner?
Answers
Tennessee v. Garner case was well known for the police officers' deadly action on a suspect.
What is the conflict of Tennessee v. Garner?Tennessee v. Garner is considered a well-known civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that an officer in law enforcement could not use excessive force while following a running criminal in accordance with the 4th Amendment.
The Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable inspections was broken, and the court determined that the statute was unconstitutional as a result of the actions performed by the police on a person in name of inspection.
Learn more about Tennessee v. Garner, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30396322
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast national security before and after 9/11.
Answers
The national security after 9/11 is one where there is No boarding pass or ID required when going to the gate, it was allowed to have 4-inch-blade knives aboard planes, the security before the 9/11 can be seen in a way that Travelers need to pass through metal detectors.
What was the 9/11 attack?The 9/11 attack can be described as the attack that was been carried out on the united states of America by the militant Islamic extremist network al-Qaeda.
It should be noted that this attack actually affected the security as well as the economy of the united states which took them some time before they actually recovered.
Learn more about 9/11 attack at:
https://brainly.com/question/27720927
#SPJ1
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
a law that criminalizes some act that was legal when it was committed is referred to as a habeas corpus law. true false
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Is there a defense of crime we talked about in this chapter that you think should not be a valid defense?
Answers
Answer: yes. Over 50% of defendants' statements about the case are 1. not supported; 2. cannot be proved; 3. are provably wrong.
On top of it, the federal judge appointed to the case, introduced obvious procedural fraud into it - used the incorrect date the case was officially filed and thus timebarred important claims, on top of other violations of plaintiff's rights.
Explanation:
One country has a comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it.
Answers
A country has a comparative advantage over another country as regards production of goods when that country is able to produce the goods at lower cost.
What is comparative advantage?
In economic , comparative advantage can be regarded as an advantage that a country get over the other when that country can produce at lower cost.
In the law of demand and supply, it is established that consumer will definitely go for product with lower price.
Countries that usually specialize as regards comparative advantage usually have a gain from trade.We can conclude that at lower cost of production , a country will have comparative advantage.
Learn more about comparative advantage at;
https://brainly.com/question/14846093
Can an appellate court's decision be appealed?
Answers
Most appeals are final. The courtroom of appeals decision typically will be the final word in the case, except it sends the case lower back to the trial court for extra court cases, or the events ask the U.S. perfect courtroom to review the case.
In writing, an enchantment is a persuasive approach that a creator uses to aid an argument. We use facts, information, and examples to support our arguments, however, those are distinct from appeals, which must do with how we gift data and examples in our persuasive writing.
An appeal is a legal system to ask a better courtroom to study a choice via a choice in a decreased court (trial court) due to the fact you trust the choice made a mistake. A litigant who documents an enchantment is referred to as an appellant. A litigant against whom the appeal is filed is called an appellee.
Learn more about appeals here https://brainly.com/question/25915978
#SPJ4