The High Court Justices are free to make contentious judgements without worrying about losing their jobs.
Because the Articles of Confederation lacked a body to settle disputes, the federal government was unable to resolve problems between states. To remedy this, the judicial branch was established under the Constitution, and Supreme Court judges were given lifetime appointments. In order to shield them from the influence of other arms of the government, the founding fathers chose to make the justices and other federal judges lifelong appointments. It enables individuals to make choices without being afraid.
To learn more tap here:
brainly.com/question/11683616
#SPJ4
Which accident involving property damage requires the operator to file an accident report with the missouri state highway patrol?.
Answer:
You must report accidents that happen in Missouri to the Driver License Bureau if: The accident happened less than one year ago, The accident involved an uninsured motorist, AND. The accident caused property damage costing more than $500, or someone was injured or killed.
A criminal statute, which is so vague or indefinite, that the courts have felt they are considered to be "void for vagueness," because they are essentially:
If a criminal statute is so ambiguous or imprecise that it fails to provide people fair notice of what behaviour is prohibited, it is ruled "void for vagueness" by the courts and violates their right to due process.
it difficult for people to understand what conduct may lead to criminal liability. The principle of "void for vagueness" is a legal concept that addresses this issue.When a criminal statute is so poorly defined or lacks clarity to the extent that it fails to provide individuals with fair notice of what behavior is prohibited, it may be deemed "void for vagueness." This means that the law is considered unconstitutional and unenforceable because it violates the due process rights of individuals.
The principle of fair notice is an essential aspect of the legal system. Laws should be written in a way
lean more about ambiguous here :
https://brainly.com/question/31273453
#SPJ11
Answer Key
All answers will be graded following this answer key:
3 marks for the answer structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion)
3 marks for presenting the legal concept (in this case the concept of offer, acceptance, and consideration)
4 marks for justifying or defending the decision
Tahir filed a civil case in court of first instance at RAK. His dispute with Khalid is worth AED 700,000. You are a judge to the case. Give your judgment and explain the decision.
It would be desirable to get the advice of a qualified legal expert or judge who is knowledgeable with the rules and regulations relevant to the particular jurisdiction in issue for a matter involving a disagreement between Tahir and Khalid over AED 700,000 in the court of first instance at RAK. To reach a well-informed decision, they would be able to evaluate the relevant facts, arguments, evidence, and legislation. A fair and unbiased assessment of the relevant facts and legal principles is crucial since legal issues include many factors.
The legal word for the power given to a legal organization to carry out justice is jurisdiction . In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction.
In order to allocate resources to best meet the requirements of society, the executive and legislative branches of government legislation have the authority to use international law, conflict of laws, constitutional law, and other legal frameworks.
Learn more about jurisdiction , from :
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ1
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
what is a public opinion poll
Answer:
It's a survey.
Explanation:
Public opinion poll is a humane research survey of public from a particular sample.
Answer:
It is a survey used for human research.
I hope this helped at all.How were voting qualifications for national elections changed by a constitutional amendment?
Answer:
The 15th Amendment to the United States Constitution changed voting qualifications for national elections. It prohibited the government from denying citizens the right to vote based on their race, color, or previous condition of servitude. This amendment extended the right to vote to African Americans, who had been denied the franchise through discriminatory laws and practices in many states. Get homework help from proffrank01[at]gma il. c om. Guaranteed quality like this one any time.
The 15th Amendment comprised the Reconstruction-era amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing civil rights and protections for African Americans after the Civil War. The amendment was intended to extend the right to vote to African Americans. However, it did not address other forms of voter disenfranchisement, such as poll taxes, literacy tests, and other discriminatory measures. Many states used these measures to prevent African Americans and other marginalized groups from voting.
Subsequent amendments, court decisions, and legislation further expanded voting qualifications for national elections. For example, the 19th Amendment granted women the right to vote in 1920 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibited discriminatory voting practices and allowed for federal oversight of elections in certain states. Other federal and state laws sought to expand access to the ballot box for all citizens.
Explanation:
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of _____.
600 officers
16 sworn officers who split their time between campuses
6 sworn officers and 66 civilian guards
over 60 sworn officers
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.
The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.
The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.
To know more about University of California here
https://brainly.com/question/16551247
#SPJ1
t is important for a licensee or broker to remove ambiguity when a seller's unclear decision could be discriminatory by forcing the seller to
Answer: Articulate his or her concerns
Explanation:
If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
Which statement is TRUE regarding Treasury Bills?
A. T-Bills are issued at par
B. T-Bills are long term instruments
C. T-Bills pay interest weekly
D. No physical certificates are issued
The statement that is true regarding Treasury Bills is that A. T-Bills are issued at par The correct answer is Option A.
Treasury bills (T-bills) are short-term financial instruments issued by the federal government. The US Treasury issues T-bills to fund government expenditures.
They are issued with maturities of 4, 13, 26, or 52 weeks, which means they mature in a few months (less than a year). Treasury bills are considered to be a risk-free investment as they are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.
When T-bills are issued, they are sold at a discount from their face value, or par value, which is the amount that the buyer will receive at maturity.
For example, if a $10,000 T-bill is sold for $9,900, the buyer will receive the $10,000 face value when it matures. The difference between the face value and the purchase price is the interest earned on the investment.
Treasury bills are usually issued in electronic form and no physical certificates are issued. They are also short term instruments and mature in less than a year. Additionally, unlike other fixed-income investments like bonds, Treasury bills do not pay interest on a semi-annual or annual basis.
Instead, they are issued at a discount from their par value and mature at face value, with the difference representing the interest earned on the investment. The correct answer is Option A. T-Bills are issued at par.
To learn more about Treasury Bills click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13095860#
#SPJ11
Chris is the owner of a fast food stall. Dan bought some food from Chris' stall. Dan became
seriously ill soon after he ate the food. He spent two weeks in hospital. It was discovered
that the food from the stall was contaminated.
Doctors found that Dan was very likely to suffer more than most people from food poisoning.
Dan eventually recovered from his illness, but found that he had lost £20 000 earnings from
his work. He also lost out on an expected promotion at work as he failed to attend an
interview when he was in hospital.
Dan had given some of his food to Euan, a homeless person, who also became ill for a short time.
Advise Dan as to his rights and remedies against Chris. Advise Euan as to his rights and remedies
against Dan or Chris 20 marks
it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.
Explanation:
In the United States, a court case involving the ownership of a patent would be heard by which court?
State or the Supreme Court
Federal only
Federal or state
State only
Answer: the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patent case appeals are heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) (see Question 1, Order of precedence). The US Supreme Court hears appeals from the CAFC on a discretionary basis.
Explanation:
Federal only i think
Imagine you are the defense attorney for the suspect. What arguments could
to damage the credibility of the evidence presented by the Forensic Odontologist
regarding the dental impression comparison
Answer:
just say they are false
Explanation:
as a lawyer you are paid to say anything you wan't to say, as long as it doesn't ruin your reputation in the lawyer world and gets your client wether defense or offense the win.
The assumption that "If it's not illegal, it must be ethical," ignores which of the following?
a.Domain of codified law
b.Domain of ethics
c.Domain of free choice
d.Discretionary responsibility
e.Domain of symbolism
The assumption that "If it's not illegal, it must be ethical," ignores, then option (b) is correct i.e. Domain of ethics.
The domain of ethics refers to the principles and values that govern what is considered morally right or wrong, whereas the domain of law refers to what is considered legally right or wrong. Something may be legal and illegal but not ethical, and vice versa. Health care ethical decision-making and behavior are intricate phenomena. This article gives a comprehensive review of the field of ethics, discusses the numerous ethical ideals' antecedents, and gives a historical overview of how ethics interacts with other fields like morality, religion, law, culture, professional standards of conduct, and policy.
To know more about illegal please refer: https://brainly.com/question/20693896
#SPJ4
The European Union is an example of which of the following?
A. A tax
B. A trade agreement
C. A law
D. A statute
Answer:
A trade agreement
Explanation:
Answer:
B. A trade agreement
Explanation:
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to avoid an illegal activity. to secure her privacy rights. to challenge the Ninth Amendment. to have a state law declared unconstitutional.
Answer:
to have a law declared unconstitutional
Explanation:
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.
What is the right Jane Roe fought for?Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.
Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Jane Roe case
brainly.com/question/10184794
what is the juditial system
Answer:
The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law (which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce law (which is the responsibility of the executive), but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.
In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.
Explanation:
Answer:
The judicial system, aka branch, decides on how laws will help the citizens in real life situations, and whether or not it will break the Constitution.
Explanation:
pls mark brainiest and hope you have a great day! ;)
If you were arrested which would you rather have, a private lawyer or a public defender? Explain your answer
define the term advocacy and mention three reasons why protestors in an advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protest.
Advocacy refers to the act of publicly supporting a particular cause or issue, and protestors in advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protests due to safety concerns, legal repercussions, and negative public perception.
Any action that promotes, urges, justifies, defends, or pleads on behalf of another person is referred to as advocacy.
What is Advocacy?Getting support from another individual to help you communicate your opinions and wishes and help you stand up for your rights is referred to as advocacy.
Your advocate is a person who supports you in this way. There are a number of reasons why protestors participating in an advocacy campaign should refrain from using violence. The three are security, legitimacy, and legality. By supplying policymakers with the data they need to make decisions and, in turn, influence legislation, advocates can have significant positive effects on the puiblic's health. Effective advocacy does not necessarily require protracted or complicated legislative procedure.
Therefore, we can conclude that advocacy is when person pleads on behalf of another.
Learn more about Advocacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29639066
#SPJ5
After a robbery why should you move away any place that a robber may have been?
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
What is the concept of the statement?Stealing from another person's person or immediate vicinity while using force or the threat of force with the purpose to steal aggravated robbery. The unjustifiable taking of someone else's property by using force or threatening to use force in order to instill fear.
Heists are defined as the theft of cash or valuable objects like artwork, jewellery, or silver. Under English and Welsh law, a robbery differs from a burglary in that a robbery entails the use of force which means that some of the heists commonly known as robberies were actually burglaries.
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
Thus, After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order.
For more details about concept of the statement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25976833
#SPJ2
the following are examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts except: group of answer choices appellate court family court traffic court probate court
The appellate court is not an example of limited jurisdiction trial courts
Appellate courts hear and assess appeals in the American legal system. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that they are fair and that the correct law was applied. It is not an illustration of a trial court with restricted jurisdiction. In matters that have been appealed from lower courts, an appellate court instead evaluates the legal questions and arguments raised in written briefs and during oral arguments rather than conducting trials or hearing evidence.
The other three given options namely family court, traffic court, and probate court are all examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts, which are tribunals with the power to hear and decide issues pertaining to a specific area of law or subject matter.
Read more about the Appellate court on:
https://brainly.com/question/11744340
#SPJ4
determine the concentration of the unknown cuso4 solution. explain how you made this determination.
The point at which the blue color disappears indicates that all of the cuso4 has reacted with the Na2S2O3. From here, you can use stoichiometry to calculate the concentration of the cuso4 solution based on the volume and concentration of the Na2S2O3 solution used.
To determine the concentration of an unknown CuSO4 solution, you can use a method called titration. In this process, you'll need a standard solution with a known concentration, usually a strong base like NaOH, to react with the CuSO4 solution. Follow these steps:
1. Prepare a burette with the standard NaOH solution.
2. Take a known volume of the unknown CuSO4 solution in a conical flask and add a few drops of a suitable indicator, like phenolphthalein.
3. Slowly add the NaOH solution from the burette to the CuSO4 solution, while constantly swirling the flask to mix the solutions.
4. The indicator will change color when the reaction is complete, which indicates the endpoint of the titration.
5. Record the volume of the NaOH solution used to reach the endpoint.
6. Use the balanced chemical equation for the reaction and the known concentration of NaOH to calculate the concentration of the CuSO4 solution using the formula:
(concentration of NaOH) × (volume of NaOH) = (concentration of CuSO4) × (volume of CuSO4)
By performing this titration, you can accurately determine the concentration of the unknown CuSO4 solution.
To learn more about Cus04 please visit
https://brainly.com/question/18831201
#SPJ11
who created individual rights
Answer:
The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
Hope this helps :) <3
Answer:james madison
Explanation:The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
Describe the political system of mexico
Provide a definition for the political system.
Provide evidence for how the political system in the country works.
Support your narrative with at least one academic source and at least one visual source (picture or video).
The political system of Mexico is a federal presidential representative democratic republic. Mexico's government is divided into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The President of Mexico is the head of state and the head of government.
The Senate and the Chamber of Deputies are the two legislative chambers. The judiciary branch is composed of a Supreme Court and lower courts, according to the Mexican constitution. The political system of Mexico is governed by a set of laws and regulations that have evolved over time to reflect the country's political, social, and economic realities. Evidence for how the political system works in Mexico:
Mexico has a multi-party system in which various political parties compete for seats in the legislature and the presidency. The President is elected every six years via popular vote and cannot be re-elected. The Senate has 128 seats, while the Chamber of Deputies has 500. Members of the Chamber of Deputies are elected every three years by a direct vote.
To know more about democratic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements about women’s rights is true?
Women received the right to vote with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Women received the right to vote before African Americans.
In 1920, women received the right to vote nationally through an amendment to the Constitution.
In 1920, the U.S. Supreme Court deliberated over women’s voting rights and did not reach a consensus.
Answer:
Women received the vote with little effort or opposition. Suffragists’ main strategy was the use of political cartoons. The women’s suffrage movement occurred in isolation from other social
Explanation:
The statement that is true about the rights of women is granted through an amendment in the constitution in the year 1920.
Option C is the correct answer.
What is an amendment?
The amendment is referring to changing any text or improvising it to make it more clear in the constitution of a country.
In the year 1920, there was an amendment passed that provided women the right to vote in the elections. This happened due to the suffrage movement being led by the National American Suffrage Association and its anti-suffrage activities.
Therefore, the statement described in option C is the correct answer.
Learn more about the amendment in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ2
What is the definition of a municipality?
a division of government directly below the state level
a city department charged with enforcing local laws
a city, town, or village with its own government
a set of laws and policies for a county
Generally speaking, a municipality is a single administrative entity having corporate status and the power to govern itself in accordance with local, state, and federal laws.
What does the municipality do?A municipality is essentially the state government's answer to the demand for specific public services (such as trash disposal, police and fire protection, water supply, and health care) beyond what the county or other local governments in the area are able to provide.
What qualities does a municipality have?A municipality must have at least one of the following qualities: a unique geographical region. an extremely public persona. formal structure.
To know more about municipality visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30190342
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. a city, town, or village with its own government
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge quiz
what would happen if there was no national court system?
Answer:
Lack of a national court system in the country means there would be absence of fair hearing. Absence of court system means there will be lots of abuse of power and lawlessness.
Discuss the sources of inner conflict in correctional environment in South Africa?
Answer:
National Council for Correctional Services
The NCCS is a statutory body that guides the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services in developing policy relating to the correctional system and the sentence-management process.
Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional Services
The JICS was established in 1998 with the statutory objective to facilitate the inspection of correctional centres so that the inspecting judge may report on the treatment of inmates and on conditions in correctional centres. The JICS is an independent office.
Explanation:
Answer:
National Council for Correctional Services
The NCCS is a statutory body that guides the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services in developing policy relating to the correctional system and the sentence-management process.
Explanation:
Where in the constitution are federal courts explicitly granted the power of judicial review?.
Answer:
just in surpreme court
Explanation: