Why did the national colonization law make settlers negotiate with state governments?

please helppp

Answer:

Orlando realized that everyone has mate in the 19th century,  except herself.

Explanation:

'Orlando' is a novel written by Virginia Woolf. The novel is about a poet, who is turned into woman from man and keeps on changing his gender.

In chapter 5, when Orlando enters the nineteenth century, she realizes that much have changed in England in the century. One thing that she realizes that have happened in the 19th century, to everyone alive was that everyone has mate. In the 19th century, Orlando wakes up in the England where everyone is married and has life partner, except herself.

It was only Orlando, in the nineteenth century, who was not married or had any mate.

This statement is false. Instead, the correct statement is "The earliest civilizations developed in fertile river valleys, not in the mountains."

In conclusion, it is important to recognize that the earliest civilizations emerged in fertile river valleys, where access to water and fertile soil provided the foundation for agricultural prosperity and the development of complex societies.

For more questions on earliest civilizations:

https://brainly.com/question/2203731

#SPJ8

Answer:

With the Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution of India enacted in 1976, the Preamble to the Constitution asserted that India is a secular nation. The Indian Constitution has allowed extensive interference of the state in religious affairs. ... India does partially separate religion and state.

Answer:

12 million immigrants

Explanation:

By the way, I know you won't give brainliest as you don't have any. Please don't lie about that stuff.

Answer:

B. The french selling the Louisiana Territory to the united states

Explanation:

took the test

Answer:

begari34 hanutef 7 jwqayi99

Explanation:

In the 1830s, one argument against the Second National Bank of the United States was that it was seen as benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the common people.

The option (A) is correct.

Critics argued that the bank's policies, such as requiring specie (gold and silver) for loans and exerting control over the nation's currency, favored the interests of wealthy elites and commercial banks.

They claimed that the bank's operations and policies concentrated economic power in the hands of a few while burdening the average citizens with financial hardships. This perception of the bank as benefiting the wealthy and exploiting the common people contributed to the opposition against its existence.

Learn more about Second National Bank:

https://brainly.com/question/3837091

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

In the 1830s, what was one argument against the Second National Bank?

(A) The wealthy at the expense of the common people.

(B) The bank could not help pay for national expenses.

(C) The bank kept the value of printed money unsteady.

(D) The bank helped state banks disrupt the national economy.

Answer:

Edwards views God as the puppet master who has a grand plan for humanity.

Explanation:

He believes that any moment, on a whim, God may destroy us. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” Edwards uses images to show the reader this belief.

Answer:

Then the branches would be unbalanced.

Explanation:

The branches could freely do what they'd like, gaining a significance in power. The government would not be stable, and it is not constitutional: Checks and balances keep the government limited and without too much power.

The most contributing factor to high unemployment in the United States after World War I was the supply of labor exceeded its demand.

The end of World War I resulted in the rise of industrial production as well as economic growth in the United States. However, the production and growth did not sustain and the United States faced a recession by the early 1920s.

This period was characterized by a rise in labor supply due to several reasons, such as immigration, returning soldiers, and a rise in the working-age population ultimately leading to a surplus of labor. Simultaneously, there was a fall in demand for labor because of declining production and foreign trade.

So, option (d) is correct.

To know more about, World War I, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28927253

Answer:

slaves

Explanation:

Answer:

slaves

Explanation:

Just took the test

Answer:

C) international help to deal with human-rights violations

Explanation:

edgen

The Congolese people began to react to Belgian torture by calling for C. international help to deal with human rights violations.

From 1885 to 1908, King Leopold II of Belgium had a stronghold on the Congo Free state where he exploited the resources (rubber especially) of the local people and subjected them to hard labor. At that time, rubber was profitable and the Congo natives who were made to work at the plantations were given quotas or targets that they were to deliver. Failure to meet these targets resulted in the mutilation of their body parts as seen in the pictures.

These acts prompted an international cry for help. Roger Casement, a British Consul was instructed by the British government to investigate the human rights abuses in Congo. His eye-witness account resulted in the overthrow of King Leopold II of Belgium on November 15, 1908.

Summarily, the Congolese people reacted to the torture meted on them during the Belgium rule by calling for international help to deal with human rights violations.

Learn more about Congolese torture under Belgium rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/1484278

Answer:

At the end of World War I, Germans could hardly recognize their country. Up to 3 million Germans, including 15 percent of its men, had been killed. Germany had been forced to become a republic instead of a monarchy, and its citizens were humiliated by their nation's bitter loss.

Explanation:

there you go

Numerous injustices persist, including systemic racism, gender inequality, economic disparities, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, and political oppression. These injustices manifest in various forms and affect different communities worldwide. For example, racial discrimination continues to marginalize and disadvantage minority groups, with disparities in areas such as education, employment, and criminal justice. Gender inequality persists in many societies, leading to unequal access to opportunities, violence against women, and limited reproductive rights.

Human rights abuses occur in numerous regions, including violations of freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, as well as infringements on privacy and the right to a fair trial. Economic inequalities remain stark, with a significant portion of the global population living in poverty, lacking access to basic needs such as healthcare, education, and clean water.

Environmental injustices are also prominent, with marginalized communities disproportionately bearing the brunt of pollution, climate change, and resource exploitation. Political oppression, censorship, and restricted freedoms curtail democratic processes and limit citizens' ability to express their opinions or participate fully in society.

While addressing these injustices is crucial, it is important to pursue change through legal and peaceful means. Civil disobedience, while historically associated with some movements, carries legal consequences and should be undertaken thoughtfully and responsibly. Instead, individuals and communities can engage in activism, advocacy, education, and support organizations and initiatives working towards justice and equality.

Ultimately, the fight against injustices requires collective effort, public awareness, policy changes, and sustained commitment to creating a more equitable and just world for all.

for more questions on injustices  

https://brainly.com/question/28780655

#SPJ8

In 1947, outgoing colonial rulers of India split the subcontinent into two states based on the distribution of raw materials and infrastructure is false. The correct option is false.

It is not true that outgoing colonial rulers of India divided the subcontinent into two states in 1947 based on raw material and infrastructural distribution. The Indian Independence Act was passed by the British Parliament in July 1947. It commanded that the dominions of India and Pakistan be defined by midnight on the 14th and 15th of August, 1947, which is marked annually as Independence Day, and that the assets of the world's biggest empire, which had been intertwined in myriad ways for more than a century, be split within a single month.

Racing against the clock, two boundary commissions worked feverishly to divide Punjab and Bengal in such a way that the maximum practical number of Muslims were left to the west of the former's new boundary and to the east of the latter's, but as soon as the new borders became known, roughly 15 million Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs fled their homes.

Learn more about India, here:

https://brainly.com/question/31213274

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete, but the complete question most probably was:

In 1947, outgoing colonial rulers of India split the subcontinent into two states based on the distribution of raw materials and infrastructure. True or false.

Answer:

British troops were permanently stationed  in Boston.

The people of Boston faced higher taxes  than colonists in other cities.

Explanation:

There was greater tension between the colonists and the British in Boston than in other colonial cities due to the following two reasons:

1. British troops were permanently stationed in Boston.

2. The people of Boston faced higher taxes than colonists in other cities.

With the arrival of British soldiers in October 1768, tensions increased in Boston that were already on the edge of an uprising.

Answer: A. Americans were angry with hoover for not doing enough to help them out if hard times.

Explanation: American people hated Hoover because everyone thought that He was the reason for the USA economic setback.

Answer:

Buck can't remember the Sunland in California once he becomes a sled dog because of the beating he received.

Answer:

From my knowledge, the difference between Christians and Jews is that Christians believe in God and Jesus, but Jews just believe in God.

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Sovereignty basically means supreme power or authority. A country can be called Sovereign if the country, has one centralized government that has the power to govern a specific area. If a country can't control its territory, It can't be Sovereign.

Mark me as Brainliest, if this answer helped

Answer:

Its democracies

Explanation:

Answer:

democracies

Explanation:

The democracies are the best option, since the federalist paper when james madison does states that democracies "have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths.".

The interpretations of the idea that governments derive their power "from the consent of the governed" change between the writing of the Declaration of Independence and today is B: Interpretations narrowed to allow the government to disregard the consent of most citizens

The Declaration of Independence can be described as one that focus on the basic ideas that God made all men equal and gave them the rights of life, liberty,  as well as pursuit of happiness.

It should eb noted that the document also stressed that the main business of government is to protect these rights and also established that government tries to withhold these rights, the people are free to revolt  however considering the case above the Interpretations narrowed to allow the government to disregard the consent of most citizens.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about Declaration of Independence at:

https://brainly.com/question/14651945

#SPJ1

Answer:

history is important because it helps us understand what happened in the past.

Even though global history may seem distant, understanding history shows how all events are interconnected. As a society, it enables us to learn from our previous errors, which assists us in deciding how to approach the future. It helps in our understanding of the diverse causes of human behavior. As a result, it makes us more objective when making decisions. One can better deal with the challenges and opportunities of the present and future by understanding the enormous complexity of our planet via history. History shapes our sense of identity. People need to become aware of their shared history. What we are currently is a result of past events.

According to a philosopher, the only thing we can learn from history is that there is nothing to learn. It is a worrying thought, considering how many mistakes people have made throughout history. As is usually stated, history repeats itself.

The sort of pollution a business enterprise creates whilst it clears out a forest is called "air pollution."

Air pollution is the infection of air because of the presence of materials within the surroundings that might be dangerous to the fitness of human beings and different dwelling beings, or cause harm to the weather or materials.

There are many unique forms of air pollutants, including gases (together with ammonia, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, methane, carbon dioxide, and chlorofluorocarbons), particulates and organic molecules.

Air pollutants can cause diseases, allergies, and even death in humans; they can also harm other living organisms, such as animals and food crops, and they can harm the natural environment.

Air pollutants are a significant risk factor for a number of pollution-related diseases, including respiratory infections, coronary heart disease, COPD, stroke, and lung cancer.

Growing evidence suggests that exposure to air pollution is linked to lower IQ scores, impaired cognition, and an increased risk of psychiatric issues such as depression and harmful perinatal fitness.

So it's clear that reducing air pollutants is the ideal answer.

Learn more about Air pollution, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/16357973

#SPJ2

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer: Handcrafted yarn will be scarcer because it takes more time and labor to produce it.

Explanation: Scarcity in economics is a term describing finite resources, or the perception of limited resources, when there’s not enough to fulfill human needs and wants. Scarcity affects the monetary value people place on goods and services and how governments and private firms decide to distribute resources. Things that are scarce, like gold, diamonds, or certain kinds of knowledge, are more valuable for being scarce because sellers of these goods and services can set higher prices.

Handcrafted yarn will be scarcer than mass-produced yarn because it takes more time and labor to produce it. Time and labor are limited resources that have alternative uses. For example, a craftsperson could use their time and labor to make something else instead of yarn. Therefore, handcrafted yarn has a higher opportunity cost than mass-produced yarn. Opportunity cost reflects the inputs’ scarcity.

Mass-produced yarn will be less scarce than handcrafted yarn because it does not take as much time and labor to produce it. Machines can produce yarn faster and more efficiently than humans. Therefore, mass-produced yarn has a lower opportunity cost than handcrafted yarn.

The company should consider how scarcity affects the supply and demand of yarn before making a decision. Supply is the amount of a good or service that sellers are willing and able to offer at a given price. Demand is the amount of a good or service that buyers are willing and able to purchase at a given price. The price of a good or service is determined by the interaction of supply and demand in a market.

If the company chooses to make wool sweaters from handcrafted yarn, it will face a lower supply and a higher price of yarn. This means that the company will have to pay more for the raw material and may not be able to produce as many sweaters as it wants. The company will also have to charge a higher price for its sweaters to cover its costs and make a profit. This may reduce the demand for its sweaters, as some buyers may not be willing or able to pay the higher price.

If the company chooses to make wool sweaters from mass-produced yarn, it will face a higher supply and a lower price of yarn. This means that the company will have to pay less for the raw material and may be able to produce more sweaters than it wants. The company will also be able to charge a lower price for its sweaters and still make a profit. This may increase the demand for its sweaters, as more buyers may be willing and able to pay the lower price.

The company should weigh the pros and cons of each option and decide which one maximizes its utility, or satisfaction, given its budget constraints and preferences.

Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)

Answer:

hey !!

1. Availability of resources: The scarcity of raw materials required for yarn production, such as wool, needs to be considered. If the supply of high-quality wool is limited, using it for individual craftspeople's yarn may result in a higher opportunity cost for the company.

Cost of production: Scarcity can affect the cost of production. Mass-produced yarn may be more cost-effective due to economies of scale and the availability of machinery, whereas yarn produced by individual craftspeople might require higher labour costs and specialized skills.

Time and efficiency: Consider the time required to produce yarn using either method. If the demand for wool sweaters is high, mass-produced yarn could be more efficient in meeting customer demands within shorter timeframes. Individual craftspeople may have limited capacity and slower production rates.

Uniqueness and craftsmanship: Scarcity can also create value in terms of uniqueness and craftsmanship. Yarn spun and dyed by individual craftspeople might result in higher-quality and more distinctive products, appealing to customers seeking handcrafted, artisanal items. This uniqueness can be a competitive advantage.

Consumer preferences: The company should consider customer preferences and market trends. Some customers may be willing to pay a premium for products made with artisanal yarn, while others may prioritize the affordability and availability offered by mass-produced yarn.

To clarify, scarcity refers to the limited availability of a resource relative to its demand. In the context of yarn production, scarcity can be understood differently based on the factors involved:

Availability and production capacity: Handcrafted yarn may be considered scarcer if there are limited craftspeople available or if the production capacity is low. It requires skilled individuals to spin and dye the yarn, and if there is a shortage of such artisans, the availability of handcrafted yarn may be limited.

Scalability and production efficiency: Mass-produced yarn, on the other hand, benefits from economies of scale and production efficiency. With machinery and automated processes, mass production can meet higher demands more quickly and consistently. In this sense, mass-produced yarn is less scarce in terms of availability and production capacity.

It's important to note that scarcity can be evaluated from different perspectives. If we focus on the scarcity of labour and time, handcrafted yarn may indeed be scarcer due to the manual labour and time-intensive nature of the process. However, if we consider availability and scalability, mass-produced yarn may be less scarce due to its ability to meet larger market demands.

hope this helps :)

Can you make it uhh clear? It blurred i can't read it

Answer:

Explanation:

1793. Saint Pierre and Miquelon saw action during the French Revolution when France had declared war on the United Kingdom as part of the War of the First Coalition. This led to a British attack on the islands under Captain William Affleck of Halifax who captured the islands in May 1793.