Why might Thor Heyerdahl’s Kon-Tiki voyage be considered
important as well as misleading for our understanding of the
settlement of the Pacific islands?
Enable GingerCannot connect to Ginger Check y
Thor Heyerdahl's Kon-Tiki voyage is considered important for our understanding of the settlement of the Pacific islands because it challenged existing theories about how the islands were populated. Heyerdahl's direct answer to this question was that Polynesians settled the islands by intentionally sailing from South America to Polynesia on rafts. This hypothesis was in contrast to the prevailing belief that the islands were settled by people who migrated from Asia to the Pacific islands.
Heyerdahl's solution to test his hypothesis was to construct a raft using materials that would have been available to prehistoric South Americans and attempt to sail from Peru to Polynesia. The successful completion of the Kon-Tiki voyage in 1947 seemed to support his theory and suggested that ancient South Americans were capable of long-distance oceanic voyages.
However, Heyerdahl's Kon-Tiki voyage has also been considered misleading because subsequent archaeological and genetic evidence has provided a more nuanced understanding of the settlement of the Pacific islands. It is now widely accepted that the islands were settled by Austronesian-speaking people originating from Southeast Asia. These settlers had sophisticated seafaring technology and knowledge, which allowed them to navigate and settle the Pacific islands.
In summary, while Thor Heyerdahl's Kon-Tiki voyage was important in challenging existing theories about the settlement of the Pacific islands, it is now considered misleading because it did not provide a complete and accurate understanding of the actual settlement patterns and the role of Austronesian-speaking peoples in the Pacific.
Tagging:
To know more about considered visit:
brainly.com/question/30746025
#SPJ11
according to document c, why did moctezuma tell cortes that the aztecs had been expecting him?
According to document c, Moctezuma told Cortes that the Aztecs had been expecting him because of a legend that predicted a white-skinned god, Quetzalcoatl, would return from the east to reclaim his throne.
Cortes was viewed as the potential fulfillment of this prophecy. The document C says that Moctezuma explained to Cortes that the Aztecs had been waiting for him. The reason behind it was the legend that had spread across their nation.
According to the Aztec legend, a white-skinned god called Quetzalcoatl was expected to return from the east one day, to take back his throne. Cortes was seen by the Aztecs as the possible fulfillment of this prediction.
Thus, Moctezuma told Cortes that the Aztecs had been waiting for his arrival, hoping that he might be the prophesied god. The people of the Aztec were fearful of Cortes because they were aware of his immense power and ability to gain control of the nation. Therefore, they treated him with honor and respect while he was in their land.
To learn more about legend, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/18452819
#SPJ11
Animal cells obtain energy by
Answer: cellular respiration
Explanation:
process that releases energy by combining glucose and oxygen.
Why do you think jefferson brings up lafayette after the second cabinet battle? explain the importance.
In conclusion, Jefferson's mention of Lafayette highlights the significance of historical alliances and their impact on national interests.
Jefferson brings up Lafayette after the second cabinet battle because Lafayette was a key figure in the American Revolution and had a close relationship with Jefferson. In the song "Cabinet Battle #2" from the musical Hamilton, Jefferson mentions Lafayette to emphasize the importance of maintaining strong ties with France. Lafayette symbolizes the support and alliance between the United States and France during the Revolutionary War.
By referencing Lafayette, Jefferson is reminding his audience of the assistance and friendship France provided during a critical time in American history. This reinforces the idea that maintaining good relations with France is crucial for the United States' continued success.
In conclusion, Jefferson's mention of Lafayette highlights the significance of historical alliances and their impact on national interests.
To know more about historical alliances visit:
https://brainly.com/question/508389
#SPJ11
What was one result of President’s Trump’s executive order that restricted travel from seven foreign countries?
Congress passed a similar law a year later.
The order was revoked by President Biden.
A federal agency was created to implement it.
The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional.
During the classical era, slaves comprised more than one-third of the total population in
A) India.
B) China.
C) the Persian Empire.
D) the Greco-Roman world.
During the classical era, slaves comprised more than one-third of the total population in the Greco-Roman world. The correct option is D.
Slavery was a common institution in ancient Greece and Rome, and it played a significant role in their societies. Slavery was deeply ingrained in the economic, social, and political systems of these civilizations.
In ancient Greece, slavery was a fundamental part of the society, and slaves were employed in various capacities. They worked in households, mines, agriculture, and even as tutors or entertainers. Slaves were considered property and had no legal rights or personal freedoms. While estimates vary, it is believed that during the classical era, slaves constituted around one-third or even more of the population in ancient Greece.
Similarly, in the Roman Empire, slavery was widespread. Slaves were used for a wide range of tasks, including domestic labor, agriculture, construction, and as gladiators. Slavery was seen as a key component of the Roman economy, and the number of slaves in Rome and its territories grew significantly over time. It is estimated that during the classical era, slaves made up more than one-third of the population in the Roman Empire.
In contrast, while slavery existed in India, China, and the Persian Empire during the classical era, it did not comprise such a large portion of the population as it did in the Greco-Roman world. The prevalence and extent of slavery in these regions varied, and slavery played a different role in their respective societies.
In India, slavery existed but was not as widespread as in the Greco-Roman world. The caste system played a more prominent role in Indian society, although there were instances of slavery and servitude.
In China, slavery existed but was generally on a smaller scale compared to other regions. Serfdom and indentured labor were more common forms of unfree labor in Chinese society.
In the Persian Empire, slavery was present, but its extent and prevalence in society are not as well-documented compared to the Greco-Roman world.
In conclusion, while slavery was present in various classical civilizations, it was in the Greco-Roman world, specifically ancient Greece and Rome, where slaves comprised more than one-third of the total population. The institution of slavery had a profound impact on these societies, shaping their economies, social structures, and everyday lives. Therefore the correct answer is D.
To learn more about Greco-Roman world refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/4736667
#SPJ11
List three rights that the colonists stated they had or should have as part of the Stamp Act Congress.
Answer: To be taxed less, to be able to have free stamps, and to be able to full send.
Explanation:
(:
What are the three major characteristics of feudalism?
A. Europe, Asia, and Africa
B. Medicine, Trading, and Geography
C. Social, Political, and Economics
D. Humans, Land, and Education
Answer: C. Social, Political, and Economic
Explanation:
the rest is not a characteristic of feudalism instead its something else so the only one that was apart of feudalism was C. * therefore meaning it has to be C right?*
write a poem consisting 2-3 stanza that promote community health.
Answer:
I have amassed enough wealth
but not bestowed with good health
I have fine body and healthy mind
permanent weakness with diseases of all kinds
I try to look reasonable as far as possible
something forces me not to be accessible
possible so much wealth stops me to be free?
Like so many heavy fruits laden on tree
Explanation:
I hope it works out
Answer:
 Wondering ThoughtsI wonder if heuristic, tentative thoughts, and ambiguous, nebulous feelings, coalesce, sometimes into resonant knowing
A highway used to not connect to other highways until years later when construction began to connect it to other highways. What power did government express?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The power the government is expressing is its power granted by the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Yes, the federal government has the power to construct interstate highways.
The 10th Amendment promotes a balance of power between the Federal and State governments in the federal system.
In less complicated terms, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution refers to the idea that any power that is not considered to the federal government is given to the states. On September 5, 1789, the amendment was added to the US Constitution. Literally, the 10th Amendment says: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively or the people." The amendment respects the principle of federalism and gives the states the faculty to have some rights to create a balance of powers.
Furthermore, the Highway Act of 1956, strengthen the power of the federal government to construct highways.
during the cold war the foreign policy of the united states called for in the event of a soviet attack
During the Cold War, the foreign policy of the United States was largely focused on containing the spread of communism and countering the influence of the Soviet Union. In the event of a Soviet attack, the US had a well-defined plan to respond.
The US foreign policy during the Cold War was shaped by the Truman Doctrine, which aimed to prevent the spread of communism by providing military and economic aid to countries threatened by Soviet expansion. The US also established military alliances such as NATO to strengthen its position against Soviet aggression.
In the event of a Soviet attack, the US had a plan called the Massive Retaliation Doctrine, which involved responding with overwhelming force, including the use of nuclear weapons. This strategy was meant to deter Soviet aggression by showing that the US was willing to use all means necessary to defend itself and its allies.
However, over time, this policy evolved into a more flexible approach known as Flexible Response. This strategy emphasized a range of military options, including conventional forces and special operations, rather than relying solely on nuclear weapons.
In conclusion, the US foreign policy during the Cold War was shaped by the need to counter Soviet influence and protect its interests and allies. In the event of a Soviet attack, the US had a well-defined plan to respond, which evolved over time to include a range of military options.
Learn more about US foreign policy: https://brainly.com/question/15658892
#SPJ11
Hey guys please help fast!! need this right now!!
Which one is NOT TRUE?
Babe Ruth is considered on the the greatest baseball players in history.
Babe Ruth was an athlete that came out of the 1920s.
Babe Ruth set records for scoring the most touchdowns.
Answer:
I think that C) Babe Ruth set records for scoring the most touchdowns is not true
Explanation:
Babe Ruth didn't play football he played baseball which means he didn't score touchdowns.
I hope this helps:))
In the 17s how was the Iroquois‘s and the Lenapee different
Answer: The Iroquois used the covenant chain to advance their own interests and preserve their own independence, while the Lenape were traditionally matrilineal and matrilocal
Recall the agriculture (farming) led to civilization. Why do you think the first civilizations developed calendars that kept track of
the days of the year?
25
answer hone
Answer:
The reason why is that agriculture is a higly seasonal economic activity. The growth of crops depends largely on the season of the year.
Because agriculture was the most important economic activity of ancient civilizations, these civilizations had to keep track of time, in order to know when to grow the crops, when to collect them, and when to regrow them.
With unionization on the downturn, why should an organization be concerned about labor relations? What benefits are received and what costs are incurred when workers unionize?
Even with unionization on the downturn, organizations should still be concerned about labor relations because maintaining positive and productive relationships with their workforce is essential for several reasons. While the specific benefits and costs of unionization can vary depending on the context and industry, here are some general considerations:
Benefits of Workers Unionizing:
1. Collective Bargaining Power: Unionized workers have the ability to collectively bargain for better wages, benefits, working conditions, and job security. This can lead to improved employee satisfaction and morale.
2. Legal Protection: Unions often provide legal representation and support to workers in cases of grievances, disputes, or unfair treatment, offering a sense of security and recourse for employees.
3. Standardization: Union contracts typically establish standardized rules and procedures, ensuring consistent treatment of workers and reducing potential disparities or favoritism.
4. Worker Empowerment: Unionization can empower workers by giving them a voice and a platform to address workplace concerns, fostering a sense of participation and democracy in decision-making processes.
Costs of Workers Unionizing:
1. Increased Labor Costs: Collective bargaining agreements may result in higher wages, benefits, and operational costs for the organization, potentially impacting profitability.
2. Loss of Management Flexibility: Union contracts can limit managerial discretion and decision-making authority, leading to a more structured and rigid work environment.
3. Potential Disruption: Strikes, work stoppages, or labor disputes may occur during negotiations or in response to grievances, resulting in operational disruptions and financial losses.
4. Administrative Burden: Negotiating and managing union contracts requires time, resources, and expertise, which can place an additional administrative burden on the organization.
It's important to note that the impact of unionization can vary depending on the organization, industry, and specific circumstances. While some organizations may view unions as a challenge or additional cost, others may see them as an opportunity for collaboration and improved employee relations. Ultimately, organizations should strive to maintain positive labor relations by fostering open communication, addressing employee concerns, and providing fair and competitive compensation and working conditions, regardless of unionization status.
To learn more about unionization refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31678862#
#SPJ11
Which of the following musical genres BEST expresses the upbeat attitude of the 1920s?
Ragtime
Ballad
Jazz
Rock
Answer:
Jazz
Explanation:
Answer:
Jazz was the best musical genre of the roaring 20's.
How did the Philipines get their independance
Answer:
In 1907, the Philippines convened its first elected assembly, and in 1916, the Jones Act promised the nation eventual independence. The archipelago became an autonomous commonwealth in 1935, and the U.S. granted independence in 1946.
Explanation:
Why did the US stop with the Trans Atlantic slave trade?
Answer: new federal law Emplaced.
Explanation:
On the first day of January, 1808, a new Federal law made it illegal to import captive people from Africa into the United States. This date marks the end—the permanent, legal closure—of the trans-Atlantic slave trade into our country.
Answer:
An Atlantic trade in African slaves began in 1444, when the portuguese began to ship slaves from west Africa to Europe. For the next hundred years, the main market for these slaves were in Europe and the Atlantic islands owned by portugal and spain. However the discovery of the American in 1492 led to the creation of new colonies with a great need for cheap labour, and from the mid-sixteenth century European ships were carrying African slaves to Brazil, the Caribbean, and North America, in steadily increasing quantities.
How was banking in Texas different during the Mexican national and Texas statehood eras?
Two centuries ago Texas was a sparsely populated and desolate backwater on the distant frontier of the waning Spanish empire, decades away from joining the emerging nation that grew out of the thirteen British colonies on the eastern shore of North America.
Today the Texas economy is large, diverse and dynamic, boasting a gross state product (GSP) valued at almost $925 billion in 2005. If the Lone Star State were an independent country, it would have the tenth largest national economy in the world--just behind Spain and Canada, and ahead of Brazil, the Republic of Korea, and India--according to data from the World Bank.
The actual unfolding of the transformation of the Texas economy was wholly unpredictable at the beginning of the 1800s when the territory was still a dangerous, desolate and dusty outpost, well beyond the frontier of substantial European settlement. Only in the last decades of the 19th century did the potential of the territory as an economic and political powerhouse begin to reveal itself. But, the growth of the cotton industry, the development of railroads and the discovery of large quantities of oil were only the first of a series of dramatic transformations that would make the Lone Star State the economic powerhouse it is today.
A combination of unexpected bounty in the form of mineral wealth and other resources, growing integration into the national economy of the United States (which itself underwent its own series of transformations), the growth of the service economy and the high technology industry, and the state's increasingly important geographic position at one of the frontiers of an extensive free trade area that includes Mexico and Canada, have all contributed to the ongoing transformation of the state.
in what nation did the members of the hijacking teams train?
In Afghanistan, the members of the hijacking teams train. option (A) is correct.
Following their preparation at al-Qaeda instructional courses in Afghanistan, they were picked by Container Loaded and al-Qaeda's tactical wing because of their broad information on Western culture and language abilities, expanding the mission's functional security and its opportunities for progress.
The fourth planned pilot, Ramzi Canister al-Shibh, an individual from the Hamburg cell, likewise decided to take part in the assaults yet couldn't get a visa for a section into the US. He was subsequently supplanted by Hani Hanjour, a Saudi public.
Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about hijacking:
https://brainly.com/question/27021767
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
In what nation did the members of the hijacking teams train?
(A) Afghanistan
(B) Pakistan
(C) United states
characteristics of progressive important to Texas
There has been a long history of Progressive activities in Texas with some popular persons like Barbara Jordan heading progressive movements and courses.
Some of the characteristics are:
An emphasis on social and economic justice such as efforts to improve working conditions and access to education.Usually centered at the urban areas, where there is greater diversity and a larger population of working-class and marginalized communities.Advocated for policies that prioritize the environment, including renewable energy and conservation efforts.Texas progressives have also pushed for increased access to healthcare, particularly for low-income and uninsured Texans.What are Progressives?Progressives strongly believed that it is government's responsibility to take care of social and economic issues and be committed to social justice and reform in the society.
They are those political and social movement that came up in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
In Texas, progressives advocated for various reforms, like women's suffrage, environmental protection, worker's rights, public education, etc.
Learn more about progressives at brainly.com/question/115015
#SPJ1
What was the intended purpose of federal legalization such as the 1947 Taft Hartley act
Answer:
Enacted in 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act was intended to protect employee rights by unfair practices by unions. The act prohibits unions from performing certain practices and requires disclosure of certain activities. The act has many detractors who feel the act has hurt labor laws and decrease worker rights
Which three states had the most Conservation areas created by Roosevelt?
Answer:
California, Pensilvania, Illinois
Explanation:
One of the items Progressives insisted on in the state Constitution was direct
democracy in the form of (Standard 4.8)
a. Bill of Rights and direct primaries
b. Initiatives and referendums
c. Petition and amendments
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I believe that is correct
What was the estates general called
HELPPPP!!!
Answer:
States General
Explanation:
grant adopted his total war startegy in hopes of what?
Answer:
I hope it helps:
Explanation:
destroying the South so it would surrender.
Answer:
MRCORRECT has answered the question
Explanation:
The correct answer is option C. "destroying the South so it would surrender".
General Ulysses Grant was the commander of the Union Army during American Civil War. Grant planned a great offensive strategy wishing to end the war by November of 1864. In order to achieve his goal, Grant order William T. Sherman's to march through the South to the sea drove a stake into the heart of the Confederacy, His plan was to destroy everything in sight in an attempt to crush the rebellion from its core
What did Special Treatment mean to the NAZI's and the Jews?
Answer: They called it the "Final Solution"
Explanation:
The term “Final Solution” (Die Enclosing) was a euphemism. Himmler was fully prepared to talk about killing to his immediate subordinates, but much of the Nazi killing machine was shrouded in bureaucratic euphemism. The doctors and administrators charged with murdering ‘incurables’ were the ‘Public Ambulance Service Ltd’ (Gemeinnützige Krankentransport GmbH); the motorized death squads which first went into action in Poland in 1939 were ‘task forces’ (Einsatzgruppen); the massacre of nearly 34,000 Jews in the ravine of Babi-Yar after the capture of Kiev in September 1941 was a ‘major operation’ (Gross-Aktiori). People identified for extermination in official Nazi documents were listed as those to be given ‘special treatment’ (Sonderbehandlung), sometimes abbreviated to ‘SB’, and from roughly mid-1943 the term ‘special lodging’ (Sonderunterbringung) was also used.
i used an app that is very helpful with my work so I hope its helpful if its not im sorry
What legislation did President Harrison want that was stopped by his enemy in
congress, speaker of the House Thomas Reed?
The McKinley Tariff was the legislation that was stopped by speaker of the House Thomas Reed.
What was the McKinley Tariff?It is a legislation that aimed to act as a protective tariff that raised the average duty on foreign imports to almost 50%.
This bill passing was backed by the Republicans who strongly supported high tariffs on imported goods but it was opposed by the Democrats.
Thus, the McKinley Tariff was the legislation that was stopped by speaker of the House Thomas Reed.
Read more about McKinley Tariff
brainly.com/question/11896118
#SPJ1
What were the steps the White Settlers took to take over Native American land? Were they justified in their actions? Were there other steps that the White Settlers could have taken that would have allowed for more fairness and equality?
1. The steps taken by white settlers to take over Native American land included forced removals, treaties, military campaigns, and the establishment of reservations.
2. The justification of their actions is a matter of debate, but from a historical perspective, many argue that the actions of white settlers were not justified as they involved the displacement, marginalization, and mistreatment of Native American communities.
3. Alternative steps that could have allowed for more fairness and equality could have included genuine negotiation and collaboration with Native American tribes, respecting their sovereignty and land rights, and seeking mutually beneficial agreements.
The steps taken by white settlers to take over Native American land involved various methods. Forced removals, such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830, led to the relocation of many Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to designated areas further west. Treaties were also used, often under duress or unfair circumstances, to acquire Native American lands. Military campaigns were employed to suppress resistance and exert control over territories. Finally, the establishment of reservations confined Native Americans to specific areas, further limiting their autonomy and control over their lands.
The justification of the actions taken by white settlers is a complex and controversial issue. From a historical perspective, many argue that the actions were not justified. The seizure of Native American lands involved the displacement, marginalization, and mistreatment of indigenous communities, leading to the loss of their cultural heritage, livelihoods, and sovereignty. The forced removals and unfair treaties violated the rights and dignity of Native Americans, resulting in immense suffering and lasting consequences.
Alternative steps could have been taken to promote fairness and equality. Genuine negotiation and collaboration with Native American tribes, recognizing their sovereignty and land rights, would have been a more just approach. Respecting and honoring existing treaties and agreements, rather than forcefully breaking them, would have fostered trust and cooperation. Additionally, exploring economic partnerships and shared governance models could have provided opportunities for Native Americans to maintain their way of life, exercise self-governance, and enjoy equitable benefits from the land.
Learn more about White Settlers: https://brainly.com/question/28444945
#SPJ11
The "Founding Fathers" included the idea of "separation of powers" in our government because A) they did not want these powers to be controlled by just one man or one group. B) they wanted to make sure that Congress would have more power than the other two branches. C) they wanted to make sure that the president would have more power than the other two branches. D) they wanted to make sure that the Supreme Court would have more power than the other two branches.
Answer:
A) they did not want these powers to be controlled by just one man or one group
Explanation:
They want the government to be split into equal powers with checks and balances that way one group is not more over powered than the others so the government system could be more fair and just.