Answers
According to the data on the map, New York has the highest level of protection for press freedom.
A shield law is what?
Shield law: what is it? Journalists have the option to decline to testify in court about information or the identification of sources they used to get their story. There is a shield law in 49 of the 50 states.
So how are shield laws beneficial?First, shield laws are crucial to the practise of real reporting and consequently to the presence of a free press, which is protected by the First Amendment. Without the ability to maintain their anonymity, people who might choose to provide journalists with sensitive or confidential information are less likely to do so.
To know more about Shield Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3324896
#SPJ4
Related Questions
PLEASE HURRY ASAP! I HAVE ONE HOUR AND THIRTY MINUTES TO ANSWER 25 QUESTIONS! WHOEVER ANSWERS WILL GET A SHOUTOUT IN MY NEXT QUESTION!
Look at the outline of the US Constitution below:
I._
which correctly completes the outline above?
A) Bill of Rights
B) The Preamble
C) Checks and Balances
D) The Executive Branch
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation: The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments in the Constitution. These are the first section of the constitution. The answer is A.
list out and summarize the possible available of judicial jurisdiction
Answers
The term "judiciary system" can also refer to the court system. The court has the authority to make rulings, uphold the law, and settle disputes.
Judges and other magistrates make up the bench or core of the judicial system, also known as the judiciary. The judiciary is the system of courts that decides legal issues and interprets, defends, and applies the law in legal proceedings. It is often referred to as the judicial system, judicial branch, court, or judiciary system.
The official authority to render rulings and verdicts in legal matters is referred to as jurisdiction. It may indicate the scope of a body's authority to render rulings and decisions in legal matters. Legally speaking, jurisdiction is the power granted by the law to a court to hear cases and provide decisions on legal issues pertaining to a specific geographic area and/or specific categories of legal cases. There are both federal and state court system in the United States, and different types of courts have varying jurisdictions. For instance, criminal trials can only be held in criminal courts.
Learn more about judiciary system here:
https://brainly.com/question/10025892
#SPJ9
this is meant for AlexatheBean for helping me
Answers
tyy sm for the points
Answer:
tyy sm for the points
Explanation:
2. How do witnesses differ from the other courtroom participants? a. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional. b. Witnesses don't need to show up to their court date. c. Witnesses are the only ones who aren't paid. d. Witnesses are the only ones without any formal legal training.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
Explanation:
A witness is a person who has experienced an event with his own senses. Witnesses often appear in the judiciary to establish what has happened. Thus, witnesses are summoned by both the defense and the prosecution to testify in favor of each party, providing important data that are relevant to the judicial case.
In this way, the lawyers of each party cite witnesses who witnessed the events, but also others who can provide more technical data, such as doctors, technical experts (criminal, computer, psychological, etc.) who contribute their knowledge as information in the trial.
Answer:
A. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
Explanation:
How do witnesses differ from the other courtroom participants?
Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
The u. S. Supreme court has ____________ jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Answers
Answer:The U. S. Supreme court has Original Jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Explanation:
7) A judge that makes a legal decision on a case today may look at past case law and follow the concept of
Answers
A judge that makes a legal decision on a case today may look at past case law and follow the concept of stare decisis.
Stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided," is a legal principle that directs judges to adhere to the precedent established by previous court decisions. It is based on the idea that consistency and predictability in the law are crucial for maintaining a fair and stable legal system.
When a judge is faced with a new case, they may review similar cases from the past that have addressed similar legal issues. By examining these precedents, the judge can gain insight into how prior courts have interpreted and applied the law in similar situations. The judge then applies these precedents to the current case to maintain consistency in the legal interpretation and ensure fairness in the decision-making process.
Stare decisis serves several important purposes. First, it promotes uniformity in the law by requiring judges to follow established legal principles and decisions. This consistency enhances predictability and allows individuals and businesses to make informed decisions based on settled legal standards.
Second, stare decisis contributes to judicial efficiency by relying on existing legal precedents. Rather than starting from scratch with each new case, judges can draw on the wisdom and rationale provided by previous court decisions, saving time and resources.
know more about stare decisis here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267
#SPJ11
Scholars have suggested several ways of better controlling organized crime than were discussed in the unit. If you were given the task of controlling organized crime, what would you choose to do ? Why do you think this would reduce organized crime ?
Answers
Answer:
The best ways to control organized crime :
1. The center link where such groups are being controlled from should be attacked .
2. Special forces for special crimes should be trained and maintained.
3. Special laws should be passed against such crimes for punishment and also for investigation purposes.
4. Strict actions from forces should be taken at first.
5. General public should be made aware of popular faces so that people can help the authorities also.
Write one paragraph (3-4 sentences) that answer the following 2 questions:
1. Why is it important for a society to have laws?
2. Provide examples of 2 laws that, in your opinion, are necessary to our way of life in the United States.
Answers
Heat Stress is when the body is exposed to a hot environment, the main source of cooling is sweat. However, in very high temperatures sweat does not evaporate quickly enough and therefore has very little cooling effect. As body heat increases, the ability to sustain the work activity diminishes and fatigue sets in:
Answers
High temperatures exceed the body's temperature-regulating mechanism, decreasing physical activity and weariness. In high temperatures, sweat, the body's main cooling mechanism, is ineffective, preventing evaporative cooling. Heat stroke and weariness might result.
What is Heat stress?Generally, Heat stress occurs when the body's temperature regulation system is overwhelmed by high temperatures, leading to decreased ability to perform physical activity and increased fatigue.
Sweat, the body's primary means of cooling, is less effective in very high temperatures, resulting in a lack of evaporative cooling.
This can lead to symptoms such as heat exhaustion and heat stroke.
Read more about Heat stress
https://brainly.com/question/15174745
#SPJ1
Self-defense as a justification requires imminent danger. (true or false)
Answers
Self-defense, as a justification requires imminent danger, is true.
The use of justifiable force to protect yourself or members of your family from bodily harm caused by an aggressor's attack, if the defender has grounds to believe he/she/they are in danger. A person guilty of violence, battery, or homicide frequently claims self-defense.
Sections 96 to 106 of the IPC outline defenses when someone can kill anyone in self-defense, although section 99 of the IPC clearly states that a right to private defense is only applicable where there is a realistic fear of death or great bodily harm to the individual.
Self-defense training is a way of life that teaches females to be warier in their surroundings and to be ready for the unexpected at all times. Self-defense training not just protects you, but also for others. Furthermore, training assists you in being emotionally and physically fit.
Learn more about self-defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/1525962
#SPJ4
True. Legal justifications for using force in response to an alleged threat or danger include "self-defense." However, in order for the use of force to be justified as self-defense, the threat or danger must be there right away, and the amount of force employed must be appropriate given the threat.
Self-defense is considered a legal justification for the use of force in response to a perceived threat or danger. However, for the use of force to be justified as self-defense, the danger or threat must be imminent and the force used must be proportional to the danger presented.
learn more about self defense here
https://brainly.com/question/30673507
#SPJ11
a central element of the popular front public culture was its mobilization for civil liberties, though the movement certainly has its opponents. identify the accomplishments of the following individuals, courts, or pieces of legislation during this time
Answers
Some key accomplishments during this period include the work of individuals like Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Supreme Court decisions related to civil liberties, and legislation like the Social Security Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act.
1. Franklin D. Roosevelt: As the President of the United States during this time, Roosevelt played a crucial role in advancing civil liberties through his New Deal policies, which aimed to alleviate economic hardship and improve working conditions for many Americans.
2. Supreme Court Decisions: The Supreme Court made several landmark decisions during this period that protected civil liberties, such as striking down the National Industrial Recovery Act for being too broad and upholding the Social Security Act as constitutional.
3. Social Security Act: This 1935 legislation established a social safety net for elderly and disabled citizens by providing financial assistance, thereby promoting social welfare and improving living conditions.
4. Fair Labor Standards Act: Passed in 1938, this law set minimum wage and maximum working hours standards, effectively outlawing child labor, and improving working conditions for millions of Americans.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit;
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Role and importance of law in society
Answers
Answer:
Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals. Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.Law can provide justice to the victims and punish those who are responsible for unlawful actions. In courts, a law is used to settle conflicts among the people. The main function of law is to ensure all-round development of people by providing security, peace, and protection.
Freedom of speech allows all of the following EXCEPT
O criticizing the government.
criticizing the actions of a neighbor.
telling lies that may badly harm another person.
delivering a speech in public.
Answers
Which member of the courtroom makes verbatim transcript of proceedings?
Answers
Answer:
court reporter
Explanation:
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answers
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
Answers
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Por qué la empatía y el asertividad son habilidades de la comunicación que permiten una mejor adaptación social?
Answers
Explanation:
Los seres humanos son seres sociales, por lo que existe la necesidad de desarrollar y mejorar las habilidades de comunicación para que haya una mejor adaptación social en cada entorno que los individuos necesitan para socializar, como en su comunidad local y en el entorno laboral.
Hay dos características que pueden ayudar en esta adaptación social, que es la empatía y la asertividad, que son habilidades que se complementan entre saber escuchar y saber hablar, porque una persona empática es capaz de comprender al otro emocional y cognitivamente, poniéndose en su lugar otro individuo para comprender y escuchar sin juzgar, pero generando identificación y aceptación. Una persona asertiva, en cambio, es aquella que defiende sus opiniones y se comunica de forma clara, directa y objetiva, pero no de forma agresiva, sino a través de una postura firme que genera seriedad y transparencia en la comunicación.
The local bank was robbed by two masked men. They pointed guns at
the tellers, but when one of the tellers hesitated, one of the robbers shot the
teller dead. The robbers then ran out of the bank with bags of money.
The next day, a local police officer was behind a car and, while pacing
it with his squad car (neither gaining nor losing distance between cars), the
officer looked at his speedometer and noticed they were going 49 miles per
hour. The officer then saw a sign post that set the speed limit at 35 miles per
hour. Next, the officersaw that the car slowed and turned left at a side street,
but did not signal the turn in any way. When the car did not come to a full
stop at the stop sign at the next block, the officer decided to activate the
emergency lights on the squad car and pull the car over.
The officer walked up to the driver’s side door, and asked for the driver
for his driver’s license, car registration, and proof of insurance. The driver
said, “What did I do?” When the officer again asked for the driver’s license,
car registration, and proof of insurance, the driver stated, “I don’t have it.”
The officer told the driver to stay put, returned to the squad car, and used his
onboard computer to type in the driver’s name, DOB, and social security
number. The computer processed the request and found that (1) the driver
has a prior felony conviction for a narcotics offense in 2015, and (2) the driver
has a suspended driver’s license for prior unpaid traffic offenses. Knowing
that driving with a suspended license is an arrestable offense, the officer
2
walked back to the car, asked the driver to get out, and placed him under
arrest.
The officerthen searched the car and found a gun underneath the front
of the driver’s seat. The officer seized the gun.
Noticing that the driver was sweating profusely, the officer began to
suspect that the driver might have been involved in the bank robbery. The
officer placed the driver in the back of the squad car and drove him to the
station. The officer, however, took a detour and made sure to drive past the
bank on the way to the station. The officer looked into the mirror and saw
the driver was staring at the bank with a tear in his eye. The officer then
decided to drive past the teller’s house, which had dark ribbons on the trees,
flowers, and signs mourning the teller’s death. They then saw family
members embracing on the porch. The officer said to himself out loud, “That
is such a shame. I heard that he had a newborn baby at home.” The officer
then played a song on his iPad, “I Fought the Law and The Law Won.”
The officer’s plan worked. The driver started thinking that he’s going
to do some serious time for what he did. The driver blurts out, “Ok, you got
me! I helped my friend do the bank job, but he was the one who shot the
teller. I’ll tell you everything if you promise me that I won’t spend the rest of
my life in prison!” When the officer said he could not make such promises,
the driver slumped back and stopped talking.
You are now the judge presiding over the driver’s criminal case, alleging that
he committed a bank robbery and felony murder for the death of the teller. The
prosecution wants to use the statement the driver made in the back of the squad
car as evidence that he was involved in the offense. Before trial, the defense
attorney moves to suppress that statement, arguing that (1) the officer had not
given his client the Miranda warnings before the driver made the statement, and
(2) the police unlawfully coerced the driver into making the statement. What is
your ruling with respect to each of the defendant’s arguments? Will you GRANT or
DENY the defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statement? Explain your reasoning.
Answers
Answer: im no jugde but he did commit a crime so i say deny
Explanation:
The Latin term for providing services without payment is
O Verdict
O Pro bono
O Plaintiff
O Deposition
Answers
A ______ is two or more people who live together in a legally and/or socially recognized relationship based on birth, adoption, or marriage.
Answers
Answer:
Family
Explanation:
it would be family because if you are born into a family you live with them and if you marry a guy/girl you become there family, if you adopt a child they become family
In a 1973 book, historian Arthur Schlesinger analyzed whether the president of the United States has become overly powerful and was no longer subject to constitutional checks and balances. Schlesinger made his argument following the Watergate scandal stating, “The expansion and abuse of presidential power constitute the underlying issue, the issue that Watergate has raised to the surface, dramatized, and made politically accessible.” Take a position on whether or not Schlesinger’s argument that the presidency has become too powerful is true today. In your essay,
Articulate a claim or thesis that addresses the issue raised by Schlesinger, and use a line of reasoning to defend it.
Use at least TWO pieces of relevant and accurate evidence to support your claim or thesis.
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the foundational documents listed below:
Constitution of the United States
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 70
Brutus No. 1
Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document listed above or from your study of the American presidency.
Use reasoning to explain why the evidence you provided supports your claim or thesis.
Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing or alternative perspective.
Answers
Answer:
“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington
Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.
During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.
You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
Enter the subject you want to present.Show your argument, that is, your opinion on this subject.Present evidence, taken from the documents and articles you have read, that proves that your argument is correct and true.Show an argument contrary to yours.Present evidence, which proves that this argument is incorrect.Finish the text by reinforcing your argument.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults
We are going to cancel the regional sales meeting …………. the big snowstorm has shut down airports and all major airlines are grounded.
A. although
B. despite
C. unless
D. since
Answers
The word that best completes the underlined word from the given sentence is:
D. SinceFrom the given question, we can see that an action is about to be taken, but there is a problem that cannot allow them to proceed. This problem is a bug snowstorm which has stopped all vehicular and air travel.
As a result of this, we need to use a word that highlights this problem and shows the reason why the regional sales meeting cannot proceed as planned.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D because the transitional word "Since" is used to show why the meeting could not take place.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/12644119
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 gives the President the power of appointment, but the guidelines for removal come from which two Supreme Court cases?
Answers
One of the guidelines for removal come from which the Supreme Court cases of Myers v. United States.
What is the ruling in Myers case?The Supreme Court ruled that the restrictions on presidential removal power requiring Senate consent to remove postmasters were unconstitutional.
The judges explains further that the power to remove appointed officials rests solely with the president and does not require congressional approval.
Therefore, the case of Myers v. United States serves as a guideline for removal of appointed officials.
Read more about Myers case
brainly.com/question/26214126
Which of the following is a question of fact?
A. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
B. Whether pre-meditation is necessary for a first-degree murder conviction.
C. Whether speech is protected by the First Amendment.
D. What is necessary for service of process?
E. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light and also what is necessary for service of process?
Answers
The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means
Question of Fact is simply known as when a speaker wants to persuade people about how to interpret facts that was presented.In law, question of fact, focus on questions that must be answered by the act of one's reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising drawn from those facts. it is also known as a question for the jury in a jury trial or for the judge in a bench trial. Fact questions are evidentiary questions in nature and are often concern with who, what, where, and when.From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct
Learn more about question of fact from:
https://brainly.com/question/13857186
this is the cartoon from my previous question
Answers
Answer:
sick cartoon lol
Explanation:
A proliferation of mens rea convictions would likely be the result of: overcriminalization; police militarization; mental illness crimes; or increased fines and fee practices?
Answers
A proliferation of mens rea convictions is likely the result of overcriminalization and increased fines and fee practices.
Mens rea refers to the mental state or intention of a person when committing a crime. Overcriminalization, the process of creating numerous criminal offenses, can contribute to more mens rea convictions by expanding the scope of criminal behavior.
This means more individuals may unknowingly or unintentionally violate the law due to its complexity. Additionally, the practice of imposing increased fines and fees can incentivize prosecutors to pursue convictions based on mens rea, as it helps generate revenue for the criminal justice system.
These factors combined can lead to a proliferation of mens rea convictions, increasing the number of individuals held accountable for their mental state when committing crimes.
Learn more about the Justice system here: brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an advantage of federalism as noted by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis?
-Citizens can operate without fear of wrongful imprisonment.
-Citizens are free from multiple levels of taxation.
-States are free to pursue novel social experiments.
-The federal government can enforce uniform standards on legal practices.
Answers
The main advantage of federalism as noted by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis is that Sates are free to pursue novel social experiments.
Hence the correct statement is third.
This allows for policy innovation and experimentation, as well as the opportunity to identify and address social problems that are unique to individual states or regions.
In his famous dissenting opinion in the 1932 case New State Ice Co. v. Liebman, Brandeis argued that states should be free to experiment with different policies and solutions to social problems and that these experiments could benefit the nation as a whole by allowing the most effective policies to be adopted by other states and eventually the federal government.
To know more about federalism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1951874
#SPJ4
20 points
What does Goodman mean by the phrase, “If you control the code, you control the world”? Describe an example of what Goodman means.
Answers
What Marc Goodman means by the phrase “If you control the code, you control the world" is that anyone who gained insight into how things are created at their source will have tremendous influence.
Who is Marc Goodman?Marc Goodman is a global strategist, a consultant and a New York Times best-selling author.
His work revolves around technology, security, business, and international affairs.
One example of that the quote above means is that if for instance one learns how to control the DNA, they would be very powerful.
Learn more about Marc Goodman at:
https://brainly.com/question/2219135
when does carnegie mellon release regular decisions
Answers
Carnegie Mellon University typically releases regular decision admissions results in late March or early April. The specific date varies each year, so it's important to check the university's website or admissions portal for the most up-to-date information.
Once decisions are released, applicants can log in to their account to view their admission status. Regular decision applicants generally have a deadline of January 4th to submit their completed application, including all required documents and supplemental materials. The university then reviews all applications and makes decisions based on factors such as academic performance, test scores, extracurricular involvement, and personal essays.
It's important to note that Carnegie Mellon has a highly competitive admissions process, with a low acceptance rate. Therefore, it's crucial to put your best effort into your application to increase your chances of being admitted. If you're waitlisted or not admitted, consider other options and stay positive about your college future.
In summary, Carnegie Mellon releases regular decision results in late March or early April, and applicants can access their admission status through their online account. Be sure to keep an eye on the university's website for the most current information regarding decision release dates.
To learn more about Carnegie Mellon University here:
https://brainly.com/question/29577418#
#SPJ11