When it comes to the Sahara Desert, a statement that is not true is that b. Occupies central and southern Africa.
The Sahara desert:
Is so large that it is almost as large as the United States Contains sand dunes that are as high as 600 feet high Has a history that stretches more than 3 million yearsOne thing that is not true however, is that the Sahara desert occupies the Central and Southern part of Africa as it only occupies the North and parts of the central part of the continent.
In conclusion, option b is wrong.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/18069551.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Trust Edge 2021
what did European countries ignore as they created new political boundaries?
Restoration is easy, if one only has the power and the will; creation is not easy, even if one has both. Restoration is reversion to the known, the certain; creation is a venture into the unknown and the uncertain, and is highly conducive to divergencies of thought, to division in the ranks; while an army of restoration knows precisely what it wishes to do, namely, to set up again the old landmarks—and that, too, as speedily as possible—to bring back the good old times, to renew the broken connection with the past. Whether we like it or not, ours is the more difficult task. If the five Great Powers of 1919 were anxious to restore the map of 1914, they could not do it; whereas the five Great Powers of 1814 found it easy to reverse the cartographical innovations of Napoleon Bonaparte. The work of Lenin and Trotzky will not be so easily undone. Fortunately for the peace of his spirit, Napoleon does not know that. Napoleon, Lenin, and Trotzky—an incongruous trio of actors on the Russian stage! Napoleon, a Frenchman, bent upon conquering Russia, was the direct means of heightening the influence and increasing the territory of Russia, as all the world saw in 1815. Lenin and Trotzky, Russians, have not only coöperated zealously in destroying the prestige of their country: they have consented and contributed, to the best of their ability, to the colossal dismemberment of Russia and its utter impotence. Russia has become merely a geographical expression, the combined achievement of German militarism and Russian Socialism. There is not Russia. What was once Russia is a disorganized aggregation of local governments, presenting, among other things, a wild tangle of territorial problems—and territorial problems resembling those of primeval chaos, with most landmarks entirely obliterated. The one outstanding landmark in contemporary Russia is that set up on March 3, 1918—the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. That treaty has never been recognized by any of the victorious Allies; nevertheless, it dogs them night and day in the time of triumph, embittering peace, if not preventing it, darkening counsel, and putting a strain upon friendship. The treaty of Brest-Litovsk may be repudiated by the conferees of Paris; it may be dead as far as Germany, its chief author, is concerned; but it is far from being a negligible factor in the history of the present. On the contrary, it, and the things it represents and embodies in its fell phrases, are bound to exercise a profound and disturbing influence upon the future. Where does one find anything in Germany parallel to this inner transformation? The history of Germany during the last forty years, during the last ten years, has shown the contrary phenomenon: a growing and not a decreasing harmony between the governors and the governed. If one wishes to test this statement, let him compare the stand taken by the only so-called opposition party in the war of 1870 and the war of our own day. In the former, the Socialists, who were few in number, were opposed to militarism, to aggrandizement, to the declaration of war, and to the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine, and their leaders, Bebel and Liebknecht, paid for their opposition by being thrown into prison. The Socialists of to-day, vastly more numerous and with far greater powers of opposition, have compromised with militarism, have warmly approved annexations by voting for the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and have on every and all occasions, in the year of our Lord 1918, joined in the general clamor that Alsace-Lorraine must never be surrendered. It would seem to be the business of an opposition to oppose. Should there emerge from the Assembly of Weimar a German democracy, that democracy will be the expression of German psychology. German psychology caused the war and kept it going. The ruling classes would never have risked the war, had they not known the temper and the nature of the German people. Nothing has yet occurred to show that the great masses of the people differed in 1914 from their rulers, either in their conceptions of the nature and the duty of the state, in their moral indifferentism, or in their arrogance and conceit. The defeat Germany has sustained may abate somewhat her contempt of other nations. It is not likely to diminish her hatred of them. It is far more likely to intensify that hatred. Men do not love their enemies any the more because their enemies have compelled them to bite the dust. What we know about the Germans does not lead up to believe, either that they have changed in essentials, or that they are changing, or that they are likely to change and to give the world the spectacle of the miracle of a new psychology. The majority of the members of the National Assembly of Weimar were members of the Reichstag, and belonged to parties that enthusiastically supported the policies of the Empire.
Explanation: Facts
What are the Four Noble Truths of the Buddha? And what are the qualities achieved from the eightfold path .
2. What was the romantic image of the West, and what was the reality? How was this expressed in motion pictures?
Answer:
In simple words, A romantic picture of the amazon basin was developed during the first four decades of the nineteenth century. Starting with the Lewis and Clark expeditions, sensual mythologies about the West started to emerge, but from these misconceptions, the image of the West as just a location of romantic love gradually developed.
The sentimentality issue anymore the rational ideologies retained so firmly in place, neither in the chosen subject nor for the exact reality, but in a manner of emotion. Afterward, conveyed in his literature as well as art, his prescient dreams and his totally original but often strange poems as well as images .
1. What has changed about the way Americans defined the ideals since 1776?
Answer:
hope it helps...
Explanation:
In 1776, the thirteen British colonies in North America were rebelling against British rule, after more than a decade of strife over taxation and government representation. As the Revolutionary War got underway, representatives from each of the colonies agreed it was time to put forward a statement expressing the colonies’ reasons for desiring independence.
[
Which G did Maryland, Plymouth, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island get
colonized for?
God
Glory
Gold
Answer:
gold british wanted to colonize an able country with minerals
All of these represent the process by which a bill becomes a law in Georgia. Place the items in the correct order in which they must take place. You may write only the underlined portion if you choose.
A bill is filed with the House Clerk.
If the bill passes the House it is sent to the Senate.
The Governor chooses to veto or pass the bill.
The House approves the changes made by the Senate without additional changes.
The bill passes the Senate and sent to the governor.
The bill is read to the House of Representatives and assigned to a committee for research.
The bill is amended by the Senate and sent back to the House of Representatives.
The bill is debated by the House of Representatives
A bill is filed with the House Clerk, then it is read to the House of Representatives and assigned to a committee for research.
After researching the bill, it is debated by the House of Representatives and if it passes, it is sent to the Senate. The Senate can then choose to amend the bill and send it back to the House of Representatives for approval.
If the House approves the changes made by the Senate without further changes, the bill passes and is sent to the Governor. The Governor then has the choice to veto or pass the bill. If the Governor passes the bill, it becomes a law.
To know more about Senate, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24779287
#SPJ4
In the excerpt, Machiavelli argues that
being loved is more important.
being loved and being feared are equally important.
being feared is more important.
being loved and feared are unimportant
What was the first piece of artwork on display at the vatican museums?.
The first piece of artwork on display at the Vatican Museums is the "Laocoön and His Sons" sculpture.
This ancient Greek sculpture dates back to the 1st century BC and was discovered in Rome in 1506. It depicts the Trojan priest Laocoön and his sons being attacked by sea serpents, a scene from Greek mythology.
The sculpture was initially placed in the courtyard of the Belvedere Palace, which was part of the Vatican complex, and later moved to its current location in the Museo Pio-Clementino. It has been on display for centuries and is considered a masterpiece of ancient Greek art.
To know more about Vatican Museums, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/24838403
#SPJ4
ap euro the linguistic diversity represented on the map contributed most directly to which of the following developments regarding french foreign policy in the nineteenth century?
The linguistic diversity represented on the map contributed most directly to the following developments regarding French foreign policy in the 19th century.
France was characterized by a strong sense of national identity and centralized government. The various groups living in the region spoke different languages and had different cultural practices.
What is Linguistic Diversity?Linguistic diversity refers to the variety of languages spoken by people in a specific geographical region. It implies the existence of a range of dialects within a language, as well as the presence of numerous languages in a given region.
Linguistic diversity is the foundation of multilingualism and is a crucial component of social and cultural diversity in the world. In the nineteenth century, the situation in France was such that the country was divided into different regions with distinct cultures and languages.
Brittany, for example, spoke Breton, which was very distinct from French, while Alsace-Lorraine spoke a Germanic dialect that was very different from French, which was the official language of the nation. This linguistic diversity posed a challenge to the French government, which was intent on strengthening national unity and promoting centralization.
The government was aware that linguistic diversity might potentially lead to regionalism and separatism. As a result, they attempted to restrict the use of non-French languages, particularly in public life and education. The linguistic diversity in France was a major factor in the country's foreign policy decisions.
In the 19th century, France pursued a policy of territorial expansion to offset its economic and political weaknesses. French policymakers sought to create an empire that would rival that of Britain. As a result, France expanded its territorial holdings in Africa and Asia, in order to gain new markets for its goods and sources of raw materials.
The linguistic diversity of the people living in these regions presented a challenge to French policymakers, as they had to decide whether to assimilate these populations into French culture or respect their linguistic and cultural diversity.
Ultimately, French policymakers chose to adopt an assimilationist policy, arguing that the French language and culture were superior to those of the colonized peoples.
To know more about linguistic diversity, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/14860934#
#SPJ11
True or False. Without the Silk Road, ancient civilizations would have been able to develop the same technologies easily and develop prosperous trade relationships.
Answer:
the answer is false
Please answer this question now in two minutes
Answer:
Explanation:
Sorry don’t know
Can there be true equality among cultures?
True equality among cultures is essential for a multicultural society. However, it is difficult to achieve because some cultures are more dominant than others, leading to inequalities. A change in mindset and behavior is necessary to ensure that all cultures are treated equally. True equality can only be achieved when there is no dominance of a specific culture over other cultures.
Equality is a term that refers to treating people equally, impartially, and with respect. In a multicultural society, cultural equality is essential. A world where all cultures have equal standing and rights may seem ideal, but can there ever be true equality among cultures? The answer is not so simple because it depends on how one defines culture. When talking about culture, it is often confined to the dominant culture, which is a culture that has the most influence in society. Most countries have a dominant culture, whether it is recognized or not.
There is no doubt that in today's world, all cultures, both minor and major, are appreciated and valued. The major problem is, some cultures receive more attention, recognition, and power than others. Inequalities may occur in various forms, including power, access to resources, representation in the media, and education. Therefore, true equality cannot be achieved in such a scenario.
Only when everyone is given equal representation, rights, and benefits can true equality be established. To achieve this equality, a change in mindset and behaviors is necessary to recognize and respect the various cultures that make up our society. This change may take time, and it may require patience, but it is essential to strive for a society where all cultures are treated fairly and with respect. Hence, we can say that true equality can only be achieved when there is no dominance of a specific culture over other cultures.
For more such questions on culture, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/514395
#SPJ8
For your writing assignment, you need to find out important information about your chosen country, including:
which type of government it has.
the parts of its government.
how power is distributed.
who governs.
the people’s role in the government.
ABOUT MEXICO!!!
Answer: Mexico is a democracy. It has a federal system, with a central government and thirty-one states. It has a separate legislative and executive branch headed by a president.
As a democracy, Mexico is ruled by its people, who vote for its leaders. In general, the people of Mexico enjoy basic rights and freedoms.
Explanation: EDGE 2021
Important information about the country of Mexico:
1. Mexico is a federal presidential republic,
2. The government of Mexico is divided into three branches:
Executive BranchLegislative BranchJudicial Branch3. Power in Mexico is distributed between the federal government and the individual states.
4. The president, along with the cabinet and various executive agencies, governs at the federal level
5. In Mexico, the people play a role in the government through their participation in elections and the exercise of their rights and freedoms.
Mexico has a system of government where power is divided between the national government and individual states, with a president serving as both the head of state and the head of government
Learn more about Legislative Branch here:
brainly.com/question/32436841
#SPJ4
*Why did Churchill of Great Britain and Roosevelt of the United States not trust Stalin of the Soviet Union?*
A)These western leaders did not trust anyone who was not educated in the West or had not been freely elected into office.
B)These western leaders believed that Stalin had another agenda to fulfill and was just using the war to fulfill this agenda.
C) These western leaders were the head of democratic states and did not trust anyone who was a communist.
D)These western leaders saw Stalin as a pawn being used by a more diabolical Soviet leader that they did not trust.
Answer:
B. These western leaders believed that Stalin had another agenda to fulfill and was just using the war to fulfill this agenda.
Explanation:
It is in fact B, I took the test
200 million years ago India had a cool climate
a. TRUE
b. FALSE
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is difficult to say with certainty what the climate of India was like 200 million years ago, as we do not have direct records or measurements from that time period. However, based on geological evidence and scientific models, it is believed that India was located near the South Pole during the early Jurassic period, around 200 million years ago. This suggests that India may have had a cool climate at that time, possibly with polar ice caps and seasonal variations in temperature and precipitation. Therefore, the statement "India had a cool climate 200 million years ago" is likely true.
bacon's rebellion of 1676 relieved much of the social tension among white virginians by
Virginians.e some of the social tension among The rebellion was a response to Governor William Berkeley's refusal to allow colonists to expand into Native American lands, which angered many settlers who were looking for new opportunities.
Nathaniel Bacon, a wealthy planter, led the rebellion, which saw the burning of Jamestown and other acts of violence against Native Americans and the colonial government. Although Bacon's Rebellion ultimately failed, it did lead to some changes in Virginia's social and political structure. One of the most significant outcomes was the rise of a more However, it is important to note that Bacon's Rebellion also increased social tension in other ways. The violence and destruction caused by the rebellion left many people feeling uncertain and fearful, and tensions between Native This helped to ease some of the social tension among white .
So while Bacon's Rebellion did relieve some social tension in Virginia, it also created new challenges and conflicts that would continue to shape the colony's history for many years to come.
Read more about social tension here: https://brainly.com/question/26202241
#SPJ11
what important precedents were set by the griggs v. duke power company case?
Why did Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852), influence northern attitudes toward slavery?
a. It included scientific evidence of the effects of slavery on those enslaved.
b. It put forth a stirring moral indictment of slavery.
c. It suggested that Northerners should pay for slaves to be sent to Africa.
d. It argued that the North was not responsible for the institution of slavery.
Answer:
b. it put forth a stirring moral indictment of slavery
Explanation:
she shows how slavery just gets worse and worse when tom continues to be moved from one place to another.
Analyze the wwii political cartoons and answer the questions that follow in the space provided.
what event is being depicted in this cartoon? explain your answer by providing details from the cartoon.
how does this event change the course of the war? explain its significance.
The Allied troops' landing operations during World War II's Operation Overlord were known as the D-Day invasion or Normandy landings. The liberation of German-occupied Western Europe from Nazi rule started with the landings on June 6, 1944.
Because of its significance in World War II, the D-Day invasion is remembered in history. Less than a year after the invasion, the Allies formally recognized Nazi Germany's capitulation, signaling the end of the Nazi regime's hold on power.
On all sides of the fight, D-Day was a bloody day that altered not just the future of nations but also the futures of whole families. Because of such, there is a lot to learn.
To learn more about D-Day, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2393370
#SPJ4
The battle of Hastings determined the language what which ruling class in the high Middle Ages?
Answer:
England
Explanation:
England fought in the Battle of Hastings against Normandy in 1066.
What
actions did
he take?
challenged the
church right
to money that it
demanded from
How did the
church
respond?
Answer:
La Iglesia católica destina parte de sus recursos económicos principalmente a cinco áreas: 1) sostener al clero y a sus ministros, 2) al ejercicio de su apostolado en diversas formas y en distintos ámbitos de la vida pública, 3) mantener el culto y las actividades religiosas (se incluye la conservación de los templos
What was a result of the Neolithic Revolution? A) Civilizations developed B) Humans first earned how to use fire C) Life expectancy declined D) People began hunting and gathering for food.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The neolithic revolution was the , result of agriculture and farming they stopped just gathering in scattered groups and more empires and farming and agriculture was made!
which kinds of investigations never include a hypothesis?
Answer:
It is a descriptive explanation
Explanation:
I took the test
________ was NOT part of Babur's Mughal Empire.
Iran
Afghanistan
Pakistan
India
Answer:
Your answer is india
Explanation:
i just did the test and got a 100%
Pakistan was not part of Babur's Mughal Empire. India and Pakistan were not divided during his rule. Thus, option C is correct.
Who was Babur?The Mughal Empire in India was established by Babur. His mother's side was related to Genghis Khan, and his father's side was related to Timur. Zahiruddin Muhammad was his given name.
Babur succeeded his father, Umar Shaikh Mirza, as king of Farghana in 1494 when he was only 11 years old. Babur was given permission to invade India by Daulat khan, the most powerful noble in Punjab and rival of Ibrahim Lodhi. He ruled India when it was not divided into India and Pakistan.
Therefore, we can conclude that C is the correct option.
Learn more about Babur here:
https://brainly.com/question/543734
#SPJ2
According to the text, how does gender influence how people of color in the Dominican Republic are treated? Use at least two pieces of evidence from the text in your response.
According to the text, it is clear that black women are under more pressure to meet European standards.
What role does colorism play in the text's overall context?
The passage demonstrates how serious a problem colorism is in the Dominican Republic.This is due to the large population of people with black complexion in the nation, yet the various hues of their skin alter how society perceives them.The author claims that there is social pressure for everyone to adopt European aesthetic standards and downplay their African ancestry.However, those with darker skin, particularly women, are subjected to greater pressure, which causes them to endure significant levels of racism in society.More information on racism at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
What are similarities with Rome and the united states Collapse?
Answer: The failure of over spending for tase bills
Explanation: Trust me
Answer:
There are numerous parallels between the problems facing the United States today and the fall of the Roman Empire, including:
1. Economic instability: Rising debt levels and unequal wealth distribution are all signs of economic instability in both Rome and the United States.
2. Political polarisation: Political polarisation and division have affected both the Roman Empire and the United States, which can make it difficult to effectively rule and solve pressing issues.
3. Military overstretch: Both Rome and the United States have experienced military overstretch, which occurs when a country's military obligations exceed its financial capacity, resulting in a loss of military might.
4. Environmental degradation: Issues with environmental degradation, such as soil deterioration, deforestation, and resource depletion, have affected both the Roman Empire and the United States.
5. Demographic shifts: The ageing of the population and dropping birthrates are two examples of the demographic shifts that have affected both Rome and the United States.
Hope it helps! : )Do you think it is fair to have equal bail fees for all accused persons? Why or why not?
Answer:
Explanation:
No, because if it's something as simple as not paying your tickets, and then someone murdering someone, those are 2 very different offenses and they should not have the same bail fees.
Who was sent to the Concentration Camps? What were the conditions of these camps?
Answer:
During the Nazi regime in Germany, millions of people were sent to concentration camps. The prisoners were typically political opponents, Jews, Romani people, homosexuals, disabled individuals, and others who were considered "undesirable" by the Nazi party. The conditions in the concentration camps were inhumane and deplorable. Here are some details about the conditions in the camps:
1. Overcrowding: The concentration camps were extremely overcrowded, with many prisoners being forced to sleep in cramped conditions.
2. Malnutrition: The prisoners were not given enough food to eat, and many suffered from malnutrition and starvation.
3. Forced Labor: Prisoners were forced to work long hours in grueling conditions, often with little or no rest.
4. Medical Experiments: Some prisoners were subjected to horrific medical experiments, often resulting in severe injury or death.
5. Brutality: Guards in the concentration camps were known for their brutality and would often physically abuse or torture the prisoners.
6. Disease: The concentration camps were breeding grounds for disease, and many prisoners died from illnesses such as typhus, tuberculosis, and dysentery.
Overall, the conditions in the concentration camps were designed to dehumanize and degrade the prisoners, and many did not survive their time there.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!! Have a wonderful day/night!!
Who were the AUTHORITARIAN leaders in each country?
Answer:
Leader of the Nazi Party and chancellor and Führer of Germany
Explanation:
There is no difference between history and poetry according to Aristotle since both describe actions of people in the past A. True B. False
Answer:
false
Explanation: