Answer:c.
Texas special sessions are more restrictive than any other state.
Explanation:
The correct answer is a. Texas special sessions are more restrictive than any other state
What is the process for calling Texas special sessions?Texas special sessions are called by the governor and are typically limited to specific topics set by the leadership of the legislature. Unlike regular sessions, there are no restrictions on how long a special session can last. The governor has the power to convene special sessions, and it is not solely the prerogative of the legislators to call themselves into session.
During special sessions, the agenda is determined by the leadership of the legislature, which includes the speaker of the House and the lieutenant governor. They decide which issues will be addressed and what bills will be considered. The governor can also add additional items to the agenda for special sessions.
Texas special sessions serve as an avenue for addressing urgent or specific legislative matters outside of the regular session. They are often called to address pressing issues that require immediate attention or to tackle specific policy priorities. While the length of special sessions is not constrained, they typically last for a few weeks.
Learn more about restrictive
brainly.com/question/30195877
#SPJ11
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
Que mecanismo de control, fuera del poder judicial ,crearías para lograr que un político procurará el bienestar del pueblo y no se corrompa?
Answer:
Por fuera del poder judicial, crearía un organismo colegiado formado igualitariamente por miembros pertenecientes a los distintos partidos políticos que se hubieran presentado en las elecciones presidenciales: por ejemplo, si hubiesen participado 5 partidos, cada uno tendría una participación del 20% en dicho organismo.
Este organismo tendría la función de evaluar las políticas del gobierno y, a través de mayorías simples, emitir dictámenes evaluatorios periódicos respecto del poder ejecutivo, pudiendo, en caso de creerlo conveniente, remitir causas al poder judicial para evaluar las políticas llevadas a cabo y declararlas nulas.
Liability as an accomplice does not extend to negligent and reckless conduct on the part of a
primary actor that results in a criminal offense.
False
True
You will be allowed to drive a low emission vehicle in ______ ONLY when you have a decal from the ____ on your vehicle.
You will be allowed to drive a low emission vehicle in the carpool lane ONLY when you have a decal from the DMV on your vehicle.
What qualifies as a zero-emission vehicle?Plug-in hybrid electric, fuel cell system, and fully battery-electric cars are some of these vehicle technologies. The Advanced Clean Cars package of laws, which includes a number of tailpipe measures implemented to reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, includes the ZEV legislation.
Which states have strong regulations on emissions?California, Connecticut, Nevada, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Hampshire, New Jersey, New Zealand, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Washington, D.C. are among the states that have adopted the CARB rule. These states often have severe emission regulations.
To know more about Emission vehicle visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29429840
#SPJ4
How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?
Answer: This relates to the idea of realism
Explanation:
Less trade deals= economic conflict
Less foreign aid=politcal conflict
Less international work equals cold relationships with other countries could damage vital relationships especially with those the U.S. needs for resources such as Saudi Arabia for oil.
Is it legal to defend yourself if someone is holding you, by the arm for example?
rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the criminal.
Judicial discretion rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the criminal.
The ability of the court to make certain legal decisions at their discretion is known as judicial discretion. The idea of the power separation states that one feature of judicial independence is the judges' discretionary authority.
One of the most significant powers of the court is judicial discretion, which allows judges to make decisions in certain situations without adhering to any set rules or recognized laws.
One example of the independence of our court is the idea of discretionary power.
By enabling the judge to take into account unique circumstances in situations when the law is insufficient or silent, its careful application enhances justice and can support an equitable judicial procedure.
To know more about judges, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29218261
#SPJ4
A student took the state examination at a testing facility and failed. She wants to review the test and see what answers she provided. She knows that she can review the exam within two years of the date of the examination and she makes an appointment to do so. Will she be able to review the entire exam?
yes she will because she made an appointment to do so
She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
What is law?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.
According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.
As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
Learn more about on Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ5
Every judge has the power to decide the cases before him/her without having to follow the decisions of any other judge or court.
Answer:
Judicial power is the power “of a court to decide and pronounce a judgment and carry it into effect between persons and parties who bring a case before it for decision.”
Whic foreign policy did American leaders follow in response to these events?
American leaders followed a policy of containment in response to the events you mentioned. Containment aimed to prevent the spread of communism by limiting its influence to already-established regions.
This approach was developed during the Cold War, primarily by George F. Kennan. The policy guided American foreign policy in various instances, such as the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and the Korean War. By providing economic and military aid to countries threatened by communism, the United States sought to maintain a balance of power and protect its global interests. Containment remained a significant aspect of U.S. foreign policy throughout the Cold War era.
For more such questions on policy, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/3810659
#SPJ11
which of the following is not a requirement for becoming a supreme court justice
a. being willing to serve
b. being confirmed by the senate
c. being a law school graduate
d. being appointed by the president
Being a law school graduate is not a requirement for becoming a supreme court justice. Thus, option C is correct.
What is the supreme court?
The U.s. Supreme Court or the supreme court in the country and also the only branch of the judiciary branch that the State constitution mandates. The complement o Supreme Court Judges is not predetermined by the Constitutional; rather, it is determined by Congress.
Qualifications for Federal judges, such as age, schooling, occupation, or citizen from native birth, are not included in the Constitution. Although a Justice need not have attended higher education or be a practicing attorney, they have all received legal training. They are chosen by the president in office, and the Senate must then confirm them.
Therefore, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about the supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
a more intensely colored dye can be used to increase the sensitivity of an elisa. explain why this is the case on the basis of beer's law
Beer's Law states that the absorbance of light by a solution is directly proportional to the concentration of the absorbing substance in the solution and the path length.
How can it be explained?
Mathematically, it can be represented as:
Absorbance (A) = ε × c × l
where ε is the molar absorptivity, c is the concentration of the absorbing substance, and l is the path length.
In an ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), a color change occurs when the enzyme-linked antibody binds to the antigen, indicating the presence of the target molecule.
The intensity of the color change is proportional to the amount of target molecule present in the sample.
Using a more intensely colored dye in an ELISA increases the molar absorptivity (ε), which in turn increases the absorbance (A) detected by the instrument.
As Beer's Law suggests, a higher absorbance value is directly related to a higher concentration of the absorbing substance (in this case, the enzyme-linked antibody bound to the antigen).
Therefore, a more intensely colored dye can enhance the sensitivity of the ELISA by making it easier to detect small changes in the concentration of the target molecule, providing more accurate and precise results.
To know more on Beer's law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30762062
#SPJ11
Tulum is a sixteen-year-old who has sought and received full legal capacity to contract from the court. This means that Tulum is
The legal term that is used for the full legal capacity of Tulum, a 16 year old is emancipation.
What is Emancipation?This simply means and denotes freedom from something and now has some level of independence and autonomy.
Hence, we can see that based on the fact that Tulum is a sixteen-year-old who has sought and received the full legal capacity to contract from the court. This means that Tulum is now fully emancipated.
Read more about emancipation here:
https://brainly.com/question/880731
kyle is being deployed to the middle east and will be gone for one year. kyle asks delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone. in this arrangement between kyle and delilah:_____.
In the arrangement between Kyle and Delilah, where Kyle is being deployed to the Middle East for one year and asks Delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone: Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent. The correct option is A.
In this scenario, Kyle, as the principal, is the person who authorizes Delilah to act on his behalf in selling the house. Delilah, as the agent, is the person who is given the authority by Kyle to carry out the specific task of selling the house.
The relationship between the principal (Kyle) and the agent (Delilah) is based on trust, as the principal relies on the agent to represent their interests and carry out their instructions.
In summary, the correct answer is option a: Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent. This is because Kyle has given Delilah the authority to sell his house while he is deployed, making him the principal and Delilah the agent in this arrangement.
To know more about principal, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30393128#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Kyle is being deployed to the Middle East and will be gone for one year. Kyle asks Delilah to sell his house for him while he is gone. In this arrangement between Kyle and Delilah:
a. Kyle is the principal and Delilah is the agent.
b. Delilah is the principal and Kyle is the agent.
c. Kyle and Delilah are both principals.
d. Kyle and Delilah are both agents.
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
It can be hard for a business to win a commercial disparagement tort
because to prevail a business must be able to show
O A. that the company took all reasonable actions to counteract the
libel
O B. that the defendant used unfair competition that resulted in the
loss
O C. that their customer base cannot be recovered
O D. an accurate projection of how much money was lost as a result of
the slander or libel
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The commercial disparagement is a type of 'tort' in which a person makes some derogatory statement against the business or a person causing them harm. It is also known as business disparagement.
Though it can be hard for the plaintiff to prove commercial disparagement yet certain parameters or prerequisites are laid in the law which can be shown as proof. One of the prerequisites is to show financial loss occurred due to the slander or libel. The plaintiff can show his/her financial losses occurred after the libel is traded in the market.
Therefore, option D is correct.
The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of federal law and has both _______ and _______ jurisdiction.
The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of federal law and has both appellate and original jurisdiction.
Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear appeals from lower courts. In the case of the Supreme Court, it has the authority to hear appeals from federal appellate courts as well as state supreme courts, but only if the case involves a federal question or issue. This means that the case must involve a question of federal law or the United States Constitution.
Original jurisdiction, on the other hand, refers to the power of a court to hear a case for the first time, rather than on appeal. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, such as those involving disputes between states or cases in which a foreign ambassador is a party.
In addition to its role as the ultimate arbiter of federal law, the Supreme Court also plays an important role in interpreting the Constitution. Its decisions have far-reaching implications and can shape legal precedent for years to come. As such, it is often considered one of the most powerful institutions in the United States.
learn more about federal law here
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
Answer:
the 2 types are Visual and Manual drivers
Answer:
There are three main types of distraction:
Visual: taking your eyes off the road. Manual: taking your hands off the wheel. Cognitive: taking your mind off driving.Explanation:
Hope it helps^^
Question 9
The filibuster
Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
Judge
Grand jury
Prosecuting attorney
Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
Cabinet
White House Staff
Executive office of the president
Department of the InteriorTop of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A frequent annoyance
Weekly Ramblings
Fireside Chats
Happy times
The filibuster was seldom utilized all through a large portion of American history however has turned into a much of the time involved strategy in the U.S. Senate during the most recent 20 years. Option B is correct .
Filibusters became more common toward the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, prompting serious consideration of amending Senate rules to end the practice. At that point, the Senate had grown in size and became more active. Because of the amount of work that needed to be done each session, a senator who chose to filibuster might make it hard for the body to move forward and get concessions from senators who wanted to approve their measures.
10 : Grand jury is the role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a Judge , Option B is correct .
The federal criminal case prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, presents evidence to a grand jury. If there is "probable cause" to suspect the defendant of committing a crime, the grand jury decides whether a trial should be held.
11 : Chief office of the president is the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the Cabinet . Option C is correct .
The White House Office, the Public safety Gathering, the Committee of Monetary Counselors, and the Workplace of The board and Financial plan are the four associations that make up the Leader Office of the President , which gives the president guidance in significant approach regions.
12 : Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as Fireside chats . Option C is correct .
Throughout the 1930 s and 1940 s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave radio addresses that were referred to as "fireside chats." FDR gave radio broadcasts to calm the nation during a turbulent time and explain things in a way that most people could understand.
Learn more about filibuster :
brainly.com/question/29551874
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
The filibuster
A. Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
B. Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
C. Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
D. Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
A. Judge
B. Grand jury
C. Prosecuting attorney
D. Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
A. Cabinet
B. White House Staff
C. Executive office of the president
D. Department of the Interior Top of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A. A frequent annoyance
B. Weekly Ramblings
C. Fireside Chats
D. Happy times
The monthly cost to receive insurance coverage is known as a(n)
A. premium
B. liability
C. deductible
D. application
Answer: A; premium
Explanation: Just did it on A pex
The monthly cost of the receiver's insurance coverage is called a premium. Hence the option A is correct.
What is a premium?A premium is an amount to be paid to the insurance policy and is a sum that isn addd to the ordinary price or change.
The premium is price that is for above and beyound some basic or internsic value. It may be the price to protect form the hazard or loss. The pemium is derived form a latin word that means prize.
Find out more infirmaion about the premium.
brainly.com/question/25280754
there are 12 universal government due care standards in the u.s. true or false?
False. There isn't a specific set of 12 universal government due care standards in the U.S.
Instead, there are various laws, regulations, and guidelines that govern different aspects of due care for different sectors and situations.
In the United States, there are various laws, regulations, and guidelines that govern different aspects of due care for different sectors and situations.
For example, in the healthcare industry, due care standards might include ensuring that patients receive appropriate medical treatment and care, maintaining patient confidentiality, and protecting patient records.
In the financial industry, due care standards might include conducting thorough background checks on potential employees, ensuring compliance with regulations and laws, and safeguarding customer financial information.
Similarly, different states may have different requirements for due care in certain situations. For example, some states may require businesses to take reasonable measures to protect their customers from harm, while others may require them to take additional precautions to ensure the safety of employees.
Overall, due care standards in the United States are not limited to a specific set of 12 universal government standards. Rather, they are established through a combination of laws, regulations, and industry-specific guidelines that vary depending on the sector, industry, and context in which they apply.
To learn more about finance industry, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30277433
#SPJ11
Is the hearsay exception impending death able to be used in an attempted murder case, if so why?
Answer:
An out-of-court statement is referred to as hearsay. A dying declaration is a type of hearsay. However, unlike regular hearsay, a dying declaration is admissible in court. As such, a dying declaration is as an exception to the hearsay rule.
Explanation:
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
A shoplifter set a small fire in a store's trash basket. The shoplifter knew that the store's automatic sprinkler system would promptly douse the fire, but his purpose was merely to create a distraction so he could walk out with an expensive watch, which would constitute felony theft. The shoplifter was stopped after he set the fire but before he could take any merchandise. No serious damage was done to the store by the fire, but the flame charred the wall next to the trash basket and blistered the paint on the surrounding area. A statute in the jurisdiction extends the crime of arson to buildings other than dwellings. If the shoplifter is tried for the crime of arson, should the court find him guilty?
A. No, because the shoplifter did not intend to burn the building.
B. No, because the shoplifter's act was sufficient only for attempted arson.
C. Yes, because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime.
D. Yes, because the shoplifter started the fire during the act of perpetrating another felony.
Yes, because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime. Option (C)
If the shoplifter is tried for the crime of arson, the court should find him guilty because his conduct demonstrated the required state of mind for the crime. A felony, which is a serious crime, is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death. Attempted arson is also punishable by law, and the shoplifter's act was enough for attempted arson but was insufficient for actual arson.
Felony theft, on the other hand, is theft that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. Arson is defined as the malicious burning of someone else's property. The individual must have had the intention of burning the property, and the fire must have been started intentionally. The shoplifter deliberately started a small fire in the trash can, knowing that the automatic sprinkler system would quickly extinguish it. He set the fire to divert attention away from himself so he could leave the store with an expensive watch. It was also discovered that the statute in that jurisdiction extends the crime of arson to buildings other than dwellings, which means that the shoplifter could be found guilty of arson if he is tried for it.
Learn more about Guilty
https://brainly.com/question/32289528
#SPJ11
The correct answer is option C because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime.
In this scenario, the shoplifter set a small fire in the store's trash basket as a deliberate act to create a distraction. Although the shoplifter may not have intended to burn down the entire building, their action still constitutes arson. Arson is the act of intentionally starting a fire or causing an explosion that results in damage to property. In this case, the shoplifter's purposeful act of starting a fire, even though it was small and quickly extinguished by the sprinkler system, demonstrates the necessary intent for the crime of arson.
To know more about Arson, visit
https://brainly.com/question/11857936
#SPJ11
A man claims he had no idea the car he bought had entered the island illegally. If this is the case, what provisions have been established to allow the man to keep or receive value for such a good? Explain the instances by citing the relevant section(s) of the Jamaican Customs Act.
If the value of the car is less than or equal to the prescribed customs duty, the importer is entitled to immediate payment at a rate of 150%. If it is more, he will obtain a permit for the extra, otherwise, he is guilty of smuggling, and the fact that he was unaware that it had been done so does not absolve him of responsibility.
One of the provisions for treating buyers fairly has been created in the Customs Act. The seizure of any imported items is addressed in Section 10 of the law.
Even if the buyer may not have been aware that the vehicle was stolen when he purchased it, he is nonetheless liable for taking stolen property and must seek for a permit from customs if there is an excess duty on the sale.
To learn more on the Jamaican Custom Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32529651
#SPJ4
why do I keep seeing the number 555
Answer:
i looked it up for you and it said that a change and major transition are coming so maybe it could be a good sign so goodluck
Explanation:
The is useful when the most common value of a data set is required.
Answer:
The Mode is useful when the most common value of a data set is required.
Step By Step:
In statistics, the Mode is the most commonly observed value in a set of data.
In addition to using known facts about a person's age and sex, what other information about a victim may be factored into a facial reconstruction?
A. the person's stature
B. the race of the person
C.the person's lifestyle
D.the manner of death
Who did police originally believe was responsible for the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez?
The police originally suspected that the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez resulted from a mob.
What is a mob?A mob can be described as a criminal gang or simply a Mafia.
By its very nature, a mob is a secret organization made up of criminals.
However, after it was reported that the couple was murdered by their own children, Lyle and Erik Menendez, police arrested the duo and the court proceedings lasted several years before they were convicted and incarcerated for life.
Thus, originally, police believed that a mob was responsible for the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez, not suspecting that the couple's children were the culprits.
Learn more about mobs at https://brainly.com/question/28029513
#SPJ1