What role does the media play in the election process ?

The Criminal profiler cannot state whether a certain criminal committed the crime.

A criminal profile only provides a general description of the sort of individual who may have committed the crime. It does not refer to a specific person who happens to meet the characteristics. As a result,

It must be noted that offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative approach used by law enforcement organizations to identify potential suspects.

It has also been used by investigators to connect crimes that may have been perpetrated by the same offender.

Learn more about criminal profiler:

https://brainly.com/question/12000532

#SPJ1

A nation's citizens and government must decide whether to create a new constitution or make changes to an existing one. It relies on a number of variables, including the political and social climate at the time.

Territorial disputes, war pension disputes, tax disputes, and commerce disputes all posed a threat to the nation's unity. The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 to rewrite the Articles of Confederation.

States would need to agree on a revision because the Articles needed unanimous consent for any amendments. Due of state rivalry, this rule made it difficult for the Articles to be changed when the conflict with Britain ended in 1783.

To know more about constitution visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30901480

#SPJ1

Answer:

Super PACs enable unlimited donations.

Super PACs have more government restrictions.

Explanation:

Super Political Action Committee are those group of committee that are heading other sub committee of any given political group. They are like the management body of the different arms and committees of that political body which they represent. While PAC are the group that has direct contact with the voters and citizens during any given political campaigns.

Answer:

Super PACs enable unlimited donations.

Super PACs have more government restrictions.

Explanation:

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The conduct on the part of the plaintiff which falls below the standard to which he should conform for his own protection and which cooperates with the negligence of the defendant in bringing about the plaintiff's harm is called "contributory negligence."

Contributory negligence is a defense in tort law, which allows a defendant to avoid liability for a plaintiff's injury or damages if the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the harm. In other words, if the plaintiff's own actions or failure to act were a significant factor in causing or contributing to their own injury, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff was partly to blame and therefore not entitled to recover damages from the defendant.

Not all states recognize contributory negligence as a complete bar to recovery, and some states have modified the doctrine to allow for comparative negligence or comparative fault. Under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault, while under pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff can recover even if they are found to be more than 50% at fault for their own injury.

Conduct on the part of the plaintiff which falls below the standard to which he should conform for his own protection and which cooperates with the negligence of the defendant in bringing about the plaintiff's harm is called contributory negligence.

Contributory negligence is when the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their own harm, and cooperated with the defendant's negligence to cause the harm.

In other words, the plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard that should have been conformed for their own protection.

Contributory negligence is often a defense used by defendants to avoid being found liable for the plaintiff's harm. To be successful, the defendant must show that the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care for their own safety, and that this failure to exercise reasonable care resulted in the plaintiff's harm.

If contributory negligence is found to be a factor, then the plaintiff's damages may be reduced or barred altogether. Thus, it is important for the plaintiff to exercise reasonable care for their own safety in order to avoid being found contributorily negligent.

To know more about Contributory negligence click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14925661#

#SPJ11

For the first question, the nature of the duty that the law has imposed on the establishment and its employees is a positive duty.

This means that they are required to actively monitor potentially intoxicated patrons and intervene if there is an indication that they may choose to drive after consuming alcohol.

For the second question, what is notable about the tort of negligent misstatement is that it strongly places liability for third-party reliance on professionals.

This means that professionals can be held liable if a third party suffers harm or loss due to their negligent misstatement. This tort action co-exists with an actionable contractual breach due to the nature of the professional relationship.

To know more about positive duty visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11459749

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.  

Explanation:

The $2 million payment can most accurately be described as a special cash dividend. The correct option is C.

A routine payment provided to shareholders as a portion of the company's profits is referred to as a regular cash dividend. The supplied scenario, however, notes that Johnson normally has a payout ratio of 0%, indicating that the company does not regularly distribute cash dividends.

A cash dividend that is paid to shareholders in addition to the ordinary payout is known as an extra cash dividend.

Thus, the most ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about Special cash dividends here:

https://brainly.com/question/32747954

#SPJ4

Civil rights guarantee that government officials will treat people equally and base decisions on merit rather than personal characteristics.

Civil Rights: Civil rights are the protections and privileges that people are entitled to as members of society. The rights that are commonly associated with civil rights include the right to vote, the right to equal treatment under the law, and the right to be free from discrimination based on race, gender, or other personal characteristics.

Civil rights laws are typically designed to prevent government officials and other people in positions of power from abusing their authority to discriminate against certain groups of people. These laws may include provisions that require employers to hire people without regard to their race or gender, for example, or that require schools to provide equal educational opportunities to all students regardless of their background or socio-economic status.

Read more about the Civil rights guarantee here:

https://brainly.com/question/31872955

#SPJ11

Answer 1,2,8,13 15

Explanation: 1st amendment gives people the rights to religion of their choice, it also gives people the right to speak up for what they believe

2nd amendment allows people to keep and bear arms for one to protect themselves and other around them

8th amendment makes sure people do not get a cruel punishment for something minor

13th amendment allowed slaves to be free, giving them a chance into their own lives

15th amendment makes sure you cannot deny someone the right to vote based on gender or color

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

When the debtor commits to paying when his resources will allow it, the obligation is regarded as having a set duration.

A firm or person that owes money is referred to as a debtor. The debtor is referred to as a borrower if the debt is in the form of a loan from a financial institution, and as an issuer if the debt is in the form of securities like bonds. Legally, a person who voluntarily files a petition for bankruptcy is also regarded as a debtor.

A debtor may be an individual or company. The money owing to the creditor (by a debtor) is regarded as an asset.

To know more about Debtor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1975497

#SPJ1

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it is B ....

Answer: ok he did it

Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.

Answer: Your welcome!

Explanation:

Public bills are bills that have wide-ranging implications for the public and affect the public as a whole. These bills can propose new laws, amend existing laws, or repeal laws. Private bills, on the other hand, are bills that are tailored to the needs of individuals or small groups of people. Private bills can grant special rights or privileges, such as a change in name, the granting of a title, or the granting of a pension, to a specific individual or group. Private bills are typically introduced at the request of a member of parliament or a private organization.

One of the serious traffic safety issues and problems Being a passenger in a vehicle without wearing a seatbelt

Deaths and injuries resulting from motor vehicle crashes represent a significant public health concern. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that motor vehicle crashes kill more than 1 million people around the world individually year, and especially injure as many as 20 to 50 million.

To drive safely for as long as possible, you need to consider three main factors: Your body, your vehicle, and your environment.

To learn more about Traffic safety, refer

https://brainly.com/question/9380087

#SPJ9

In addition to the probationer's punishment and the community's protection, a probation that places a high priority on punishment may also involve the probationer's rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Reintegration is the process of transitioning from incarceration to a community, becoming accustomed to life from outside prison or jail, and making an attempt to live a life free of crime, as per our definition.

Probationary sentences emphasize mentoring and participation in the community. Anyone who infringes against the rights of others ought to be punished or fined, according to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, the most popular set of sentencing laws in the United States.

When punishment is used for revenge, incapacitation, or deterrence, it is permissible. The deterrence argument contends that if an offender is punished, both the perpetrator and those who emulate him will be deterred from committing other crimes.

Learn more about probation: https://brainly.com/question/14526197

#SPJ4

All of Hawaii Revised Statutes Ann., section 291-52, Michie's Hawaii Revised Statutes Annotated, published by LexisNexis (LexisNexis Supp. 2019). Hawaii can be included in the pocket section for 2019.

291-52 of the Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann (LexisNexis Supp. 2019). Revised Statutes of Hawaii (HRS) The codified laws of Hawaii are contained in the 14 hardcover volumes of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) and cumulative supplements. (The term "codified" simply refers to the arrangement of the laws into a formal code or framework.)

Since its inception in early American history, the constitutional principle of nullification—which holds that individual states may reject federal legislation or judicial rulings they find unconstitutional—has generated considerable controversy.

Learn more about Hawaii Visit: brainly.com/question/25899557

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Explain about the Section 291-52 of Michie's Hawaii Revised Statutes Annotated, published by LexisNexis, all of which appears in the 2019 pocket part.

False. The PCAOB can impose any type of monetary penalties.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is an independent regulatory body established by the U.S. Congress to oversee and regulate the accounting industry, particularly the auditing of public companies. One of the key powers vested in the PCAOB is the authority to impose monetary penalties on accounting firms for violations of auditing and professional standards. Through its oversight function, the PCAOB ensures that accounting firms adhere to rigorous standards and guidelines in conducting audits and providing reliable financial reporting. When the PCAOB identifies violations or deficiencies in an accounting firm's auditing practices or professional conduct, it has the authority to take enforcement actions, including imposing monetary penalties.

Learn more about PCAOB here:

brainly.com/question/32734910

#SPJ11

A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.

The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.

According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.

As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on management, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29023210

#SPJ1

Answer:

the action by the state or an authority of taking property from its owner for public use or benefit:

No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.

The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.

Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.

The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.

Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:

https://brainly.com/question/32959753

#SPJ11

Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.

Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.

This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.

Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.

Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360

#SPJ1

Common exclusions found in liability policies are damage to property owned by the insured.

Liability insurance is a component of the general insurance system of risk financing that shields the buyer from the risks of liabilities brought on by lawsuits and other claims of a similar nature.

It also shields the insured in the event that the buyer is sued for claims covered by the insurance policy.

Hence, the choice of damage to property owned by the insured is correct.

Learn more about liability policies:

https://brainly.com/question/13771374

#SPJ1

Answer: down there

Explanation:

The E-Sign Act allows the use of electronic records to satisfy any statute, regulation, or rule of law requiring that such information be provided in writing, if the consumer has affirmatively consented to such use and has not withdrawn such consent.

Answer:

Explanation:

The age of jurors can have a significant effect on trial outcomes. Here are some ways in which the age of jurors can impact the trial:

Life experience and perspective: Jurors of different ages have varying life experiences and perspectives, which can affect how they perceive evidence and testimony. Older jurors may have more life experience and knowledge about the legal system, while younger jurors may be more idealistic or empathetic. These different perspectives can influence how they weigh evidence and make decisions.

Cognitive abilities: Jurors of different ages may have varying cognitive abilities, which can affect their ability to understand complex evidence and testimony. Older jurors may have difficulty with hearing or memory, which can affect their ability to accurately recall evidence presented during the trial.

Technology use: Jurors of different ages may have varying levels of familiarity with technology, which can impact how they understand and interpret digital evidence such as video recordings or digital documents.

Decision-making tendencies: Research suggests that younger jurors may be more likely to make decisions based on emotions or gut reactions, while older jurors may be more cautious and analytical in their decision-making. These tendencies can affect how they weigh evidence and make decisions.

Jury deliberation: The age composition of a jury can also affect the deliberation process. Jurors of different ages may have varying communication styles, decision-making processes, and group dynamics that can impact how they work together to reach a verdict.

Overall, the age of jurors can have a significant impact on trial outcomes. While it is important to have a diverse jury pool that represents a range of ages and backgrounds, it is also important to consider the potential effects of age on trial outcomes and to ensure that jurors are selected in a fair and unbiased manner.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

The goal of social policy is in order to identify and find ways of reducing inequalities in access to services and as well as support between social groups.

The main goal of social policies is in order to ensure that everyone in the society lives in peace and harmony and also away from the conflicts. With the social policies, it is aimed to ensure that social development, social integration, social justice, social balance, and social peace to the social groups.

Social policy aims to improve human welfare and also to meet human needs for health, education, housing and also economic security. For instance, in the United States, a few programs are: Medicare- Health insurance for individuals over 65 and those with certain illnesses or disabilities.

Hence, important areas of social policy are welfare, social security, poverty reduction, justice, etc.

To learn more about social policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/25451003

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.