Answers
From 1920 until 1945, Germany was home to the National Socialist German Workers' Party, or Nazi Party. It was a far-right political organisation.
The National Socialist German Workers' Party, also known as the Nazi Party, was a far-right political organisation that developed in Germany following World War I. The party, which was led by Adolf Hitler, promoted Aryan supremacy, anti-Semitism, and radical nationalism. Millions of people perished during World War II as a result of the Nazi Party's genocide, war, and totalitarian policies, which were put into place when the party came to power in 1933. As Germany lost the war, the party was finally liquidated and made illegal. The Nazi party was a political organisation that began to exist in Germany in the 1920s and gained power in the 1930s under the direction of Adolf Hitler.
learn more about Nazi Party here:
https://brainly.com/question/30563151
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to take legal action and protect yourself.
Answers
HELP! 75 POINTS:
1. Areas within a corrections facility such as medical, psychological, behavior modification, rehabilitation, education, administration, and transportation are all examples of _____.
A. supportive areas
B. support disciplines
C. supportive facilities
D. support staff
2. Which of the following is not one of the support disciplines generally provided individuals incarcerated in a correctional facility?
A. psychological counseling
B. community employment services
C. educational opportunities
D. medical services
3. One element of Jake’s sentencing is that he pay back what he stole from the nursing home. What is this component of Jake’s sentence called?
A. verdict
B. recidivism
C. situational
D. restitution
4. Which governmental jurisdiction maintains facilities that hold the majority of sentenced offenders?
A. local
B. federal
C. state
D. county
Answers
1. Areas within a corrections facility such as medical, psychological, behavior modification, rehabilitation, education, administration, and transportation are all examples of C. supportive facilities.
2. B. community employment services are not one of the support disciplines generally provided to individuals incarcerated in a correctional facility.
3. The component of Jake's sentence, whereby he pays back what he stole from the nursing home, is D. restitution.
4. The governmental jurisdiction that maintains facilities that hold the majority of sentenced offenders is B. federal.
What are correctional facilities?Correctional facilities are state or federal housing facilities that confine convicted felons with various sentences for varying offenses.
Thus, areas within a corrections facility such as medical, psychological, behavior modification, rehabilitation, education, administration, and transportation are all examples of C. supportive facilities.
Learn more about correctional facilities at https://brainly.com/question/6705028
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
Answers
2 we do not have enough public order people now a days do whatever they want in public
What is the name of the legal principle that "ensures that the judicial system is the same for every defendant?"
Answers
Answer:
Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.
Explanation:
Does the definition of first-degree murder vary from state to state? Explain your answer
Answers
Answer:
murdering in a different state
Explanation:
9893 and more murder
Answer:
Although the exact state laws defining first-degree murder vary by state, most state penal codes require that a prosecutor establish willfulness, deliberation, and premeditation in order to convict a defendant of first-degree murder. Willfulness requires that the defendant acted with the intent to kill another person.
In which century did the western roman empire came to a fall
Answers
Answer:
The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476, and the Western imperial court in Ravenna was formally dissolved by Justinian in 554. The Eastern imperial court survived until 1453.
Explanation:
The Western Roman Empire comprises the western provinces of the Roman Empire at any time during which they were administered by a separate independent Imperial court; in particular, this term is used in historiography to describe the period from 286 to 476, where there were separate coequal courts dividing the governance of the empire in the Western and the Eastern provinces, with a distinct imperial succession in the separate courts.
Which of the following has original jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between two or more states?
U.S. Circuit Court
U.S. District Court
U.S. Supreme Court
US. Intermediate Appellate Court
Answers
The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.
The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.
To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961368
#SPJ4
which is a primary reason for new jail construction over the past decade?
Answers
There are several primary reasons for new jail construction over the past decade. One reason is the increase in the number of people being incarcerated.
There are several primary reasons for new jail construction over the past decade. One reason is the increase in the number of people being incarcerated. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, and this rate has continued to increase over the years. With more people being arrested and convicted of crimes, the demand for more jail space has increased.
Another reason for new jail construction is the need for modernization. Many jails across the country were built several decades ago and are outdated. They lack the necessary infrastructure and technology to effectively manage inmate populations and keep correctional officers and staff safe. As a result, many jails are being replaced or renovated to improve safety and security.
Additionally, some states and localities are building new jails as part of their efforts to reduce overcrowding. Overcrowding is a significant problem in many jails, and it can lead to unsafe and unhealthy conditions for inmates and staff. Building new jails or expanding existing facilities can help to alleviate overcrowding and improve conditions.
In conclusion, the primary reasons for new jail construction over the past decade include the increase in the number of people being incarcerated, the need for modernization, and the efforts to reduce overcrowding.
To know more about incarcerate visit: https://brainly.com/question/31917575
#SPJ11
Which factor is a reason for persistent delinquent behavior according to life course theory?
A stable marriage
A permanent residence
Unemployment
Good upbringing
Answers
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Were prosecutors influenced in their decision by Mayweather's wealth and fame? Did Mayweather benefit from hiring expensive, prominent attorneys to defend him?
Answers
you are walking down a street and you pass by a beer brewery. a barrel rolls out of a third story window and injures you while walking by. you have no idea how this accident occurred. what legal theory will serve you best if you sue the brewery?
Answers
No, you cannot get the accusations made against you dropped. Possession by a Minor. This paragraph clearly states that it was unlawful for anyone who was deemed a minor to be found in possession of alcohol.
Such a person is seen to have broken the law if they acquire, use, or are discovered in possession of such products.
Therefore, despite the fact that you were not informed of your rights, you are nevertheless thought to have broken the law.
The less useful someone passing would be, the more people there are. The distribution of accountability is present. When there are numerous individuals around, no one feels accountable for their actions or inaction.
For such more question on Possession
https://brainly.com/question/1512862
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an unbudgetable spending shock?
Property tax bill
Semi-annual dental visit
Gas used on a planned road trip
Parking Ticket
If you use your Rainy Day fund to pay for a shock, how should you replenish the account?
As a part of your normal savings each month, use part fo refill the fund
With small regular payments as part of your budget moving forward
In as large of payments you can make each month until the account is refilled
Using your emergency credit card as a cash advance
How can you avoid Budgetable spending shocks?
By updating your spending plan or budget regularly
By keeping a Rainy Day fund
By keeping an Emergency Credit Card
Spending shocks cannot be avoided
Answers
Answer:
1)D 2)C 3)A
Explanation:
i took the test
Roger is a forensic investigator. his examination of a dead body reveals that the body is completely limp. which state is the body in?
a. rigor mortis
b. algor mortis
c. pallor mortis
d. primary flaccidity
Answers
Answer:
the answer is A. rigor mortis
Explanation:
critically examine any ethical system or code (e.g., a religious cod or system used in business or any of the professions), and show how each of the do/ don'ts of this code apply to the various aspects of morality
Answers
Answer:
I am writing on principal of disclosure in business ethics. As per the principal, a finance professional shall not disclose his or hr clients personal information to someone other, for his or her own personal benefit. This concept directly relates to general morality as one should not use others confidential and resources for personal gain.
Although this code prohibits disclose but in case, the professional gets to know something illegal happening, then he or she is obliged to disclose that data to concerned authorities.
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in mcculloch v. Maryland and gibbons v. Ogden was.
Answers
Creating a powerful precedent that allowed future national policy to develop free of the constraints of state prerogatives.
What is national policy?In 1876, John A. Macdonald's Conservative Party introduced the National Policy, a Canadian economic agenda. Following the Conservatives' victory in the 1878 Canadian federal election, Macdonald began executing his agenda in 1879.
National policies are the main players in the government process, and they support rural economic development and growth. As a result, numerous types of NGOs and INGOs desire to implement in rural regions and enhance development operations.
Increase birth-age life expectancy from 67.5 to 70 by 2025. Total Fertility Rate (TFR) reduction to 2.1 at the national and sub-national levels by 2025. Reduce child mortality to 23 by 2025.
To know more about national policy follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1064937
#SPJ4
What constitutional amendment is of special significance for the supreme court when considering how to best protect individual rights from action by state and local governments?.
Answers
The 97th constitutional amendment is of special significance for the supreme court when considering how to best protect individual rights from action by state and local governments.
What is a constitutional amendment?The constitution of a nation, organization, or another sort of body can be changed through a constitutional amendment. In an established constitution, amendments are frequently braided into the pertinent parts, directly changing the wording. They can also be added to the constitution as supplemental additions (codicils), affecting the structure of government without changing the wording of the original document.
The majority of constitutions stipulate that in order to become law, amendments must first undergo a more rigorous special procedure than is necessary for regular legislation. Examples of these extraordinary procedures include supermajorities in the legislature, direct voter approval in a referendum, or even a combination of two or more different special procedures.
To know more about constitutional amendment visit:- https://brainly.com/question/8643523
#SPJ4
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
Answers
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
How has the Supreme Court dealt with cases of affirmative action in the United States?
a) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action is unconstitutional because it includes a race test.
b) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action is lawful because it helps a specific group of people
c) it first ruled that the practice was unlawful but it overturned precedence to then say it is lawful under the constitution
d) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action can be either lawful or unlawful depending on the individual circumstances of a case
Answers
Explanation:
D i think if not its b hope this helps!
Ashton is a crime scene investigator. He ensures that all the evidence gathered at the scene is properly handled and labeled. What is Ashton protecting? Ashton ensures that the the documentation of who possesses evidence at all times, is protected by properly handling and labeling evidence.
Answers
Answer:
so if ashton is in charged of protecting the evidence meaning he has to keep up with files on the person this person is a demonstrative investagator
Answer:
chain of custody
Explanation:
analyze the cases and in a few sentences explain how you would rule it
Case 1: A server at a restaurant believed that he was a victim of racial discrimination. He filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC (the administrative agency that enforces federal laws against discrimination) in October 2005. For reasons that are unclear, neither the employee nor the EEOC took any other action regarding the case until October 2011, when the EEOC finally decided that the employee was a victim of racial discrimination and gave him permission to file a lawsuit (all federal discrimination cases must be investigated by the EEOC before a person can file a lawsuit). The server filed a lawsuit in December 2011. The employer’s attorneys argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed because of the lengthy (six-year) delay and the employee’s failure to prompt the EEOC to take action sooner. This, they argued, put the defense at a disadvantage. Should the court allow this case to proceed under these circumstances? Why or why not?
Case 2: After a jury awarded a plaintiff $300,000 in damages in a sexual harassment case, a federal district court judge reduced the award to $50,000. The judge did so because at the time of the jury’s verdict, the plaintiff employer had twenty-five employees, and Title VII (of the Civil Rights Act—a federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination) caps damages for employers with no more than 100 employees at a maximum of $50,000. However, four years earlier, when the harassment occurred, the employer had 247 employees. Was the judge correct in capping damages awarded to the plaintiff based on the employer’s size at the time of the jury’s verdict rather than at the time when the discrimination occurred? Why or why not?
Answers
Case 1: The court should allow the case to proceed despite the delay caused by the EEOC.
Case 2: The judge should have capped damages based on the employer's size at the time of discrimination.
Case 1: Despite the protracted delay, the court should permit this case to continue. Although the six year delay is significant, the EEOC not the employee, is primarily to blame for it. It would be unfair to punish the employee for the agency's inaction, and the defense can still make their cases and present their supporting documentation during the court proceedings to refute the discrimination claim.
Case 2: In basing the damages cap on the employer's size at the time of the jury verdict, the judge erred. The proper strategy should take into account the employer's size at the time of the discrimination, as that is when the Title VII violation occurred. The cap's intention is to limit damages for smaller employers but it should be determined by the size of the employer at the time of the harassment in order to make sure the plaintiff is fairly compensated for their losses.
Learn more about EEOC at:
brainly.com/question/31559733
#SPJ4
True or false statement frequently civil disorder arises from an accumulation of grievances and then precipitating incident ignites rioting.
Answers
because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, the ucr has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime. True or False
Answers
The given statement "because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, the UCR has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime" is true.
The UCR (Uniform Crime Report) has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime. This is because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, which can result in an incomplete and inaccurate picture of crime in a given area.
The UCR now includes estimates of unreported crimes based on surveys of victims, in an attempt to provide a more accurate representation of crime rates.
To know more about UCR, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30273202#
#SPJ11
accessory to a crime is a separate offense, usually a
Answers
An accessory to a crime is a separate offense, usually a misdemeanor, for assisting the perpetrator of the crime. It is an offense that is separate from the offense committed by the principal actor.
This crime occurs when a person knowingly assists someone else in the commission of a crime, either before or after the crime is committed.What is an accessory to a crime?An accessory to a crime is a person who aids or assists a criminal before, during, or after the commission of the crime. They usually do not take part in the crime itself, but they provide help or support to the person committing the crime. The accessory may provide assistance in a variety of ways, such as by providing transportation, helping to plan the crime, or hiding evidence after the crime.Accessories to crimes may be charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the crime committed. Some states also have laws that make it illegal to assist someone in committing a specific type of crime, such as a drug crime or a gang-related crime.
To know more about misdemeanor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11328028
#SPJ11
Differentiate terrorism and activism
Answers
Answer:
its a good question.
if you look at wiki definition (well its not necessiailty a source of truth, but it refers largely wat a typical person thinks).....terrorism is defined as use of violence to achieve ones' political goal, which is not really different from activism.
i guess the easy answer is that terrorism is a violent act against the traditional social value; whereas activism is a fight, sometimes violent, against what the society considers as unjustice.
if you want a more thoughtful answer, you can add that sometimes one's definition of activism can be considered as terrorsim by a different person, because different ppl in the society have different social value and priority.
say if some self acclaimed activists run riot on the street, some ppl would consider them as activists; but if you are a store owner who dont agree with their view, their act is an act of terror.
Explanation:
what do you think a prosecutor would have to show to that ari is guilty of arson (and as a result felony murder)?
Answers
A prosecutor would have to show that Ari committed the act of arson and that the act resulted in a death to prove that Ari is guilty of felony murder.
The prosecutor would have to provide evidence that Ari set a fire intentionally, with the purpose of damaging or destroying property. This could include witness testimony, video or photo evidence, or evidence of an accelerant.
The prosecutor would also need to show that the fire resulted in the death of another person, such as through medical evidence, witness testimony, or video or photo evidence.
In addition, the prosecutor would need to show that Ari was aware that setting the fire could result in the death of another person.
Know more about Evidence here
https://brainly.com/question/15880833#
#SPJ11
a driver's license may be suspended for anyone under 18 years of age that has at least 15 consecutive unexcused absences from school.
Answers
False, a driver's license may not be suspended for anyone under 18 years of age that has at least 15 consecutive unexcused absences from school.
A driver's license is the official document that certifies a specific person's legal ability to operate one or more types of motorized vehicles—such as motorcycles, cars, trucks, or buses—on a public road. Typically, these licenses are plastic and about the size of a credit card.
You can apply for a provisional license at the age of 17 and a half without taking driver's ed. No learner's permit is necessary for those who are 18 years of age or older to apply for their driver's license. Any age group may apply for CA ID cards.
To know more about driver's license: https://brainly.com/question/18611420
#SPJ4
The - formally nominates judges for federal district courts. After nomination, the candidate must first be considered by the - Committee.presidentsenate judiciary
Answers
The president formally nominates judges for federal district courts. After nomination, the candidate must first be considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
This committee is responsible for evaluating the candidate's qualifications, including their legal knowledge and experience, as well as their personal character. The committee also interviews the nominee and reviews their record in order to make an informed recommendation to the Senate.
If the committee approves the nomination, the candidate is then voted on by the full Senate, which has the power to approve or reject the candidate. The Senate's decision is the final step in the process, and it is not uncommon for the Senate to reject a president's nominee.
know more about president here
https://brainly.com/question/497462#
#SPJ11
this defense requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage
Answers
The defense that requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage is called "comparative negligence." Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine responsibility and damages in personal injury cases.
It is a defense used by the defendant, which asserts that the plaintiff was partially or wholly responsible for the damages suffered, and thus the defendant should only be held liable for the percentage of damages that they caused. Comparative negligence requires a jury to apportion liability between the plaintiff and defendant based on their respective degrees of fault.
The jury is asked to determine the percentage of negligence attributed to each party, and damages are awarded based on that percentage. In states that follow pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they were found to be 99% at fault, but their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
Learn more about doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ11
"each hazard carries an associated _____________, which is represented by the likelihood of the hazard leading to an actual disaster event and the consequences of that event should it occur."
a.risk
b.danger
c.harm
d.reward
Answers
"each hazard carries an associated risk, which is represented by the likelihood of the hazard leading to an actual disaster event and the consequences of that event should it occur."
The likelihood (probability) of a harmful event, such as injury or death from a specific hazard, is referred to as risk; a hazard is a situation that has the potential to cause harm (regardless of the likelihood of it actually occurring). Physical hazards events include radiation, magnetic fields, pressure extremes (high pressure or vacuum), noise, and so on. Psychosocial hazards include stress, violence, and so on. Safety hazards include slipping/tripping hazards, inadequate machine guarding, and equipment malfunctions or breakdowns. A function of hazard level and likelihood (or probability) that the hazard will cause harm.
learn more about hazard event here:
https://brainly.com/question/2817915
#SPJ4