The purpose of the statute of frauds is that it requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the parties bound by the contract.
The purpose of this statute is to prevent fraud and other injury by ensuring that important agreements are documented and verified by all parties involved. Other measures, such as community service for those convicted of fraud or warning labels on products or services prone to fraud, may also be used to deter fraudulent behavior. In the case of Bernie Madoff, a statue erected on Wall Street serves as a reminder that crime doesn't pay and may deter others from committing similar acts of fraud . The Statute of Frauds exists to protect both parties involved in a contract by establishing a clear and concrete record of the agreement. This makes it more difficult for either party to later deny the existence or terms of the contract, ultimately minimizing the risk of fraud and other injury in contractual relationships.
To know more about Statue of Frauds visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12285524
#SPJ11
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true about CERTs? A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood. B. CERTS often support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects in the community. C. Being a CERT volunteer requires little time because disasters do not occur frequently. D. CERTS never support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects.
Answer:
A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood.
Explanation:
CERT is an educational program that seeks to instruct volunteers who can help their communities in emergencies or disasters, in addition to teaching concepts for preventing these disasters, low-complexity rescues and even simpler medical procedures that can make all the difference in safety of the victims .. As stated before, the goal is for the volunteer to be able to help their community in the face of a need.
Sebastian is skateboarding outside the local rec center. On the sidewalk, he finds a wallet that someone has dropped. Sebastian does not see anyone around, and the wallet does not contain an ID, so he takes the wallet inside the recreation center to give to the desk. He hopes that the owner will come looking for it. What are Sebastian’s actions an example of? A. crime B. folkway C. more D. law
Answer:
law i think
Explanation:
if not its more
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
a representative who is elected by all voters of the state is called :
Answer:
At-large
Explanation:
Once the initial pleadings are filed, most lawsuits move into the ________ stage, in which the parties attempt to collect evidence for trial.
The stage in which the parties attempt to collect evidence for trial is known as the discovery stage.
During the discovery stage, parties to the lawsuit can ask for documents or other evidence to be produced by the opposing party or from third parties who may have relevant information. In the discovery stage, parties are required to be truthful with each other and provide all relevant information requested. Depositions, or sworn statements from witnesses, may also be taken to get evidence from witnesses, including expert witnesses. Other discovery methods include written questions (interrogatories), requests for admission, and requests for the production of documents and things.
The discovery process is crucial in a lawsuit because it allows both parties to obtain relevant information and evidence from each other to prepare for trial. During the discovery stage, parties can also try to resolve the case before it goes to trial, through mediation or settlement negotiations.
In conclusion, the stage in which the parties attempt to collect evidence for trial is called the discovery stage.
Learn more about the discovery stage: https://brainly.com/question/22618729
#SPJ11
Explain how ethical dilemmas are evaluated and resolved, what factors are involved?
Answer:
By mutual understanding and cooperation.
Explanation:
Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.
Your department has experienced budget cuts over the last five years, resulting in a 20% reduction in line personnel, and the elimination of several proactive special units and the Community Policing Unit.
What will your department look like in five, ten, and twenty years?
Why have you made these decisions?
What must your department do to recoup the losses in personnel?
How will your hiring practices change to meet the different workforce-facing law enforcement?
In five, ten, and twenty years, the department may face continued resource limitations, reduced staffing levels, and a more streamlined structure. These decisions were made due to budget constraints and the need to prioritize essential services.
To recoup personnel losses, the department can focus on strategic recruitment, retention strategies, and partnerships with community organizations.
Hiring practices may evolve to attract diverse candidates, emphasize technological skills, and adapt to the changing demands of law enforcement.
In five years, the department will likely operate with a reduced workforce and limited resources due to the budget cuts. The elimination of proactive special units and the Community Policing Unit will lead to a narrower focus on reactive law enforcement.
This may result in a decline in community engagement and preventive strategies. In ten years, the impact of the budget cuts may become more pronounced, with further personnel reductions and decreased capacity for specialized units. The department may struggle to address complex and evolving crime patterns effectively.
To recoup the losses in personnel, the department needs to explore various strategies. These could include advocating for increased funding from government sources, seeking partnerships with community organizations, and exploring innovative cost-saving measures. Implementing efficiencies in administrative processes and leveraging technology can also help maximize the productivity of the available personnel.
Hiring practices must adapt to meet the challenges of workforce-facing law enforcement. The department should focus on recruiting candidates with diverse skill sets, including technological proficiency, problem-solving abilities, and strong communication skills.
Emphasizing community-oriented policing during the hiring process is crucial to rebuilding trust and fostering positive relationships with the community. Collaborating with local educational institutions and offering attractive compensation packages can also help attract qualified individuals to the department.
Overall, the department must prioritize resource allocation, invest in training and professional development, and foster strong community partnerships to mitigate the effects of the budget cuts and adapt to the changing landscape of law enforcement.
For more such answers on Budget
https://brainly.com/question/6663636
#SPJ8
in what ways does the bill of rights, paired with the fourteenth amendment, limit the rights of the states vs. the federal government, and in what ways does it protect individual americans? equal protection of the laws means every place/state/citizens that the law applies to will follow the same law. the place/state/citizens cannot change or break the law.
Answer:
The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, in conjunction with the Fourteenth Amendment, establishes a framework for protecting individual rights and limiting the powers of both the federal government and the states. While the Bill of Rights primarily focuses on safeguarding individual liberties, the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that these rights are applied equally to all citizens.
Limiting the Powers of the Federal Government:
First Amendment: The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. It prohibits the federal government from interfering with these fundamental rights and ensures that individuals have the freedom to express themselves without censorship or persecution.
Second Amendment: The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms. It restricts the federal government from infringing on an individual's right to own firearms, ensuring the right to self-defense.
Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It places limitations on the federal government's ability to conduct searches without probable cause or obtaining a warrant, thereby safeguarding individuals' privacy rights.
Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment includes protections such as the right to due process, protection against self-incrimination, and safeguards against double jeopardy. It ensures that the federal government respects an individual's rights to fair treatment and prevents coercion in legal proceedings.
Limiting the Powers of the States:
Fourteenth Amendment: The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, extends the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states. It includes the Equal Protection Clause, which requires states to provide equal treatment under the law to all individuals within their jurisdiction. This provision restricts state governments from implementing discriminatory laws or policies that infringe upon an individual's rights.
Protecting Individual Americans:
First Amendment: The First Amendment protects the freedom of religion, speech, and assembly for individuals across the United States. It ensures that citizens have the right to express their beliefs, worship freely, engage in political activism, and criticize the government without fear of retribution.
Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment safeguards individuals from unwarranted searches and seizures by both the federal government and state authorities. It protects citizens' privacy and ensures that law enforcement must have probable cause or a valid warrant before conducting searches or seizing property.
Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process rights, ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and have the right to a fair trial. It also protects against self-incrimination and ensures that individuals cannot be tried for the same offense multiple times.
Fourteenth Amendment: The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause ensures that all individuals receive equal treatment under the law, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or other protected characteristics. It prohibits discrimination andand promotes equal rights for all citizens.
In summary, the Bill of Rights, in combination with the Fourteenth Amendment, establishes a framework that both limits the powers of the federal government and protects individual Americans. It safeguards fundamental rights and ensures that the government, at both federal and state levels, respects the equal protection of the law and upholds individual liberties
autopros recalled thousands of tires when several people died in traffic accidents blamed on faulty tires. this is an example of
The action by Autopros is an example of a product recall.
What is a product recall ?A product recall is undertaken when a defective or perilous item is determined to have been made and must, as a consequence, be repaired or withdrawn from the market in order to guarantee consumer safety. The recall of thousands of tires by AutoPros was attributed to the treads on the tires which were deemed faulty after causing several fatal accidents.
Manufacturer or distributor-initiated voluntary recalls are as common as those mandated by government agencies such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in the United States.
Find out more on product recalls at https://brainly.com/question/29993372
#SPJ1
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
a judge in a court that hears all types of cases. over the past month, he has presided over cases involving murder, identity theft, arson, and vandalism. what type of jurisdiction does this scenario describe?
A scenario where a judge in a court hears all types of cases, including murder, identity theft, arson, and vandalism this type of jurisdiction is known as "general jurisdiction," as the judge has the authority to hear a wide range of cases, encompassing various legal issues and subject matters.
General jurisdiction is a court’s authority to hear any type of case which is not vested in another court. Often, states will vest their trial courts with general jurisdiction. It is a form of minimum contacts that may enable a judge in a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a corporate defendant in that state without violating due process, irrespective of the nature of the claim.
To learn more about "General jurisdicton" visit: https://brainly.com/question/6995997
#SPJ11
.Bill was injured on the job and hospitalized for several months. Without telling Bill, and to prevent him from being cited by the city during this period, Bill’s friend Ted mowed Bill’s lawn weekly and fed and watered his pets. When Bill returned home from the hospital, he was shocked at what Ted had done and said, “I’ll pay you $500 for all your work.” Is this an enforceable promise
Answer:
Ted is going to jail bingo
Explanation:
The remark that can be given regarding the enforceability of the promise would be:
Yes
In the given situation, the promise would be enforceable because there is a discrepancy between the words that Ted cut the bill which was inappropriate. This mowing down of Bill's lawn without his permission is inadequate and illegal. Therefore, this would be enforceable as the action took place in his absence.Learn more about "Law" here:
brainly.com/question/6590381
The model of criminal justice that is focused on protecting defendants’ rights is known as the ______ model.
Answer:
the due process model
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:process
Explanation:
The owner of the property has the right to establish
certain rules on their property that may or may not be
part of the criminal code.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules
True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.
What is criminal code?The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons who commit crimes.
The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.
The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the government and has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about criminal code here:
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ2
What 2014 feature film depicted the subject of a multimillion dollar libel judgment brought by former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura that was overturned by a Courts of Appeal
The 2014 feature film that depicted the subject of a multimillion dollar libel judgment brought by former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura was "American Sniper".
The film is a biographical war drama directed by Clint Eastwood and stars Bradley Cooper as Chris Kyle, a US Navy SEAL who served in Iraq and became known as one of the deadliest snipers in American history.
In the book on which the movie was based, Kyle claimed to have punched Ventura in a bar in 2006 after Ventura allegedly made disparaging remarks about Navy SEALs. Ventura denied the allegation and sued Kyle for defamation, leading to a highly publicized trial in 2014. A jury awarded Ventura $1.8 million in damages, but the verdict was later overturned by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, which ruled that Kyle's statements were protected under the First Amendment.
The controversy surrounding the trial and the portrayal of Ventura in "American Sniper" generated significant debate and criticism. Some argued that the film presented a biased and inaccurate depiction of Ventura, while others defended Kyle's right to free speech and criticized Ventura for suing a deceased veteran.
learn more about judgment here
https://brainly.com/question/28344967
#SPJ11
Question # 1
Multiple Choice
is an example of transient evidence at the crime scene
on Willow Lane.
O the bleeding man on the driveway
a nosey neighbor who keeps coming and going at the
crime scene
O a homeless person living in the woods behind the house
a lit cigarette in the ashtray near the dead body
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
T/F the largest impact of the CSI Effect have been on law enforcement and corrections
Answer:
false
Explanation:
police suspected that a man was engaged in large-scale drug distribution. while the man was away, an officer entered his apartment without a warrant to see if he could find evidence of drug dealing. inside the man's apartment, the officer discovered a ledger that appeared to contain records of drug transactions. written inside the ledger was the name of a prominent local businessman. the officer then located and questioned the businessman, who admitted that he had bought drugs from the man on numerous occasions. the businessman arranged for the man and the officer to run into each other at a local nightclub. the officer asked the man how he and the businessmen knew each other, and the man, unaware of the officer's identity, informed the officer that he sold the businessman drugs and bragged that he had hundreds of customers. based solely on the officer's testimony, which reflected the above events, the grand jury returned an indictment against the man for drug distribution. if the man's attorney files a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the man's constitutional rights were violated, should the court grant the motion?
Based on the given scenario, it is highly likely that the court would grant the motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the man's constitutional rights were violated.
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. In this case, the officer entered the man's apartment without a warrant while the man was away. This action is a clear violation of the man's Fourth Amendment rights, as there were no exigent circumstances or legal justification for the warrantless entry.
Additionally, the officer's subsequent questioning of the businessman, arranging a meeting between the man and the officer, and eliciting incriminating statements from the man without informing him of his Miranda rights raise concerns about violations of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
The evidence obtained as a result of these constitutional violations, namely the discovery of the ledger and the incriminating statements made by the man, would likely be considered fruit of the poisonous tree and inadmissible in court. Therefore, the man's attorney would have a strong basis for filing a motion to dismiss the indictment, asserting that the man's constitutional rights were violated during the investigation.
For more question on constitutional rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8562924
#SPJ8
Discuss the pros and cons of raising children in correctional institutions. How you expand or limit such programs?
Answer:
Explanation:
While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.
Speeding is either a primary or secondary factor in most all vehicle accidents.
True
False
Answer:
Primary is true
Explanation:
Primary Traffic Offenses:
Most traffic violations are primary offenses. Common primary offenses include: speeding. disobeying a traffic signal (including red light violations).
Riley, who is three years old, has never met her dad since he was sent to the state penitentiary for check fraud just after she was born. He was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam. One day when she returns from daycare. he is waiting there to meet her. What MOST likelv hannener to Riley's father?
As Riley father was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam but, in one he waits daycare to meet her, what has most likely happened to Riley's father is he was released early on parole.
What is a parole in law?Basically, a parole refers to the conditional release of prisoners before they complete their sentence. The paroled prisoners are alwats supervised by a public official, usually called a parole officer. If the paroled prisoners violate the conditions of their release, they may be returned to prison.
For example, a paroled prisoners must get and keep a job, avoid drugs and alcohol, avoid their victims, not commit any crimes, and report regularly to their parole officer. But if the paroled prisoner violated his parole by violently assaulting someone, he would probably be returned to prison. If he ran a stop sign, he probably would not be.
Read more about parole
brainly.com/question/14467348
#SPJ1
Angelina and Brad have six kids. They have been secretly separated for a number of years, and they have finally decided to get a divorce. During their separation, the kids
lived primarily with Angelina. However, Brad insists he should get primary custody of the children. If he can't get custody of all of the kids, he is willing to settle for
custody of his three favorite kids and let Angelina have the other three.
What are some of the issues here?
- 12
Pararanh
Should people living with HIV be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status to prospective partners; why or why not? Should a participant be legally required to disclose, if they have taken precautions to limit the transfer of HIV?
No, people living with HIV should not be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status.
HIV is a virus, rather than a crime, and its transmission between consenting adults should not be criminalized. While disclosure of HIV status is important for reducing the risk of transmission, forcing those with HIV to disclose is not always in the interests of public health, and can be a violation of autonomy and privacy.
The legality of disclosing one's HIV status should be left to the individual to decide, and if other precautions have been taken, it should not be legally required.
To know more about HIV , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31765366
#SPJ4
The city of Chicago was having issues with people defacing local buses and trains. To stop the defacing the city passes a law banning the sale of spray paint within city limits. This type of law is known as _
The city of Chicago was having issues with people defacing local buses and trains. To stop the defacing the city passes a law banning the sale of spray paint within city limits. This type of law is known as mala prohibita.
If you deface something, you've blemished or disfigured it in some way. for instance, graffiti can deface a statue. To deface something means to harm it or simply mess up its look. And every now and then it is each: Throwing a cup of espresso on a treasured painting ruins the face of the portray, so we are saying it is been defaced.
Deface means to destruct or destroy the look. The term can be used with admiration for people or files. Defacing a human is a crook offense. Defacing also approaches making illegible by using injuring the face of a written file.
Deface method to destruct or ruin the appearance of. The time period may be used with respect to individuals or documents. Defacing a human is a crook offense. Defacing additionally way making illegible via injuring the face of a written document.
Learn more about defacing here https://brainly.com/question/10975188
#SPJ4
Under which circumstances would you consider filing an amicus brief in an appeals case?
Answer:
An amicus curiae brief in support of a petitioner or appellant shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket or a response is called for by the Court, whichever is later, and that time will not be extended.
1. You may drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle
Answer: The answer is false.
Explanation: To pass another vehicle, you must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
We cannot drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle. To pass another vehicle, we must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
The given statement is false.
What is a paved roadway?Paved road is defined as an improved street, highway, alley, public way, or easement that is covered by concrete or asphaltic concrete, excluding access roadways that connect a facility to a public paved roadway but are not open to through traffic.
On a two-way street, keep left to allow traffic from the opposite direction to pass on your right, and keep right on a one-way street to allow vehicles behind you to overtake from the right.
When we turn left, stay to the left side of the road you're leaving as well as the one you're entering. When turning right, move to the center of the exiting road and then to the left side of the entering road.
Therefore, drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle is not possible any under any circumstances.
To learn more on paved roadway, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15488796
#SPJ2