What is the name of the conceptual framework in which the research is carried out?.

Answer:

The equation is not true. It is actually c=30

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to divide amount of money she's selling the candy bars for which is $2.50.

If her profit was $75, you want to know how much bars she sold, you will have to divide the amount of money she's selling the candy bars for and the amount she's earning which is $75 divided by $2.50 which is 30.

So c= 30

Answer:

[see below]

Step-by-step explanation:

A functions input is assigned to exactly one output. This means that the inputs must not repeat.

{(-3, 5), (-2, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

Since no inputs repeat, the relation given is a function.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

Yes, it's a function.

Step-by-step explanation:

X or input no repeated.

Answer:

Slope = ∆y/∆x

slope = ( -5_1 ) / ( 3_-3 )

slope = -6 / 6

slope = -1

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

first, you turn 3 1/2 into 3 2/4'ths and change 3 two fourth's into 14/4 fraction.

next, you change 2 one fourth into 9/4th's fraction

your equation would be 14/4 divided by 9/4th's = a times b/c

when you used divide, you get get flip one of the fractions being divided, and it could turn into 14/4 TIMES 4 over 9 = a times b/c.

wait this area down here could be wrong:

when you get your equation, multiply them together and you get 56 over 36 equals a times b/c.

A times B /C is equal to 56/36 which can simple out to 28/18 which AGAIN simpled out to 14/9

C IS 9 BECAUSE IT IS THE DENOMINATOR

and because of that, A would be the answer.

Answer:

When x = 4, (4, 0)

When y = 4, (6, 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the ordered-pair solution when x = 4, plug 4 into the x of the equation.

y = 2x - 8

y = 2(4) - 8

y = 8 - 8

y = 0

This produces the ordered pair (4, 0).

To find the ordered-pair solution when y = 4, plug 4 into the y of the equation.

y = 2x - 8

4 = 2x - 8

12 = 2x

6 = x

x = 6

This produces the ordered pair (6, 4).

The critical value (zo) for the given test is 2.33. So, option A) is correct.

A critical value is the value of the test statistic which defines the upper and lower bounds of a confidence interval or defines the threshold of statistical significance in a statistical test.

Critical value can be defined as a value that is useful in checking whether the null hypothesis can be rejected or not by comparing it with the test statistic.

Based on the information provided, we can use a one-tailed z-test with a level of significance (α) of 0.01.

The formula for the critical value (zo) is:
zo = zα
where zα is the z-score corresponding to the level of significance (α).

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the z-score for α = 0.01 is 2.33.

Therefore, the critical value (zo) for this test is 2.33.

Thus, option A) is correct.

Learn more about critical value:

https://brainly.com/question/14040224

#SPJ11

The value of the given expression [\(87^3+ 13^3/87^2 -87 * 13 + 13^2\)] by simplifying the numerator and denominator using suitable identities is 100.

We will first calculate the numerator:

As  (\(a^3\) + \(b^3\)) = (a + b)(\(a^2\) - ab + \(b^2\)) :

\(87^3\) + \(13^3\) = (87 + 13)(\(87^2\) - \(87 * 13\) + \(13^2\))

= 100(\(87^2\) - 87 * 13 + \(13^2\))

Now, calculate the denominator:

\(87^2 - 87 * 13 + 13^2\)

As,(\(a^2 -2ab +b^2\)) =\((a - b)^2\):

\(87^2 - 87 * 13 + 13^2 = (87 - 13)^2\)

\(= 74^2\)

So by solving the equation further:

\((87^3+13^3) / (87^2- 87 * 13+13^2) = 100*(87^2- 87 *13 + 13^2)/(87^2 - 87 * 13 + 13^2)\)

As we can see the numerator and denominator are the same expressions (\(87^2 - 87 * 13 + 13^2\)). so, they cancel each other:

\((87^3 + 13^3) / (87^2 - 87 * 13 + 13^2) = 100\)

So, the value of the given expression is 100.

To know more about the expression:-

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Anatomical planes are created by imaginary lines that intersect the body into parts

1) The line integral value is : ∫F dr = 6

2) The line integral value is : ∫F dr = 6

3) The line integral value is : ∫F dr = 6

Here we are given:

\(F.dr = (3x + 2y)dx + (2x -2z)dy + (3x -2y)dz,\)

where\(\vec{F}\) is a conservative field

So,

f(x, y , z) = \(\int\limits (3x + 2y)dx + (2x -2z)dy + (3x -2y)dz,\)

f(x , y , z) = (3zx +2yx) + (2xy - 2zy) + (3xz - 2yz) + c(x , y , z)

\(f(x, y, z) = (6xz + 4xy - 4yz) + c(x, y, z)\)

Now substitute the values of x , y ,z ,

1)

Line segment from (0, 0 , 0) to (1,1 ,1)

∫F dr = f(1,1,1) - f(0,0,0)

= |6 + 4 - 4 |- |0 + 0 - 0|

∫F dr = 6

2)

Line segment from (0,0,0) to (0,0,1) to (1,1,1)

First we take (0,0,0) to (0,0,1)

\(\int _c \vec{F}.\vec{dr}=f(0,0,1)-f(0,0,0) =[6(0)(1)+4(0)(0)-4(0)(1)]-[6(0)(0)+4(0)(0)-4(0)(0)] =[0+0-0]-[0+0-0]\)

∫F dr = 0

\(\Rightarrow \int _{c}\vec{F}.\vec{dr}=0+6 [F.dr = 6\)

3)

Line segment from (0,0,0) to (1,0,0) to (1,1,0) to (1,1,1)

First we take (0,0,0) to (1,0,0)

\(\int _c \vec{F}.\vec{dr}=f(1,0,0)-f(0,0,0) =[6(1)(0)+4(1)(0)-4(0)(0)]-[6(0)(0)+4(0)(0)-4(0)(0)] =[0+0-0]-[0+0-0]\int _{c}\vec{F}.\vec{dr}=0\)

Next we take (1,0,0) to (1,1,0)

\(\int _c \vec{F}.\vec{dr}=f(1,1,0)-f(1,0,0) = [6(1)(0) + 4(1)(1) − 4(1)(0)] - [6(1)(0) + 4(1)(0) — 4(0)(0)] = [0+4-0] - [0+0-0]\int _{c}\vec{F}.\vec{dr}=4\)

Lastly we take (1,1,0) to (1,1,1)

\(F.dr = f(1,1,1) ƒ(1,1,0) = [6(1)(1) +4(1)(1) − 4(1)(1)] - [6(1)(0) + 4(1)(1) — 4(1)(0)] =[6+4-4]-[0+4-0]\int _{c}\vec{F}.\vec{dr}=2\)

Adding the three results we get

\(\Rightarrow \int _{c}\vec{F}.\vec{dr}=0+4+2\\\\\int\limits F.dr = 6\)

Therefore we see that the Line integral for the three cases comes out to be same between the initial and final points since it is independent of the path taken.

Know more about line integral ,

https://brainly.com/question/29850528

#SPJ4

By Pythagoras theorem, The length of MN=5 units and that of LN=4.33 units.

 is the formula for Pythagoras' theorem. The right-angled triangle's longest side, or c, is used in this equation. The hypotenuse is another name for this line. The other two sides of the triangle are shown by letters A and b.

Since, it is a right angle triangle, we can use Pythagoras theorem.

cos 60=base/hypotenuse

1/2=2.5/Hypotenuse

Hypotenuse=2*2.5

Hypotenuse=MN=5 units.

now,

sin 60=perpendicular/hypotenuse

\(\sqrt{3}/2=LN/5\\\)

LN=4.33 units.

To know more about Pythagoras theorem visit:-

brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

Answer:

[-1,5]

Step-by-step explanation:

all reals between -1 and 5

It was found that

Then, evaluating at x=4,

The expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724732.60.

Decision Tree:

To solve the given problem, the first step is to create a decision tree. The decision tree for the given problem is shown below:

Expected Value Calculation: The expected value of the "Buy New" option can be calculated using the following formula:

Expected Value = (Prob. of Prosperity * Payoff for Prosperity) + (Prob. of Recession * Payoff for Recession)

Substituting the given values in the above formula, we get:

Expected Value for "Buy New" = (0.7 * 1,035,332) + (0.3 * -150,000)Expected Value for "Buy New" = 724,732.60

Therefore, the expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724,732.60.

Conclusion:

To conclude, the decision tree is an effective tool used in decision making, especially when the consequences of different decisions are unclear. It helps individuals understand the costs and benefits of different choices and decide the best possible action based on their preferences and probabilities.

The expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724,732.60.

For more questions on expected value

https://brainly.com/question/14723169

#SPJ8

Answer:

option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is d (the last one).

pq= -10 x 4= -40 (lowest value)

p-q= -10 - 4= -14 (middle value)

p+q= -10 + 4= -6 ( highest value)

Interactions involving dummy variables can provide insights into the different effects of independent variables across categories.

1. Dummy variables are binary variables that represent categorical variables in a regression analysis. When interactions are included between dummy variables and other independent variables, it allows for differential effects of the independent variables based on the different levels of the categorical variable.

For example, let's consider a regression model to predict income based on education level and gender. We can include an interaction term between education level (represented by dummy variables for different levels) and gender. This interaction term allows us to examine whether the effect of education level on income differs between males and females. It helps capture any gender-specific differences in the relationship between education and income.

1.2 The linear probability model (LPM) is a common approach to estimate the probability of an event occurring using a linear regression framework. However, it has several problems:

1. The predicted probabilities from the LPM can fall outside the [0, 1] range: Since the LPM does not impose any restrictions on the predicted probabilities, they can sometimes exceed the valid probability range. This violates the assumption of probabilities being bounded between 0 and 1.

2. Heteroscedasticity: The LPM assumes constant error variance across the range of the predictors. However, in practice, the variability of the error term may change with different levels of the predictors, resulting in heteroscedasticity. This violates the assumption of homoscedasticity.

3. Non-linearity: The LPM assumes a linear relationship between the predictors and the probability of the event. However, this may not always be the case, and using a linear model can result in misspecification.

To remedy these problems, an alternative to the LPM is to use logistic regression or probit regression models. These models explicitly model the probability of an event occurring and address the issues mentioned above. They provide predicted probabilities that fall within the valid range of 0 to 1, account for heteroscedasticity, and allow for non-linear relationships between the predictors and the probability of the event.

Learn more about LPM here:

https://brainly.com/question/30890632

#SPJ4

Becca made a mistake while constructing triangle DEF by using the angles 50°, 65°, and 65°. The mistake she made was violating the triangle inequality theorem.

According to the theorem, the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. In other words, if we add the lengths of two sides of a triangle, it must be greater than the length of the third side.

Since Becca only used angles to construct the triangle, she did not consider the side lengths of the triangle. Therefore, there is a possibility that the triangle she constructed does not satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, and it may not be a valid triangle.

In order to ensure the triangle is valid, Becca needs to consider the side lengths while constructing the triangle. She could use trigonometric ratios or a ruler and protractor to measure the side lengths and angles accurately.

To know more about triangle inequality theorem here

https://brainly.com/question/1163433

#SPJ4

Answer:

2x^3-5x^2-17x+20

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 2x^3 - 5x^2 - 17x + 20

Step-by-step explanation: just simplify it

A C++ function getNorm that returns its 1-norm is defined.

Here's an implementation of the 'getNorm' function in C++:

#include <iostream>

float getNorm(float **matrix, int N) {

   float norm = 0.0;    

   for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {

       float sum = 0.0;

       for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {

           sum += std::abs(matrix[i][j]);

       }

       if (sum > norm) {

           norm = sum;

       }

   }    

   return norm;

}

In this implementation, we iterate over each column of the matrix and calculate the sum of absolute values of elements in that column. We keep track of the maximum sum encountered so far and return it as the 1-norm of the matrix.

Complete Question:

Given a NxN matrix of floats, write a function getNorm that returns its 1-norm, defined as: || A||\(_1\) = max (i<=j<=n)\((\sum (i=1\ to\ n) |a_{ij}|\))

The prototype of getNorm should be: float getNorm(float **matrix, int N);

To know more about 1-norm, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30440638

#SPJ4

ΔHKJ and ΔLNP are similar triangle due to equal pair of corresponding angles .

Similar triangles are defined as two triangles with the same shape, equal pair of corresponding angles, and the same ratio of the corresponding sides.

Given,

m∠H = 30°

m∠J=50°

m∠P=50°

m∠N=100°

In triangle ΔHKJ

m∠H = 30°

m∠J=50°

m∠K= 180°- (m∠H+m∠J) = 180°-(30°+50°)

m∠K= 100°

In ΔHKJ and ΔLNP,

m∠J = m∠P= 50°

m∠K= m∠N= 100°

According to Angle-Angle (AA) rule, two triangles are said to be similar if two angles in one particular triangle are equal to two angles of another triangle.

Thus, ΔHKJ and ΔLNP are similar triangle due to equal pair of corresponding angles.

Hence, ΔHKJ ~ ΔLNP

learn more about similar triangle

https://brainly.com/question/25882965

If A is a symmetric matrix, then A³ is also a symmetric matrix.

To prove this, we can use the definition of a symmetric matrix, which is a matrix that is equal to its transpose. In other words, if A is a symmetric matrix, then A = A^T.

Now, let's look at A³:

A³ = A * A * A

We can replace each A with A^T, since they are equal:

A³ = A^T * A^T * A^T

Now, we can use the property that the transpose of a product of matrices is equal to the product of their transposes in reverse order:

A³ = (A^T * A^T * A^T)^T

A³ = (A^T)^T * (A^T)^T * (A^T)^T

Since the transpose of a transpose is the original matrix, we can simplify:

A³ = A * A * A

Therefore, A³ is also a symmetric matrix.

More information about the symmetric matrix here:

https://brainly.com/question/16374195

#SPJ11

A linear system that is underdetermined either has no solution or infinitely many solutions. has an infinite number of solutions and is consistent, for example, (x, y, z) = (1, 2, 2), (2, 3, 2), and (3, 4, 2).

If there are more equations than unknowns in a system of linear equations or a system of polynomial equations, it is said to be underdetermined (in contrast to an overdetermined system, where there are more equations than unknowns). The notion of constraint counting can be used to clarify the vocabulary. It is possible to think of each unknown as a potential degree of freedom. One degree of freedom is constrained by each equation that is added to the system.

Know more about linear system

https://brainly.com/question/28732353

#SPJ4

Answer:

false

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the expected value of a single policy for the life insurance company, we need to consider the two possible outcomes: the individual survives the year, and the individual does not survive the year.

If the individual survives (99.97% chance), the company will receive the premium of $195 and won't have to pay anything. If the individual does not survive (0.03% chance), the company will have to pay the $200,000 policy minus the $195 premium received.

To calculate the expected value, multiply the probability of each outcome by its respective financial result and then sum them up:

Expected value = (0.9997 * $195) + (0.0003 * (-$200,000 + $195))
Expected value ≈ $194.91 - $60
Expected value ≈ $134.91

The expected value to the company of a single policy in this scenario is approximately $134.91.

know more about expected value here

https://brainly.com/question/28197299

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(x = 2.75\)

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm assuming you have an equation

\(12x + 7 = 40\\\)

and you want to solve for x.

This is easy. First, subtract 7 from each side of the equation.

\(12x+7-7 = 40-7\)

\(12x = 33\)

Then divide both sides by 12, to get x alone on the left side.

\(\frac{12x}{12} = \frac{33}{12}\)

\(x = \frac{33}{12} = 2.75\)

Answer: 6

Step-by-step explanation:

38+x= 13+5+8+x

38+x=26+x

38-26=2x

12=2x

x=6

Answer: You have to divide them

The null hypothesis is that the linear regression model does not exist. This essentially means that the value of all the coefficients is equal to zero.

What is the null hypothesis?

The null hypothesis is a common statistical theory that contends that there is no statistical relationship or significance between any two sets of observed data and measured phenomena for any given single observed variable.

Here,

We have to find out the slope of the line predicted by the null hypothesis if we are doing a linear regression.

We concluded that the null hypothesis states that the slope is equal to zero, and the alternative hypothesis states that the slope is not equal to zero.

Hence, the null hypothesis is that the linear regression model does not exist. This essentially means that the value of all the coefficients is equal to zero.

To learn more about the null hypothesis from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/13135308

#SPJ4

The fact that x² = 64 can be Factors whereas x = 64 cannot is the reason why there are fewer solutions for x² = 64 than for x = 64.

By removing x from both sides, you may isolate the x word. You get the correct conclusion that "3 = 3". This is a true statement, which indicates that "all real numbers" are the answer to the equation. You will get a true statement if you try to solve the original problem with x = 0.

It is possible to rewrite x² = 64 as (x-8)(x+8) = 0.

The formula for the squared difference.

The fact that either factor might be equal to zero demonstrates that the solutions are x = 8 and x = -8.

On the other hand, the equation x = 64 has only one solution, which is x = 64 itself.

This is because there is no way to factor x = 64 into two factors, one of which is zero.

The difference in the number of solutions between x² = 64 and x = 64 is due to the fact that x² = 64 can be factored, while x = 64 cannot be factored.

To know more about Factors visit;-

https://brainly.com/question/14549998

#SPJ1