What is one thing that poet langston hughes was blacklisted for?

The riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago had significant repercussions both politically and socially.

The convention itself was marked by a great deal of tension and controversy due to the Vietnam War and the civil rights movement. Thousands of anti-war protesters, civil rights activists, and countercultural groups gathered in Chicago to voice their dissent.

The protests turned violent when clashes erupted between the demonstrators and the Chicago Police Department. The police used tear gas, batons, and physical force to disperse the crowds, leading to widespread injuries and arrests. The scenes of police brutality and the chaotic nature of the protests were captured by television cameras and broadcasted extensively, both nationally and internationally.

The repercussions of the riots were multifaceted:

1. Political Impact: The violence and unrest at the convention had a profound impact on the Democratic Party. The party was deeply divided between those supporting the establishment and those advocating for more radical change. The riots further highlighted this division, ultimately leading to a loss of public confidence and a decrease in voter support for the Democratic nominee, Hubert Humphrey.

2. Public Perception: The televised coverage of the riots had a significant impact on public opinion. The scenes of police brutality and the ensuing chaos shocked many viewers and sparked widespread criticism of the Chicago police and the handling of the protests. The exposure of these events on television contributed to a growing sense of distrust in the government and fueled the anti-establishment sentiment of the era.

3. Activism and Protest: The riots at the convention energized the anti-war and civil rights movements. They galvanized activists and further mobilized public opposition to the Vietnam War and other social injustices. The protests also prompted a reevaluation of police tactics and the treatment of protesters, leading to reforms in law enforcement practices.

In terms of recent events that were covered and exposed extensively on television, one notable example is the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests that took place in 2020 following the killing of George Floyd, a Black man, by a Minneapolis police officer. The protests erupted across the United States and even internationally, with millions of people taking to the streets to demand an end to systemic racism and police violence.

Similar to the 1968 Democratic Convention, the BLM protests received extensive coverage on television and other media platforms. The videos capturing instances of police brutality against protesters, peaceful demonstrations, and the destruction of property were widely disseminated. The widespread coverage of these events contributed to a national conversation on racial injustice, policing, and the need for social reforms. The BLM movement has since had a significant impact on public discourse, policy changes, and activism related to racial equality.

Learn more about Democratic here:

#SPJ11

https://brainly.com/question/27864036

Answer: A caravan was a group of people usually traders traveling together across a desert in Asia or North Africa. I am not completely sure about your sencond question, I am guessing caravans made Mecca wealthy due to the fact it was a trade center which would attract traders such as caravans. Mecca I believe was a religous area to which could be an attraction.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

B-Many Gods

Explanation:

They have found shrines and temples in mecca.

Answer:

Explanation:

Arabian polytheism, the dominant form of religion in pre-Islamic Arabia, was based on veneration of deities and spirits. Worship was directed to various gods and goddesses, including Hubal and the goddesses al-Lāt, al-'Uzzā, and Manāt, at local shrines and temples such as the Kaaba in Mecca.

Answer:

I Think B: introduce his purpose

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

The Gini coefficient is a measure of income distribution that ranges from 0 to 1. The closer the value is to 0, the more equal the income distribution, whereas the closer it is to 1, the more unequal it is. A Gini coefficient of 0.41 in 1976, 0.45 in 1982, 0.39 in 1987, and 0.47 in 1990 indicates that Kennesania's income distribution became more unequal over time.

The highest level of income inequality occurred in 1990 when the Gini coefficient was 0.47. When compared to previous years, it was the highest among all the given years. This means that a small percentage of people held a majority of the income in the country during that year, while the rest of the population shared the remaining income. This measure is frequently used by economists to evaluate the effectiveness of policies aimed at reducing inequality. In this instance, policymakers in Kennesania should have responded to the growing inequality by introducing policies aimed at reducing the income gap between the wealthy and the poor. However, this is a theoretical analysis that ignores the historical, social, and political factors that may influence economic policy-making.

To know more about the coefficient visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13431100

#SPJ11

Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong used command economy system to accelerate the economic growth of their respective nations. A command economy is an economic system where the central government makes decisions and controls all aspects of the economy.

It is also referred to as a planned economy since the government plans and allocates resources, controls prices, and regulates production. The government decides what goods and services will be produced, how they will be produced, and to whom they will be distributed.In a command economy, the government has total control over the economy, and all factors of production are state-owned.

Prices and wages are set by the government, and the production quotas are also decided by the government. Private ownership is not allowed in such an economic system.Command economies were adopted in several countries during the 20th century. Soviet Union, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, adopted a command economy system in 1928, while China, under Mao Zedong, also implemented a similar system after the communist revolution in 1949.

To learn more about  Economic system visit here:

brainly.com/question/27630988

#SPJ11

The correct answer is D) received more white votes than the Democratic Party.

In almost every presidential election since 1968, the Republican Party has received more white votes than the Democratic Party.

This can be understood as a continuing preference on the part of White Anglo Saxon people, who have conservative or traditional ideas and see the Republican party ad the one that supports their point of view; both, political and personal.

The Republican Party is formed by conservative people that show traits of nationalism. These conservative people support family values, extreme patriotism, conservative schools, the protection of US products. They are against the government expenditure in assistance programs, and the reduction of taxes to increase the production in private corporations. They do not favor immigration.

 The purpose of grandfather clauses, poll taxes, and literacy tests imposed in the south after reconstruction was to suppress the African American vote and maintain white political power. Grandfather clauses allowed individuals to vote if their ancestors had been eligible to vote prior to 1867, effectively exempting white voters from literacy tests and poll taxes.

    Poll taxes were a fee paid in order to vote, which disproportionately impacted poor African Americans who could not afford to pay. Literacy tests were also used as a tool to prevent African Americans from voting, as they were often designed to be impossibly difficult and were selectively enforced. The effect of these discriminatory policies was a significant reduction in African American voter participation and representation in southern politics. It wasn't until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that these practices were finally abolished.

To know more about Civil Rights Act of 1964  click this link-

brainly.com/question/23500700

#SPJ11

The equation of a line perpendicular to y = 4 + x that passes through the point (-3, 3) is y = -x.

Mathematically, the standard form of the equation of a straight line is given by this mathematical expression;

y = mx + c

Where:

From the information provided, we have the following:

y = 4 + x. Therefore, the slope, m = 1.

In Mathematics, a condition that must be met for two lines to be perpendicular is given by:

m₁ × m₂ = -1

1 × m₂ = -1

m₂ = -1

At point (-3, 3), an equation of this line can be calculated by using the point-slope form:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

y - 3 = -1(x - (-3))

y - 3 = -x - 3

y = -x - 3 + 3

y = -x

Read more on slope here: brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Find the equation of a line perpendicular to y = 4 + x that passes through the point (-3, 3).

The term "greenback" was a civil war-era nickname for the paper money issued by the United States government, which was not backed by gold or silver reserves. The greenbacks were first issued in 1862 as a means to finance the war effort, as the government needed to raise money quickly and did not have enough gold or silver to back the currency.

The greenbacks were controversial at the time, as many people believed they would lead to inflation and a devaluation of the currency. Some also believed that they violated the Constitution, which only allowed for gold and silver to be used as legal tender. However, the government continued to issue greenbacks throughout the war, and they eventually became an accepted form of currency.
After the war, there was a debate over whether or not the greenbacks should continue to be used. Some people argued that they had helped finance the war effort and should be retired, while others believed that they should remain in circulation. In the end, the greenbacks were gradually phased out and replaced with a new system of currency backed by gold reserves. However, they remain an important part of American history and a symbol of the country's determination to overcome the challenges of the Civil War.

Learn more about government here

https://brainly.com/question/30106636

#SPJ11

Answer:

4. Believed to be the descendants of gods.

Explanation:

They were worshipped as such

The rulers of ancient Egypt were believed to be descendants of the gods. In ancient Egyptian society, the pharaohs held a divine status and were considered living embodiments of the gods on Earth.

The option (4) is correct.

They were believed to be direct descendants of deities, particularly the sun god Ra or the god Horus. This divine lineage bestowed upon the pharaohs the authority to rule and make decisions on behalf of the gods and the people.

The pharaohs were revered as both political and religious leaders, serving as the intermediaries between the mortal realm and the divine realm, ensuring the prosperity and well-being of the kingdom.

Learn more about ancient Egypt:

https://brainly.com/question/673694

#SPJ2

Based on the excerpt, Beveridge would have most likely opposed option (B) Antiexpansionist groups that advocated Filipino independence.

The excerpt highlights Beveridge's belief in American imperialism and the necessity of expanding American influence and territories. Therefore, he would have likely opposed antiexpansionist groups that advocated for Filipino independence, as this would go against his pro-imperialist stance. However, he also emphasizes the importance of justice and humanitarianism in the treatment of other nations and peoples. The doctrine of survival of the fittest as applied to society is a social Darwinist concept that advocates for the survival of the strongest and most competitive individuals or groups, often at the expense of the weaker or less fortunate. This ideology contradicts the humanitarian principles that Beveridge espouses in his speech.

Learn more about  Filipino independence.

https://brainly.com/question/18627361

#SPJ4

The correct answer is B) in the past all civilizations had a traditional economic system.

What is true about a traditional economic system is that in the past all civilizations had a traditional economic system.

When we are talking about a traditional economic system, we refer to a kind of economy that is basically dependent on trade, crafts, and agriculture. This economy relies on custom in determining how goods are produced, and also relies on people rather than technology to do their work.  

It is a different type of economy compared to the modern economy in a globalized world, in which digital systems allow better forms of trade, including digital finances, banking, and applications.

Answer:

transferring to an American School

Explanation:

Crops need nutrients to grow to restore the nutrients in the field the land needs to be fertilized.

The three primary nutrients that are typically delivered to crops by inorganic fertilizers are nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K). Other goods and procedures, like organic manures, plant waste, and biological nitrogen fixation, may also provide nutrients.

The same factors that cause animal needs also apply to plant needs. They need them for reproduction as well as for growth, defense against pathogens, and defense against pests. Nutrients are required by plants in greater, lesser, or trace amounts, much like animals.

Learn more about crops nutrients here:

https://brainly.com/question/20108510

#SPJ1

The German invasion of Belgium began on the fourth of August, 1914. Over 56,000 people were k!lled overall.

8/10

Answer:

The Ku Klux Klan first arose in the South during the Reconstruction Era, but experienced a resurgence in the period immediately following the end of the First World War.

The KKK was a viciously racist organization that employed violence and acts of terror in order to assert white supremacy and maintain a strict racial hierarchy.

Although most of the KKK’s savagery was aimed at African Americans, their hatred extended to immigrants, Catholics, Jews, liberals, and progressives.

The revival of the KKK in the 1920s was demonstrative of a society coping with the effects of industrialization, urbanization, and immigration.

Explanation:

The Ku Klux Klan was a viciously racist white supremacist organization that first arose in the South after the end of the Civil War. Its members opposed the dismantling of slavery and sought to keep African Americans in a permanent state of subjugation to whites. During Reconstruction, the Klan employed violence and terror in the hopes of overthrowing Republican state governments in the South and maintaining the antebellum racial hierarchy.^1  

The first Ku Klux Klan declined in the 1870s, partly due to the passage of federal legislation aimed at prosecuting the crimes of Klansmen, though some local cells continued to operate. The institutionalization of Jim Crow segregation in the South, moreover, meant that the KKK’s desire to maintain the antebellum racial hierarchy had been fulfilled.

The changes in immigration and the broader cultural shifts of the 1920s were closely intertwined with the rise of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) during that period. The KKK experienced a resurgence fueled by nativism, xenophobia, and racial tensions.

The influx of immigrants, particularly from Southern and Eastern Europe, triggered fears of cultural dilution and job competition among some segments of the American population. The KKK exploited these anxieties and used them as a rallying point for their anti-immigrant and white supremacist ideologies. They targeted not only immigrants but also African Americans and other minority groups.

The restrictive immigration policies of the 1920s, such as the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924, reflected some of the sentiments that the KKK advocated. These policies sought to limit immigration, particularly from non-Western European countries, aligning with the KKK's goals of preserving a perceived white, Protestant, and "American" identity. The changes in immigration patterns and the discriminatory atmosphere of the 1920s provided fertile ground for the KKK's growth and influence.

Learn more about Ku Klux Klan here:

https://brainly.com/question/11619576

#SPJ2

Answer:

A. Both were rejected by colonists who thought that the British government was imposing unfair taxes.

C. Both were repealed after hostile reactions from the colonists.

Explanation:

A. Both the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts were rejected by the colonists who felt that the British government was imposing unfair taxes. The colonists believed that only their own colonial governments should have the right to tax them, not the British government.

B. Only the Townshend Acts involved the taxation of tea, not the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act required taxes to be paid on printed materials such as newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards.

C. Both Acts were eventually repealed after hostile reactions from the colonists, although the Stamp Act was repealed more quickly than the Townshend Acts.

D. Neither Act was intended to lower taxes in the colonies, but rather to raise revenue for the British government.

E. Both Acts were widely opposed by the colonists and were not accepted or praised by them.

Answer:

A. Both were rejected by colonists who thought that the British government was imposing unfair taxes.

C. Both were repealed after hostile reactions from the colonists.

Explanation:

A. Both the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts were rejected by the colonists who felt that the British government was imposing unfair taxes. The colonists believed that only their own colonial governments should have the right to tax them, not the British government.

B. Only the Townshend Acts involved the taxation of tea, not the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act required taxes to be paid on printed materials such as newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards.

C. Both Acts were eventually repealed after hostile reactions from the colonists, although the Stamp Act was repealed more quickly than the Townshend Acts.

D. Neither Act was intended to lower taxes in the colonies, but rather to raise revenue for the British government.

E. Both Acts were widely opposed by the colonists and were not accepted or praised by them.

Explanation:

concern was: the start of the war. Since the Constitution simultaneously gave Congress the authority to declare war, there has been friction between the legislative and executive parts of the U.S. government.

Although the majority of American politicians backed the Mexican-American War, young congressman from the state of Illinois Abraham Lincoln, who had been elected a few months after the war's declaration, was one of the war's most vocal opponents. Lincoln, like many others who opposed the war, believed it was an attempt to enlarge slavery should the United States government win a victory over Mexico. If I understand correctly, some, if not all, of the gentlemen from the other side of the House who have addressed the committee in the past two days have complained rather bitterly.

learn more about that war here:

https://brainly.com/question/9500187

#SPJ4

A revolution, in broad terms, refers to a radical and transformative change in society, often accompanied by significant shifts in political, social, economic, or cultural structures.

It typically involves widespread and collective actions taken by individuals or groups to challenge and overthrow existing power structures in pursuit of a new vision or ideology.Revolutions historically have been driven by various factors, such as oppressive regimes, inequality, social injustice, political repression, or economic hardships. They can emerge as a response to the grievances of marginalized groups, seeking to challenge and reshape the status quo.

As for the necessity of revolutions in the 21st century, it is a complex and subjective question. While many societies have made substantial progress in terms of democracy, human rights, and social justice, significant challenges and inequalities persist. Issues like wealth disparity, systemic discrimination, political corruption, environmental degradation, and the limitations of existing systems can still generate discontent and demands for change.

However, the nature of social and political activism has evolved in the 21st century. Movements and protests have increasingly embraced nonviolent means, advocating for reform, social movements, and incremental change rather than seeking to completely overthrow existing systems through violent revolutions.

Whether a revolution is deemed necessary or not depends on the specific context and the goals being pursued. Some argue that incremental reforms and peaceful means of change can address societal issues effectively, while others believe that fundamental structural changes may require more disruptive and transformative approaches.

Ultimately, the question of whether revolutions are still necessary in the 21st century is a matter of ongoing debate and depends on one's perspective on the existing systems, the specific issues at hand, and the effectiveness of various means of social and political change.

To know more about transformative visit
https://brainly.com/question/33487023
#SPJ11

A revolution can be described as a profound and often violent change in the social, political, or economic structures of a society. It typically involves a collective uprising by a significant portion of the population against an existing system or regime, driven by a shared desire for fundamental transformation. Revolutions aim to challenge and overthrow oppressive or unjust power structures and establish new ones that reflect the aspirations and needs of the people.

In the 21st century, while many societies have made significant progress in terms of social and political advancements, there are still instances where revolutions can be seen as necessary. Factors that might contribute to the need for revolutions include systemic inequality, political corruption, authoritarianism, lack of basic human rights, and social injustices. In such cases, revolutions can serve as a catalyst for change, giving a voice to marginalized groups and creating opportunities for building more inclusive, equitable, and democratic societies.

It's important to note that not all revolutions are violent or result in widespread destruction. Peaceful revolutions, driven by mass protests, civil disobedience, and collective action, can also bring about transformative changes. In the 21st century, advancements in technology and communication have provided new avenues for mobilization and organizing, making peaceful revolutions more viable than ever before.

However, it is crucial to evaluate each situation individually and consider the potential consequences of revolution. While revolutions have the potential to bring about positive change, they can also be accompanied by significant instability, violence, and loss of life. Therefore, it is essential to seek peaceful means of addressing grievances and pursuing social progress whenever possible.

To know more about  revolution Visit
https://brainly.com/question/21398749
#SPJ11

Who established the first mission in East Texas?

a. Stephen Austin

b. Martin de Leon

c. Father Hidalgo

d. Father Massanet

Answer:

Who established the first mission in East Texas?

a. Stephen Austin

b. Martin de Leon

c. Father Hidalgo

D. Father Massanet

Explanation:

Father Massanet, a Spanish priest in the early 1960, built the first mission in East Texas. It was called San Francisco de los Tejas.

Thanks!!!!☺

Answer:

What are you answer choices?

Explanation:

I would guess, yes, because it's only a short period of time, cause you do have the American Revolution later on. Which, is when people started to notice we all were created equal.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

During the American Revolution, the American seaborne forces consisted of armed ships from various sources.

One of the most important sources was the Continental Navy, which was established by the Continental Congress in 1775. The navy's ships were primarily used to disrupt British supply lines and to protect American merchant ships.

In addition to the Continental Navy, the American seaborne forces also included privateers. Privateers were privately owned ships that were authorized by the government to attack and capture British merchant vessels.

These privateers played a crucial role in disrupting British trade and weakening the British war effort. Finally, the American seaborne forces also included state navies, which were established by individual states to protect their own interests.

Overall, the American seaborne forces during the Revolution were a diverse and effective group that played a critical role in securing American independence.

To know more about American Revolution refer here: https://brainly.com/question/27833385#

#SPJ11

The postwar U.S. economy faced several major concerns and actual problems. Some of the major concerns were related to the reconversion of the economy from wartime to peacetime production.

The demobilization of millions of military personnel, and the transition of war industries to civilian ones. The government also had to manage inflation, which had been kept low during the war through price controls and rationing but surged after the war.

One of the biggest actual problems was the shift from a demobilization, which had been heavily government-controlled, to a more market-based economy. This shift created uncertainty and instability, leading to labor strikes, social unrest, and a wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that reshaped the business landscape. Additionally, the U.S. faced international economic competition, especially from Europe and Japan, which had undergone reconstruction and modernization efforts following the war.

To learn more about demobilization, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/12246981

#SPJ4

What are the major concern/ actual problems postwar u.s. economy?

Answer: probation

Explanation: most common punishment for juviniles.

Answer:

successful surprise attack on the Egyptian relief army ensured the Crusaders' occupation of Palestine

Explanation:

Conquerors feel the gain surpasses the risk despite the immense hazards they must confront in order to dominate. prudence or precision. great desire for recognition and achievement. ability to influence or inspire a vast number of individuals.

Why conquerors should leave local rulers on as governors?

States opposed to granting the federal government more authority because: After gaining independence from Britain, many Americans thought that building a strong federal government with excessive control over the states would only lead to the installation of a new autocrat to succeed King George III.

Due to the widespread fear of a powerful central government at the time the Articles of Confederation were written and the strong loyalty of Americans to their state during the American Revolution instead of any national government, the Articles of Confederation kept the national government as weak as possible on purpose.

The Articles of Confederation, which aimed to create a confederation of states, said that each state would "preserve its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, every power, jurisdiction, and right not expressly to the United States in Congress assembled."

learn more about governors:

https://brainly.com/question/30907826

#SPJ1