What factors did President Trump take into account in nominating Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to fill Supreme Court vacancies? under what circumstances did the vacancies become available? what were the results? and why? what factors did senators take into account in voting for or against these nominees?
Answers
President Trump prioritized conservative judges with strong legal credentials and young age, the vacancies became available due to death or retirement, with mixed results in confirmation process, and senators considered various factors in voting for/against nominees.
What is confirmation process?
In nominating Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, President Trump took into account their conservative judicial philosophy, track record as a federal judge, and potential impact on the ideological balance of the Supreme Court. He also prioritized relatively young nominees, hoping they would serve for a long time. The vacancies for which they were nominated became available due to the death or retirement of the justices, with Gorsuch filling the seat of Antonin Scalia, Kavanaugh filling the seat of Anthony Kennedy, and Barrett filling the seat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were confirmed by the Senate, while Barrett's confirmation was more contentious. Senators considered a range of factors when voting on these nominees, such as judicial philosophy, record, responses in hearings, political views, misconduct allegations, and timing of confirmation. The confirmation process was influenced by the specific circumstances of the vacancy and the political climate at the time.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30030276
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Which conclusion can be drawn from this chart?
Answers
Promoting patriotism in post-apartheid South African schools is important.
Argue this point in detail and indicate why, according to Brighthouse (2008), patriotism should be promoted in local schools
Answers
It is crucial to encourage patriotism in South African schools after apartheid for a number of reasons. A nation that has historically faced significant differences and conflicts needs patriotism to foster a sense of national pride and solidarity. It promotes a sense of duty towards the nation and its residents, motivating them to actively contribute to the advancement of the country.
Encouraging nationalism in the post-apartheid Building a more unified, accountable, and respectful society requires the support of South African schools. Schools may assist in producing a generation of South Africans who are devoted to the advancement and development of their nation by instilling in them a feeling of national pride and identity. We should make the most of this chance to influence the course of our nation, as Brighthouse contends that schools are the perfect setting for fostering patriotism.
Learn more about patriotism here:
https://brainly.com/question/14855779
#SPJ
What is a Filibuster?
Answers
Answer:
A filibuster is a political tactic whereby one or more members of a legislative body extend the discussion of proposed legislation in an effort to postpone or completely obstruct decision-making.
Explanation:
what argument could be made for keeping electoral college
Answers
Will enjoys a breakfast of ham and eggs while he waits for the soldiers to leave the tavern. yes or no
Answers
Answer:they are welcome
Explanation:
As you are never understanding the word you want me a word to you ask for me to say to me that this guy has a good idea and you can speak with you to ttt
What circumstances shattered American perceptions of superiority?
Answers
The circumstances that shattered American perceptions of superiority were the Vietnam War, the civil rights movement, the Watergate scandal, economic decline, terrorism, and 9/11.
American perceptions of superiority were shattered by several circumstances some of which are:
The Vietnam War: The prolonged and divisive Vietnam War revealed the limitations of American military power and led to a loss of confidence in the U.S. government's ability to achieve victory. The war showcased the complexities of guerilla warfare and the challenges of fighting an insurgency.Civil Rights Movement: The Civil Rights Movement exposed deep-seated racial inequalities and discrimination within American society. It challenged the notion of American exceptionalism by highlighting systemic racism and the denial of basic rights to African Americans.Watergate Scandal: The Watergate scandal, involving the illegal activities of the Nixon administration, eroded public trust in the government. It exposed corruption and abuses of power at the highest level, undermining the perception of American democracy as an infallible system.Economic Decline: Economic challenges, such as the oil crisis of the 1970s and the decline of American manufacturing industries, shattered the perception of American economic superiority. The rise of global competition and outsourcing revealed vulnerabilities in the American economy.Terrorism and 9/11: The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shattered the sense of American invulnerability and highlighted the country's vulnerability to external threats. It led to a reevaluation of American security policies and raised questions about the effectiveness of intelligence and defense systems.These circumstances collectively challenged the notion of American superiority, forcing a reassessment of the country's role and capabilities on both domestic and global fronts.
In conclusion, the circumstances that shattered American perceptions of superiority were the Vietnam War, the civil rights movement, the Watergate scandal, economic decline, terrorism, and 9/11.
To learn more about America:
brainly.com/question/31718552
Based on the graph, which conclusion can be drawn about the period of the Crusades? Britain was not as active in the Crusades as France or Germany. Some Christians moved to Islamic lands during the 200 years of the Crusades. The Crusades resulted in the migration of people from the Middle East to Europe. The Crusades corresponded with a major population growth in Europe.
Answers
Answer:
The crusades correspond with major population growth in Europe.
Explanation:
I just took the test and got this answer correct.
what was meant by referring to the Spanish-American war as the "splendid little war"?
Answers
The Spanish-American war was called the "splendid little war" due to its short duration and decisive victory for the United States.
The Spanish-American war, which lasted only four months in 1898, was referred to as the "splendid little war" for a few reasons.
Firstly, it was a short and decisive conflict that resulted in a clear victory for the United States.
Secondly, it was considered "splendid" because it was fought in tropical locations like Cuba and the Philippines, which were seen as exotic and exciting destinations for American soldiers and journalists.
Finally, the war was seen as a demonstration of American power and imperialism, as the US acquired territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam from Spain.
Despite the many debates surrounding the war's motivations and consequences, its nickname has endured as a symbol of American military might and triumph.
For more such questions on splendid little war, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/11400418
#SPJ11
Write three paragraphs answering the following questions:
1. How and why did slavery develop in the North American colonies?
2. Why do you think slavery existed in a country that, by the Revolution, claimed
all people were free and equal?
3. How were the enslaved, women, and Native peoples treated in the new United
States after the Revolution?
Answers
Wouldn’t let me post answer so I took pictures…
Was the United States justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ?
Answers
Which battle helped to disprove the assumption made by many in the Union
that Black soldiers could not fight as well as white soldiers?
OA. Battle of Fort Sumter
OB. Battle of Port Royal
C. Battle of Fredericksburg
D. Battle of Fort Wagner
Answers
D. Battle of Fort Wagner. The heroic performance of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry, a regiment of African American soldiers, at the Battle of Fort Wagner challenged the assumption that Black soldiers were inferior fighters.fighters. So, option D is the right choice.
The Battle of Fort Wagner took place during the American Civil War on July 18, 1863.The Union Army, including the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, composed of African American soldiers, launched an assault on Confederate-held Fort Wagner in South Carolina.Despite facing heavy casualties, the 54th Massachusetts Regiment demonstrated immense bravery and valor in their attack on the fort.Their performance challenged the prevalent assumption among many in the Union that Black soldiers were inferior and could not fight as well as white soldiers.The 54th Massachusetts Regiment's courageous actions and their willingness to sacrifice their lives on the battlefield shattered stereotypes and proved that Black soldiers were just as capable and effective in combat as their white counterparts.The battle garnered significant attention and helped to dispel the prejudiced belief, ultimately contributing to the broader acceptance and recognition of the contributions of African American soldiers in the Civil War.The right answer is option D. Battle of Fort Wagner
For more such question on Battle of Fort Wagner
https://brainly.com/question/19674743
#SPJ8
23. Find the exact value of cos(20) knowing that: *
(1 Point)
sin (0) = -2/2 270º < 0 < 360° how to solve
Answers
Answer:
\(\cos(2\theta) = 0\)
Explanation:
Given
\(\sin(\theta) = -\frac{\sqrt 2}{2}\)
\(270^o < \theta < 360^o\)
Required
\(\cos(2\theta)\)
Recall that:
\(\sin^2(\theta) + \cos^2(\theta) =1\)
Substitute: \(\sin(\theta) = -\frac{\sqrt 2}{2}\)
\((-\frac{\sqrt 2}{2})^2 + \cos^2(\theta) =1\)
\(\frac{1}{2} + \cos^2(\theta) =1\)
Collect like terms
\(\cos^2(\theta) =1-\frac{1}{2}\)
\(\cos^2(\theta) =\frac{1}{2}\)
\(\cos(2\theta)\) is calculated as:
\(\cos(2\theta) = \cos^2(\theta) - \sin^2(\theta)\)
So, we have:
\(\cos(2\theta) = \frac{1}{2} - (-\frac{\sqrt 2}{2})^2\)
\(\cos(2\theta) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{2}{4}\)
\(\cos(2\theta) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}\)
\(\cos(2\theta) = 0\)
Outside invasions and problems from within spell the end for most____.
cities
city-states
civilizations
villages
Answers
Answer: City-States
Explanation:
Civilizations are more general
Cities weren't called cities back then
Villages are irrelevant to this conversation
CITY-STATES ARE THE ANSWER
what did the first amendment protect
Answers
Answer:
free speech
Explanation:
what revolutions did Marxism leader inspire throughout the world
Answers
Answer:
Marxism helped to consolidate, inspire, and radicalize elements of the labour and socialist movements in western Europe, and it was later the basis of Marxism-Leninism and Maoism, the revolutionary doctrines developed by Vladimir Lenin in Russia and Mao Zedong in China, respectively.
Explanation:
can i get brainlist
Besides religion, European countries had many reasons to begin exploring. How were the motives of the Spanish for exploring the New World similar to those of the French and English?
A) The Spanish sought to find profit from new land to create more wealth for the mother country.
B) They hoped to find a place to store the overabundance of natural resources in Europe.
C) They wanted to discover new countries and customs they could adopt for themselves.
D) The Spanish hoped to cooperate with other European countries to gain knowledge of the world.
Answers
Answer:
Hii the answer of this question is A
Why did FDR see raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as an increase in Freedom, and why did Hoover see it as restricting freedom?
Answers
FDR saw raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as an increase in freedom because he believed that a government's responsibility was to ensure the welfare of its citizens.
He believed that providing assistance to the less fortunate would help to create a more equal society, where everyone had access to the resources necessary to achieve their goals. FDR's New Deal programs, which included social security, unemployment benefits, and public works projects, were designed to provide this assistance.
Hoover, on the other hand, saw raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as restricting freedom because he believed that a government's primary responsibility was to protect the rights of individuals and businesses to pursue their own interests. Hoover believed that government intervention in the economy, even in the form of social welfare programs, would lead to a loss of individual freedom and a more oppressive government. He believed that the free market, left to its own devices, would ultimately provide for the welfare of all citizens.
To know more about taxes here
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
#SPJ1
6. Describe how Justice John Marshall helped decide how powerful the federal government would be
Answers
Marshall's brilliant legal analyses had two outcomes. They enhanced the Court's status as a coequal with the legislative and executive arms of government, and they created the Court's power of judicial review in the political system.
John Marshall, who was he?American politician and jurist John Marshall (September 24, 1755 – July 6, 1835) was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States from 1801 until his passing in 1835. He continues to be the chief justice with the fourth-longest tenure of any justice in American history. Supreme Court, he is widely recognized as one of the most influential justices ever to serve. Marshall previously held the position of fourth U.S. Secretary of State under John Adams as president.
Marshall is most remembered for two significant contributions to the administration of modern-day America. In order for the court to claim equal standing with Congress and the Executive he first created the department's standing and authority and a balanced administration with distinct powers. He argued that the court has the power to interpret the Constitution as the supreme law and to keep the other arms of government accountable to it.
Second, Marshall gave the Constitution interpretations that considerably increased the federal government's authority.
To know more about John Marshall, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17050036
#SPJ1
According to Adam Smith, how did the “discovery and colonization” of America affect the economic development of Europe?
Answers
Answer:
population decrease big time and stop the growth of the people and laws
brainliest please
Explanation:
Limiting expression of personal opinions or beliefs is a proper function on government
True False ?
Answers
Answer:
So, no, the government can't limit it. False, I think? (I am kinda confused on your question, so, I gave the best answer I could)
Explanation:
The First Amendment guarantees our right to free expression and free association, which means that the government does not have the right to forbid us from saying what we like and writing what we like; we can form clubs and organizations, and take part in demonstrations and rallies.
ill give brainliest if you get this correct!!!!!!!!!!!
Answers
Answer: I think it's B
Explanation: hope this helps
Was the USA justified to become Imperialistic?
Answers
Answer:
America's justifications are no more valid than any other country.
Explanation:
The treaty of Paris was signed Cause and the effect
Answers
Answer:
The Treaty of Paris of 1763 ended the French and Indian War/Seven Years' War between Great Britain and France, as well as their respective allies. In the terms of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, effectively ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies there.
Explanation:
what are the causes and effects from key details on triumphs and troubles
Answers
In triumphs and troubles by Paul Mason, many sores appeared on people's faces and bodies as a result of the infections.
What is the explanation for this?Some people were unable to walk or move because they were powerless, and they wailed in anguish.
Many people died not just from infections, but also from starvation since they "couldn't get out to look for food" and "everyone else was too sick to care for them, so they starved to death in their own beds."
Hence the cause was the infection the effect was pain an suffering.
Learn more about cause and effect ;
https://brainly.com/question/16556938
#SPJ1
describe the settlement of colonial Virginia, with particular emphasis on the relationship between English settlers and Native Americans.
Answers
Answer:
The settlement of colonial Virginia began in 1607 with the establishment of Jamestown, the first permanent English colony in North America. The relationship between English settlers and Native Americans in Virginia was complex and evolved over time.
Initially, the English settlers were heavily dependent on the goodwill and assistance of Native American tribes, particularly the Powhatan Confederacy, led by Chief Powhatan. The Powhatan people provided the colonists with food, trade, and guidance on how to survive in the new environment. Chief Powhatan’s daughter, Pocahontas, played a notable role in fostering relations between the Powhatans and the English.
However, as the English population increased and the demand for land expanded, conflicts arose. The colonists sought to acquire Native American lands for tobacco cultivation, leading to tensions and sporadic conflicts with Native tribes. The lands that the English took resulted in the displacement and disruption of the Powhatan way of life.
The relationship between Native Americans and English settlers deteriorated further in the aftermath of the Anglo-Powhatan Wars (1610-1646). These conflicts were marked by violence, raids, and reprisals from both sides. As English settlements expanded and Native territories shrank, various treaties were made to establish boundaries between English and Native lands. However, these agreements were often ignored or violated, leading to further hostilities.
It is essential to note that the interactions between English settlers and Native Americans were not solely characterized by conflict. There were instances of cultural exchange, trade, intermarriage, and cooperation, particularly in the early years of the colony. However, overall, the relationship was strained due to competing interests, differing cultural practices, and the profound impact of colonization on Native American communities.
The settlement of colonial Virginia laid the foundation for English colonization in North America, but it involved a complex and often turbulent relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans who already inhabited the land.
Explanation:
The settlement of colonial Virginia began in 1607 with the establishment of Jamestown, the first permanent English colony in North America. The relationship between English settlers and Native Americans in Virginia was complex and evolved over time.
Initially, the English settlers were heavily dependent on the goodwill and assistance of Native American tribes, particularly the Powhatan Confederacy, led by Chief Powhatan. The Powhatan people provided the colonists with food, trade, and guidance on how to survive in the new environment. Chief Powhatan’s daughter, Pocahontas, played a notable role in fostering relations between the Powhatans and the English.
However, as the English population increased and the demand for land expanded, conflicts arose. The colonists sought to acquire Native American lands for tobacco cultivation, leading to tensions and sporadic conflicts with Native tribes. The lands that the English took resulted in the displacement and disruption of the Powhatan way of life.
The relationship between Native Americans and English settlers deteriorated further in the aftermath of the Anglo-Powhatan Wars (1610-1646). These conflicts were marked by violence, raids, and reprisals from both sides. As English settlements expanded and Native territories shrank, various treaties were made to establish boundaries between English and Native lands. However, these agreements were often ignored or violated, leading to further hostilities.
It is essential to note that the interactions between English settlers and Native Americans were not solely characterized by conflict. There were instances of cultural exchange, trade, intermarriage, and cooperation, particularly in the early years of the colony. However, overall, the relationship was strained due to competing interests, differing cultural practices, and the profound impact of colonization on Native American communities.
The settlement of colonial Virginia laid the foundation for English colonization in North America, but it involved a complex and often turbulent relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans who already inhabited the land.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
Which of the following was planned and discussed openly to help countries have confidence in its fairness?
A Treaty of Versailles
B League of Nations
C United Nations
D. Yalta Conference
Which of the following best explains why the United States and Soviet Union were the two global superpowers after World War II?
A They embraced a similarly effective economic system.
B They provided significant support to each other throughout the war.
C. They did not experience significant loss of life from the war.
D They had significant industrial centers that had not been destroyed, unlike other powers.
What was the Marshall Plan?
A The strategy to win in Europe and then focus on Japan
B The decision not to oppose communism directly but to contain it
C. The decision to divide territories occupied by the Allies
D... The strategy to provide significant aid to European countries to help them rebuild
What was the main purpose of the United Nations?
A Stopping the spread of communism
B. Stopping the spread of capitalism
C. Helping former colonies develop
D.. Preserving a lasting peace
What was one major difference between the United Nations and the earlier League of Nations?
A The United Nations did not have a means of military intervention.
B. The United Nations was required while the League of Nations was voluntary.
C The League of Nations never achieved the participation of the United States.
D. The Russians and Chinese supported the League of Nations but not the United Nations.
According to Soviet leadership, what was the only way of ensuring a lasting peace in the world?
A. Keeping Germany weak
B A revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society
C A strong United Nations Security Council
D Free liberal democracies rather than monarchies throughout the world
Answers
One thing that was planned and discussed openly to inspire confidence in its fairness was the C United Nations.
The best explanation for why the United States and Soviet Union were the two global superpowers is D They had significant industrial centers that had not been destroyed, unlike other powers.
The Marshall Plan was D... The strategy to provide significant aid to European countries to help them rebuild
The purpose of the United Nations was D.. Preserving a lasting peace.
A difference between the United Nations and the earlier League of Nations was C. The League of Nations never achieved the participation of the United States.
Soviet Leadership believed that the only way to ensure lasting peace was B A revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society.
Why did the Soviet Union and the United States become superpowers?The United States and the Soviet Union became superpowers after World War II because their industrial centers were not destroyed in the war and so were able to make a quick comeback.
In the case of the United States, Japan and Germany were never able to attack them on Mainland U.S.A. and the Soviets moved their industry away from the Germans. This protected both industries.
Find out more on superpowers at https://brainly.com/question/21162814
#SPJ1
Answer:
One thing that was planned and discussed openly to inspire confidence in its fairness was the C United Nations.
The best explanation for why the United States and Soviet Union were the two global superpowers is D They had significant industrial centers that had not been destroyed, unlike other powers.
The Marshall Plan was D... The strategy to provide significant aid to European countries to help them rebuild
The purpose of the United Nations was D.. Preserving a lasting peace.
A difference between the United Nations and the earlier League of Nations was C. The League of Nations never achieved the participation of the United States.
Soviet Leadership believed that the only way to ensure lasting peace was B A revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society.
Why did the Soviet Union and the United States become superpowers?
The United States and the Soviet Union became superpowers after World War II because their industrial centers were not destroyed in the war and so were able to make a quick comeback.
In the case of the United States, Japan and Germany were never able to attack them on Mainland U.S.A. and the Soviets moved their industry away from the Germans. This protected both industries.
Explanation:
Which of these is true about Virginia laws from 1705 that prevented
nonwhites from gaining political office?
Answers
Answer
It separated the races, treating nonwhites as less than whites
Explanation:
Answer: They made it easier to take away rights from nonwhites in the future.
Explanation: took the quiz
General Lee’s surrender in 1865 marked
the North’s defeat in the Civil War.
the official end of slavery in the United States.
the South’s defeat in the Civil War.
the end of ten years of armed conflict.
Answers
Answer:
C. The South's defeat in the Civil War
Explanation:
Have a nice day!
Answer:
C
Explanation:
got it right on edge
Please help me write 2 paragraphs for my Ethics online class the directions are the following:
Paragraph 1
Explain the differences you discovered about academic misconduct versus academic honesty while taking this course. Did anything surprise you? Describe how the academic honesty practices you learned in this course apply or will apply to your life and education.
Paragraph 2
Please help me make this class better for future students. Each semester I take your suggestions and update the class.
Was the class what you expected? Why or why not?
Did the class help you better develop your critical thinking process?
What would you change about the class to make it better?
What was your favorite assignment(s) or activity(s) that I should definitely keep?
Are there any assignments or activities that you would remove or change, and if you would change them what would you suggest?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the class?
Were the Smartbook Quizzes better than standard quizzes?
Did the Smartbook Quizzes help with your understanding of the material?
Thank you for a wonderful class!
Answers
Academic misconduct are behavior that violates the ethical and moral standards of academia while Academic honesty are behavior upholding the values of integrity, trust and fairness in academic work.
What is difference between academic misconduct & honesty?An academic misconduct includes cheating, plagiarism, falsifying data, and other forms of academic dishonesty while academic honesty involves ethical conduct such as acknowledging sources, avoiding cheating, and producing original work.
Academic misconduct undermines integrity of the academic institution and can result in consequences like failing a course, expulsion from school, or legal repercussions. Academic honesty fosters an environment of trust and mutual respect among peers and promotes the pursuit of knowledge and truth.
Read more about academic
brainly.com/question/30008674
#SPJ1
In what ways could the Black Death have led to improvements in health in surviving populations?????
Answers
Answer:
As a result of the money spent per capita on food in the wake of the Black Death actually increased. “People were able to eat more meat and high-quality bread, which in turn would have improved health,”
Explanation: