Arbitration uses a third party, usually an attorney, who hears arguments, reviews evidence, and renders a decision regarding issues surrounding the termination of a marriage.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques like arbitration are used to settle conflicts outside of the legal system. One or more people will decide the case, producing the "arbitration award." Unless all parties agree that the arbitration process and decision are non-binding, an arbitration decision or award is enforceable in court, is legally binding on both parties, and is binding on both parties. In the context of international business transactions, arbitration is frequently utilized to settle commercial disputes. Arbitration is often used in consumer and employment disputes in some nations, such as the United States, where it may be required by the terms of employment or business contracts and may include a waiver of the right to file a class action lawsuit. Consensual arbitration, especially commercial arbitration, should be distinguished from mandatory arbitration for consumer and employee disputes. Arbitration awards are subject to limited powers of review and appeal. Judiciary processes, alternative conflict resolution, expert determination, or mediation are not the same as arbitration (a form of settlement negotiation facilitated by a neutral third party).
Learn more about Arbitration here
https://brainly.com/question/4779318
#SPJ4
Which of these is NOT a reason why a dirt or gravel road can be
dangerous?
A. Your tires are more likely to be punctured
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
C. It means you are off the GPS network which is dangerous
D. It’s most likely for your vehicle to lose traction
Answer:
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
Explanation:
Losing the track of a GPS network is not a dangerous for driving on a gravel road or dirt.
What is a gravel road?Gravel road is a road, the upper surface of which is covered with gravel and small crushed stones. There is risk of tires getting punctured, or vehicle to lose traction while driving on such roads.
Hence, option C holds true regarding a gravel road.
Learn more about a gravel road here:
https://brainly.com/question/5215737
#SPJ2
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
a salary or per diem increase for legislators in texas is determined by the
Legislative Compensation Board determines a salary or per diem increase for legislators in Texas.
The Legislative Compensation Board is responsible for setting the compensation for members of the Texas Legislature. It consists of five members, including the Lieutenant Governor, the Speaker of the House, and three public members appointed by the Governor. The board meets every two years to review and recommend changes to the salary and per diem rates for legislators. Factors such as the cost of living, economic conditions, and comparative rates in other states are taken into account during the evaluation process. The recommendations made by the Legislative Compensation Board must be approved by the Legislature before they go into effect. The purpose of this board is to ensure fair and appropriate compensation for legislators in Texas while considering various relevant factors.
Learn more about Texas here:
https://brainly.com/question/31929424
#SPJ11
the type of weapon used most frequently in domestic violence cases is:
For a powerboat to be operated in compliance with the law, in addition to registration number what else is required?
Answer:
What else that is needed for a powerboat to be operated in compliance with the law aside from the registration number is the display of valid state registration decal while boating, although, each State has different specifications on what powerboats to be registered.
Explanation:
In addition to a registration number, a powerboat must also be equipped with the necessary safety equipment required by law.
What is a powerboat?A powerboat is a watercraft that is powered by an engine, rather than by sails or oars. Powerboats come in a variety of shapes and sizes, ranging from small, single-person boats to large, multi-passenger vessels.
They are commonly used for recreational activities such as water skiing, fishing, and cruising, as well as for commercial purposes such as transportation and shipping.
Some common types of powerboats include speedboats, motor yachts, center consoles, and pontoons.
Learn more about powerboat, here
https://brainly.com/question/4003773
#SPJ2
Which debates do you think are more valuable to voters?
A. Presidential debates
B. Vice-presidential debates
C. Both presidential and vice-presidential debates
D. I'm not sure
Select an answer
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case
a.
beyond a reasonable doubt.
b.
by a preponderance of the evidence.
c.
through a scintilla of evidence.
d.
to the extent promised in her attorney’s opening statement.
2. In Coastal Fishing Company’s suit against Dockside Marina, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Coastal’s favor. Dockside files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Coastal, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for
a.
a judgment in accordance with the verdict.
b.
a judgment as a matter of law.
c.
a new trial.
d.
judgment n.o.v.
3. Gabrielle files a suit against Hard ‘n Fast Adhesives, Inc. Hard ‘n Fast responds that even if Gabrielle’s statement of the facts is true, according to the law Hard n’ Fast is not liable. This is
a.
a counterclaim.
b.
a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
c.
a motion for summary judgment.
d.
a motion to dismiss.
4. Madison files a complaint in a suit against Christopher, and he files an answer. The case may now be
a.
appealed to a higher court.
b.
dismissed or settled.
c.
resolved but only after a trial.
d.
remanded for further proceedings.
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
Questions 16-20 choose the vocabulary word that best fits the description.
A Cast Off
B-Radial Pattern
C-Pool
D-Artery Spurts
E. Transfer
16. This was created due to fall which resulted in a blow to the head. 17. The carotid artery was damaged creating this blood pattern. 18. Michael stepped in blood as he tried to remove the body. This blood was found on the carpet of his car. 19. Each time Michael stabbed his victim blood hit the wall behind him. 20. Michael then punched his victim on the stab wound, this created a fan like blood stain pattern.
According to the information the vocabulary is related with each meaning.
How to find the explanation for each vocabulary?Here are the explanations for each vocabulary word in relation to the given descriptions:
A Cast Off - This is a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion (such as a weapon or limb) flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. In this case, if the fall resulted in the head hitting an object, the blood from the injury could have splattered and created a cast-off pattern on nearby surfaces.Artery Spurts - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that is caused by the pumping action of the heart, creating spurts of blood with each beat. If the carotid artery was damaged, it would likely create this type of pattern as blood would spurt out with each heartbeat.Transfer - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when a bloody object comes into contact with a surface, leaving a pattern behind. In this case, Michael stepping in blood and then leaving a bloody footprint on the carpet of his car would be an example of transfer.Radial Pattern - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when blood is released from a central source, such as a bleeding wound. If Michael's victim was bleeding from stab wounds and standing against a wall, each time Michael stabbed him, blood could hit the wall behind him in a radial pattern.Cast Off - This is again a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. If Michael punched his victim on the stab wound, blood could have been flung off his hand and onto nearby surfaces, creating a cast-off pattern in a fan-like shape.In conclusion, forensic science often relies on the interpretation of bloodstain patterns to help reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to a crime. Understanding the different types of bloodstain patterns and what causes them is crucial in order to accurately analyze and interpret the evidence.
Learn more about forensic science in: https://brainly.com/question/29773304
#SPJ1
As Vincent gets older, he tends to look for high-paying jobs, watch for sales, and search for items and opportunities that invite happiness and
fulfillment. What does Vincent's behavior demonstrate?
OA the law of supply and demand
OB. entrepreneurial ability
OC lens of scarcity
OD. rational self-interest
Answer:
the right answer is rational self interest,
Explanation:
i just took the quiz
4. The Bill of Rights establishes a number of important protections if a person is accused
of a crime. Check the box that identifies a protection found in the Bill of Rights that
protects a person accused of a crime
A person cannot be tried twice for the same crime
A person can't be forced to testify against him or
herself
A person can't be prevented from voting based on his
or her race
A person can't be punished for a crime in a cruel or
unusual way.
Protection in the
Bill of Rights
Protection not in
the Bill of Rights
The statement that identifies a protection found in the Bill of Rights that protects a person accused of a crime is that a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime. The Option A.
What protection safeguards a person accused of a crime?The Fifth Amendment provides several protections for individuals accused of a crime, one of which is known as double jeopardy which means that a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime.
This means that if someone is acquitted of a crime, the government cannot try them again for the same offense, so, it is designed to prevent the government from unfairly punishing someone by repeatedly bringing charges against them for the same crime.
Read more about Bill of Rights
brainly.com/question/28828470
#SPJ1
if a landlocked property owner fails to acquire a voluntary agreement to access his property from the nearest public road, he may get such access by an:
If a landlocked property owner fails to acquire a voluntary agreement to access his property from the nearest public road, he may get such access by an easement by necessity.
What is an easement by necessity?An easement by necessity is a legal right to access an adjacent property by crossing over it. This is given to a landowner whose property is entirely surrounded by other people's land. An easement by necessity is an easement that is granted to a landlocked property owner by law when there is no other way for the owner to access his land.
In case a landlocked property owner fails to acquire a voluntary agreement to access his property from the nearest public road, he may get such access by an easement by necessity. An easement by necessity is one of the two types of implied easements. It's also referred to as an implied easement by necessity and is granted by the court when the landowner's access to his property is blocked.
Learn more about voluntary agreement: https://brainly.com/question/32313006
#SPJ11
standards to define obscenity were set forth in:
Standards to define obscenity were set forth in Roth v. United States. In Roth v. United States, a landmark case in 1957, the Supreme Court established new standards for defining obscenity. The correct answer is A.
The case involved a publisher, Samuel Roth, who had been convicted of mailing obscene materials. The Court ruled that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and that materials could be considered obscene if they were found to be "utterly without redeeming social value."
This test became known as the Roth test and was used to determine what constituted obscene materials for many years. The Roth test was later modified in the case of Miller v. California (1973), which established a three-part test for determining obscenity.
This test is still used today in many jurisdictions. Under the Miller test, materials are considered obscene if they meet all three of the following criteria:
(1) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
(2) the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (3) the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Standards to define obscenity were set forth in Roth v. United States. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
To know more about Roth v. United States refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31927243#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
Standards to define obscenity were set forth in:
A) Roth v. United States
B) Brown v. Board of Education
C) Gideon v. Wainwright
D) Miranda v. Arizona
What is the meaning of the executive branch?
Administration of the United States Laws are carried out and enforced by the executive branch. There are other boards, commissions, and committees in addition to the president, vice president, Cabinet, executive departments, and autonomous agencies.
What does the judicial branch mean?One component of the American government is the judicial branch. The court system is the name given to the judicial branch. There are various court levels. The United States' highest court is the Supreme Court. Laws are reviewed by courts.
The legislative branch's purpose is unclear.Lawmaking is done by the legislative branch. Along with other government organizations, it is made up of the Congress. The House of Representatives and the Senate are both constituent parts of Congress. Americans in each state cast ballots to elect representatives and senators to their state legislatures.
To Know more about , vice president,
https://brainly.com/question/18882530
#SPJ4
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with: firefighters security guards others involved in the accident submit answer
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with Security guards
How to avoid accident?Around the world, the 4 E's—education, enforcement, engineering, environment, and emergency care for victims of traffic accidents—have been the main focus of accident prevention and control. Drive according to the posted speed restrictions on the different roads. Keep in mind that "speed thrills but kills."Before operating a bicycle, motorcycle, or car, always wear seat belts, helmets, and other safety gear. Overspeeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, misreading traffic signs, being tired, and drinking are all examples of driver error. Pedestrian: Ignorance, erroneous crossings, traveling on the carriageway, and jaywalkers.The law mandates that you give security personnel information from your driver's license in the event of an accident.
To learn more about avoid accident refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24622288
#SPJ4
Which is the best definition of civil liberties?.
The rights that exist when the government does not intervene arbitrarily are known as civil liberties. People can speak, write, own, marry, identify, and vote as they wish without intervention from the government in an entirely free society.
Let us discuss civil liberty in detail
In theory, the government and its agencies merely need to refrain from limiting these liberties to guarantee them. As long as the government stays out of its citizen's personal affairs, no additional effort is inherently necessary to support these freedoms. Civil rights, where the government actively seeks to promote democratic values and equality of treatment, are different from this category of liberties. Although there is frequently a lot of overlap, each jurisdiction recognises its own distinct set of civil liberties. The freedoms of the right to a fair trial, an open and public hearing, the right to marry, and the right to vote are examples of civil liberties. The government should be prohibited from interfering with these capacities since doing so would be against democracy and the law. The ability to marry, which has historically proven to be challenging for LGBT+ couples around the world, may stand out the most. Even though many people view this as unalienable civil liberty, same-sex marriage is illegal in a few European nations.
To know more about civil liberty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13578017
#SPJ4
In order to appease both Federalists and Anti-Federalists, it was agreed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that a group of delegates would be charged with selecting the president, in what would be called the "electoral college." This was designed to assure that
The election of the President was done by a group of delegates who were charged under the electoral college for this purpose, and this was designed for assuring the liberty of the nation to be maintained.
The electoral college is the system formed with an intention to hold the elections of the constituency assembly in the United States. The delegation of holding the electoral college is given under the duty of a special group, who also make sure to maintain the liberty of the constitution while the President is being elected.
Learn more about electoral college here:
https://brainly.com/question/25396133
#SPJ4
Complete question
In order to appease both Federalists and Anti-Federalists, it was agreed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that a group of delegates would be charged with selecting the president, in what would be called the “electoral college.” This was designed to assure that ________.
any one pls give me a gogle play gift card of 25 pls?
Answer:
k
Explanation:
Explanation:
sorry I can't. I'm broke
A form of regulation that controls a firm's prices and profits based on its costs and capital investments is called: A) price cap regulation. B) antitrust regulation. C) rate of return regulation. D) HHI regulation.
The correct answer to your question is: C) rate of return regulation. This form of regulation controls a firm's prices and profits based on its costs and capital investments.
The form of regulation that controls a firm's prices and profits based on its costs and capital investments is called rate of return regulation This type of regulation allows the firm to earn a fair return on its investments while also ensuring that prices are not excessively high for consumers. Price cap regulation (option A) sets a limit on how much a company can charge for its products or services. Antitrust regulation (option B) is designed to prevent monopolies and promote competition in the marketplace. HHI regulation (option D) is a measure of market concentration used to assess the level of competition in a particular industry.
Learn More about regulationhere :-
https://brainly.com/question/30894164
#SPJ11
The local mall' has had complaints about roaming groups of teenagers frightening away the clientele. In an effort to address the shopkeeper's concerns,
the mall has posted a sign that limits the number of teenagers who can enter the
mall and travel through it together to two. What possible constitutional
violations could this ban create?
Answer:
Violations of the First Amendment
Explanation:
Given that the First Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to the freedom of assembly. Hence, any form of restriction of the teenagers from assembling in public spaces, including the local mall would be considered as a violation of the first amendment.
Hence, in this situation, the possible constitutional violations this ban could create is that of "First Amendment"
In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated
perjury.
O True
O False
The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.
What happens when a witness does not answer a question in Texan courts?In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.
Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181
#SPJ1
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your iPhone to secretly record a conversation with him where he admits that he did, in fact, steal the shirts. He is awaiting trial, and you bring the recording to the police station to submit it as evidence. In your state, it is illegal to use a secretly recorded conversation in a court of law. In other words, this piece of evidence is inadmissible. Do you agree with this rule? In your answer, define the exclusionary rule and doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree, and explain how these terms apply to your situation.
Answer: I agree with this rule that secretly recorded conversations cannot be used as evidence in a court of law. I agree with this rule because with technology now days it would be all too easy to takes someones words out of contact or even rearrange what was said. This also violates our rights as Americans and takes away our privacy. The fruit of the poisonous tree rule is an extension of the exclusionary rule meaning, illegally gathered evidence cannot be admissible in a court of law, the fruit being the evidence and the poisonous tree being the means in which the evidence was gathered.
Explanation:
can a defendant be convicted on the testimony of one eyewitness alone?
There are no legal requirements or opposing evidence, so convictions can be based solely on the testimony of a single eyewitness as long as he is the only witness. Before a conviction was handed down, his testimony was thoroughly independently verified.
When a witness to a crime (or an accident or another significant event of legal significance) goes to court and recounts all the specifics of what she saw, this is known as providing eyewitness testimony. This involves a trickier process than you might think.
Like a video camera, the human memory is unable to record: It is common for witnesses to crimes to forget crucial information later on, such as a complete physical description of the attacker, including hair color, height, weight, and age. Witness statements must be accurate and reflect what the witness saw, heard, or felt. It is crucial to keep in mind that everyone involved in the case, not just the court, should have access to witness statements.
People's accounts of things they saw are referred to as eyewitness testimony in legal contexts. For instance, they might be asked to describe a theft that someone saw happen or a lawsuit involving a car accident. This includes information about the offender's identity, the crime scene, and more.
Learn more about lawsuit at:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
the matter and energy laws tell us that we can recycle
The laws of matter and energy conservation tell us that we can recycle. To conserve resources and protect the environment, recycling is essential.
Recycling refers to the process of transforming old and waste materials into new and useful ones. This is accomplished through the separation, collection, processing, and transformation of old materials into new products, which are then sold or donated for reuse. Recycling is an excellent way to protect the environment, conserve natural resources, and reduce the amount of waste produced.Recycling is essential because it reduces the number of natural resources we need to make new products. This decreases the extraction and processing of natural resources, reducing the associated energy consumption and pollution. Furthermore, the reduced waste generated decreases the need for landfill space, which is critical since landfill space is limited. Recycling can also help to lower greenhouse gas emissions by reducing the amount of waste that is burned in incinerators.In conclusion, Recycling is an essential practice that reduces the consumption of natural resources while also benefiting the environment. The laws of matter and energy conservation tell us that we can recycle.
know more about energy conservation,here:
https://brainly.com/question/13949051
#SPJ11
What type of intent is necessary to violate the provisions of the Deadly Weapons Control Law?
Attempt robbery or dacoity while armed with a lethal we-apon.— If the criminal is armed with a dangerous we-apon while attempting to commit robbery... dacoity, the imprisonment with which such offender must be sentenced shall Law.
Central Government Law committing grave harm voluntarily utilizing dangerous we-apon or ways —Whoever, except as provided in section 335, voluntarily causes grievous harm by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing, or cutting, or any instrument which, when used as a we=apon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or corrosive substance.
To learn more about Law, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
How would limiting awards affect medical malpractice lawsuits?
Answer: Supporters say caps on medical malpractice awards discourage frivolous lawsuits and reduce the cost of health care because providers no longer need to practice defensive medicine. Yet research shows that costs from medical liability make up just 2 to 2.5 percent of total health care spending
Explanation:
ILL NAME U AS BRAINLIEST
Communism is an example of the interdependence between which two subject areas?
A) economics and psychology
B) sociology and human geography
C) political science and economics
D) political science and anthropology
Answer:
Option C
Political science and ecnomoics
bermuda trangle found in which country