Under this type of democratic government, the people vote for the legislative branch and the legislative branch chooses the head of government.
A. Legislative Branch
B. Autocratic Government
C. Parliamentary Democracy
D. Presidential Democracy

The true statements are Hitler ruled as a dictator and persuaded people to believe in a "pure” German race, and Nazism and fascism have some similarities.

know more about Fascist governments here:

https://brainly.com/question/12922809

#SPJ8

Answer:

a

Explanation:

its a bcoz its world war one

Mao's role as a Communist Commissar was not specifically to control the people within the party, but rather to ensure that Communist Party members were following the party line and adhering to Communist ideology.

As a Communist Commissar, Mao was responsible for political education and propaganda work among Party members and was tasked with ensuring that the Party's policies were being implemented correctly. He was also responsible for maintaining Party discipline and enforcing Party directives.

Mao's role as a Commissar was important in the early years of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as the Party faced many challenges and internal divisions. Mao's leadership and political acumen helped to unify the Party and build support for Communist ideology among the Chinese people.

Later, as Mao rose to power within the Party and became Chairman of the Communist Party of China, his role expanded to include overall leadership of the country. However, even in this role, Mao continued to prioritize Communist ideology and Party unity, often at the expense of individual freedoms and human rights.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Having suffered a string of defeats that fall, including losing the capital of Philadelphia to the British, the Americans made camp for the winter outside of the city. While at Valley Forge, the army endured a chronic supply crisis but largely remained as well fed and clothed as it did during the previous campaigning season.

Explanation:

While a lack of clothing caused suffering among some the men, many were fully uniformed with the best equipped units used for foraging and patrols. During the early months at Valley Forge, Washington lobbied to improve the army's supply situation with some success. Statue of Brigadier General Anthony Wayne at Valley Forge.

Ancient Ku sh had a city called Nap ata at the forth cataract of the Nile. It is situated in the site of the present city of Karima, Sud an, about 1.5 kilometers first from river's right bank. It contained Je bel Ba rkal, the primary Kus hite religious center of Am un, and was the New Kingdom of Egypt's farthest southern permanent colony. It served as the interim capital of the Kingdom of Kush after the Twenty-fifth Dynasty of Egypt fell in 663 B C. It was taken by the Egyptians in 593 B C, and the Kus hite capital was moved to Me ro. Nap ata remained the main place of worship for the kingdom even after this change.

With the establishment of the republic of Upper and Lower Egypt under the rule of Narmer, the first phara oh of the First Dynasty, ancient Egyptian civilization began to take shape approximately 3150 B C. Before the Achae menid Empire conquered Egypt in the sixth century B C, the country was ruled primarily by native Egyptians.

Learn more about Egyptian history here:

https://brainly.com/question/13108048

#SPJ9

Computer Revolution led to Fewer clerical workers were needed in general and businesses were able to save payroll money. Workers were now able to focus more directly on management tasks and the clerical work would be done quicker and more reliably.

What do you mean by computer revolution?

To know more about Computer Revolution here

https://brainly.com/question/932241

#SPJ1

Controlling West African gold and salt mines was desirable for rulers due to their value in the trans-Saharan trade network.

Controlling gold and salt allowed rulers to amass wealth and power for their governments, armies, and infrastructure.

Monopolies over gold and salt mines gave rulers control over production, distribution, and trade. Monopoly allowed rulers to impose taxes, generating revenue and strengthening political authority.

Valuable resources enhanced rulers' prestige and influence. It facilitated diplomacy and alliances with neighboring states and foreign powers. Rulers controlling resources held high status and power, earning respect from subjects and potential allies.

Learn more about West African trading from

https://brainly.com/question/809583

#SPJ1

Based on the historical background, the statement means thus:

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Rutledge spoke for Southern planters by supporting slavery.

In conclusion, we can conclude that the meaning of the statement is a given earlier.

Learn more on Constitutional Convention in 1787 here: https://brainly.com/question/7652028

During the early 1800s in the United States, women had limited legal rights and were generally considered to have a subordinate status compared to men. Women's legal rights were restricted in various aspects, including:

Overall, women's legal rights in the early 1800s were characterized by significant limitations and inequalities, reflecting a societal structure that marginalized and subordinated women to men in various aspects of life.

for similar questions on woman’s legal rights .

https://brainly.com/question/9523503

#SPJ8

Note that the factor that might account for the fact that developed countries were more affected than developing countries during the H1N1 pandemic is: "People in developed countries traveled more and were exposed to more people." (Option C)

The 2009 swine flu pandemic, caused by the H1N1 influenza virus and declared by the World Health Organization from June 2009 to August 2010, was the third recent H1N1 flu pandemic. In April 2009, the first two instances were detected independently in the United States.

In April 2009, the first two instances were detected independently in the United States. The virus looked to be a novel strain of H1N1 that emerged from a prior triple reassortment of bird, swine, and human flu viruses which further mixed with a Eurasian pig flu virus, leading to the moniker "swine flu".

Learn more about H1N1 pandemic;
https://brainly.com/question/2295548
#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

he is describing the war to his mother

Answer: A. The soldier's mother

Explanation: It says so in the beginning. It is not a trick question because this is only a test to see if you know what "intended audience" means. Hope it helps! :))))

Answer: France had a colony for several years, they imported slaves from West Africa, Martinique and Guadeloupe to work on its plantations. In this period, the Antillean Creole language developed. France formally ceded possession of Dominica to Great Britain in 1763. Great Britain established a small colony on the island in 1805.

Answer:

What is the question??

Explanation:

multiple choice?

Answer:

the 2nd one

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The Spanish used a number of strategies to spread Catholicism throughout Native Texas. These included the establishment of missions, the conversion of Native American leaders, and the use of education and religious instruction to teach Native Americans about Christianity.

One of the main ways in which the Spanish spread Catholicism in Native Texas was through the establishment of missions. The Spanish established a number of missions in the region, including the Mission San Antonio de Valero (later known as the Alamo), the Mission San Francisco de la Espada, and the Mission San José y San Miguel de Aguayo. These missions were both religious and social centers, and they played a key role in the evangelization of Native Americans.

The Spanish also used the conversion of Native American leaders as a strategy to spread Catholicism. By converting Native American leaders, the Spanish hoped to create a class of Native American elites who would support their efforts to evangelize the region. These Native American leaders were often given Spanish names, and were educated in the Catholic faith. They were also granted land and other privileges in exchange for their support of the Spanish missionizing efforts.

Finally, the Spanish used education and religious instruction as tools to teach Native Americans about Catholicism. Native American children were often educated in mission schools, where they were taught to read, write, and speak Spanish. They were also taught the basics of the Catholic faith, and were encouraged to adopt the Catholic way of life. These efforts helped to spread Catholicism among Native Americans, and contributed to the growth of the Catholic Church in Texas.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Imperialism created tensions and rivalries between European powers as they competed for colonies and resources, leading to the formation of alliances and a complex web of diplomatic relations that ultimately contributed to the outbreak of World War I. Additionally, the aggressive pursuit of imperialistic policies by Germany, in particular, threatened the balance of power in Europe and heightened tensions among nations.

In 1832, Parliament approved the Great Reform Act.

It reallocated house seats of British Parliament, giving significant towns and cities representation while removing rotten boroughs.

It also increased the electorate, or the number of individuals who can vote, by allowing more males to vote.

Find out more information about 'British parliament':

https://brainly.com/question/2280126?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

B its right on edge

Explanation:

Answer:

the buddy and I am just asking for a few

Explanation:

The ideals on which the United States was founded and the reasons for separation from Great Britain

Answer:

In the 1930s, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party rose to power in Germany, and they quickly began to take aggressive actions towards their neighbors. One term often used to describe the policy of the Western powers towards Hitler's actions during this time is "appeasement." Appeasement refers to the strategy of giving in to an aggressor's demands in order to avoid conflict. Many leaders in Europe believed that this approach would prevent another devastating world war like the one that had just ended in 1918.

One example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, which allowed Hitler to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, despite the fact that it violated previous agreements and treaties. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain believed that this concession would satisfy Hitler's territorial ambitions and prevent a war in Europe. Another example was the Anschluss, or the annexation of Austria by Nazi Germany in 1938, which was met with little resistance from the international community.

French and British leaders at the time, such as Chamberlain and French Premier Édouard Daladier, were eager to avoid another war and believed that appeasement was the best strategy. They were also dealing with economic and political instability at home and did not want to spend resources on another war. Additionally, many in the West were still recovering from the trauma of World War I and were hesitant to enter into another large-scale conflict.

However, others at the time, such as Winston Churchill in Britain, opposed appeasement and argued that it would only embolden Hitler to take further aggressive actions. They believed that it was necessary to confront Hitler and his expansionist agenda, even if it meant going to war.

In hindsight, it is easy to criticize the appeasement strategy as shortsighted and ultimately unsuccessful. While it did temporarily avoid conflict, it also allowed Hitler to continue his aggression, leading to the invasion of Poland in 1939 and the start of World War II. In hindsight, the Western powers should have been more proactive in confronting Hitler's aggression and challenging his territorial ambitions earlier on, possibly preventing the catastrophic loss of life and destruction that followed.

The answer is Federal Government. Marshall court's decisions on matters relating to native Americans served to establish native nations, sovereign entities over which the Federal Government had ultimate authority.

Marshall Court decisions regarding Native Americans had a profound impact on the establishment of Indigenous nations as the sovereign entities. The Marshall Court ruled that Native Americans had certain rights under the Constitution and could not be treated as a second-class citizens.

In its judgments, the Court also affirmed that Native American nations have the right to the self-government and that the federal government has supreme authority over them but cannot interfere in their internal affairs. These judgments were instrumental in creating the legal framework for the recognition of the Native American nations as separate sovereign entities and laid the groundwork for modern federal tribal relations.

To know more about Federal Government:

brainly.com/question/12486518

#SPJ4

Answer:

Paul believed that his vision proved that Jesus lived in heaven, that Jesus was the Messiah and God's Son, and that he would soon return. Moreover, Paul thought that the purpose of this revelation was his own appointment to preach among the Gentiles (Galatians 1:16).

The timing is right for a history like this. The World War II generation is dying out, and America has reacted with a wave of patriotic nostalgia. Books such as Tom Brokaw’s “The Greatest Generation” and movies such as “Saving Private Ryan” are celebrating the “good war” against the Axis and the virtues that won it as they haven’t been celebrated in decades. This is natural, even laudable, but it runs the risk of re-sanctifying and re-whitewashing what, as UC Berkeley ethnic studies professor Ronald Takaki reminds us, was a very complex experience.

Takaki’s survey of the war’s impact on Americans of African, Japanese, Mexican, Chinese, Jewish, Korean, Indian, German, Italian and Native origin reaches two conclusions. The first is that the battle against Nazi racism exposed America’s own prejudices as peacetime never could. The ironies were glaring: Why should minorities fight a “white man’s war” in segregated armed forces on behalf of a country that denied them equal rights and, in some cases, citizenship? That they fought anyway--with conspicuous gallantry--put the country in their moral debt.

The second is that World War II gave many minority Americans--and women of all races--an economic and psychological boost. The needs of defense industries, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s desire to counter Axis propaganda, opened skilled, high-paying jobs to people who had never had a chance at them before. Minority workers and soldiers made unprecedented contact with other minorities as well as with whites. Feelings of self-confidence and belonging, once enjoyed, were not easily relinquished. In short, Takaki says, the war jump-started the civil rights movement.

Takaki takes his title from a letter to the Pittsburgh Courier written in 1942 by James G. Thompson, an African American cafeteria worker who later served in the Army. Referring to the popular “V for victory” sign, Thompson said: “Let we colored Americans adopt the double VV for a double victory. The first V for victory over our enemies from without, the second V for victory over our enemies from within--those who perpetrate these ugly prejudices.”

“Double Victory” reconsiders some of the war’s most troubling questions. Why did the United States intern 120,000 Japanese Americans when there was no evidence of their disloyalty, yet largely leave German and Italian Americans alone? Why were immigration quotas on Jews from Europe upheld and shiploads of refugees from the Nazis turned away? Why didn’t the Allies bomb the rail lines to Auschwitz and otherwise disrupt the death-camp system once its existence was confirmed? Where logic fails, Takaki argues, the only explanation is racism.

Still, the picture Takaki gives us isn’t uniformly bleak. Nothing about the war was simple, he asserts. Korean Americans reacted to news of Pearl Harbor with joy--war with Japan meant eventual independence for their homeland--even though bigots often mistook them for Japanese. Long-oppressed Chinese Californians suddenly became “friends” because China was fighting Japan. Mexican Americans suffered the “Zoot Suit Riots” in Los Angeles in 1943, but gained respect because of their high casualty rate in the war.

Indeed, “Double Victory” would make a good high school textbook. It’s brief and clear. It tells familiar stories--the Navajo code talkers, the Japanese American 442nd Regimental Combat Team--in less detail than specialists would want, but it puts all the stories into one set of covers and in a revealing context. Some of Takaki’s conclusions will be disputed--particularly his assertion that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary--but his portraits of Roosevelt, having to be prodded into doing the right but politically risky thing and then doing it halfheartedly, and of President Harry S. Truman, his “buck-stops-here” facade hiding his genuine horror over the A-bombing, are convincingly nuanced.

When the US entered World War 2 in the late 1941, the largest racial minority group on the US was black Americans.

They made up about ten % of the general population. After being freed from slavery only the some generations earlier, blacks still faced daily racial discrimination. on the South, where seventy five % of black Americans were lived, racism was particularly not good.

In so many Southern states the so-called Jim Crow laws enforced legalized segregation (the separation of blacks or whites) in public places such as schools, theaters, or restaurants.

In the North, urban ghettos (a section of the city where minorities live, often with overcrowding or poverty) or slums were growing like to the blacks migrated from the rural South by seek jobs.

The National Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) or other organizations fought discrimination and segregation, but progress was low.

Learn more about discrimination here https://brainly.com/question/14896067

#SPJ2

Individual actions can have an impact on government and political decisions, but the level of influence may vary depending on the specific action and context.

Some individual actions that can potentially influence government and political decisions include:

1. Voting: One of the most direct ways for individuals to have an impact on government and political decisions is through voting in elections. By casting a vote for a particular candidate or issue, individuals can contribute to the outcome of elections and potentially influence the policies and actions of elected officials.

2. Advocacy: Engaging in advocacy activities, such as contacting elected representatives, participating in protests or rallies, or writing letters to the editor, can also potentially influence government and political decisions. These actions can help raise awareness about specific issues and bring public pressure to bear on elected officials.

3. Donations: Individuals can also influence government and political decisions through financial contributions to political campaigns or advocacy groups. Donations can help fund political advertising, research, and lobbying efforts that aim to influence policy decisions.

4. Community involvement: Participating in local community organizations or attending town hall meetings can also potentially influence government and political decisions. By engaging with elected officials and other community members, individuals can help shape the priorities and policies of their local government.

Overall, while individual actions can have an impact on government and political decisions, the most effective approaches often involve a combination of strategies, including both individual and collective action.

Know more about Political decisions here:

https://brainly.com/question/14722200

#SPJ11

The American Revolutionaries were primarily motivated by constitutional principles, ideals of equality, and economic self-interest. The Revolution was a result of the colonists' frustration with their lack of representation in the British government, which they perceived as a violation of their constitutional rights.

For such more question on  Revolutionaries

https://brainly.com/question/28123253

#SPJ8

The view on Obergefell Vs. Hodges Justice Kennedy concluded that the fundamental right to marry cannot be limited to heterosexual couples. Justice Ruth Ginsburg stated that the idea of marriage has changed and that marriage today is different from what it used to be under the law.

The dissenting opinions on Obergefell Vs. Hodges are Chief justice Robert says he argued that same-sex marriage bans were constitutional. Justice Scalia argued that the question of whether same-sex marriage should be recognized is one for the state legislatures and that for the issue to be decided by unelected judges goes against one of the most basic precepts of the Constitution.

Justice Thomas said the court “should consider” these other precedents in future cases, saying that Obergefell, Griswold and Lawrence v. Texas—which affirmed the right to sexual intimacy between same-sex couples—were also “erroneous” and the court has “a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents.

Learn more about Justice, here:

https://brainly.com/question/978006

#SPJ1

Answer:

liberty, equality, and democracy....

Answer: Please refer to:

Our founding document establishes a general framework for effective gover- nance of a nation destined to grow and change. It fixes the basic structure of government and some of its important procedures while expressing our com- mitment to certain core values: liberty, equality, and democracy.

Explanation:

Not sure but hope it helps.