under current court interpretations of the first amendment, a public official could potentially win in a libel lawsuit. t/f

The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.

The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.

As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.

To learn more about Indonesia, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31792781

#SPJ4

Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.

In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.

Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.

To know more about law:

brainly.com/question/30133385

#SPJ4

The functions of the temple of Jerusalem and the church today share several similarities. Both serve as places of worship, where individuals can come together to pray and seek guidance from a higher power. They are also places where people can receive spiritual education and guidance through teachings and sermons.

In addition, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as places of community and social interaction. They provide opportunities for individuals to connect with others who share their beliefs and values. They are also centers for outreach and charitable work, serving the needs of the local community and beyond.

Moreover, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today emphasize the importance of rituals and traditions. They celebrate important religious holidays and events, providing a sense of continuity and connection with the past. Finally, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as symbols of faith and hope, reminding believers of the power of the divine and the promise of salvation.

For more such questions on church

https://brainly.com/question/28389583

#SPJ11

It explains the purpose of its charter, the services it provided, the duration of its charter, the competition it faced, and the events following its expiration.

The First Bank of the United States, chartered in 1791, played a crucial role in the early financial system of the United States. Its charter was granted to stabilize the economy and establish a national currency. The bank offered various services such as issuing banknotes, collecting taxes, and providing loans to the federal government and individuals. Its charter lasted for twenty years, until 1811, when it faced opposition from those who believed it had too much power and hindered state banks.

During its existence, the bank faced competition from state-chartered banks that saw it as a threat to their own influence. This led to a political and economic debate about the bank's necessity and constitutionality. After its charter expired in 1811, the country experienced financial instability and difficulties in regulating the banking system. In response, a second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1816, but its existence also faced controversy, ultimately leading to its dissolution in 1836.

The First Bank of the United States remains an important historical landmark today, showcasing the early efforts to establish a national financial system in the United States and the subsequent debates over the role and scope of government involvement in banking and finance.

Learn more about  First Bank of the United States: brainly.com/question/1222843

#SPJ11

Answer:

Ethics are behavior standards and different for everyone.

Laws are established by a governing body and apply to everyone.

Explanation:

Ethics or moral philosophy is an area of knowledge whose object of investigation is human actions and their guiding principles. Every culture is directly associated with ethical values that are passed on to the individuals who carry them, as well as carrying their own concepts of good and evil, which allows ethics to be different for each person.

Law, on the other hand, is a norm established by a governing body within a society or group. This standard aims to create rules that must be followed by everyone, ensuring that coexistence and relationships between all the elements that make up this society are beneficial.

Answer:

Storage, cleaning and travel

Explanation:

took a course

If enough investors decide to purchase stocks, they are likely to drive up stock prices, thereby causing demand to exceed supply and prices to rise.

This can create a positive feedback loop where the increasing prices attract more investors, leading to further price increases.

This phenomenon is known as a bull market. However, if this trend continues for an extended period, it can lead to overvalued stocks and a potential market correction, which is a significant drop in stock prices.

In a bull market, there is an overall positive sentiment about the economy and the stock market, which leads to increased demand for stocks and other securities.

To know more about stocks here:

https://brainly.com/question/29750557

#SPJ4

Answer:

Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself

Explanation:

No matter who does the investigation, citizen complaints are inherently difficult to sustain in favor of the complainant. Investigating citizen complaints is a complex task that requires thorough examination of the facts.

However, there are inherent challenges in sustaining these complaints. First, gathering sufficient evidence can be challenging, as incidents often occur without independent witnesses or conclusive proof. Second, establishing credibility can be difficult, as the complainant's account may be disputed by the accused or subject to subjective interpretations.

Lastly, biases and limitations within the investigative process, such as institutional biases or procedural constraints, can impede a fair and thorough examination of the complaint. These inherent difficulties in sustaining citizen complaints highlight the need for a robust investigative process that addresses these challenges.

To know more about complaint investigation, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/32295735

Answer:

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States. The development of universal manhood suffrage.

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States was the establishment of the Constitution, which laid the foundation for a democratic government by creating a system of checks and balances, protecting individual rights, and promoting the principle of majority rule.

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States is the fact that the country is governed by a system that places ultimate power in the hands of the people. This is achieved through free and fair elections, where every citizen has the right to vote and express their opinions on the issues that matter to them. The fact that the United States has been able to maintain a stable democracy for over two centuries is a testament to the strength and resilience of this system. Additionally, the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights enshrine the principles of democracy, including the protection of individual rights and freedoms. These documents provide a framework for the government to operate within, and ensure that the voices of the people are heard and respected. Overall, the supremacy of democracy in the United States is evident in the country's political institutions, legal system, and culture.

learn more about democracy

https://brainly.com/question/21256069

#SPJ11

Answer:

"D"

Explanation:

After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President. Please mark brainliest if my answer helped, thanks!

That is accurate, yes. Kryder's Law states that the storage density on magnetic disks is increasing at an exponential rate

A rule known as Kryder's Law is named for Mark Kryder, a specialist in magnetic storage.

It claims that, similar to Moore's Law for the growth of transistor density in microprocessors, the area density of magnetic disk storage is growing exponentially.

Kryder's Law states that magnetic disk storage density doubles roughly every 12 to 18 months.

This led to important developments in disk storage technology, allowing for the storage of ever-increasing volumes of data on smaller, more effective disk drives.

It should be emphasized, though, that the rate of growth has slowed recently as the effects of physical restrictions have become more obvious.

Learn more about Law:

https://brainly.com/question/29750431

#SPJ4

Answer:

They learn from their mistakes and depending on how severe the punishment is, this prevents other people from breaking the law which will essentially make the world a safer place to live in, without people being constantly in fear that something could happen to them.

Explanation:

Punishing individuals who break the law serves several purposes, including:

Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering breaking the law. The fear of punishment can discourage people from committing crimes.

Rehabilitation: Punishment can also serve as a means of rehabilitating offenders, helping them to understand the impact of their actions and encouraging them to change their behavior.

Retribution: Punishment can also be seen as a way of holding offenders accountable for their actions and providing a sense of justice for victims and society as a whole.

Protection: Punishment can also serve to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community, either through imprisonment or other forms of punishment.

Public safety: Punishing individuals who break the law can also help maintain public safety by removing individuals who pose a threat to society.

Restitution: Punishment can also include restitution, which would be a form of compensation to the victims of the crime.

It is important to note that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed and should aim to achieve a balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and reintegration of the offender into society.

In 2016, 37% of drivers under 21 years old who were involved in fatal crashes in the US were found to be speeding.

In 2016, a significant statistic revealed that 37% of the drivers under 21 years old who were involved in fatal crashes in the United States were found to be speeding. This statistic indicates the alarming impact of speeding among young drivers and its contribution to fatal accidents. Speeding is a dangerous behavior that increases the risk of losing control of the vehicle, reduces reaction time, and magnifies the severity of collisions.

The high percentage highlights the need for effective measures to address this issue and promote safer driving habits among young individuals. This includes comprehensive driver education programs that emphasize the risks and consequences of speeding, stricter enforcement of speed limits, and increased public awareness campaigns to educate young drivers about the importance of responsible driving.

By addressing speeding as a significant factor in fatal crashes involving young drivers, efforts can be made to save lives and reduce the devastating impact of such accidents. Promoting a culture of safe driving practices and instilling a sense of responsibility among young drivers is crucial in creating a safer road environment for everyone.

For more such question on US

https://brainly.com/question/14994944

#SPJ11

Answer:

it indeed should be harder.

Explanation:

So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote

The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.

The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.

The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.

It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.

Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The cybersecurity terms used to describe the two types of insider threats are careless users and malicious users.

Careless users – Individuals who create entry points or mishandle data due to failure of security measures or failure of judgment regarding data policies and practices.

An unwary user can put themselves at risk and pose a threat by clicking a link in an email or granting network access.

Less dramatically, but perhaps more generally, careless users can increase risk from simple mistakes like: B. Bypassing security procedures in the normal course of business.

Malicious User – An individual who has or has had valid access to a system and uses it intentionally to steal or misuse data

A malicious user could be someone who is angry and seeking revenge, or someone who is greedily motivated to steal information in order to make money.

Since these users are insiders, they may know how to hide their tracks, which can make detection difficult.

To learn more about 'Cybersecurity', here:

https://brainly.com/question/24856293?

#SPJ4

Answer:

I say false

Explanation:

Answer:

left

Explanation:

Answer:

D. prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency

Explanation:

(the others seem a bit bias) please let me know if I am wrong :}

Persons aged 65 or older have the lowest victimization rates for all types of crime.

As per the data published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, older adults are less likely to become victims of crimes than younger people. This could be due to a variety of factors, including their decreased involvement in high-risk activities and reduced opportunities for interaction with potential offenders. Additionally, older adults may be more cautious and vigilant when it comes to crime prevention strategies.

Incidences of property crime and violent crime among older adults are considerably low. Some common types of crimes against older people are: Abuse or neglect Elder abuse is a type of abuse that occurs when an elderly person is exploited or mistreated. Neglect or abuse by family members or other caretakers is a common form of elder abuse. Inadequate nutrition, lack of medical attention, and financial fraud are all examples of abuse and neglect.

Learn more about Bureau of Justice Statistics here: https://brainly.com/question/31107620

#SPJ11

Scene 1: Polonius summons his astute servant Reynaldo and orders him to spy on Laertes in Paris. Hamlet orders the servant to track down any Danes in Paris and question them about Laertes'.

Whereabouts and reputation. Reynaldo sends his servant Reynaldo to France with money and written notes for Laertes, as well as instructions to inquire about and spy on Hamlet' personal life. He gives him specific instructions on how to conduct his investigations and then sends him on his way. "A room in Polonius' house," from Act 2, Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Hamlet, is an example of the setting.

To learn more about Hamlet, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30104887

#SPJ4

I would advise candidate Trump to adopt a more inclusive and empathetic communication style, focusing on unity and collaboration rather than divisive rhetoric.

As candidate Trump's public relations advisor, I would emphasize the importance of building bridges and appealing to a wider audience. I would encourage him to choose his words carefully, avoiding inflammatory language and personal attacks. Instead, I would suggest emphasizing policy positions and highlighting his accomplishments, while also demonstrating empathy and understanding for diverse perspectives.

I would recommend engaging in constructive dialogue, actively listening to concerns, and presenting himself as a unifying force. By modifying his approach to be more inclusive and empathetic, candidate Trump could appeal to a broader range of voters and project a more presidential image.

Learn more about Trump: https://brainly.com/question/29994218

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

 Compared to Roosevelt, President Taft was more committed to expanding U.S. foreign trade. He pursued a strategy called "dollar diplomacy" to encourage U.S. investments in the Caribbean, South and Central America, and the Far East. Taft used government officials to promote the overseas sale of American goods, particularly military hardware and heavy industrial goods, in order to carry out this foreign policy agenda.

The United States military was seen as a tool for economic diplomacy in Taft's conception of foreign policy. He sent 2,700 U.S. marines to Nicaragua to stabilize the conservative, pro-U.S. regime when rebels threatened to overthrow its government and invited U.S. banks to lend and grant debt-ridden Honduras.

In general, Taft's efforts to create a new style for U.S. foreign policy were unsuccessful. Under Taft, American trade with China actually decreased. Additionally, the ill will that Roosevelt's military interventions in Panama and Santa Domingo had already created was exacerbated by his program to seek commercial advantages in Central America.

To know more about President's foreign policy:

https://brainly.com/question/873324

#SPJ4

President Taft's famous foreign policy encouraged U.S. companies in order to interact with foreign countries in an attempt to make a profit.

When compared to Roosevelt, the President Taft was more committed to expanding U.S. foreign trade. However, he pursued a strategy, which is called "dollar diplomacy" in order to encourage U.S. investments in the Caribbean, South and Central America, and also the Far East.

However, President Taft used the government officials in order to promote the overseas sale of the American goods. In which, particularly the military hardware and heavy industrial goods, in order to carry out this foreign policy agenda.

Hence, President Taft's efforts were said to be unsuccessful.

To learn more about the foreign policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/957177

#SPJ4

Answer:

(A) Civil Rights: (i) All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. All are equal before the law.  

(B) Political Rights: (i) Every one possesses the right to take part in the Government of his country, directly or indirectly through freely chosen representatives.

(C) Economic Rights: (i) Everyone possesses the right to own property  i only got 3 sry

Explanation:

There are many types of inheritance.

1. Intestate Inheritance: This type of inheritance occurs when a person dies without having made a will. In this case, the assets of the deceased are distributed according to the laws of the state in which the deceased resided.

2. Testate Inheritance: This type of inheritance occurs when a person dies leaving behind a valid will. In this case, the assets are distributed according to the wishes of the deceased as stated in his/her will.

3. Joint Tenancy: This type of inheritance occurs when property is owned jointly by two or more persons. In this case, when one of the joint tenants dies, the surviving tenant automatically becomes the owner of the entire property.

4. Tenancy in Common: This type of inheritance occurs when two or more people own a property with each having separate and distinct rights. In this case, when one of the tenants dies, his/her share of the property passes on to his/her heirs.

5. Community Property: This type of inheritance occurs when two spouses own a property together. In this case, when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse becomes the owner of the entire property.

6. Gift: This type of inheritance occurs when a person makes a gift of property to another person while they are still alive.

To learn more about inheritance refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/15078897

#SPJ4

The tie vote in the U.S. Supreme Court case regarding the legality of smoking catnip means that the previous ruling from the appellate court stands. In this case, the appellate court ruled that smoking catnip is legal. Therefore, the tie vote does not change the legality of catnip.

Typically, when there is a tie vote in the Supreme Court, the decision of the lower court is affirmed, which means that the ruling made by the appellate court remains in effect. In this scenario, since the appellate court ruled that smoking catnip is legal, the tie vote in the Supreme Court does not change that decision.

It is important to note that a tie vote in the Supreme Court does not establish a national precedent or create new law. It only means that the decision of the lower court stands in the specific case being heard. Other similar cases in different jurisdictions may have different outcomes based on the laws and circumstances specific to those cases.

In summary, the tie vote in the Supreme Court case regarding the legality of smoking catnip means that the ruling made by the appellate court, which stated that smoking catnip is legal, remains in effect.

To know more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11

Answer:

Answer, THE SENATE

Explanation:

under the Appointments Clause of the United States constitution and law of the United States, certain federal positions appointed by the presidents of the United States require confirmation (advice and consent) of the United States SENATE.

Hope this helped my friend?!