TRUE/FALSE. once the agency relationship between a principal and an agent has ended, the agent loses the right to bind the principal.

primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped

Answer: Judicial review, the Constitution

Explanation:

Just took the assignment

Ty

Answer:

a on the first blank and c or the constitution on the second one

Explanation:

Option third is correct. The primary goal of the guardian ad litem is to act in the best interests of the child.

About guardian ad litem

A guardian ad litem is a person who a court appoints to look after a person while a case is being heard. To determine what options would be in the "best interests of a child," the court appoints a "guardian ad litem" (GAL). In this instance, a GAL in the divorce or parental responsibilities and rights case is being discussed. The GAL will investigate the family circumstances and provide the court advice on issues such as where the kids should spend the most of their time. if a parent's substance misuse is harming the youngster. what kind of interaction a child ought to have with the parent.

To know more about guardian ad litem:

brainly.com/question/8111317

#SPJ4

The main purpose of the contract was for construction services. An "estimated"  or witness decides is stated in the contract. Project and construction-related terms were utilized in the contract.

It is a method that entails extrapolating specific instances of the relevant law from a small sample of cases to a larger group of situations. The historical, empirical, or a posteriori methods are other names for it.

It is also possible to say that it is a real-world approach to legal issues in work, study, and research. According to Dworkin, the purpose of all legal interpretation is to "constructively interpret" or "create the finest possible example of the form or genre to which it is taken to belong" the social practice of law.

Learn more about decision making Visit: brainly.com/question/1249089

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

_____ is a form of subjective decision making that begins when a victim or witness decides whether or not to report a crime to the police.

Answer:

it would be D, a witness.

Explanation:

bailiff is in charge of court room security

plaintiff is the person bringing the charges

defendant is the person accused of a crime or some kind of wrong doing

Answer:

D a witness

Explanation:

he or she tells the truth

Answer:

Explanation:

In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?

the profession of the victim

the profession of the criminal

the type of crime committed

the area the crime was committed in

Answer:

The Notary Signing Agent should: Recommend that the borrower contact the lender's representative before signing the documents.

Arson.

Burglary.

Extortion.

Theft.

Vandalism.

Juvenile vandalism penalties.

Burglary.

The Visiting Forces Act 1952.

Answer:

Rio Grande, aka "Río Bravo del Norte"

Answer:

true

Explanation:

it is true

Answer:

Yes it is valid.

Explanation:

In the context, it is given that Gil found an engine that was lying in his neighbor's garage. Gil asked the neighbor for the engine and also offered money. But his neighbor said to have the engine without any cost but on one condition. The condition is that Gil have to take away the engine by the weekend and also he has to clean the garage where there is oil slipping from the engine. Though the engine worth nearly 1200 dollar, but Gil said he will take the engine by the end of the weekend and will clean the garage for the neighbor. Therefore it is valid contract.

There are different kinds of contract.  This is a valid contract.

There are different basic elements needed for the agreement to be a legally enforceable that is to be a valid contract. They are:

Learn more about valid contract from

https://brainly.com/question/8116487

Answer:

when you are driving and drinking you may get an accident

The constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment, specifically the freedom of speech.

In Schenck v. United States case, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether Schenck's actions of distributing anti-war leaflets during World War I violated the Espionage Act of 1917 and, if so, whether that violated his First Amendment rights.

The Court ultimately ruled that Schenck's actions did violate the Espionage Act and that the First Amendment did not protect him in this instance. The Court held that the freedom of speech is not absolute and can be limited in times of war or when it presents a "clear and present danger" to the nation's security.

Hence, the constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment's freedom of speech, and the Court's ruling established the "clear and present danger" test for limiting that freedom in certain circumstances.

Learn more about Schenck v. United States:

https://brainly.com/question/24938794

#SPJ11

This is an example of a policy shift towards community-based alternatives to juvenile detention.

In 2013, Governor Jerry Brown's announcement to halt new admissions to the DJJ and redirect funds toward county-level interventions marked a significant shift in the state's approach to juvenile justice. The move recognized the limitations and failures of incarceration as a solution for young offenders, and instead prioritized community-based alternatives that address the root causes of delinquency and provide rehabilitation and support services. By empowering counties to take a more proactive role in preventing recidivism, the policy aims to reduce reliance on costly and ineffective detention facilities, and ultimately improve outcomes for youth involved in the justice system. Overall, the shift towards community-based interventions reflects a growing recognition of the importance of addressing the social and environmental factors that contribute to youth offending and promoting a more holistic, restorative approach to justice.

Learn more about Governor Jerry Brown's: https://brainly.com/question/32362144

#SPJ11

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Substituted judgment simply refers to a decision that is made by an individual on behalf of someone else who is considered to be incompetent and therefore unable to make a decision for himself or herself.

In such scenario, the decision-maker trhes as much as possible to be accurate and make a decision with facts on behalf of the incompetent person.

True. A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This concept is known as "in rem jurisdiction," which allows a court to make decisions regarding property within its territorial limits, even if the property owner is not physically present in the jurisdiction.

Yes, a court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This is known as in rem jurisdiction, where the court has authority over the property itself rather than the people involved in the case. In some cases, a court may also have in personam jurisdiction, which means authority over the individuals involved in the case. However, in rem jurisdiction is particularly relevant in cases involving property disputes or when a person is seeking to claim ownership of a piece of property.

Learn more about rem jurisdiction: https://brainly.com/question/30490907

#SPJ11

The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.

Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:

https://brainly.com/question/1172086

#SPJ11

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

Answer:

B. He is not responsible for damages because reasonable care was given.

Explanation:

As shown in the details, he was specifically given a key to unlock and lock the shed for the delivery of wood. The details also state that the burglars broke into a locked shed. This means that he locked the shed behind him, and therefore is not at fault.

Further proof is that the burglars also caused damage when breaking in, which meant they did not have access to the key in order to open it. This also demonstrates that David was responsible in the care with the key.

Hope this helps!!

The federal government relies most heavily on Income tax. The correct option is option A.

2. All the statements are true when it comes to when a beekeeper's bees pollinate the crops of the farmer next door. Option C is the correct option.

3. The type of tax explained is regressive tax. The correct option is option A.

4. The United States most closely resembles a mixed economic system. The correct option is B.

5. The category in which the government spend the most is healthcare. Option C is the correct option.

6. The option which is not considered as public good provided by the government is healthcare. Option E is the correct option.

7. The contracts do all of the listed options. The correct option is option C.

8. The government is NOT likely to address a positive externality using law. The correct option is option E.

9. Pollution is not a public goods provided by the government. The correct option is option D.

10. The fishes in the ocean are rival and nonexcludable. The correct option is option B.

Income tax is a kind of tax that is imposed on people or organizations based on their earnings or income. It is often imposed by the government and is used to pay for public programs and services. The amount of income tax payable is typically calculated by applying a tax rate to the taxpayer's taxable income. Depending on the income threshold and tax regulations of the particular nation or jurisdiction, the tax rate may change. Regularly throughout the year, income tax is normally paid by withholding from paychecks or projected tax payments.

Learn more about Income Tax here

https://brainly.com/question/30157668

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is TRUE that the shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for "comfort and esteem."

According to various research findings, the people that move from periodic social drinking to substance abuse usually do such due to the need to give themselves comfort when they are suffering from one sad moment or depression.

The other way people change from periodic drinking to substance abuse is to elevate their self-esteem, especially when they are low on confidence.

Hence, in this case, the statement is TRUE.

Would you rather live in a small colonial town where everyone knows each other's business, or in a bustling 18th century city where anonymity is possible?

The four Questions are seen below

Generally,  Would you rather be a wealthy plantation owner with slaves, or a poor white farmer with few opportunities for upward mobility?

Would you rather be a member of a religious minority in early America, facing persecution and discrimination, or a member of the dominant religious group?

Would you rather be a colonial woman with limited legal rights, or a Native American facing forced displacement and cultural genocide?

Would you rather be a member of a colonial militia fighting in the American Revolution, or a loyalist forced to flee to Canada after the war?

Read more about colonial town

https://brainly.com/question/13459134

#SPJ1

It is true to say that possible witnesses include tenants, businesspeople, and customers from the burnt building or surrounding buildings as well as bus-drivers, taxi drivers, delivery people, sanitation workers collecting garbage, police patrols, and people waiting for buses and taxis.

Possible witnesses consisted tenants, businesspeople and customers fro the burnt building and surrounding building as well as passers-by, including taxi drivers, bus drivers, delivery people, garbage collectors, police patrols and people waiting for busses and taxi. Possible witnesses implies any help beneficiary known to be actually present in the spot and at the hour of the supposed maltreatment or disregard. It can likewise incorporate any assistance beneficiary what its identity is accepted may have data that could be valuable to an examination.

Police patrols can be invaluable source of information to arson investigators because of their technical knowledge  and because of what they observe in fire.

To know more about witness,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/15649802

#SPJ4