Answers
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) that the San Francisco Laundry Licensing Board had engaged in discriminatory application of the law.
In this landmark decision, the Court held that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause applied to all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States, including non-citizens. The case involved Yick Wo, a Chinese immigrant who was denied a laundry permit based on a city ordinance, which the Licensing Board had disproportionately applied against Chinese immigrants. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Yick Wo, concluding that the discriminatory application of the ordinance violated the Equal Protection Clause. This decision set a significant precedent in ensuring equal protection of the laws for all individuals, regardless of citizenship or ethnicity.
To learn more about Supreme Court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29604190
#SPJ11
Related Questions
How does a counterclaim help support a position in an argumentative essay?
Answers
Answer:
A counterclaim helps support the writer position in an argumentative essay because The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect, as you write, think about your audience.
Answer:
The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect.
Explanation:
edge 2021
Why did the professional field of paralegals develop?
O Legal secretaries trained paralegals to help with their overload.
O The paperwork for lawyers alone caused this field to increase.
O In the 1970s, lawyers had no one to assist in executing legal work.
O During the Vietnam War, people took an interest in legal matters, resulting in an increase of paralegals.
Answers
Answer: C, In the 1970s, lawyers had no one to assist in executing legal work.
Explanation: I just did the assignment
What is Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?
Answers
The Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000 is a set of guidelines and procedures for Virginia state agencies and the administrative processes they follow.
The Act outlines the methods for developing, adopting, and implementing regulations, as well as hearing and decision-making procedures.
What is the Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?The Virginia Administrative Process Act is a set of state laws that govern the operations of Virginia's administrative agencies.
The Act establishes the procedures that state agencies must follow in adopting, developing, and implementing rules and regulations. The Act was enacted in 1981 and is designed to ensure that state agencies operate in a fair and open manner.
It outlines the procedures for public participation in the development of regulations, including opportunities for public comment, public hearings, and judicial review.
It also outlines the methods for enforcing agency decisions and appeals to those decisions.
In summary, the Virginia Administrative Process Act provides a structured process for state agencies to follow in conducting their affairs, ensuring that they operate in an open and fair manner that is consistent with the principles of democratic government.
To know more about Virginia Administrative Process refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/20338178#
#SPJ11
Can somebody help me
Answers
Who won the Gonzales v CARHART case?
Answers
Answer:
The decisions of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits reversed. Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003
The fair use act allows anyone to use copyrighted materials for educational purposes. What other uses are covered under the fair use act?.
Answers
The fair use doctrine is a legal principle that allows individuals to use copyrighted materials under certain circumstances without obtaining permission from the copyright owner. In addition to educational purposes, there are several other uses that are covered under the fair use act.
For example, fair use may apply to criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, research, and parody. The fair use doctrine also looks at the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount of the copyrighted material being used, the purpose of the use, and the potential impact on the market for the copyrighted work.
It's important to note that fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis and there is no clear-cut rule for determining whether a particular use is fair or not. Ultimately, it's up to the courts to determine whether a particular use of copyrighted material is fair or infringing.
To know more about fair use doctrine visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29761981
#SPJ11
While off duty and at a party, Police Officer Woods was asked by the homeowner to get some ice from his basement. Since the ice machine was not immediately apparent, the officer opened two doors. Behind door number two were six marijuana plants. Officer Woods arrested the home owner. Did Officer Woods legally find the marijuana?
Answers
Answer:
No because he did not get consent from the onwer.
Explanation:
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
Answers
true/false. a decrease in government expenditures serves as an example of an adverse supply shock.
Answers
False. A decrease in government expenditures is not an adverse supply shock.
An adverse supply shock refers to an unexpected event that disrupts the supply chain and leads to a decrease in the availability of goods and services, causing an increase in their prices. Examples of adverse supply shocks include natural disasters, wars, and trade restrictions.
A decrease in government expenditures, on the other hand, is a deliberate policy decision to reduce government spending, which can have various impacts on the economy depending on the context and timing of the decision.
In some cases, it may lead to a reduction in aggregate demand, while in others, it may free up resources for private investment and stimulate economic growth.
Know more about "adverse supply shock".
https://brainly.com/question/28482236
#SPJ11
a court will grant a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of the moving party if the following three conditions are met: .
Answers
It is vital that any relief provided in a civil lawsuit be done so exclusively in light of the pleadings' requests.
Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure contains a provision for amending pleadings. The court will only permit revision, though, if it is necessary to resolve the dispute between the parties. This clause does not aim to subvert the law; rather, it advances objectives of justice.
A petition cannot be submitted before to the election for the returned candidate, but it may be submitted by any candidate who ran in the election, by any elector within 45 days of the election for the returned .
Learn more about pleadings.
https://brainly.com/question/28541460
#SPJ4
which type of breaching relies on brute force created by tactical team members
Answers
Use the minimum amount of force to achieve positive entry to an objective
Explain. The difference between low, medium, and high risk investment?
Answers
Riskier investments have the potential for bigger losses—but there's also the opportunity for larger gains. Low-risk investments, on the other hand, are seen as safer bets that typically pull smaller returns. Both types of investments can help bring you closer to your financial goals.
since the sherman act was passed, what has been the general trend in the u.s. regarding antitrust legislation
Answers
The trend in the U.S. regarding antitrust legislation has been one of increasing regulation and enforcement to protect competition and consumers, with recent attention on the tech industry.
Since the passage of the Sherman Act in 1890, the general trend in the U.S. regarding antitrust legislation has been one of increasing regulation and enforcement. The Sherman Act was followed by the Clayton Act in 1914, which further strengthened antitrust laws by prohibiting specific types of anticompetitive practices such as price discrimination and tying arrangements.
In the 20th century, antitrust enforcement became a key feature of U.S. economic policy. The 1930s saw the creation of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which was given the responsibility of enforcing antitrust laws. In the 1960s, Congress passed the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which required companies to notify the government of any large mergers or acquisitions.
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in antitrust enforcement as concerns have grown about the concentration of market power in the hands of a few large tech companies. In 2020, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against GG alleging antitrust violations, and there have been calls for increased antitrust scrutiny of other tech giants such as FB and Amz.
To learn more about antitrust legislation
https://brainly.com/question/25610822
#SPJ4
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
Answers
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
To constitute consideration, there must be
a. a bargained-for exchange.
b. serious thought underlying each party’s intent to contract.
c. a performance.
d. a payment.
Answers
A. In your opinion, did the justice and correctional system fail Paula Cooper (this should include from the time she was a child until her adulthood)? If yes, detail what should have been done to maybe have a different outcome in Miss Cooper's life. If no, (you do not think the systems failed her) detail what both systems did for Miss Cooper as she moved through them (child to adult). This should be a minimum of 10 sentences to get full credit.
B. What did you think about this case?
Answers
A. The justice and correctional system failed Paula Cooper in many ways. Paula Cooper had a difficult childhood, and she was already a victim of neglect and abuse before committing a heinous crime at the age of 15. She was sentenced to death, which was later commuted to 60 years in prison.
However, she should have received help and support to address the underlying causes of her behavior, such as mental health issues and childhood trauma. Instead, she was put in an adult prison where she faced violence, abuse, and poor living conditions.
The correctional system did not provide her with the necessary rehabilitation, education, and therapy to prepare her for re-entry into society. If the justice and correctional system had treated Paula Cooper's underlying issues instead of punishing her, there could have been a different outcome in her life. She could have had the chance to lead a productive life and avoid the mistakes of her past.
B. This case is a tragic example of how the justice system can fail individuals, particularly those who have experienced childhood trauma and mental health issues. It highlights the need for a more holistic approach to the criminal justice system, one that emphasizes rehabilitation and support instead of punishment.
It is important to recognize the root causes of criminal behavior and address them rather than simply punishing the offender. The case also underscores the racial and economic disparities that exist within the criminal justice system, where individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to be incarcerated and receive harsher sentences. Overall, this case should serve as a reminder of the flaws in the justice system and the need for reform.
To know more about heinous crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/2455972
#SPJ1
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answers
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
In recent cases involving advertising in space offered by the government, case outcomes favoring advertisers have often been determined by the nature of the ______.
speech involved
Answers
In recent cases involving advertising in space offered by the government, case outcomes favoring advertisers have often been determined by the nature of the speech involved.
The practice and techniques used to draw attention to a product or service are referred to as advertising. Advertising seeks to draw attention to a product or service by putting it in the spotlight. It is typically used to promote a specific product or service, but it has a wide range of applications, the most common being commercial advertising.
Through "branding," which associates a product name or image with certain qualities in the minds of consumers, commercial advertisements frequently seek to increase consumption of their products or services. Direct-response advertising, on the other hand, is intended to elicit an immediate sale. Political parties, interest groups, religious organizations, and government agencies are examples of non-commercial entities that advertise more than consumer goods or services.
Learn more about advertising to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ4
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs" Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount
Answers
The way a court will resolve this dispute is e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
What makes a binding contract?For a contract to be considered legally binding on the parties, it must comply with the elements of contracts, including:Offer and acceptanceConsiderationMutual intentionLegalityCapacity.What is consideration?
A consideration is a promise of some valuable thing offered by a promissor in exchange for something of value by a promisee.
The rules of consideration ensure that there is a mutual agreement between the promisor and the promisee about its value and also in the eyes of the law.
Thus, in this case, the court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
Learn more about vague considerations in contracts at https://brainly.com/question/17083291
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
Hanna accepts Mayra's offer but later, a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?
a) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
b) The court will determine that Hanna pays only the figures mentioned in the contract.
c) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
d) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract
what distinguishes a political crime from other types of crime
Answers
A political crime is distinguished from other types of crimes by its underlying motivation, which is typically linked to politics or the pursuit of political objectives.
Unlike ordinary crimes that are driven by personal gain, revenge, or other individual motives, political crimes are committed with the intention of achieving political goals or challenging the existing political order. Here are some key factors that distinguish political crimes from other types of crime:
1. Motivation: The primary distinguishing factor is the political motivation behind the crime. Political crimes are committed to advance political ideologies, disrupt the functioning of governments or institutions, express dissent against policies or regimes, or promote political agendas. The motivation is rooted in challenging or influencing the political landscape, rather than personal gain or criminal intent.
2. Targets: Political crimes often target political figures, government institutions, or symbols of authority. This can include acts of terrorism, assassinations, coups d'état, sabotage, espionage, or acts of civil disobedience. The targets are chosen based on their political significance and the desired impact on the political system or the public perception of it.
3. Impact: Political crimes often seek to create societal or political change, either through direct action or by influencing public opinion. The intended impact can be disrupting government operations, instigating public unrest, challenging the legitimacy of the ruling regime, or raising awareness about specific political issues. The aim is to generate political discourse, mobilize support, or challenge the existing power structures.
4. Legal and Moral Considerations: Political crimes may involve acts that are considered illegal under normal circumstances but may be seen as morally justifiable or necessary by the perpetrators due to their political objectives. This can create complex legal and ethical debates surrounding the legitimacy and consequences of these actions.
It's important to note that the classification of a crime as political can sometimes be subjective and vary depending on the perspective or context. Some acts that are considered political crimes by certain groups or governments may be seen as acts of resistance or activism by others. The distinction between political crimes and other types of crimes can be influenced by legal frameworks, social norms, and political ideologies prevalent in a particular society.
To learn more about political crime, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31196567
#SPJ11
Looking at misty rain and fog, explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to adjust your driving and lower your risk
Answers
Answer:
Turn on Fog lights and slow your speed
Explanation:
it helps to see, and harder to crash if you are going slower
Designating a different set of specific powers to both the house and the senate best illustrates which principle of government? responses.
Answers
The clearest example is when certain authorities are granted to the house and senate separately. The concept of government is shown by popular sovereignty.
What three sorts of sovereignty are there?The federal govt, state governments, and tribal governments are the three different forms of sovereign states in the US. The people—the individuals with the right to vote—are the source of a federal government's sovereign power. The federal government is the source of a state's sovereign authority.
What makes sovereignty so crucial?The manner in which freedom, equality, and justice are created and upheld in society depends on the precise definition of establishing national sovereignty. Therefore, the foundation of liberty, equality, and justice is national sovereignty. There are no constraints on freedom in our nation or culture.
To know more about sovereignty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7793449
#SPJ4
Laws to protect consumer privacy are quickly becoming the norm. California created the first of these laws in 2018. What is the name of this law?.
Answers
Answer: The California Consumer Privacy Act
What strategy to achieve women's rights do Roland and Deroine advocate? What strategy can be detected in Rose's remarks? In what ways are their perspectives similar to or different from one another?
Answers
Roland and Deroine advocated for women's rights through direct political action. Rose, on the other hand, advocated for women's rights through education and persuasion. The perspectives of Roland, Deroine, and Rose were similar in that they all believed that women should have the same rights as men.
They founded the Society for the Rights of Women in 1848, and they ran for office themselves. They were also active in the press, writing articles and pamphlets about the need for women's suffrage and other reforms.
Rose, on the other hand, advocated for women's rights through education and persuasion. She founded the Association for the Advancement of Women in 1851, and she gave lectures and wrote articles about the need for women's education and economic independence.
The perspectives of Roland, Deroine, and Rose were similar in that they all believed that women should have the same rights as men. However, they differed in their strategies for achieving this goal.
Roland and Deroine believed that women could achieve equality through direct political action, while Rose believed that women could achieve equality through education and persuasion.
In conclusion, Roland, Deroine, and Rose were all important figures in the early women's rights movement. They each had their own unique perspective on how to achieve equality for women, and their work helped to pave the way for future generations of feminists.
To know more about women's rights, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32581245#
#SPJ11
Agril has both an abeolute and comparative advantage in painting khes B. April has both an absolute and comparative acvantage in painting snowboavos. C. April has neeser an absolute nor comparative advantage in paintang kales D. April has neither an absolute nor a comparative acvartage in painting showboards Consider two individuals, Nigel and Mia, who produce hair pins and bandanas. Nigel's and Mia's hourfy productivity are shown in Table 3.3. Which of the following is true? A. Nigol has a comparative advantage in producing hair pins but not bandanas B. Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing bandanas but not hair pins. C. Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing both goods. D. Nhel does not have a comparative advantage in producing e.ther good.
Answers
The correct answer is A: Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing hairpins but not bandanas.
Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing hairpins but not bandanas.
To determine comparative advantage, we compare the hourly productivity of the two individuals. In this case, Nigel and Mia produce hairpins and bandanas. Without the specific data from Table 3.3, I'm unable to provide a detailed explanation.
However, based on the question's options, it is evident that Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing hairpins but not bandanas. This means that Nigel can produce hairpins more efficiently or with a lower opportunity cost compared to Mia. Therefore, option A, stating that Nigel has a comparative advantage in producing hairpins but not bandanas, is the correct choice.
Learn more about lower opportunity cost here:
brainly.com/question/27379559
#SPJ11
Que es el comunismo en tus propias palabras. AYUDAAAA plz ya casi lo entrego namas falta eso si no sacare 6 noo jajajja
Answers
Name at least 3 characteristics of black street gangs
Answers
Answer: violent, territorial, and predatory
Explanation: Black gangs have significantly evolved over the last 40 years, and trend analysis indicates that these gangs will continue to grow in both rural and urban areas. As gangs and gang membership increase, gangs will become more violent, territorial, and predatory in response to competition and rivalry.
what is the difference between legal remedies and equitable remedies for breach of contract?
Answers
The non-breaching party may obtain monetary damages through legal remedies. These kinds of damages are intended to make up for the harm that has been done to the plaintiff varies In the event of a breach of contract, one category of remedies is known as equitable remedies. Equitable remedies are measures that the court orders and which will help to end the violation or disagreement.
A legal remedy is a type of compensation given to a victim in order to uphold a specific right or right a wrong that has been done to them.When a Legal Remedy is insufficient or insufficient to fully recompense the aggrieved party, an Equitable Remedy is awarded to ensure fairness and justice.Damages, also referred to as a financial award, are a legal remedy.A non-monetary award known as a "equitable remedy" is one that is frequently given in the form of injunctions, specific performance, and other equitable remedies.To know more about legal remedy and Equitable Remedy, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14137496
#SPJ4
A group of citizens is concerned about the safety of their city park at night. Their city council has limited funds, and does not want to pay for
new safety initiatives.
Which scenario is an example of how persuasion could be used to resolve this situation?
The citizens work with other community members to build a fence around the park.
The city council votes to close the park at night without meeting with the concerned citizens.
The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime.
The city council agrees to consider installing a fence around the park if the citizens volunteer to form a community watch group.
Answers
The scenario is an example of The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime .
Option C is correct .
Concerned citizen :A person who is a member of a country and has rights because he was born or entitled to it, or lives in a particular city.
What does it mean to be a concerned citizen?Concerned Citizens are participating members of the political community. Citizenship is obtained by fulfilling national, state, or local legal requirements. A state grants its citizens certain rights and privileges. In return, concerned citizens are expected to obey the laws of their country and defend the country against enemies.
Importance of being a concerned citizen :Being a concerned citizen of a country has many legal advantages, such as voting rights, the right to hold public office, social security, health services, public education, permanent residency, and property rights, depending on the country. Around including land, or employment.
Learn more about concerned citizen :
brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1
A Texas “Under 21” ID or Driver's License cannot be used as proof of age.
Answers
Answer:
i think its false to be honest....sorry if incorrect
Check the "under 21 Until" date and as long as the date of birth shows the customer's age to be 21 years or older and the Driver's License is still valid, it is a valid ID to purchase alcohol.
Explanation:
sorry if this is wrong
but
Texas law does not state that a person over the age of 21 must provide proof of age for alcohol purchases. There is no specific form of ID considered “valid” under state law. You will not be charged with a crime if the minor misrepresents his / her age with an ID that is: Issued by a government agency.