the sum of twice a number and 17 is no greater than 41

Answer: The expression that represents the perimeter of the rectangle is given as

Perimeter= 4x +10

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter= 2l+2w =2( l+w)

Let the  width be  =x

And Length=x+5

So that the Perimeter =2l+2w becomes

Perimeter =2x +2(x+5)

Perimeter =2x+2x+10

Perimeter= 4x +10

The required values are :

a) E(X) = 4. b) Var(X) = 3.984. c) P(X

a) To find the expected value of X,

We use the formula E(X) = np,

Where n is the number of trials and p is the probability of success.

In this case,

n = 1000 and

p = 0.004,

So E(X) = 1000 x 0.004 = 4.

b) To find the variance of X,

We use the formula Var(X) = np(1-p).

Here, Var(X) = 1000 x 0.004 x (1-0.004) = 3.984.

c) To find P(X<5) exactly,

We can use the binomial probability formula:

P(X=k) = (\(^n C_k\)) \(p^{k}\)\((1-p)^{(n-k)}\).

We need to calculate the sum of P(X=k) for k=0 to k=4.

This can be done manually or using a calculator/program.

d) To find P(X<5) using a normal approximation with half-unit correction, We first need to check if the conditions for using the normal approximation are met.

The conditions are np ≥ 10 and n(1-p) ≥ 10.

In this case, np = 4 and n(1-p) = 996, so the conditions are met.

Next, we calculate the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution using the formulas

μ = np and σ = √(np(1-p)).

Here, μ = 4 and σ = √(3.984) = 1.996.

Since we need to find P(X<5), we can use the continuity correction and find P(X<5.5) instead.

This is because we are approximating a discrete distribution with a continuous one.

The continuity correction is the adjustment of 0.5 units to the lower and upper limits of the discrete distribution.

Finally, we standardize the value of 5.5 using z = (x-μ)/σ and find the probability using a standard normal table.

The result is P(Z < (5.5-4)/1.996) = P(Z < 0.75) = 0.7734.

To learn more about statistics visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30765535

#SPJ4

210 orders are possibe to pass across a bridge.

The number of orders in which 7 cars can cross a bridge that can only accommodate 4 cars at a time can be calculated using the permutation formula.

The formula for permutation is n!/(n-r)! where n is the total number of items and r is the number of items being selected at a time. In this case, n = 7 cars and r = 4 cars at a time.

Thus, the number of orders in which 7 cars can cross the bridge is 7!/(7-4)! = 7!/(3)! = 765 = 210. This means that there are 210 possible orders in which 7 cars can cross the bridge.

To know more about permutation formula click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29272987#

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Step-by-step explanation:

thats correct becauee yeah

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

sin(2x) = 2 ×cos(x)× sin(x)

● sin(x) = 2 × cos(x) × sin(x)

● 2 × cos(x) = 1

● cos (x) = 1/2

So we can deduce that:

● x = Pi/3 + 2*k*Pi

● or x = -Pi/3 + 2*k*Pi

K is an integer

The Solution of x:

x = π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

x = 2π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

In degrees:

x = 60° + 360°n, where n is an integer.

x = 120° + 360°n, where n is an integer.

To solve the equation sin(2x) = sin(x), we can use the properties of trigonometric functions.

First, let's simplify the equation using the double angle identity for sine:

sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x).

Now we can rewrite the equation as:

2sin(x)cos(x) = sin(x).

2cos(x) = 1.

Dividing both sides of the equation by cos(x), we get:

2 = 1/cos(x).

Now, we can find the value of cos(x) by taking the reciprocal of both sides:

cos(x) = 1/2.

From the unit circle or trigonometric values,

we know that cos(x) = 1/2 corresponds to angles of π/3 or 2π/3 (in radians) or 60° or 120° .

So, the solutions for x are:

x = π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

or

x = 2π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

In degrees:

x = 60° + 360°n, where n is an integer.

or

x = 120° + 360°n, where n is an integer.

Learn more about Trigonometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/13262593

#SPJ6

The probability that a poker hand from a well-shuffled deck is a flush is 0.00198.

The probability that Anne is bluffing, given that at least one player is bluffing is 1.95.

a) Probability that a poker hand from a well-shuffled deck is a flush:

Consider the following points for a poker hand from a well-shuffled deck is a flush:

There are 4 suits in a deck of cards.

There are 13 denominations in each suit.

When choosing a flush hand, any of the suits can be selected.

Therefore, the probability of choosing a suit is: P(Suit) = 4/4 = 1.

Therefore, the probability of selecting a suit is 1.The first card may be of any denomination. Therefore, the probability of selecting any denomination is 1.

Since all 5 cards must have the same suit, the second card must be of the same suit as the first card. Therefore, the probability of selecting the second card of the same suit is:

P(Same Suit) = 12/51

The third card must also be of the same suit as the first card and second card. Therefore, the probability of selecting the third card of the same suit is:

P(Same Suit) = 11/50

The fourth card must also be of the same suit as the first card, second card, and third card. Therefore, the probability of selecting the fourth card of the same suit is:

P(Same Suit) = 10/49

The fifth card must also be of the same suit as the first card, second card, third card, and fourth card. Therefore, the probability of selecting the fifth card of the same suit is:

P(Same Suit) = 9/48

Multiplying all probabilities together, we have:

P(Suit) × P(Same Suit) × P(Same Suit) × P(Same Suit) × P(Same Suit)= 1 × 12/51 × 11/50 × 10/49 × 9/48= 0.00198

Therefore, the probability that a poker hand from a well-shuffled deck is a flush is 0.00198.

Ans: 0.00198.

b) Probability that Anne is bluffing, given that at least one player is bluffing:

Consider the following points for the probability that Anne is bluffing, given that at least one player is bluffing:

Anne has a 20% chance of bluffing.

Barney has a 30% chance of bluffing.

The two players bluff independently.

P(Anne is bluffing) = 20/100 = 1/5P(Barney is bluffing) = 30/100 = 3/10

Let A be the event that Anne is bluffing and B be the event that Barney is bluffing.

Let C be the event that at least one player is bluffing.

P(C) = 1 - P(none is bluffing) = 1 - (1 - P(Anne is bluffing)) × (1 - P(Barney is bluffing))= 1 - (1 - 1/5) × (1 - 3/10)= 1 - (4/5) × (7/10)= 1 - 28/50= 22/50= 11/25

Now, P(A ∩ C) = P(A) × P(C|A)

Where P(C|A) is the probability that at least one player is bluffing given that Anne is bluffing.= (3/10 + 7/10 × 4/5) / (1 - 4/5)= (3/10 + 28/50) / (1/5)= (15/50 + 28/50) / (1/5)= 43/50 × 5= 215/50

Therefore, P(A|C) = P(A ∩ C) / P(C)= 215/50 × 25/11= 1.95

Therefore, the probability that Anne is bluffing, given that at least one player is bluffing is 1.95. Ans: 1.95.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31120123

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(x = 0.68\)

Step-by-step explanation:

We would like to find out the value of x using logarithms of the given equation .The equation is ,

\(\longrightarrow 25^x - 3(5^x)=0\\\)

Add \(3(5^x)\) on both sides,

\(\longrightarrow 25^x = 3(5^x) \)

Using log to the base 10 on both sides, we have;

\(\longrightarrow log_{10}(25^x) = log_{10}\{3(5^x)\}\)

Recall that \( log(ab ) = log\ a + log\ b \) .

\(\longrightarrow log_{10}(25^x)=log_{10}3 + log_{10}5^x \)

Recall the properties of logarithm as \( log\ a^b = b\ log\ a \) .

\(\longrightarrow xlog25 = log_{10}3 + xlog_{10}5 \)

Again we can rewrite it as ,

\(\longrightarrow xlog(5^2)=log_{10}3+xlog_{10}5\\ \)

\(\longrightarrow 2x\ log_{10}5 = log_{10}3+xlog_{10}5 \\ \)

\(\longrightarrow 2x\ log_{10}5-x\ log_{10}5 = log_{10}5 \)

Simplify,

\(\longrightarrow x\ log_{10}5=log_{10}3 \)

Divide both sides by log5 ,

\(\longrightarrow x =\dfrac{log_{10}3}{log_{10}5} \)

Put on the values of log 3 and log5 ,

\(\longrightarrow x =\dfrac{0.47}{0.69} \)

Simplify,

\(\longrightarrow \underline{{\underline{\boldsymbol{ x = 0.68}}}}\)

And we are done!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The width equals 2x+3

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a Rectangle = Length x Width

(2x² + 5x + 3) / (x + 1) = 2x + 3

(x + 1) × (2x + 3) = 2x² + 5x + 3

So the width is 2x + 3

Answer: -1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

y/-7=1/14 (cross multiply)

14y=7 (divide both sides)

y=-1/2

Answer:

I really dont know the answer but i guess it is 80 or something

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the line plot, the total weight gained by the dogs that gained ¹/₈ of a pound or ³/₄ of a pound is C. 5 pounds.

A line plot is a graph that uses check marks above a number line, to show the frequency of each value.

In this line plot, the addition of the weights gained by dogs that gained ¹/₈ of a pound or ³/₄ of a pound shows the total.

The quantity of weight in pounds gained by the dogs that gained ¹/₈ of a pound = 1

The quantity of weight in pounds gained by the dogs that gained ¹/₄ of a pound = 2

The quantity of weight in pounds gained by the dogs that gained ³/₈ of a pound = 2

The quantity of weight in pounds gained by the dogs that gained ¹/₂ of a pound = 3

The quantity of weight in pounds gained by the dogs that gained ³/₄ of a pound = 4

Thus, based on the line plot, the total weight gained by the dogs that gained ¹/₈ of a pound or ³/₄ of a pound = 5 (1 + 4)

Learn more about line plots at https://brainly.com/question/30143735.

#SPJ1

Answer:

thx:)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

oof

Step-by-step explanation:

Total tickets of a basketball game sold to students are 332 and total tickets sold to adults are 456.

Total number of sold tickets for a basketball game = 788

Total receipts for game = $1,400

Price of game tickets for an adults = $2.50/ticket

Price of game tickets for student = $1.25/ ticket

let us assume that total tickets sold to adults be "x".

Out of 788 , total tickets sold to students = 788 - x

Total money paid by adults = $2.50x

Total money paid by students = $1.25(778 - x)

Total money paid by adults and students will be equal to ($2.50x + $1.25(788 - x) ).

Total receipts for game is $1,400, so

$2.50x + $1.25(788 - x) = $1,400

which is a linear equation of one variable.

Now, we have to solve this equation

2.50x + 1.25×788 - 1.25x = 1,400

=> 1.25x + 985 = 1400

=> 1.25x = 1400 - 985 = 415

=> x = 415/1.25 = 332

So, total tickets sold to adults are 332 . Then,

total tickets sold to students = 788 - 332 = 456.

To learn more about linear equation , refer:

https://brainly.com/question/28555579

#SPJ4

Answer: The expression that represents the amount of money John has collected is:

5 * m

This expression calculates the amount of money John collects by multiplying the number of members (m) by the amount of money collected per member ($5).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  3)  25

  4)  32

Step-by-step explanation:

In each of the pairs of similar figures, you want to solve for the variable.

Sometimes, the problem statement gives you more information than you need. Here, the smaller triangle can be ignored. It has no marking corresponding to x, and the larger triangle has all the information needed.

The Pythagorean theorem can be used to find the length of the hypotenuse, given the lengths of the other two sides in the right triangle.

  c² = a² +b²

  x² = 15² +20² = 225 +400 = 625

  x = √625 = 25

The value of x is 25.

The similarity statement ABCD ~ EFGH means we can write the proportion ...

  HE/DA = EF/AB . . . . . . . . corresponding sides are proportional

  x/28 = 16/14 . . . . . . . . . use the given measures

  x = 28(16/14) = 32 . . . . multiply by 28

The value of x is 32.

__

Additional comment

If you recognize the ratios of the sides of the right triangles are 15:20 = 3:4, then you can make use of your knowledge of the 3-4-5 right triangle to write the proportion ...

  3 : 4 : 5 = 15 : 20 : 25 = 15 : 20 : x   ⇒   x=25

Answer:

30%

Step-by-step explanation:

Selma spent 3/10 of her allowance on a new backpack.

Hence, the percent of her allowance that she spent is calculated as:

Fraction of allowance spent on Backpack × 100

= 3/10 × 100

= 0.3/1 × 100

= 30%

Therefore, Selma spent 30% of her allowance on a new backpack.

We can use polar coordinates to perform this integration:
x = r*cos(θ)
y = r*sin(θ)
x^2 + y^2 = r^2
First, we integrate with respect to r:
∫[r^2 * ln(r^2) / 2 - r^2 / 4] from 1 to 10

Now, we evaluate the integral:
[(10^2 * ln(10^2) / 2 - 10^2 / 4) - (1^2 * ln(1^2) / 2 - 1^2 / 4)] = 50 * ln(100) - 25

Now, we integrate with respect to θ:
∫(50 * ln(100) - 25) dθ from 0 to 2π

Since this is a constant, the integral becomes:
(50 * ln(100) - 25) * (2π - 0) = 100π * ln(10) - 50π

Thus, the final answer is: 100π * ln(10) - 50π.

To solve this problem, we need to integrate f(x,y) = In(x2 + v2 / x2 + y2) over the given region, which is the set of all points (x,y) such that 1 < x2 + y2 < 100.

We can rewrite the integrand as In[(x2 + v2) / (x2 + y2)] = In(x2 + v2) - In(x2 + y2).

Using polar coordinates, we have x2 + y2 = r2 and the region is described by 1 < r < 10. Thus, the integral becomes:

∫∫(1 < r < 10) [In(x2 + v2) - In(x2 + y2)] r dr dθ

Integrating with respect to θ gives a factor of 2π, so we have:

2π ∫(1 < r < 10) [In(x2 + v2) - In(x2 + y2)] r dr

= 2π [∫(1 < r < 10) In(x2 + v2) r dr - ∫(1 < r < 10) In(x2 + y2) r dr]

To evaluate these integrals, we can use the substitution u = x2 + v2 (for the first integral) and u = x2 + y2 (for the second integral). Then, we have:

∫(1 < r < 10) In(x2 + v2) r dr = ∫(1 < u < 100+v2) In(u) du / 2v

∫(1 < r < 10) In(x2 + y2) r dr = ∫(1 < u < 100) In(u) du / 2

Plugging these into our expression for the integral and simplifying, we get:

2π [(In(100+v2) - In(2v)) / 2v - In(10) / 2]

= π In[(100+v2) / (40v2)]

Therefore, the answer is D. 2rt In 10.

Learn more about Coordinates:

brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

Answer:

1/50

Step-by-step explanation:

40:2000 can be simplied by dividing both numbers by 40

To determine whether a critical point is a local minimum, maximum, or saddle point, one can find the Hessian matrix of the function at that point and analyze its eigenvalues.

To determine the critical point of a function, one needs to find the values of its independent variables that make the gradient zero. The Hessian matrix is the matrix of second-order partial derivatives of a function, and it can help determine the nature of a critical point.

Given a function, if the Hessian matrix evaluated at a critical point has all positive eigenvalues, then the function has a local minimum at that point. If the Hessian matrix has all negative eigenvalues, the function has a local maximum at that point. If the Hessian matrix has a mix of positive and negative eigenvalues, then the point is a saddle point. If the Hessian matrix has some zero eigenvalues, then the test is inconclusive and higher-order derivatives must be examined.

It is possible to find the Hessian matrix for any given function and evaluate it at a critical point to determine its nature. By analyzing the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix, one can identify whether the critical point is a local minimum, maximum, or saddle point.

To learn more about Hessian matrix

https://brainly.com/question/31850779

#SPJ4

Complete question:

At which critical point does the function have a Hessian matrix, and what is the value of the matrix at this point? What type of critical point is this?

Answer:

7 songs

Step-by-step explanation:

75% of 16 is 12

16 + 12 = 28

75% of 28 is 21

28 - 21 = 7

Answer:

7 songs

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It can be simplified to: -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-4

Step-by-step explanation:

combine like terms 8n-8n-6+2

8n-8n=0 so

-6+2=-4

Answer:

b, c, and d are solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 2 < 2 - 2x

5x - 2 < 2

5x < 4

x < 4/5

b) 1/2 < 4/5  true

c) -3 < 4/5  true

d) 2/3 < 4/5  true

if im right its 32 / n = -4

if your meant to solve it its -8

The balance in the fund at the end of 23 years, with monthly deposits of $1,150 and a 3.25% annual interest rate, is approximately $449,069.51. The amount of interest earned over the period is approximately $420,630.49.

a. The balance in the fund at the end of the 23-year period, considering a monthly deposit of $1,150 and an annual interest rate of 3.25% compounded annually, is approximately $449,069.51.

To calculate the balance, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where A is the accumulated balance, P is the monthly deposit, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, we have monthly deposits, so we need to convert the annual interest rate to a monthly rate:

Monthly interest rate = (1 + 0.0325)^(1/12) - 1 = 0.002683

Using this monthly interest rate, we can calculate the accumulated balance over the 23-year period:

A = 1150 * [(1 + 0.002683)^(12*23) - 1] / 0.002683 = $449,069.51

Therefore, the balance in the fund at the end of the 23-year period is approximately $449,069.51.

b. The amount of interest earned over the 23-year period can be calculated by subtracting the total deposits from the accumulated balance:

Interest earned = (Monthly deposit * Number of months * Number of years) - Accumulated balance

Interest earned = (1150 * 12 * 23) - 449069.51 = $420,630.49

Therefore, the amount of interest earned over the 23-year period is approximately $420,630.49.

To learn more about annual interest rate click here: brainly.com/question/20631001

#SPJ11

We are 99% confident that the true average stance duration among elderly individuals lies within the range of 744.56 ms to 857.44 ms.

To test whether the true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals, we can perform a one-tailed independent samples t-test. The null hypothesis (H0)

Using the t-test, we compare the means and standard deviations of the two samples and calculate the test statistic

a) To calculate a 99% confidence interval for the true average stance duration among elderly individuals, we can use the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and the t-distribution.

Given:

Older adults: n = 28, sample mean = 801, sample standard deviation = 117

Using the formula for a confidence interval for the mean, we have:

Margin of error = t * (sample standard deviation / √n)

Since the sample size is relatively large (n > 30), we can use the z-score instead of the t-score for a 99% confidence interval. The critical z-value for a 99% confidence level is approximately 2.576.

Calculating the margin of error:

Margin of error = 2.576 * (117 / √28) ≈ 56.44

The confidence interval is then calculated as:

Confidence interval = (sample mean - margin of error, sample mean + margin of error)

Confidence interval = (801 - 56.44, 801 + 56.44) ≈ (744.56, 857.44)

b) To test whether the true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals, we can perform a one-tailed independent samples t-test.

The null hypothesis (H0): The true average stance duration among elderly individuals is equal to or less than the true average stance duration among younger individuals.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha): The true average stance duration among elderly individuals is larger than the true average stance duration among younger individuals.

. With the given data, perform the t-test and obtain the p-value.

c) To construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means between older and younger adults, we can use the formula for the confidence interval of the difference in means.

Given:

Older adults: n1 = 28, sample mean1 = 801, sample standard deviation1 = 117

Younger adults: n2 = 16, sample mean2 = 780, sample standard deviation2 = 72

Calculating the standard error of the difference in means:

Standard error = √((s1^2 / n1) + (s2^2 / n2))

Standard error = √((117^2 / 28) + (72^2 / 16)) ≈ 33.89

Using the t-distribution and a 95% confidence level, the critical t-value (with degrees of freedom = n1 + n2 - 2) is approximately 2.048.

Calculating the margin of error:

Margin of error = t * standard error

Margin of error = 2.048 * 33.89 ≈ 69.29

The confidence interval is then calculated as:

Confidence interval = (mean1 - mean2 - margin of error, mean1 - mean2 + margin of error)

Confidence interval = (801 - 780 - 69.29, 801 - 780 + 69.29) ≈ (-48.29, 38.29)

Comparison with part (b): In part (b), we performed a one-tailed test to determine if the true average stance duration among elderly individuals is larger than among younger individuals. In part (c), the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means (-48.29, 38.29) includes zero. This suggests that we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the true average stance duration is significantly larger among elderly individuals compared to younger individuals at the 95% confidence level.

Know more about 99% confident here:

https://brainly.com/question/30762304

#SPJ11

Answer:

  c:  8,20,25

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know which set of side lengths can form a triangle from the sets ...

A set of lengths can form a triangle if and only if the sum of the shorter two exceeds the longest.

In sets a, b, d, the sum of the shorter two is equal to the longest. These lengths will form a line segment, not a triangle.

A triangle can be formed by ...

  c: 8,20,25 . . . . . . 8+20=28 > 25

<95141404393>

The pseudo-order rate constant, or apparent rate constant, in equation (3) refers to a rate constant that appears in a pseudo-order rate law. It is called "pseudo" because it does not represent the true reaction order but is an effective rate constant obtained under specific conditions.

In the rate law for the reaction cC + dD → products, the rate is expressed as rate = k(C)^α(D)^β, where α and β are the unknown reaction orders.

a) The rate law for this reaction will be a pseudo β-order law in (D) when the concentration of D remains much larger than the concentration of C throughout the reaction. In other words, if the concentration of D is in excess compared to C, then the rate becomes solely dependent on the concentration of C, resulting in a pseudo β-order rate law.

b) To determine the value of β using the method of isolation, a series of experiments can be conducted.

If β is equal to 1, the reaction rate would be directly proportional to the concentration of D. By varying the concentration of D while keeping the concentration of C constant, multiple experiments can be performed, and the corresponding rates can be measured. Plotting the rate versus the concentration of D on a graph would yield a straight line with a slope of β, indicating that β is equal to 1.

If β is equal to 2, the reaction rate would be proportional to the square of the concentration of D. Similar to the previous case, different experiments can be carried out by changing the concentration of D while keeping C constant. The obtained rates can be plotted against the square of the concentration of D. If the resulting graph shows a straight line with a slope of β, it indicates that β is equal to 2.

Analyzing the experimental data and observing the relationship between the rate and the concentration of D in each case allows the determination of the value of β in the rate law.

To know more about the method of isolation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/5082157#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer would be two and four

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

II and IV

Step-by-step explanation:

H and S only would appear the same after 180° rotation.