Answers
Option third is correct. The primary goal of the guardian ad litem is to act in the best interests of the child.
About guardian ad litem
A guardian ad litem is a person who a court appoints to look after a person while a case is being heard. To determine what options would be in the "best interests of a child," the court appoints a "guardian ad litem" (GAL). In this instance, a GAL in the divorce or parental responsibilities and rights case is being discussed. The GAL will investigate the family circumstances and provide the court advice on issues such as where the kids should spend the most of their time. if a parent's substance misuse is harming the youngster. what kind of interaction a child ought to have with the parent.
To know more about guardian ad litem:
brainly.com/question/8111317
#SPJ4
Related Questions
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answers
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are commonly known as "local content laws" or "local ownership requirements."
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
On review of an agency’s interpretation of the law, a court is
likely to defer to the agency’s view under Chevron, unless
it is arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the
statute.
Answers
Courts should respect reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous provisions of congressional acts under Chevron, unless those interpretations are clearly unreasonable, capricious, or arbitrary.
In certain situations, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should respect an agency's interpretation of a statute unless they find it to be "arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute." Skidmore deference allows a federal court to choose the appropriate level of deference for each case based on the agency's capacity to support its interpretation, as opposed to Chevron deference, which mandates that a federal court defer to an agency's interpretation of an ambiguous statute if the interpretation is thought to be reasonable.
Read more about agency’s interpretation at
https://brainly.com/question/29972706
#SPJ4
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system? Explain.
Answers
The criminal justice system's goals are to defend society, deal with offenders, and rehabilitate criminals.
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system?It accomplishes this by having the culprit be arrested and put on trial for their crimes. If found guilty, they face jail time or additional penalties including fines or community service.
Police-based services offer crucial support to crime victims, such as on-site crisis intervention and arranging for emergency medical care. A victim's short- and long-term rebuilding may also benefit from the information and referrals provided by law enforcement programs to services and resources.
Learn more about criminal justice system here
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answers
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to take legal action and protect yourself.
Answers
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
Dirty headlight lenses are safe and do not cut the amount of light your headlight emit by as much as 90
Answers
Answer:
What type of headlight lens can cut the amount of light it emits by 90 percent? Low beam Keep headlights clean Dirt on the lenses can reduce the light by percent?
Explanation:
The plastic lenses that commonly cover headlight bulbs become cloudy and hazy over time, reducing the amount of light illuminating the road.
1. Review at least one major law enacted by the federal
government in relation to health. Asses what promoted this
legislation. How might it impact the health of older adults?
Answers
Answer:
One major law enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The ACA was passed in 2010 with the aim of improving access to healthcare, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the quality of care for all Americans.
Several factors promoted the legislation of the ACA. One key factor was the high number of uninsured individuals in the United States, which left many people without access to necessary medical services. The rising costs of healthcare and the challenges faced by individuals with pre-existing conditions in obtaining affordable coverage were also driving forces behind the ACA.
The ACA has various provisions that directly impact the health of older adults. It provides new protections for older Americans by prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on age. The law also expands Medicaid, which benefits low-income older adults who may have previously struggled to afford healthcare.
Furthermore, the ACA introduced measures to enhance preventive care for older adults, such as free screenings and vaccinations. It established the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit, allowing seniors to receive preventive services and personalized prevention plans at no additional cost. The ACA also implemented changes to Medicare's prescription drug coverage, aiming to reduce out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications.
Overall, the ACA has had a significant impact on the health of older adults by expanding access to affordable healthcare, improving preventive services, and addressing some of the financial burdens associated with aging and healthcare costs. However, it remains a complex and debated law, and its implementation and effects continue to be evaluated and discussed.
Explanation:
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010. The ACA was designed to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage for Americans, including older adults.
What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Before the ACA, many older adults were unable to afford health insurance due to their age and pre-existing conditions, which made it difficult to access necessary medical care.
The ACA addressed this issue by prohibiting insurers from charging older adults more for coverage based on their age, and by expanding access to Medicaid for low-income individuals and families.
As a result, older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
Additionally, the ACA also established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is responsible for testing new payment and service delivery models that aim to improve the quality of care for older adults while reducing healthcare costs.
Read more about ACA at https://brainly.com/question/29793469
#SPJ11
How did the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influence his ruling in the mcculloch case?.
Answers
Answer: Federalists like strong central government. This ruling strengthened the central government.He wanted more power in the federal government.
Explanation:
Under the common law, from the 1500s until today, the law has allowed past property owners to place limitations on the uses of real property in the future through the use of covenants (promises) as set forth in real property deeds as well as use of the fee defeasible estates (i.e. "To John Doe, so long as the property is used as a tobacco farm") and the evolution of zoning statutes and practice. Thomas Jefferson argued vehemently that no past owner of real property (dead or alive) should be allowed to restrict a future owner of real property concerning its present use; however, the Virginia State Legislature disagreed with him and land use limitation continues today. Jefferson described this practice as "Allowing the dead to control the lands of the living."Was Jefferson right, or should we maintain the practice of allowing past property owners to place land use limitations in deeds of lands sold or gifted? Further, should the government be allowed to determine how a private property owner uses his/her respective land?
Answers
Answer:
v
Explanation:
h
High Energy Ltd (Energy) is a listed company with interests in the oil and gas sector in Australia and the USA.It is headquartered in Brisbane. Energy has a board of five directors, consisting of three executive directors and two independent, non-executive directors. The executive directors are also shareholders in Energy. They own 20% of Energy's shares each, as does Whitesand Inc,a US investment fund. The remaining shares are owned by members of the public, including Corporate Citizens against Climate Change (CCCC),which has a 1% shareholding.CCCC is a company limited by guarantee that campaigns on business social responsibility issues It uses small shareholdings in Australian companies to push them to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. CCcC has targeted Energy because of its significant investments in the US fracking industry, which produce high levels of greenhouse gas, and because cccc understands that Whitesand also supports a 'net-o' agenda CccC wishes to bring three resolutions to a general meeting of Energy: 1) that Energy consider divesting itself of 40% of its interests in the US fracking business by 2040; 2) that Energy's constitution be changed to prohibit the company from investing in any new fracking businesses;and 3 that Energy's board be required to produce a report each year on its progress towards a 'net-0' emissions goal. CccC proposes to hold the meeting via LetsTalkNow, an opensource virtual meeting technology, which is not very well known in Australia but (according to cccc's IT officer) popular in the Us and available for download free-of-charge.She says it is both more secure and reliable than commercial products like Zoom. Cccc would also like the meeting to be held at US (Californian) time to allow Whitesands' corporate representative to be part of the discussion. Advise Energy on whether Cccc has the power to ensure that Energy's members meet to consider these resolutions in this way
Answers
CCCC does not have the power to ensure that Energy's members meet to consider the proposed resolutions in the way they have suggested.
As a shareholder with a 1% shareholding, CCCC has the right to bring resolutions to a general meeting of Energy. However, they do not have the power to dictate the format or timing of the meeting. It is up to Energy's board to decide on the details of the meeting, including the technology used, the timing, and the location.
Furthermore, Energy's board has a duty to act in the best interests of the company and all of its shareholders, not just those proposed by CCCC. The board may consider the proposed resolutions and decide whether or not to recommend them to the shareholders, but ultimately it is up to the shareholders to vote on them.
If CCCC is not satisfied with the board's response, they may consider other options, such as launching a public campaign or seeking legal action. However, they cannot force Energy's members to meet in a specific way or to consider their proposed resolutions.
Learn more about shareholding
brainly.com/question/33096799
#SPJ11
This is the element that requires that no laws or statutes be violated, for example, if a construction contractor is not licensed in Oregon then they would be in violation of a State statute?
Select one:
a. agreement
b. capacity
c. legality
d. consideration
Answers
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
identify a constitutional amendment or clause that was used to justify the decisionsin both powellv. alabama(1932) and gideon v. wainwright(1963)
Answers
The constitutional amendment that was used to justify the decisions in both Powell v. Alabama (1932) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) is the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The Sixth Amendment states: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense."
In Powell v. Alabama, the Supreme Court ruled that the denial of legal representation for indigent defendants in a capital case violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment. The case highlighted the importance of providing legal counsel to ensure a fair trial and protect the accused's right to effective assistance of counsel.
Gideon v. Wainwright further expanded on the right to counsel established in Powell v. Alabama. In this landmark case, the Supreme Court held that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to provide legal counsel to defendants who are unable to afford an attorney in all criminal cases, not just capital cases. The court ruled that the right to counsel is fundamental and essential to a fair trial, applying it to state criminal proceedings through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
These cases underscore the significance of the Sixth Amendment in guaranteeing the right to counsel for individuals accused of crimes. The amendment ensures that defendants have access to legal representation to effectively confront the charges against them, participate in their defense, and safeguard their constitutional rights during the criminal justice process.
Learn more about United States here
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
Bento Cuisine is a lunch-cart business. It occupies a street corner in Texarkana, a city that straddles the border of Arkansas and Texas. Across the street—and across the state line, which runs down the middle of the street—is Rico’s Tacos. The two businesses compete for customers. Recently, Bento has begun to suspect that Rico’s is engaging in competitive behavior that is illegal. Bento’s manager overheard several of Rico’s employees discussing these competitive tactics while on a break at a nearby Starbucks. Bento files a lawsuit against Rico’s in a federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (See Basic Judicial Requirements and Following a State Court Case.)
1) Determine whether Rico’s could file a motion claiming that the federal court lacks jurisdiction over this dispute. Why and why not? Explain.
2) Assume that the case goes to trial. Bento believes that it has both the law and the facts on its side. Nevertheless, at the end of the trial, the jury decides against Bento, and the judge issues a ruling in favor of Rico’s. If Bento is unwilling to accept this result, what are its options? Explain
Answers
Answer:
PLease make this the branliest answer!!! Hope this helps, I had the same Homework!
Explanation:
1. Rico's could file a motion claiming that a federal court lacked jurisdiction to hear the dispute, but the motion would likely be denied. Because there appears to be diversity of citizenship in the situation set out here, if the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount, a suit can be filed in a federal district court.
2. Bento's first option might be to file a motion to set aside the verdict and hold a new trial. This motion will be granted if the judge is convinced, after examining the evidence, that the jury was in error (assuming the trial involved a jury) but does not think it appropriate to issue a judgment for Bento's side. Bento's second option would be to appeal the trial court's judgment, including a denial of the motion for a new trial, to the appropriate court of appeals. An appellate court is most likely to review the case for errors in law, not fact. In any case, the appellate court will not hear new evidence.
State if you believe a developing country could achieve any
advantages and disadvantages of being a tax haven.
READ THE QUESTION CAREFULLY AND PROVIDE ADVANTAGES AND
DISADVANTAGES. PROVIDE SOURCES
Answers
Developing countries have the potential to achieve certain advantages and disadvantages by positioning themselves as tax havens.
However, it's important to note that the advantages and disadvantages can vary depending on the specific circumstances and policies of each country. Here are some general advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages of being a tax haven for a developing country:
Attracting foreign investment: By offering low or zero tax rates, developing countries can attract foreign businesses and investors, stimulating economic growth and job creation.
Generating revenue: Although tax rates are low, tax havens can generate significant revenue by attracting a large volume of international transactions, financial activities, and investments.
Economic diversification: Becoming a tax haven can provide an opportunity for developing countries to diversify their economies beyond traditional industries, such as agriculture or manufacturing, by focusing on financial services and international business.
Disadvantages of being a tax haven for a developing country:
Risk of capital flight: Developing countries that rely heavily on tax haven status may experience capital flight if tax regulations change or global sentiment shifts, leading to potential economic instability.
Negative impact on domestic tax revenue: Low tax rates for multinational corporations and wealthy individuals can reduce domestic tax revenue, hindering the government's ability to fund essential public services and infrastructure.
Reputation and transparency issues: Being labeled as a tax haven can damage a country's reputation and create concerns about transparency and financial integrity, which may discourage foreign investment or lead to increased scrutiny from international regulatory bodies.
It's important to note that the advantages and disadvantages of being a tax haven can vary depending on factors such as the country's overall economic stability, regulatory frameworks, and the balance between attracting international investment and maintaining domestic tax revenue.
Learn more about public services
https://brainly.com/question/14452199
#SPJ11
Why did Congress have so much trouble passing laws under the terms of
the Articles of Confederation?
Answers
how can you impact public policy?
Answers
Answer:
Public policy is best described as the broad area of government laws, regulations, court decisions, and local ordinances.
Explanation:
Many citizens and groups try to influence public policy through the political process by supporting candidates and political parties. That's a good way to make a positive impact, but not the best way. Politicians and political parties come and go.
_can be used to assess_
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
Explain the four key elements of the conflict perspective. Describe how radical criminology differs from more conservative conflict theories. Discuss the policy directions that modern radical criminologists envision and explain how they differ from the policies earlier radical criminologists advocated.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Conflict Perspective has approach of viewing society as a constantly changing entity, due to competition for scarce resources.
Four key elements are :
Competition Revolution, Structural Inequality Conflict / War1. Explain the interaction view of lawmaking and provide an example.
2. Which view of lawmaking do you agree with? Or which view of lawmaking do you not agree with? (interaction view, consensus view, conflict view)
Answers
Answer:
1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .
Why is DNA fingerprinting used in forensics?
A. to identify the place of crime
B. to identify the evidence
C. to identify the modus operandi
D. to identify the culprit
Answers
what form of municipal government closely matches the structure of state and national government with a distinct executive and legislative branch
A. municipal
B. dictatorship
C. mayor-council
D. township
Answers
The form of municipal government that closely matches the structure of state and national government with a distinct executive and legislative branch is the mayor-council form of government.
In this form of government, the mayor serves as the chief executive of the municipality and is responsible for the administration of the government. The mayor is elected by the people and has the power to veto ordinances passed by the legislative branch, which is the city council.The city council, on the other hand, is responsible for creating and passing ordinances that govern the municipality. The council is made up of elected officials who serve as representatives of their respective districts within the city. The council also has the power to override a mayor's veto with a supermajority vote.This structure closely resembles the state and national government structure, where the governor or president serves as the chief executive, and the legislative branch is made up of elected officials who create and pass laws.In contrast, a township form of government is typically found in rural areas and often has a smaller population than a city. A dictatorship, on the other hand, is a form of government where power is concentrated in the hands of a single individual or group, which is not consistent with the democratic principles of a mayor-council form of government.
To know more about government visit:
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
Answer:
mayor-council
Explanation:
please explain it HELP HELP HELP
Answers
A criminal code is a written compilation of the majority of the criminal laws in a certain jurisdiction. A criminal code will include the offences that are legal in the jurisdiction, potential punishments, and certain general regulations.
What is penal code, NAPOLCOM and PNP?
The National Police Commission is the body tasked with overseeing and managing the Philippine National Police in accordance with the 1987 Constitution and the Major Police Reform Laws, Republic Act Nos. 6975 and 8551. The Indian Criminal Code is broken into 511 sections spread across 23 chapters.
The Indian Criminal Code's main goals are to define good and wrong as well as the consequences of doing something illegal. The "intention" of committing the crime is a critical factor in criminal law for determining the offense's potential punishment. The Philippine National Police is administered and controlled by the National Police Commission, often known as NAPOLCOM, an affiliated agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government.
Learn more about penal code:
https://brainly.com/question/10282902
#SPJ1
Which five amendments do you consider to be of greatest importance? Write a reason for each one.
Answers
Answer 1,2,8,13 15
Explanation: 1st amendment gives people the rights to religion of their choice, it also gives people the right to speak up for what they believe
2nd amendment allows people to keep and bear arms for one to protect themselves and other around them
8th amendment makes sure people do not get a cruel punishment for something minor
13th amendment allowed slaves to be free, giving them a chance into their own lives
15th amendment makes sure you cannot deny someone the right to vote based on gender or color
Which is true about Plato’s Five Regimes of human government?
referendum
court order
repossession
executive order
Answers
Answer:
Jesus loves you
Sometimes, economic goals conflict with one another. Therefore, all nations must their economic goals. And each choice comes with some kind of _____.
Answers
Answer:
loss
Explanation:
The economic goals are the objectives of any nation which it desires to achieve. The economic goals of any nations includes full employment, efficiency, security, equity, stability, economic freedom and economic growth.
The economic goal are sometimes incompatible with each other. The cost of fulfilling the one set goals is having less resources to address the other sets of goals.
The economic goals conflict with one another. Every goal cannot be achieve at the same time. The choice of one goal comes with the loss of another goal.
Identify some ways in which, over the long run, workers adjust after a minimum wage law is enacted.
Answers
a. Some young people decide to work instead of attending school full-time and d. Some retired workers re-entering the labor force are correct.
In accordance with Indian labor legislation, the Minimum Wages Act of 1948 establishes the minimum wages that need to be provided to both skilled and unskilled laborers. a law establishing minimum wage rates for particular occupations.
The minimum wage, which will be $7.25 per hour in 2022, was created by the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal legislation. The federal minimum wage is evaluated by the government on a regular basis.
The minimal amount of compensation that an employer is obliged to pay wage earners for the job completed during a certain period that cannot be decreased by a union contract or an individual contract is known as a minimum wage.
Learn more about the minimum wage act here:
https://brainly.com/question/28441408
#SPJ4
Complete question;
Identify some ways in which, over the long run, workers adjust after a minimum wage law is enacted.
a. Some young people decide to work instead of attending school full-time.
b. Workers leave the labor force due to too-low wages.
c. Workers at the bottom of the pay scale move up to better-paying jobs.
d. Some retired workers re-enter the labor force.
the manipulation of legislative district boundaries is called
Answers
The manipulation of legislative district boundaries is called: gerrymandering.
1. Gerrymandering is a practice that involves manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts, often to favor a particular political party or group.
2. This manipulation can be done in different ways, such as "packing" and "cracking." Packing refers to concentrating the opposing party's voters in a few districts, while cracking involves spreading them out across several districts to dilute their voting power.
3. The term "gerrymandering" was first used in 1812, named after Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry, who approved a controversial redistricting plan that benefited his party.
4. Gerrymandering can have significant effects on the representation of citizens in the legislative process. It may lead to underrepresentation of minority groups and a lack of competitive elections, which can weaken democratic accountability.
5. In recent years, there have been various efforts to address gerrymandering, including the use of independent commissions, court interventions, and the development of mathematical algorithms to create fairer district boundaries.
In conclusion, gerrymandering is the manipulation of legislative district boundaries to favor a specific political party or group. This practice can negatively impact the democratic process and representation, but efforts are being made to address and prevent it.
To know more about gerrymandering, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31295198#
#SPJ11
Facts: Officers wanted to search Dollree Mapp's house, but she said no because they did not have a warrant. They were looking for a suspected bomber. Eventually, the police forced their way in. They did not find a bomber, but they did find a trunk of obscene pictures in the basement. Ms. Mapp was arrested and convicted for possession of obscenity. She appealed.
Question for the court: Can you be convicted on the basis of illegally obtained evidence? Decision: No. The court held that evidence seized without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions both in Federal and now State courts. This is called the Exclusionary Rule. Issue: Can the Exclusionary Rule cause a criminal to go free? Explain below in 2-4 sentences.
Answers
Answer:
they didn't have a warrant so they shouldn't have forced there way in. Also they cannot be arrested
Explanation:
hoped this helped sry if wrong lol