Answers
The prima facie case of a crime is said to exist if probable cause exists to show that there has been a violation of all the elements of a specific criminal statute.
A prima facie case is the minimum amount of evidence necessary to establish the possibility of a crime, and it allows for further legal proceedings. Probable cause refers to the existence of reasonable grounds, based on the facts and circumstances, for believing that a person has committed a crime.
To establish a prima facie case, the prosecution must present evidence that demonstrates each element of the offense as defined by the criminal statute. For example, in a theft case, the elements may include the unlawful taking of property and the intent to deprive the owner of that property permanently. If the prosecution can provide evidence to support each element, a prima facie case is established, and the matter can proceed to trial.
It is crucial to note that a prima facie case does not guarantee a conviction. The burden of proof remains on the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt during the trial. The defendant has the right to challenge the evidence, present their own evidence, and argue their innocence. The establishment of a prima facie case is simply a preliminary step in the criminal justice process, allowing the legal system to ensure that cases brought before the courts have a reasonable basis for further examination.
Learn more about prima facie case here: https://brainly.com/question/29585251
#SPJ11
Related Questions
11. List five powers granted expressly to the president by
the Constitution.
Answers
Answer: The Constitution assigns the president the power to sign or veto bills, direct the armed forces as Commander and Chief, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene sessions Congress, grant pardons for crimes, and receive ambassadors.
Answer:
Veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their cabinet, convene or adjourn congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors
Explanation:
Brown v. Board, Main points, argument, and violations. I am expecting a decent paragraph! (10 Sentence!) Majority Opinion for the brief also!
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
True or False? according to the variance sum law, the variance of the difference between two independedt variablees is equal to the difference of their variances
Answers
The statement is True. According to the variance sum law, when dealing with two independent variables, the variance of the difference between them is equal to the sum of their variances, not the difference.
This means that if we have two independent variables X and Y, their variances are Var(X) and Var(Y) respectively. The variance of their difference, Z = X - Y, is given by Var(Z) = Var(X) + Var(Y).
This law holds true because the covariance between the two independent variables is zero, so their combined variance is simply the sum of their individual variances.
This result is very useful in statistics and is often used in hypothesis testing and confidence interval construction. It allows us to determine the variability of the difference between two independent variables and to make inferences about their relationship.
In summary, the variance of the difference between two independent variables is equal to the sum of their variances, not the difference.
For more such questions on variables, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27993463
#SPJ11
What is the difference between factual guilt and legal guilt?
Answers
Factual guilt can be regarded as the things that is done by the defendant did while legal guilt is what can be proved by prosecutor.
What is guilt?Guilt can be regarded as the responsibility that is been taken by someone for doing something wrong and against the law.
Therefore, Factual guilt can be regarded as the things that is done by the defendant did while legal guilt is what can be proved by prosecutor.
Learn more about legal guilt from
https://brainly.com/question/8193162
#SPJ1
If a case is of a type that can be brought in federal court, that means it can never be brought in state court.
Answers
Is the United States an Empire?
Do you think it is correct to describe the United States as an empire? Discuss with reference to
historical events and examples. Should the U.S. play a less aggressive role in the world, more
aggressive, or have we got it about right? Discuss and explain your thoughts.
Answers
An empire could be a sovereign state consisting of many territories and peoples subject to one ruling authority, typically an emperor. The federal of the US has never stated its territories as an empire, however some commentators said it was.
hope it helps!
What is the key feature of labeling theory?
Answers
Answer:
Labeling theory suggests that after time you become what others label you as. For example, the child who is being labeled as "evil" in school will become an evil person. The person becomes the thing he is described as being.
Explanation:
exhibit 5 (page 12) shows the details of the offer terms for mci as of march 29, 2005. at first glance, the offer from qwest seems more attractive: higher cash value and higher stock value. why does the board prefer the offer from verizon? g
Answers
The Registrar hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date unless the Registrar shall file a further amendment.
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and at the closing of the merger of MCI, Inc. with and into Eli Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (or at the closing of the “alternative” merger of a direct and wholly owned subsidiary of Verizon with and into MCI, if either Verizon or MCI fails to receive, from its respective counsel, a tax opinion to the effect that the merger will qualify as a reorganization for tax purposes, or if certain other conditions are not satisfied), sometimes referred to as the merger, as described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February \(14, 2005\), as amended on March \(4, 2005\)and March \(29, 2005\), included as Annex A to the enclosed proxy statement and prospectus forming a part of this Registration Statement.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box. ¨
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule \(462\)(b) under the Securities Act of \(1933\), check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
Learn more about registration statement here
https://brainly.com/question/29347425
#SPJ4
. In response to promises that had been made in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution, James Madison drew up the
1. Whiskey Bill.
2. Fugitive Slave Act.
3. Judiciary Act of 1789.
4. first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly called the Bill of Rights
Answers
The first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly called the Bill of Rights, were drawn up by James Madison in response to promises that had been made in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution.
These amendments guarantee certain basic rights and freedoms to citizens of the United States, such as freedom of speech, press, religion, and the right to bear arms. The Bill of Rights also established the judicial system and limits on how the federal government can use its power.
The Whiskey Bill was a law passed in 1791 that imposed a tax on distilled spirits,
while the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 allowed owners of enslaved people to pursue and reclaim them in states where slavery had been abolished.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system, including the Supreme Court.
Know more about Fugitive Slave Act here
https://brainly.com/question/26160636#
#SPJ11
The right response is 4. In response to pledges made in order to win ratification of the Constitution, James Madison drafted the first ten amendments to the Constitution, also known as the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was amended in 1791 to provide these guarantees of specific individual rights and liberties, including freedom of speech and religion.
James Madison drew up the first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly called the Bill of Rights, in response to promises that had been made in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution. These amendments guaranteed certain individual rights and protections, such as freedom of speech and religion, and were added to the Constitution in 1791.
learn more about bill of rights here
https://brainly.com/question/30092735
#SPJ11
brainly Everyone working in the United States is required by law to have a work permit. False False True True
Answers
"Everyone working in the United States is required by law to have a work permit," the correct answer is: False
Does Everyone working in the United States is required by law to have a work permit?While it is true that many individuals working in the United States are required to have work permits, not everyone falls under this requirement. The work permit, commonly known as an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) or work visa, is typically required for foreign nationals who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents (green card holders). They need work permits to legally work in the United States.
U.S. citizens and permanent residents do not need work permits as they have the legal right to work in the country. However, they may need to provide proof of their citizenship or residency status when starting a new job.
It's important to note that immigration and work authorization laws can be complex, so individual circumstances may vary. It's always best to consult with an immigration attorney or the appropriate government agencies for specific advice and guidance.
Learn more about work permit at https://brainly.com/question/5084657
#SPJ1
________ refers to simple exaggerations in advertisements that are not meant to be believed and that are permitted by law.
Answers
Puffery
Explanation:
refers to simple exaggeration in advertisements that are not meant to be believed and are are considered illegal
What does the first amendment to the constitution say about religion
Answers
If the defendant successfully proves __________, no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence, the plaintiff will be denied any recovery of damages. a. negligence per se b. comparative negligence c. contributory negligence d. res ipsa loquitur
Answers
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
A certiorari pool describes the
a.method used to appoint the chief justice.
b.nickname for the water fountain in the courtyard of the Supreme Court building.
c.computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court selects its cases each year.
d.practice by which Supreme Court law clerks work together to evaluate each petition.
Answers
Certiorari pool refers to the computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court of the United States selects the cases it will hear each year. Therefore the correct option is option C.
The certiorari pool is made up of legal clerks from each of the justices who screen the thousands of petitions filed each term and recommend which matters should be heard by the Court. The use of the certiorari pool has been criticised for lowering the number of cases heard by the Court and limiting the variety of problems presented for consideration.
The certiorari pool is a procedure utilised by the United States Supreme Court to help manage the huge number of certiorari petitions (requests for the Court to review a lower court decision) that are filed each year.
For such more question on Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
when driving on an incline, hill start assist is activated ______.
Answers
When driving on an incline, hill start assist is activated when the vehicle is stopped on an incline or hill and the driver releases the brake pedal.
What is the hill start assist?Hill start assist is a feature found in many modern vehicles, particularly those with automatic transmissions, that helps to prevent the vehicle from rolling backwards when starting on an incline.
The system works by holding the brakes for a few seconds after the driver releases the brake pedal, this then gives the driver time to move their foot to the accelerator pedal so as to apply power to the wheels.
Read more on inclinehere:https://brainly.com/question/16949303
#SPJ1
What qualifies as the first broken window theory in law
Answers
Answer:
The broken windows theory, defined in 1982 by social scientists James Wilson and George Kelling, drawing on earlier research by Stanford University psychologist Philip Zimbardo, argues that no matter how rich or poor a neighborhood, one broken window would soon lead to many more windows being broken: “One unrepaired ...
Explanation:
In the developing world, most women who achieve political office tend to have family ties to prominent
male politicians. Male officials in these countries
Answers
Answer:
The first one
Explanation:
Or the second one
I don't know but I hope you get it right! Have a nice life! ✌
Is law school worth it ?
Answers
your choice
Explanation:
Law school take 3 year
it's intense and comptive
have to read really long books
But it easier to get into than medical school
Answer:
Law school is not a bad idea for every student
Explanation:
but it certainly can be a bad idea for some students. If you have unreasonable expectations of what a lawyer's work entails, how much money you will make, or if you have the wrong reasons for wanting to attend, than law school can be a bad idea.
Brainlest
good luck! :D
if you answer this question you get 100 points, the question is
what is the meeting of life
Answers
A shopper brought suit in federal district court against a large retail store for negligence, as a result of the shopper having slipped and fallen in the store. The shopper alleged that the fall was caused by a wet floor. During discovery, the shopper requested production of a store surveillance video that showed her slip and fall. The retail store objected on the ground that the video constituted work product. The video was recorded in the ordinary course of business. The video was preserved, rather than recorded over, in anticipation that the slip and fall might eventuate in litigation. The shopper has moved to compel production of the videotape.
Should the court grant the shopper's motion to compel?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is "True".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
In this question, the statement is true because the videotape is not a work item.
The Procedures of Civil Procedure are indeed the lawsuit rules utilized in civil matters in England and Wales by the Court of Appeal, UK High court, and county courts. The CPR aimed at improving access to the courts by facilitating cost-effectiveness, speed, and easier for the quasi to understand.
A pre-trial hearing shall take place at the start of the hearings of the Court of Magistrates. These are designed to handle particular legal problems that need to be addressed before the trial begins.
On which charges did the jury in federal court convicted the police officers who earlier declared not guilty in the Rodney King case?
A. Violating Mr. King civil rights
B.Carrying out illegal search C. Arresting without a warranted
D. Using the the force
Answers
D. Using Force
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer:
Violating Mr. King's Civil Rights
Explanation:
Took the Test
Nhóm quốc gia nào dưới đây có thủ tướng là người nắm quyền lực nhiều nhất?
5 điểm
A. Anh, Việt Nam, Trung Quốc, Nhật Bản
B. Hàn Quốc, Nhật Bản, Thái Lan, Đức
C. Anh, Nhật Bản, Đức, Singapore
D. Nga, Việt Nam, Thái Lan, Singapore
Answers
Explanation:
đáp án C
Obama's executive order on the accessibility of private handguns relates
directly to this case *
O Marbury v. Madison
D. C. V. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
O U.S. vs. Nixon
Answers
Answer: It relates to the D.C. v. Heller case.
Explanation: This case has to do with the second amendment that allows an individual to bear arms.
2. Do you think imprisonment is the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated a law? Why or why not
Answers
Answer:
Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.
Police may randomly stop a vehicle to check the driver's license and registration.
True
False
Answers
Article 4 in the Constitution was
written in an attempt to do which of
the following with the government?
A. Get Congress and the president to get along.
B. Get individual states to get along.
C. Get the Supreme Court to align to the Constitution.
D. Get the president to nominate Supreme Court
justices.
Answers
Answer:
It should be B. Get individual states to get along.
Explanation:
The article basically outlines the relationship between the states as well as the relationship between the government and individual states.
How can a president get around the difficult process of getting the Senate to ratify a treaty?
A. enter into international executive agreements
B. bring the treaty to the Supreme Court for ratification
C. nothing at all
D. bring the treaty to the House of Representatives for ratification
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Among the categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment is "fighting words."
Which of the following statements is not true when it comes to regulation of fighting words?
response - correct
A
Fighting words—words or epithets that, when addressed to an ordinary citizen, are inherently likely to incite immediate physical retaliation—may be punished.
B
Fighting words statutes are often struck down for overbreadth.
C
True threats—statements meant to communicate an intent to place an individual or group in fear of bodily harm—may be punished.
D
Hate crime statutes may limit fighting words sanctions to cases in which the words seek to insult or provoke on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.
Answers
The statement that is not true when it comes to the regulation of fighting words is:
D. Hate crime statutes may limit fighting words sanctions to cases in which the words seek to insult or provoke on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.
The correct statement is that hate crime statutes may enhance penalties for crimes motivated by bias or prejudice based on race, religion, or sexual orientation, but they do not necessarily limit fighting words sanctions to those specific categories. Hate crime statutes typically focus on the motivation behind the crime, rather than the specific content of the speech itself.
To know more about true
Visit https://brainly.com/question/33522612
#SPJ11
Josiah is a very likable person, but has been out of trouble, his whole life. He began drinking and taking drugs in high school, his parents him to rehab clinic to break his addictions. Josiah did well for a while, but then got caught up with some friends who were planning to break into a pharmacy to steal drugs. Josiah didn’t want to go along with it, but the idea of getting a large supply of painkillers was just too tempting after the robbery Josiah is arrested. His lawyer says that Joshua does know what is right and wrong, but just can’t stop myself from doing things that are bad. What crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions?
Answers
The crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions is self control theory of crime.
The self-control theory of crime, sometimes known as the general theory of crime, is a criminological theory that holds that a lack of individual self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior.
According to the self-control crime theory, people who were ineffectively parented before the age of ten develop less self-control than others of roughly the same age who were reared with better parenting. Low levels of self-control have also been linked to illegal and impulsive behavior, according to research.
Therefore, the appropriate crime theory to explain Josiah's actions is self-control theory.
To learn more on self-control theory of crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27254406
#SPJ1
the juxtaposition of opposing or contrasting ideas, is called?
Answers
The juxtaposition of being in opposition or ideas that are completely contrast in the essence of each other are called as the figure of speech, antithesis.
The antithesis is a figure of speech that may be taken into interpretation as the one wherein the ideologies defined within a sentence or a statement are completely in contrast or opposition to each other. Moreover, it is noteworthy to mention that an antithesis does not define the ideology, but identifies the opposing ideas that they tend to reflect as an effect of the same.
Learn more about antithesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/11610465
#SPJ4