Answers
The level of care expected of a reasonable person under similar circumstances in meeting one's fiduciary duty is called B. Duty of Care.
This principle refers to the obligation of a fiduciary, such as a director or trustee, to act responsibly and make decisions in the best interest of the organization or beneficiaries they serve. Duty of Care requires fiduciaries to exercise reasonable diligence, competence, and skill when managing resources, making decisions, and providing oversight. It ensures that they act in good faith, avoid negligence, and remain informed about relevant issues.
This duty contrasts with A. Duty of Loyalty focuses on putting the organization's interests ahead of personal interests and avoiding conflicts of interest. C. Transparency and D. Fairness are important values in fulfilling fiduciary responsibilities, but they are not specific legal duties. Transparency refers to open and honest communication, while fairness ensures that decisions are made objectively and without bias.
In summary, Duty of Care is the key principle that outlines the level of care expected from fiduciaries in fulfilling their responsibilities. It emphasizes the need for responsible decision-making and oversight while considering the interests of the organization and its beneficiaries. Therefore the correct option is B
Know more about Duty of Care here:
https://brainly.com/question/31148084
#SPJ11
Related Questions
What are the three broad areas of forensic science? A. archeology, biology, and physics B. physics, chemistry, and dentistry C. paleontology, biology, and physical science D. biology, chemistry, and physical science
Answers
Someone correct me if I’m wrong
Answer: D
Explanation: i searched
WILL GIVE THANKS PLUS BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP ME!!
5. Which step in the progression of a case may include movement of a case through
local, state and federal jurisdictions?
A. Sentencing
B. Deliberations
C. Trial
D. Appeals
Answers
If half the people in the U.S.A are singing that carol baskin killed her husband. AND she is completely psycho. Although tiger king is also psycho. what is the probability she killed her husband and fed him to the tigers
Answers
Answer:
carol baskin killed her husband wacked him cant convince her then it didnt happen fed him to the tigers they snaken whats happen??? CAROL BASKIN!
Explanation:
Some early police forces were organized by politicians. This era of the history of policing is known as the Political Era. What was the major weakness of these forces? corruption not enough officers to staff forces not enough money to support agency budgets none of the above
Answers
The correct answer is A) corruption.
The major weakness of these forces was corruption.
The problem and big issue here were that policemen, police officers were appointed by politicians that most of the time served political interests instead of serving the citizens. This was part of the United States political history from 1840 to 1920, commonly known as the Political Era of Policing. Local politicians hired the police members and of course, the forts served the politician interests which allowed corrupt practices and injustices in society.
in the parlato v. equitable life assurance society of the united states case, the court held:
Answers
In the Parlato v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States case, the court held that Equitable Life Assurance Society was not liable for negligent hiring. How did Parlato v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States case emerge?Joseph Parlato was a convicted felon who was hired by Equitable Life Assurance Society to sell life insurance.
He was then arrested for embezzlement, which he had committed while working for Equitable. Parlato's victim sued Equitable Life Assurance Society, alleging that the company was responsible for Parlato's actions because it had negligently hired him. The court, on the other hand, held that Equitable Life Assurance Society was not responsible for Parlato's actions because it had no reason to believe he was an embezzler.
The company's hiring process had been proper, and there was no proof that they were aware of his criminal record.The court found in favour of the Equitable Life Assurance Society because they had acted reasonably and prudently in hiring Parlato. The court ruled that the company was not liable for Parlato's embezzlement, which he had carried out independently and without the company's knowledge.
To know more about Equitable Life Assurance Society refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/25988209#
#SPJ11
What is the first thing a forensic scientist should do when they see this evidence?
A.
Make a plaster mold of it.
B.
Scrape soil samples from it.
C.
Take a photograph of it.
D.
Draw a sketch of it.
Answers
The first thing a forensic scientist should do is take a photograph of the evidence for documentation and preservation. The correct option is c.
When a forensic scientist comes across evidence, the first thing they should do is take a picture of it. Photographs provide a visual record that can be referred to later in the investigation or during court proceedings, serving as essential documentation of the original condition and location of the evidence.
It guards against tampering with the evidence and maintains its integrity. Depending on the nature of the evidence and the investigation, forensic scientists can continue with other necessary procedures after the evidence has been properly photographed such as collecting samples, creating molds or making sketches.
learn more about forensic scientist here
brainly.com/question/29293791
#SPJ3
Hey please help asap
A ___________ alleges that even if the facts as presented in the plaintiff's complaint are true, there is no reason to continue the lawsuit.
A. Settlement
B. Motion for summary judgment
C. Motion for judgment on the pleadings
D. Motion to dismiss
Answers
Answer:
A Motion to dismiss alleges that even if the facts as presented in the plaintiff's complaint are true, there is no reason to continue the lawsuit.
Explanation:
"A motion to dismiss is filed when a party believes that the complaint is legally invalid, which can be based on a variety of grounds." Basically, the case is thrown away.
Answer:
Motion to Dismiss
Explanation:
Pretty simple, as the question practically gives it to you, but i again had trouble with this question, but ay, don't we all?
the ftc sued amazon, alleging the online giant tricked consumers into doing what?
Answers
The US Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon.com Inc. on Wednesday, alleging that the company deceived customers into signing up for its Prime membership service and purposely made it difficult to unsubscribe.
The ftc sueing amazon, alleging the online giant.Amazon.com Inc. was sued by the US Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday on the grounds that it tricked customers into subscribing to its Prime membership service and purposefully made it difficult to cancel.
The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, the FTC's most aggressive move against the firm to date under the leadership of Lina Khan, accusing it of illegally pressuring customers to subscribe to its Prime membership and then making it difficult for them to abandon it.
The ftc and amazon here: https://brainly.com/question/14266241
#SPj1
which of the following is an accurate comparison of how the supreme court has applied the doctrine of selective incorporation? (4 points) before engel v. vitale (1962) after engel v. vitale (1962) (a) the establishment clause does not apply to the states. the establishment clause applies to the states. (b) the bill of rights does not apply to the states. the bill of rights applies to the states. (c) the establishment clause limits the actions of the state governments. the establishment clause limits the action of the federal government. (d) the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from the federal government. the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from state governments.
Answers
The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.
Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.
Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.
Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ11
help me please to answer my assignment
Answers
Answer:
I don't know how we can help you its just asking what you have learned, appreciate and discovered
Explanation:
the defendant was prosecuted for bank robbery. at trial, the bank te11er was unable to identify the defendant, now bearded, as the bank robber. the prosecutor then showed the te1jer a group of photographs, and the teller testified that she had previously told the prosecutor that the middle picture (concededly a picture of the defendant before he grew a beard) was a picture of the bank robber. the teller's testimony is:
Answers
The teller's testimony is that she had previously identified the middle picture, which was a picture of the defendant before he grew a beard, as a picture of the bank robber.
According to the teller's testimony, she previously told the prosecutor that the middle image in a collection of pictures represented the bank robber. Before developing a beard, the defendant is shown in the middle photograph. However, the teller was unable to identify the defendant who was now sporting a beard as the bank robber during the trial.
In order to prove that the teller had correctly identified the defendant as the bank robber before the trial, the prosecutor introduced the testimony. This testimony is significant because it suggests that even though the teller was unable to positively identify the defendant in court, she had initially recognized the defendant as the perpetrator based on the photograph.
To know more about testimony here
brainly.com/question/33645791
#SPJ4
Everyone that reading this inspiring message,Lets start off with learning students that are smart, and students that are suffering Are not comprehending what teachers are teaching because all the teaching because all the teaching the teachers do and all the test the teacher gives these test Are no help because what you teachers do is a waste of learning time,Because all students are bored, because you teachers are not really teaching , your makeing the the students give up on what they want to do which is learn And how i know this is because all you teachers do is teach 1 subject 2 days and then put the students to the test And you wonder where the cheating guide comes from And parents that are reading this inspiring message dont blame your kids, for what chores they dont do and all the video games they play because your child sits in the classroom for 7 hours knowing nothing And teachers i hope this message inspires you to Make learning more acceptable by reteaching lesson over and over and test come last.
Answers
Answer:
Don't worry about it.....
Where does the controversy lie with military movement?
A. Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution declares president as commander - in - chief of the armed forces but Article 2, Section 1 gives Congress the power to declare war.
B. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution declares the president as commander - in - chief of the armed forces but Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to declare war.
C. There is no controversy because the president is commander - in - chief.
D. There is no controversy because Congress declares war.
Answers
B. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution declares the president as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to declare war.
This tension has led to debates over the extent of the president's power to deploy military forces without explicit authorization from Congress. While the president has the power to order military action in response to an attack on the United States or its interests, there is controversy over whether the president can take military action without a declaration of war from Congress in other circumstances.
abby gets a state court civil judgment against casey, but casey does not pay. which of the following is one of the tools available to abby to enforce the judgment against casey?
Answers
Writ of Execution is is one of the tools available to Abby to enforce the judgment against Casey.
A writ of execution is a court order that authorises law enforcement officials to start transferring property as the result of a legal decision. It makes a judgement of possession effective. Assets, cash, and real estate are all examples of property. An official document issued by a court that establishes ownership rights is known as a judgement of possession. The judge may then issue a writ of execution to start the property transfer when the court issues a judgement of possession. The writ of execution actually starts the transfer procedure from a judgement debtor to a plaintiff; the judgement for possession just declares the plaintiff has a claim to the property.
Learn more about writ of execution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15836478
#SPJ4
You notice that a co-worker is being harassed by a group of people outside in the parking lot at work. None of the group of people work here. Which of the following actions should you take?
Answers
The best action to take to help a co-worker from aggressors is to A. Ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.
What is a Conflict?This refers to the disagreement that exists between two or more entities where there is a constant struggle among them.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario of a person being harrassed in the parking lot, the best action to take based on that the aggressors do not work there is to ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.
Read more about conflict resolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/24769299
#SPJ1
What is the policy for non-retaliation
Answers
Answer:
A non-retaliation policy is a policy that is developed to ensure that an organization and its employees are complying with state and federal laws regarding the prohibition of retaliation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Protects employees, who in good faith report suspected non-compliance
Explanation:
I need help with the caption part can anyone know what to write please help
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
1.- The level of government that is involved here is the federal government. The executive branch department involved is the Secretary of the Treasury. We can also include the Fed, the Federal Reserve, although it is not part of the federal government. The Fed is the central bank of the United States and it is a private organization located in Washington D.C., that oversees the public finances and the monetary system of the United States.
2.- The banking system affects me in that I need to save money early in my life in order to have enough money to create a patrimony. I am going to use this money in the future to invest in college, and later, when I work, the money saved in the bank would have generated enough interest to buy a car or buy me a beautiful house.
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.
In order to obtain court supervision for a traffic violation, a minor must appear in court with a parent/legal guardian and attend a traffic safety school. True or false?.
Answers
A minor must appear in court with their parent or legal guardian and complete a driving safety course in order to get court supervision for a traffic offence. Hence, the statement is TRUE.
Did you know that a parent or legal guardian can revoke a minor's driver's license at any time before the age of 18?
Some states mandate a minimum of 50 hours of supervised driving behind the wheel for children or those under the age of 16. It is required in order to obtain a driver's license.
Drivers who are minor or under the age of 18 must hold their instruction permit for nine months prior to receiving their driver's license.
Find out what is NOT a punishment for committing a traffic violation here: https://brainly.com/question/10464560
#SPJ4
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
Answers
How many hours do you have to falsely claim as a PCA or CFSS worker for it to be a crime?
A. 15 minutes
B. 1 hour
C. 4 hours
D. 100 hours
Answers
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
In a democracy, how is rule of law regarded?
Answers
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answers
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
in what way does a deed of trust differ from a mortgage
Answers
A deed of trust and a mortgage are both instruments used to secure loans on real estate property. The main difference lies in the way they involve parties and handle the property title. In a mortgage, there are two parties: the borrower and the lender. The borrower holds the property title until the loan is fully repaid.
On the other hand, a deed of trust involves three parties: the borrower, the lender, and a trustee. The trustee holds the property title in trust for the lender until the loan is repaid. If the borrower defaults, the trustee can quickly foreclose the property on behalf of the lender, making the process more efficient than a mortgage foreclosure.
A deed of trust and a mortgage are both legal documents that involve a borrower pledging their property as collateral for a loan. However, the main difference between the two lies in the way that they function. A mortgage is a two-party agreement between the borrower and the lender, while a deed of trust involves three parties: the borrower, the lender, and a third-party trustee. In a deed of trust, the trustee holds legal title to the property until the loan is paid off. This provides an added layer of security for the lender. Additionally, foreclosure proceedings are typically faster and less expensive under a deed of trust than under a mortgage. In summary, while both a mortgage and a deed of trust serve a similar purpose, the way they are structured and function differs.
To know more about real estate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29124410
#SPJ11
Answer:
A mortgage involves only two parties: the borrower and the lender. A deed of trust has a borrower, lender and a “trustee.” The trustee is a neutral third party that holds the title to a property until the loan is completely paid off by the borrower.
Joseph has decided to build a fence around his property to prevent his neighbor's dog from destroying his yard. Joseph's neighbor realized the fence is crossing onto his property. He asked Joseph to move the fence, but Joseph refused. The neighbor decided to take this to court. What type of law does this represent? criminal, Ocivil, constitutional, juvenile, military
Answers
What are the heads of each
department called?
Answers
Answer:
it is called the cabinet
Explanation:
The Cabinet is a group of president's top advisors.
why do states obey international law?
Answers
Answer:
All states in the contemporary world, including great powers, are compelled to justify their behavior according to legal rules and accepted norms. This essay will analyse the extent to which states comply and the reasons for their compliance. Essentially, the extent to which states follow their international obligations has developed over the past 400 years.
Explanation:
Answer:
states calculate their interests according to what is considered acceptable
Explanation:
international law and abiding by accepted norms are considered acceptable behaviour, states are likely to comply these theories offer useful explanations for how states behave
Discuss monetary policy in India.
Answers
Answer:
Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.
In our everyday lives were are always confronted with the requirement that we should operate within the parameters of the law. These laws may be those which are laid down by your parents at home, your church, the management of a particular tertiary institution or the government through our parliament. Give your views / opinions regarding the above statement
Answers
Law acts as a guideline to act in a manner that as to what is acceptable in the society.
Law has a daily impact on us and is fundamental to our social, political, and economic existence. Laws regulate what is right and wrong, good and bad, desirable and undesirable, and what we can and cannot do. They are used to resolve conflicts, punish offenders, and to govern.
Law keeps society functioning because without it there would be anarchy and a struggle for survival. Laws are made to benefit society, reshape values, advance public policies, foster peace, and make freedom and the future possible.
To learn more about law click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ9