Judicial restraint is the refusal to invalidate such actions and instead refers the matter to regular politics.
A philosophy of Judicial restraint interpretation called "judicial restraint" urges judges to keep their own power under check. In summary, judges should interpret the law rather than get involved in determining public policy. The original intent of the people who established the constitution should always be taken into consideration by Judicial restraint when making decisions. The Roe v. Wade judgement is one more instance of a U.S. Supreme Court case that illustrates the Judicial restraint ideology (1973). In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether a Texas legislation that forbade women from getting an abortions to end their pregnancies was constitutional. A legal concept known as "judicial restraint" refers to a style of judicial interpretation that highlights the discretionary nature of the court. Judges are urged to make decisions only in accordance with the principle of stare decisis, which requires Supreme Court to uphold earlier rulings. The primary practical and philosophical advantage of Judicial restraint is that it directs originalism and ensures that it respects self-government and the freedom to propose laws that is guaranteed by the constitution.
Learn more about Judicial restraint here:
brainly.com/question/14276997
#SPJ4
What role does the NLRB have as an administrative agency to provide overight in labor-management disagreements? Should the decisions of an administrative agency be enforceable through the federal courts?
The NLRB is an administrative agency that oversees labor disputes. Its decisions are typically enforceable through federal courts, although they can be challenged or appealed.
The NLRB, or National Labor Relations Board, is an administrative agency that oversees labor-management disagreements. It ensures fair labor practices and protects employees' rights to engage in collective bargaining. The NLRB conducts elections to determine if employees want to be represented by a union and investigates unfair labor practices.
As an administrative agency, the decisions made by the NLRB are typically enforceable through the federal courts. However, there are certain circumstances where the decisions can be challenged or appealed. For example, if a party believes that the NLRB's decision was based on an error of law or that the agency exceeded its authority, they may seek judicial review. The NLRB's decisions can have significant impact as they establish precedents and shape labor laws. The courts play a vital role in reviewing the agency's decisions to ensure they comply with the law and are fair to all parties involved.
In summary, the NLRB acts as an administrative agency to oversee labor-management disagreements, and its decisions are generally enforceable through the federal courts, subject to review and potential challenge.
Learn more about labor disputes here:
https://brainly.com/question/32615838
#SPJ11
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when:.
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
What is exculpatory clause?An exculpatory clause is when someone or an organization is excused from liability from things like negligence or wrongdoing when faced with a lawsuit.
An example of exculpatory clause is when a venue print an exculpatory clause on tickets it sells for a concert, indicating that it is not responsible for personal injury caused by employees or others during the show.
Hence, an exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
Learn more about exculpatory clause here : https://brainly.com/question/4631290
Pretend you are an African American man living in 1870 in the United States. Describe two ways in which the 14th Amendment might have affected your life. Write in the first person, and create a name for your imaginary person
Answer:
Explanation:
My name is Elijah Washington, and I am an African American man living in the United States in 1870. The 14th Amendment has had a profound and transformative impact on my life, empowering me in ways I never thought possible.
Firstly, the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has shattered the chains of inequality that bound us for far too long. With this revolutionary clause, I now have a legal shield against the insidious discrimination and unequal treatment that plagued our society. It declares that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This powerful language has emboldened me to challenge the systemic injustices that have stifled our progress. Whether facing racial segregation, unequal access to public facilities, or discriminatory employment practices, I can wield the Equal Protection Clause as a sword of justice, demanding fair treatment and equal rights.
Secondly, the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause has bestowed upon me the long-awaited recognition and dignity of being a true American citizen. For generations, African Americans like myself were denied the basic rights and privileges of citizenship. But with the stroke of a pen, the 14th Amendment has finally acknowledged our inherent right to belong. As a citizen, I now possess the unassailable armor of legal protection. I am entitled to due process, ensuring that the wheels of justice shall turn for me as they do for anyone else. I can exercise my newfound political power, actively participating in the democratic process, and working towards dismantling the chains of prejudice and injustice that still linger.
The 14th Amendment has become our collective anthem of freedom, an unwavering testament to the resilience and fortitude of our community. It has emboldened us to march forward, forging a path towards true equality. While I recognize that the battle for justice is far from over, the 14th Amendment has ignited a fire within our hearts, reminding us of the promise and potential that lie within each of us. Through the Equal Protection Clause, we have the power to challenge the darkest corners of prejudice, ensuring that our children and grandchildren will grow up in a world where they are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Through the Citizenship Clause, we have claimed our rightful place in this nation, ready to reshape its destiny and build a more inclusive society for all. As an African American man in 1870, I stand proud, shoulder to shoulder with my brothers and sisters, knowing that the 14th Amendment is our beacon of hope, guiding us towards a brighter and more just future. Together, we will overcome the challenges that lie ahead, forging a path of equality, freedom, and unparalleled achievement. The 14th Amendment has forever changed the trajectory of our lives, and we will seize this opportunity to reshape our destiny and inspire generations to come.
Which rehabilitation programme would you apply to mr x if he were to be incarcerated and why do you think that programme will be effective in rehabilitation
The most recently developed theory of punishment is that of rehabilitation, which holds that the goal of punishment is to provide the offender with therapy and training so that he would be able to reintegrate into society and function as a law-abiding member of the community. I would prefer this type of rehabilitation programme for Mr.x.
Why is rehabilitation better than incarceration?Addicts who are in recovery usually conduct less expensive crimes. They are also typically arrested less frequently. The cost of obtaining addiction treatment is becoming more accessible thanks to healthcare reforms. Reduced expenses for law enforcement and the courts will result from declining crime rates and fewer arrests.
To know more about rehabilitation programme visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22182314
#SPJ9
When Morty leased his new car, he was required by law to _________ to ______________ of financial loss caused by a vehicle collision.
Answer:
purchase insurance; reduce the risk
Explanation:
When Morty leased his new car he was forced by law to buy insurance in order to minimize the possibility of financial damage incurred by a collision with a vehicle.
If you rent a car, the contract specifies you are liable for any damage to the vehicle, irrespective of how the damage was caused. And, before you leave the rental car lot, you have to check it very carefully, note any harm on the form they send you, and make sure that you have a copy for yourself.
Answer:
Purchase insurance; Reduce the risk is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
Insurance policy is a contract, expressed by a policy, where an insurance provider gives an individual or institution economic individual or entity receives financial. The business shares liabilities for consumers in order to make premiums more manageable for the insured.
Risk reduction steps to reduce loss frequency or extent, also known as regulation of losses. Can include engineering, fire safety, security checks, or the management of claims.
1- Why is it important in a democratic society that the government follow due process of law
when trying suspected criminals?
Answer:
It is not, in a Democracy trials and Juries are ruled by passion and prejudice, without regard to established rights of the accused.
Explanation:
You are a medical assistant at the family practice office of Dr. Janice Parrish. Elizabeth James and her daughter Anne have been patients at the practice for 10 years. Anne is 20 years old. Elizabeth is in the office for a blood pressure check. While you are taking her blood pressure, she tells you that Anne was in to see Dr. Parrish last week. She also says that she thinks Anne has been acting strangely and asks you if her daughter is pregnantHow would you respond to Elizabeth? What can you legally tell Elizabeth about her daughter?
You are a medical assistant at the family practice office of Dr. Janice Parrish. Without patient and healthcare professional permission, providing information to another individual is a privacy breach.
Ethical standards dictate that the information not be released. Medical ethics need confidentiality. Inform the patient and get an agreement to share information.
This is further explained below.
What is Medical ethics?Generally, Autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice are the four principles that were developed by Beauchamp and Childress.
These principles have had a significant impact on the field of medical ethics, and they are essential to comprehending the approach that is currently being taken to an ethical evaluation in the medical field.
According to the regulations on privacy, it is a breach of privacy for any information to be released to a third party without first obtaining the approval of both the patient and the healthcare professionals involved.
It is essential to act in accordance with one's ethical values; hence, the information should not be made public.
One of the principles of medical ethics that must be adhered to is the principle of confidentiality.
It is essential to offer the patient with information and inquire about their permission before providing any information.
Read more about Medical ethics
https://brainly.com/question/10281304
#SPJ1
Which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? Group of answer choices Compensatory damages Liquidation damages Punitive damages Incidental damages Exemplary damages
The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.
Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.
In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.
Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11
is a procedure during which the name of the defendant and the alleged crime are recorded in the investigating agency's or police department's records.
Police investigation record is a procedure during which the name of the defendant and the alleged crime are recorded in the investigating agency's or police department's records.
The Code of Criminal Procedure referred to the police investigating the records for the collection of evidence which is conducted by an authorative officers who is authorized by a Magistrate.There are three types of investigations which include suchas Experimental , Comparative, Descriptive.
The procedure of police investigating consists based on the following steps that is first FIR report filling, location of the crime,collecting evidence and interrogating the relevant persons. The police play the most important role in the investigation of a criminal case menas they have to investigate the cognizable case and find the truth as per the provisions of laws.
Learn more about police investigating click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/9537771
#SPJ4
Why is competition limited in an oligopoly?
In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:
Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.
Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.
Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.
Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.
Know more about oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518761
#SPJ8
Public Law 99-457 extended the benefits of Public Law 94-142 to:______.
What is required to become a reserve police officer with most police departments? The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor’s staff. The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Answer:
The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Explanation:
In Indiana, reserve officers are required to complete 40 hours of basic training, as well as 24 hours of continuing in-service training each year
Jane Smith listed and sold a company’s building, for which the company paid her a fee. Which would be TRUE regarding this situation?
Answer: You did not give the answer choices
Explanation: I will answer this once you do
How can we use stasis theory on Depp V Heard trial. What are ways this issue has been framed?
Answer:
Explanation:
To help you develop a plan for an argument, using stasis theory can help in your invention stage.In a discussion of a problem or issue, stasis theory asks you and your fellow debater to come to an agreement on an issue. For example, people have various opinions about sexism and racism. Let's take sexism, for example. Some people do not feel that sexism exists while others are adamant that it does. To come to an agreement, you could apply stasis theory by first asking if it really exists or happens (fact). Next, you and your friend would need to define and discuss what acts make up or constitute sexism (definition). Then, you have to look at the character or nature of the act. Is the issue hurtful or not (quality: right or wrong)? Finally, is there something that should be done about this concern (policy: plan of action)? These questions help develop the issue at hand. Background:Stasis theory was developed by an ancient rhetorician named Hermagoras, an ancient Greek in the 3rd century BC. He proposed four questions to help analyze or study a problem or issue, and those questions can be used as an invention help. Aristotle, another ancient Greek and philosopher and rhetorician from the 4th century, is often associated with the idea of stasis theory, and he used it primarily in the invention stage. The theory was later refined by Cicero, and orator, and other others.
Marriage is considered a legal contract between two individuals.
True
False
How many judges did trump appoint to the supreme court.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
He appointed Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Brett Kavanaugh in 2018, and Amy Coney Barrett in 2020.
Brainliest please :)
Match each example to the type of law it reflects.
A. civil law
B. criminal law
C. military law
D. constitutional law
1. A senator attempts to stop a newspaper from exercising its freedom to report on the senator’s corruption scandal.
2. Joanne has cheated her business partner.
3. Mark is accused of stealing supplies while serving in the US Army.
4. Jon robs a bank and steals thousands of dollars.
Answer: yes
Explanation:
1 goes with D
2 goes with A
3 goes C
4 goes with B
10. If a petition for registration removal is denied by the court, how long must the offender wait to
petition the court again?
Answer:
6luni
Explanation:
Do you believe that the introduction of crack cocaine in black
neighborhoods, in the early to mid, is having an impact on communities of color today How and why
Yes, I believe that the introduction of crack cocaine in black neighborhoods in the early to mid 1980s is still having an impact on communities of color today. This is because the widespread distribution and use of crack cocaine in these neighborhoods led to a number of negative consequences that continue to affect these communities.
One of the most significant impacts of the crack cocaine epidemic was the increase in violence and crime that occurred as a result of the drug's illegal status and the resulting underground market. The high demand for crack cocaine led to a proliferation of drug dealing and associated criminal activities, including gang activity, drug trafficking, and violent turf wars. This increase in crime and violence had a significant negative impact on the safety and well-being of residents in these neighborhoods, and continues to be a problem today.
In addition to the increase in crime and violence, the crack cocaine epidemic also had a number of other negative impacts on communities of color. The drug was often associated with poverty and social marginalization, and many people who were addicted to crack cocaine struggled with homelessness, unemployment, and other social and economic problems. This led to a further deterioration of the social and economic fabric of these communities, which has had long-lasting effects on their overall well-being.
Furthermore, the crack cocaine epidemic disproportionately affected black communities, and many people who were incarcerated for drug offenses were black. This led to a significant increase in the prison population, which had a disproportionate impact on communities of color. The mass incarceration of people of color has had a number of negative consequences, including the disruption of families, the perpetuation of poverty, and the stigmatization of individuals who have been incarcerated.
In conclusion, the introduction of crack cocaine in black neighborhoods in the early to mid 1980s has had a lasting impact on communities of color. It has contributed to increased violence and crime, social and economic marginalization, and mass incarceration, all of which continue to have negative consequences for these communities today.
20 points !! please help
Compare and contrast the U.S. Presidency and Congress with the Michigan governorship and state legislature in terms of membership, terms, term limits, and powers under the Constitution.
a(n) ________ is a common method prosecutors use to maintain high conviction rates.
A plea bargain between the defendant and the state is a common method that prosecutors use to maintain high conviction rates.
Who is a defendant?In court proceedings, a defendant is an individual or person who is the party either accused of committing a crime in criminal cases or against whom some type of civil relief is being examined in a civil case. Terminology varies from one jurisdiction to another.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It can then be concluded that a common method that prosecutors use to maintain high conviction rates is a plea bargain between the defendant and the state.
learn more about defendant: https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
antitrust laws help guard against mergers that could hurt ________.
Antitrust laws help guard against mergers that could hurt consumers. Thus the correct option is B.
Antitrust laws work to encourage competition and avoid monopolies, making sure that firms don't have too much sway to raise prices, restrict customer options, or stifle innovation.
Antitrust laws strive to shield consumers from higher costs, worse quality, and fewer alternatives by prohibiting or regulating mergers that can limit competition.
The courts must decide which mergers and commercial practices are illegal based on the unique facts of each case because the antitrust laws usually prohibit them.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Antitrust laws, here:
brainly.com/question/13800256
#SPJ1
Question 1:
Alcohol is a drug that works as a _____ affects your thinking abilities.
Answer:
Depressant.
Explanation:
Alcoholism is a disease in which the body becomes dependent on ethanol. It is characterized by a constant desire to consume alcohol. There is no control over the amount of alcohol consumed, leading to multi-day drinking processes. If, for some reason, alcohol consumption is stopped (money runs out, health deteriorates), withdrawal symptoms develop - from sweating to alcohol psychosis, for example. In more severe cases, alcoholic psychosis can be fatal. There is a clear link between oxidative damage and inflammation and alcohol-related diseases such as brain dysfunction, musculoskeletal disorders, lung changes, increased severity of infections, malnutrition and cardiovascular disease or cancer.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
All federal statutory laws are part of the
A. United States Code
B. state constitutions
C. U.S. Constitution
D. regulatory agencies
SUBMIT
The assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing is called:
Answer:
Joint and several liability.Explanation:
The joint and several liability establishes that assessment would be conducted against a defendant of all the losses or damages despite of the plaintiff's share of the liability/wrongdoing. In joint and several liability, two or more parties share the responsibility of the lawsuit. Every party is liable to the repayment of the total damage and the plaintiff may collect the damage repayment from any or all of them.which term refers to youthful offenders who engage in illegal acts, such as theft, burglary, robbery, property damage, or the sale or use of illegal drugs?
The term that refers to youthful offenders who engage in illegal acts, such as theft, burglary, robbery, property damage, or the sale or use of illegal drugs is "juvenile delinquents."
Juvenile delinquency refers to the criminal behavior of minors, usually under the age of 18, that violates the law. A minor who commits a criminal offense is referred to as a "juvenile delinquent." The criminal activity that a juvenile delinquent commits is referred to as "juvenile delinquency."
Juvenile delinquents are classified in two categories; status offenders and criminal offenders. Status offenders commit offenses that are illegal only because of their age. They include acts like truancy, breaking curfew, and running away from home. Criminal offenders, on the other hand, commit crimes such as theft, burglary, robbery, property damage, or the sale or use of illegal drugs.
Learn more about juvenile delinquents
https://brainly.com/question/2140805
#SPJ11
Many states have laws like Virginia’s that give customers the right to keep or inspect parts that are removed by an auto mechanic. Does that help solve an asymmetric information problem?
Yes, Like Virginia, several states have regulations allowing customers to keep or examine parts that an auto repair removes from their vehicle.
State of Virginia, also known as the Commonwealth of Virginia, is located between the Atlantic Coast and the Appalachian Mountains in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern parts of the United States. The Commonwealth's topography and climate are influenced by the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Chesapeake Bay, which serve as habitat for a large portion of its flora and animals. Richmond serves as the state's capital; Virginia Beach is its most populated city; and Fairfax County is its most populous political unit. Over 8.65 million people called the Commonwealth home as of 2020, with 36% of them residing in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Several indigenous tribes, including the Powhatan, are responsible for the region's early history. The first permanent English colony in the New World was founded by the London Company in 1607 with the Colony of Virginia. This status is alluded to in Virginia's state nickname, the Old Dominion. Conflicts both inside and beyond the colony were fostered by the slave labour and land that were taken from displaced native tribes, which fueled the plantation economy's expansion. Virginia was one of the original Thirteen Colonies during the American Revolution, and conflicts there helped to ensure the country's freedom.
Learn more about Virginia here
https://brainly.com/question/16738332
#SPJ4
After completeing a driver improvement program and your license is reinstated you will be on probation for.
A driver will be placed on probation for 1 year following the completion of a driving improvement programme and the restoration of your licence.
The Driver Improvement Program (DIP), a 4–8-hour educational course, aims to rehabilitate drivers. After your hearing date, you will get a notice from the MVA if the court ordered you to undergo a driver improvement programme. After receiving a driver's licence restoration, finishing the MVC Driver Improvement Program, or the Probationary Driver School Program, a driver will be placed on probation for a year. Any conviction for a moving offence during that probationary term will result in a suggested suspension of the driver's licence. The length of the suspension is determined by how soon after restoration the infraction occurs.
To know more about conviction:
brainly.com/question/28387703
#SPJ4
Person responsible for supplying the facts of what they know about a crime during a trial is *
A) bailiff
B) plaintiff
C) defendant
D) witness
Answer:
it would be D, a witness.
Explanation:
bailiff is in charge of court room security
plaintiff is the person bringing the charges
defendant is the person accused of a crime or some kind of wrong doing
Answer:
D a witness
Explanation:
he or she tells the truth