the final question of the blanchard-peale "three part test", has to do with conscience. true false

Answer:

Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.

Explanation:

Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.

When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.

Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.

Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.

Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.

Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.

Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.

Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.

Learn more about Gideon here:

https://brainly.com/question/20791026

#SPJ2

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

The two new responsibilities that adolescents may have to assume as a result of their changing life roles​ are caring for their possessions and to focus on the studies.

Adolescent refers to the age of development from the child to the adult. In this age, a person experiences several changes in his body and learns about certain new that has not been known to him before.

The age of adolescence comes with the various responsibilities and changes. The individual has to give the extra focus on the studies as has introduced with the new subjects. He is materialistic at this stage of life.

Therefore, it can be concluded that Adolescents may need to take on two new obligations as a result of their shifting life roles: taking care of their things and concentrating on their schoolwork.

Learn more about Adolescent here:

https://brainly.com/question/9506316

#SPJ1

The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of English common law was basically to provide a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes and enforcing laws in the country.

The common law system, that developed in England in the Middle Ages, played a greater emphasis on the role of judges in making decisions based on custom, precedents, and reason, rather than relying solely on written laws or edicts from a monarch. It further led to the creation of law courts to hear and decide these cases, and also established a legal precedents that would guide future decisions.

The overall development of the English common law system and its various courts helped in creating a more stable and predictable legal framework, it also played a key role in the growth and development of English society.

To know more about English common law refer to-

brainly.com/question/7413269#

#SPJ4

The origins of sociology can be found in the 1830s after Auguste Compte made the proposition that there should be a unification of all human activity into one distinct science.

This refers to the collection of citations and articles that contains the summary of these sources about a person or thing.

Hence, we can see that some early theorists of sociology and their contributions include:

Sociology as a field has evolved and progressed primarily in the 18th Century during the Industrial Revolution as sociologists aimed to understand the thinking and rationale that was used for the revolution.

The attached image shows you a sample of an annotated bibliography and you can use the information given above to get a good idea on how to create one.

Read more about sociology here:

https://brainly.com/question/14363783

#SPJ1

Answer:

During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?

Explanation:

There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.

Answer:

4-h

5-g

6- d

7-f

8-i

9-e

Explanation:

I think some of it is missing but i went with what i had and made educated decisions

Based on the information provided, the state's political culture is best described as Moralistic.

Moralistic political culture refers to a system where government and politics are seen as a means to promote the common good and advance the moral values of society. In such states, the government is often involved in regulating societal behaviors and enforcing moral standards.The description of the state having restricted abortion rights, a ban on drugs, long prison sentences, and a high death penalty rate suggests a focus on moral issues and the use of government power to enforce specific moral values. This aligns with the characteristics of a moralistic political culture.The other options, Moralistic-individualistic, Traditionalistic, and Individualistic, do not fully capture the emphasis on moral values and the active role of the government in regulating behaviors and imposing penalties as described in the given scenario.

To know more about moral values, click here https://brainly.com/question/31964586

#SPJ11

The separation of powers with checks and balances, as enshrined in the United States Constitution, enhances the ability of the federal government to respond to the coronavirus crisis.

This system ensures that power is distributed among different branches of government and provides mechanisms to prevent any one branch from becoming too dominant.

The separation of powers allows for collaboration, accountability, and the protection of individual rights, which are crucial in addressing a complex and evolving crisis like the coronavirus pandemic.

The separation of powers with checks and balances is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government, designed to prevent the concentration of power and ensure accountability. In the context of the coronavirus crisis, this system is advantageous for several reasons.

First, it allows for a division of responsibilities and specialization among different branches of government. The executive branch can swiftly respond to emergencies, such as implementing public health measures and coordinating relief efforts. The legislative branch can pass laws and allocate resources to address the crisis.

The judicial branch can provide oversight and protect individual rights. This distribution of power enables a comprehensive and coordinated response.

Second, checks and balances promote collaboration and consensus-building. The branches of government must work together, exchanging information, proposing solutions, and reviewing actions. This fosters a cooperative approach, where multiple perspectives and expertise are considered, leading to more informed decision-making.

Third, the system ensures accountability. Each branch has the power to oversee and check the actions of the others. This prevents any one branch from abusing its authority or neglecting its duties.

The executive branch's actions can be reviewed by the judiciary, and the legislative branch can pass laws to address any deficiencies or gaps in the response. This accountability promotes transparency, adherence to the rule of law, and protection of citizens' rights.

While the separation of powers with checks and balances may introduce some complexity and potential for disagreements, it ultimately strengthens the federal government's ability to respond to crises like the coronavirus pandemic.

By fostering collaboration, specialization, and accountability, this system provides a robust framework for effective governance and promotes the interests and well-being of the people.

Learn more about coronavirus crisis here:

brainly.com/question/30821269

#SPJ11

The separation of powers with checks and balances, as enshrined in the United States Constitution, enhances the ability of the federal government to respond to the coronavirus crisis.

This system ensures that power is distributed among different branches of government and provides mechanisms to prevent any one branch from becoming too dominant.

The separation of powers allows for collaboration, accountability, and the protection of individual rights, which are crucial in addressing a complex and evolving crisis like the coronavirus pandemic.

The separation of powers with checks and balances is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government, designed to prevent the concentration of power and ensure accountability. In the context of the coronavirus crisis, this system is advantageous for several reasons.

First, it allows for a division of responsibilities and specialization among different branches of government. The executive branch can swiftly respond to emergencies, such as implementing public health measures and coordinating relief efforts. The legislative branch can pass laws and allocate resources to address the crisis.

The judicial branch can provide oversight and protect individual rights. This distribution of power enables a comprehensive and coordinated response.

Second, checks and balances promote collaboration and consensus-building. The branches of government must work together, exchanging information, proposing solutions, and reviewing actions. This fosters a cooperative approach, where multiple perspectives and expertise are considered, leading to more informed decision-making.

Third, the system ensures accountability. Each branch has the power to oversee and check the actions of the others. This prevents any one branch from abusing its authority or neglecting its duties.

The executive branch's actions can be reviewed by the judiciary, and the legislative branch can pass laws to address any deficiencies or gaps in the response. This accountability promotes transparency, adherence to the rule of law, and protection of citizens' rights.

While the separation of powers with checks and balances may introduce some complexity and potential for disagreements, it ultimately strengthens the federal government's ability to respond to crises like the coronavirus pandemic.

By fostering collaboration, specialization, and accountability, this system provides a robust framework for effective governance and promotes the interests and well-being of the people.

Learn more about coronavirus crisis here:

brainly.com/question/30821269

#SPJ11

DeWitt and Hamilton differed in their opinions on including a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. DeWitt was in favor of adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, as he believed it was necessary to protect individual liberties and limit government power. On the other hand, Hamilton opposed the inclusion of a Bill of Rights,.

Learn more about Bill of Rights: https://brainly.com/question/493206

#SPJ11

Answer:

D. All of the above. if that is an answer

Explanation:

I had a similar question to this and the answer was all if the above

Harper may recover damages for bodily harm, emotional distress, and reasonable medical expenses. So, the correct option is d. all of the above.

Harper, while walking in a park, got hit on the head with a baseball. The ball was thrown at her by Aaron who intended to hit her to show off in front of his friends. She may recover damages for bodily harm, emotional distress, and reasonable medical expenses.

Harper may be entitled to further damages, such as punitive damages. Punitive damages are given to the defendant as retribution for their malicious or careless actions. Given that Aaron's conduct in this situation was both deliberate and careless, Harper might be eligible to get punitive damages.

Therefore, the correct option is d. all of the above.

Learn more about medical expenses, here:

https://brainly.com/question/32456287

#SPJ5

The question is incomplete. So, probably the complete question is:

Harper, while walking in a park, got hit on the head with a baseball. The ball was thrown at her by Aaron who intended to hit her to show off in front of his friends. She may recover damages for:

a) bodily harm

b) emotional distress

c) reasonable medical expenses

d) all of the above

The penalties for driving without a license or with a suspended or revoked license can vary depending on the state or jurisdiction where the offense occurs.

Driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence has different punishments depending on the state or jurisdiction where the incident occurs. Nonetheless, the following are some examples of common fines that may be imposed:

Fines: A driver who is discovered driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence may face a punishment that ranges from hundreds to thousands of dollars depending on the jurisdiction and the precise circumstances of the incident.

License Suspension or Revocation: Depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the act, a driver who is caught driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence may have their licence suspended or revoked for a length of time.

For such more question on license:

https://brainly.com/question/29106760

#SPJ4

Answer:

No, they should not. Police don't always know what is right and they can make mistakes. They should stick to protecting their citizens and not controlling. They should leave that to the government.

If maybe police had to be given full power to control its citizens they would need a lot more practices, and they would need more training. Their job would be much harder.

But altogether I don't think they should.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

it's to hard to explain but why he is stealing stealing is not good he must be perfect on job and yes it cost of the training itself

Answer:

national powers: coining money, making laws, explaining laws

state powers: minimum wage, opening schools, establishing businesses

national probably has more power because they can make and establish laws, plus they are the ones who gave the states the power

Explanation:

Answer:

100,000USD

Explanation:

The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that false statements and product disparagement can cause in tort law.

Defamation is a tort that encompasses false statements about a person or entity that harm their reputation. In this case, the false claim of finding a finger in the chili caused damage to Wendy's brand image, leading to a decline in sales and public trust.

Moreover, the false statement also constitutes product disparagement or trade libel, which involves making false statements about a business's products or services to harm their reputation and economic interests.

The Wendy's chili incident highlights the potential harm caused by false statements in tort law, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and the need for legal recourse to seek compensation for the damages suffered.

Learn more about Defamation here:

https://brainly.com/question/28196525

#SPJ11

Answer:

you didnt put the options but recorders write down everything said and done that happens within the court room

Answer:

1. The mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights (ACHPR):

The African Union (formerly OAU) established the African Commission on Human and People's Rights (ACHPR) in 1981 with the mandate to promote and protect the human and people's rights of Africans through the adoption of the African Charter.  Captured in Article 30 of the African Charter are the mandates of the Commission, which were further enumerated in Article 45 to include the following:

a. Promote human and people's rights

b. Protect human and people's rights

c. Interpret the African Charter on Human and People's Rights

d. Study, research, and document problems relating to human and people's rights

e. Work and cooperate with non-governmental and intergovernmental institutions to ensure that states in African observe and respect human and people's rights

f. Disseminate vital information and organize fora for entrenching human and people's rights

g. Appoint special rapporteurs to each state of the African Union.

2. Analysis of the interface between the Commission and the African Court on Human and People's Rights:

The African Court on Human and People's Rights is an international court based in Arusha, Tanzania.  It was established to reinforce and complement the efforts and mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights.  While the ACHPR carries out human and people's rights investigations, documents its findings, and submits reports to the African Court on Human and People's Rights, the court adjudicates on human and people's rights violations.  They work in tandem with each other to achieve the mandate of the African Charter.

Explanation:

The African Charter, established by the Organization of African Unity (renamed the African Union), is a set of rules, called Articles, which guarantee and enforce certain human rights and fundamental freedoms for individuals and peoples of Africa.   It was created and finally adopted by the OAU in June 1981, and became enforceable from October 1986.  The charter established the ACHPR and the African Court on Human and People's Rights, as two vital institutions to promote and protect human and people's rights.

The statement is True, Texas is one of a handful of states that does not have a state income tax.

Texas is a state located in the southern region of the United States. It is the second-largest state by land area and the second-most populous state in the country. The state has a diverse geography, including plains, mountains, forests, and coastline. Texas has a rich history and culture that reflects its mix of Native American, Spanish, and European influences.

The state is known for its oil and gas industry, which has played a significant role in the state's economy since the early 20th century. Other major industries in Texas include agriculture, technology, and manufacturing. Texas is home to several large cities, including Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin, the state capital. The state has a diverse population, with a large Hispanic population and a growing number of Asian and African American residents.

To learn more about Texas visit here:

brainly.com/question/29874906

#SPJ4

Answer:

Vicarious liability in tort involves holding a particular entity responsible for any wrong doing . The entity may not necessarily be the one who committed it.

The entity bears the consequences and brunt of such tortious actions which may vary from accidents to loss or damage of certain goods and services. The entity is the one who pays the compensations or other forms of reliefs to the victims of the tortious actions.

The Law would violate the privileges and immunities Clause of the Constitution. The privileges and immunities clause states that states must treat visitors in the same manner as residents.

According to Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution's Privileges and Immunities Clause, "the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states."

Thus, the correct statement is the Law would violate the privileges and immunities Clause of the Constitution.

Learn more about privileges and immunities Clause here:

https://brainly.com/question/4515922

#SPJ1

Answer: Certified first responder

Explanation:

Volunteer Firefighters can be trained as Medical First Responders. These firefighters are trained specially to deal with fire extinguishing and rescue operation during fire hazards and they are also skilled in providing emergency medical aid to victims of fire hazards like they can give cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospital pre-arrival medical care to patients.

Answer:

firefighter paramedic

Explanation:

If it has been previously suspended and reinstated, your license will be suspended for accumulating 8 points within three years.

A license suspension involves the taking away of a license or privilege for some period.

Some license suspensions may be definite while others are indefinite.

Thus, while the first-time suspension is based on the accumulation of 12 points within three years, a subsequent suspension is based on 8 points.

Learn more about license suspension at https://brainly.com/question/13112961

Answer:

Legality means an act is in accordance with the law. Ethics is about concepts of right and wrong behaviour.

Answer:

Where is the MCQs? where is it? also give brainliest

All of the following are ways to avoid having a collision except riding too close to a boat in order to jump its wake. Option (b) is correct.

In physics, collision, often known as impact, is the sudden, powerful coming together of two bodies in direct contact.

There are several things to do to avoid a collision, including:

Determine the likely events that might occur in order to be ready in advance to handle them.

Understanding one's car and its features enables timely emergency actions, such as using the brakes, to be taken.

Realizing that in order to keep the PWC balanced and on the path, one must have control over its navigation.

Therefore, Option (b) is correct. Riding too close to a boat in order to jump its wake.

Learn more about Collision, here;

https://brainly.com/question/13138178

#SPJ2

Your question is incomplete, your question will be ;

The following are ways to avoid having a collision

EXCEPT:

a. anticipate possible situations before they occur

b. riding too close to a boat in order to jump its wake

C. realizing that personal watercraft take time to stop

d. knowing that you need throttle to steer a PWC

27

Explanation:

in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa

If the defense claims that your testimony does not align with that of other officers, it is not advisable to amend your testimony solely to eliminate potential jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.

As a witness, your primary duty is to provide truthful and accurate testimony based on your personal knowledge and observations. Tampering with or altering your testimony to artificially align with other officers' statements can compromise the integrity of the legal process and undermine the pursuit of justice.

While it is essential for law enforcement agencies to maintain consistency and credibility in their investigations and testimonies, it should not come at the expense of truthfulness. It is the responsibility of the defense and prosecution to present their respective cases, and the jury's task is to evaluate the evidence and testimonies provided.

If your testimony differs from that of other officers due to genuine differences in observations or recollections, it is important to explain those differences honestly and provide any relevant context or reasoning.

It is up to the jury to weigh the credibility and reliability of witnesses and their testimonies when reaching a verdict. Attempting to amend your testimony solely for the purpose of presenting a unified front can be seen as unethical and may have serious legal consequences.

Learn more about testimony here :

https://brainly.com/question/32360114

#SPJ11