The father in "The secret Latina" teaches his children about Black history and civil rights because-
A. he wants to teach them about his new identity
B. the children consider themselves black
C. the mother wants the children to know about both
cultures
D. he knows the mother can't teach them Spanish

Leo Tolstoy was a prominent Russian writer and philosopher. His novels, including "War and Peace" and "Anna Karenina," are considered masterpieces of world literature. Tolstoy's works explore themes such as love, war, and morality, and his writing style is characterized by his ability to create complex characters. He also had a significant impact on philosophy and religion, advocating for nonviolence and a moral life.

Leo Tolstoy was a renowned Russian writer and philosopher. He was born on September 9, 1828, in Tula, Russia, and died on November 20, 1910. Tolstoy is widely regarded as one of the greatest novelists of all time, and his works have had a profound influence on literature.

Tolstoy's most famous novel is "War and Peace," which he wrote over a period of six years. The novel is set during the Napoleonic Wars and explores themes such as love, war, and the human condition. It is known for its extensive cast of characters and its detailed portrayal of Russian society.

Another significant work by Tolstoy is "Anna Karenina," which tells the story of a woman trapped in a loveless marriage. The novel delves into themes of morality, love, and society's expectations. Tolstoy's writing style is characterized by his ability to create complex and realistic characters and his exploration of moral and philosophical issues.

In addition to his literary achievements, Tolstoy was also known for his philosophical and religious beliefs. Later in life, he underwent a spiritual transformation and became a devout Christian anarchist. He rejected the privileges of wealth and sought a simple and humble lifestyle. Tolstoy's beliefs influenced his later works, such as "The Kingdom of God is Within You" and "Resurrection," which explored his ideas on nonviolence and the pursuit of a moral life.

For more such questions on War and Peace, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/26923683

#SPJ8

Answer:

Jesus has been teaching and curing people in Judea and Jerusalem. Then he crosses the Jordan River to teach from city to city in the district of Perea. Soon, though, he will be back in Jerusalem.

A man exerts himself vigorously to get in through a narrow door

While Jesus is in Perea, a man asks: “Lord, are those being saved few?” The man may know of debates among the religious leaders over whether many will be saved or only a few. Jesus shifts the issue from how many will be saved to what must be done in order to be saved. “Exert yourselves vigorously to get in through the narrow door,” he says. Yes, effort, a struggle, is required. Why so? Jesus explains: “Many, I tell you, will seek to get in but will not be able.”​

To illustrate the need for vigorous effort, Jesus says: “When the householder gets up and locks the door, you will stand outside knocking at the door, saying, ‘Lord, open to us.’ . . . But he will say to you, ‘I do not know where you are from. Get away from me, all you workers of unrighteousness!’”

This illustrates the plight of a person who comes late​—apparently when it is convenient for him—​and finds that the door is shut and locked. He should have come earlier, even if that was inconvenient. It is like that with many who could have benefited from Jesus’ being there teaching them. They failed to seize the opportunity to make true worship their chief purpose in life. Those to whom Jesus has been sent have not, for the most part, accepted God’s provision for salvation. Jesus says that they will ‘weep and gnash their teeth’ when they are thrown outside. Yet people “from east and west and from north and south,” yes, from all nations, “will recline at the table in the Kingdom of God.”​

Jesus explains: “There are those last [such as non-Jews and downtrodden Jews] who will be first, and there are those first [religiously favored Jews who take pride in being descendants of Abraham] who will be last.” ( Their being “last” means that such ungrateful ones will not be in the Kingdom of God at all.

Some Pharisees now come to Jesus and advise him: “Get out and go away from here, because Herod [Antipas] wants to kill you.” Perhaps King Herod himself started this rumor to cause Jesus to flee the territory. Herod may be afraid that somehow he will become involved in the death of another prophet, even as he was in the killing of John the Baptist. But Jesus tells the Pharisees: “Go and tell that fox, ‘Look! I am casting out demons and healing people today  and tomorrow, and on the third day I will be finished.’” In calling Herod a “fox,” Jesus may be alluding to how crafty foxes can be. However, Jesus will not be manipulated or rushed by Herod or anyone else. He is going to carry out the assignment his Father gave him, doing so according to God’s schedule, not man’s.

Jesus moves on in his journey toward Jerusalem because, as he says, “it cannot be that a prophet should be put to death outside of Jerusalem.”  No Bible prophecy said that the Messiah must die in that city, so why does Jesus speak of being killed there? Because Jerusalem is the capital, where the 71-member Sanhedrin high court is located and where those accused of being false prophets would be tried. Furthermore, that is where animal sacrifices are offered. Thus, Jesus realizes that it would be inadmissible for him to be killed elsewhere.

A mother hen gathers her chicks under her wings

“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the killer of the prophets and stoner of those sent to her,” Jesus laments, “how often I wanted to gather your children together the way a hen gathers her brood of chicks under her wings! But you did not want it. Look! Your house is abandoned to you.” The nation is rejecting the Son of God and must face the consequences!

Before Jesus gets to Jerusalem, a leader of the Pharisees invites him to his house for a meal on the Sabbath. Those invited watch closely to see what Jesus might do about a man present who is suffering from dropsy (a severe accumulation of fluid, often in the legs and feet). Jesus asks the Pharisees and the experts in the Law: “Is it lawful to cure on the Sabbath or not?”​

Nobody answers. Jesus heals the man and then asks them: “Who of you, if his son or bull falls into a well, will not immediately pull him out on the Sabbath day?” Again, they have no response to his sound reasoning.

Jesus has been educating and restoring individuals in Judea and Jerusalem. Then, at that point, he crosses the Jordan River to educate from one city to another in the region of Perea. Before long, however, he will be back in Jerusalem.

Jesus is in Perea, a man inquires, Master, are those being saved not many. The man might know about banters among the strict pioneers about whether many will be saved or a couple.

Jesus moves the issue from the number of will be saved to what should be done to be saved. Strive enthusiastically to get in through the thin entryway," he says. Indeed, exertion, a battle, is required. Why so Jesus makes sense of: "Many, I tell you, will try to get in however won't be capable."

To show the requirement for enthusiastic exertion, Jesus says: "When the householder gets up and locks the entryway, you will remain outside thumping at the entryway, saying, 'Ruler, open to us. Be that as it may, he will share with you, 'I don't have the foggiest idea where you are from. Move away from me, all you laborers of indecency.

For more information about Jesus, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/21473660

To ensure successful communication when addressing a legitimate complaint involving two individuals in the United States, individuals should conduct thorough research, gather relevant information, choose an appropriate communication channel, maintain professionalism and respect, consider legal advice if needed, and follow up on the complaint. These strategies maximize the chances of achieving a productive dialogue and desired resolution.

To achieve successful communication when addressing a legitimate complaint involving two individuals in the United States, several strategies can be implemented within the given context. First and foremost, it is crucial to conduct thorough research and gather all relevant information related to the complaint. This includes identifying specific details, supporting evidence, and any applicable laws or regulations. By having a well-prepared and fact-based argument, individuals can present their case with confidence.

Next, it is advisable to choose an appropriate communication channel that suits the context and individuals involved. This could be through a formal written letter, email, or even an in-person meeting. It is important to be respectful and concise in the communication, clearly articulating the issue and desired resolution.

Furthermore, it is essential to maintain a professional and courteous tone throughout the communication process. Being respectful and avoiding personal attacks or emotional outbursts enhances the chances of a productive dialogue.

Additionally, individuals should consider seeking legal advice or assistance if necessary, especially if the complaint pertains to a legal matter. A lawyer can provide guidance on the best course of action and ensure that the communication is aligned with legal requirements.

Lastly, it is crucial to follow up on the complaint. Establishing a timeline for response or resolution and politely requesting updates can help ensure that the communication does not get overlooked.

By following these strategies, individuals can maximize the likelihood of their complaint being effectively addressed and their communication achieving the desired outcome.

For more such information on: legitimate complaint

https://brainly.com/question/25725191

#SPJ8

The question probable may be:

What strategies can individuals in the United States employ to ensure successful communication when presenting a legitimate complaint that requires the attention of two specific individuals within a given context?

The given phrases were categorized according to their classes and the Headword of each phrase was identified. Furthermore, a sentence was made using each phrase to explain its usage in a sentence.

For more questions on phrases

https://brainly.com/question/27892321

#SPJ8

Answer:

period.

Explanation:

Answer:

capital "i" is the punctuation

Explanation:

The narrator is 33 years old and about 8 years have passed between the beginning of Gilead and the time the narrator is living.

We can reach this answer because:

As we can see, the protagonist and narrator is telling the story of when she was 33 years old, but she shows the moments when Gilead began to be established when she was around 25 years old.

With that, we can say that about eight years have passed.

more information:

https://brainly.com/question/4049326?referrer=searchResults

https://brainly.com/question/20539015?referrer=searchResults

The meaning of the given words are given below so you can have a better understanding of getting the right answer:

a. Corruption: This refers to the dishonest and fraudulent conduct.

b. Contradiction: This is the situation when a proposition conflicts with itself,

c. Picture: This is an image of something.

d. Reversal: This is a change to an opposite direction, position,

This refers to the term that is used to describe and define the use of words in a given or particular language.

Hence, it can be seen that the word meanings has been given above to help you get the right answer.

Read more about vocabulary here:

https://brainly.com/question/1587636

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

They are different because racism is a form of bullying when it comes to skin color and bias is picking favorites (gender most of the time)

Answer:

represent an idea. allegories use characters to reveal morals/messages in a story, poem, etc.

A purposeful anecdote is a straightforward story that addresses a bigger point about society or human instinct, whose various characters might address genuine figures. An allegory most often uses characters to the correct answer is to explain the current event.

Allegory is the statement of certainties or speculations about human life through emblematic fictitious figures and their activities. It incorporates such structures as tale and illustration.

As a scholarly gadget or creative structure, an allegory is an account or visual portrayal wherein a person, spot, or occasion can be deciphered to address a deeper significance with moral or political importance.

For more information about allegory, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/3021285

Neoclassicists understand beauty Option B. A quality possessed by objects

Neoclassicism, a movement that emerged in the 18th century as a reaction against the flamboyance of the Baroque period, had a distinct understanding of beauty. For the Neoclassicists, beauty was not merely a subjective perception or a response to the vastness of nature (option A) or a subjective quality defined by the perceiver (option C). Instead, they saw beauty as an inherent characteristic of objects, guided by principles of reason, order, and harmony.

Neoclassical aesthetics drew inspiration from the art and architecture of ancient Greece and Rome, seeking to revive the classical ideals of balance, proportion, and restraint. They believed that beauty resided in adherence to these principles, which they viewed as objective and universally applicable. Neoclassical artists aimed to create works that reflected these principles, emphasizing simplicity, clarity, and symmetry.

In their understanding, beauty was seen as timeless and eternal, transcending individual preferences. It was not a subjective experience dependent on personal taste or cultural context. Instead, it was an objective quality that could be recognized and appreciated by all who possessed an understanding of the principles of classical art and aesthetics.

In summary, the Neoclassicists understood beauty as a quality possessed by objects, guided by principles of reason, order, and harmony. It was not a subjective experience but an objective characteristic that could be recognized through adherence to classical ideals. Therefore, the correct option is B.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

How did the Neoclassicists understand beauty?

A. The feeling of facing the immensity of nature.

B. A quality possessed by objects

C. A subjective quality defined by the perceiver.

Know more about Neoclassicists here:

https://brainly.com/question/1083282

#SPJ8

John Wilkes Booth actively backed the cause of the South. He was not shy about expressing his support for slavery and contempt for US President Abraham Lincoln.

Booth, a Marylander by birth, was a fervent Confederate supporter throughout the Civil War. He planned to kidnap Lincoln and conceal him until all Confederate captives were freed before the tragic night at Ford's Theatre.

Booth actively promoted slavery, and in 1859 he joined a Virginian company that helped catch John Brown after his raid on Harper's Ferry. Booth saw Brown being put to death firsthand. in the Civil War.

To know more about John Wilkes Booth visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/896872

#SPJ1

Answer:someone help I don’t know what to do

Explanation: please

The summary of the passage is "The conditions of frontier life in America have shaped important intellectual traits."

The passage can be summarized as follows:

Travelers who explored the frontier from colonial times onwards have described common characteristics that have persisted even as higher social organizations developed.

As a result, the American intellect has acquired distinctive qualities such as a combination of coarseness, strength, acuteness, and acquisitiveness; a practical and inventive mindset that finds quick solutions; a mastery of material things without much focus on the artistic, but with the ability to achieve significant outcomes; a restless and energetic nature; a dominant individualism that can be both positive and negative; and a sense of freedom that brings buoyancy and exuberance. These traits are attributed to the frontier or are found elsewhere due to the influence of the frontier.

Learn more about passages at:

https://brainly.com/question/25950911

#SPJ1

Reverend Parris is a suspicious, ambitious, but strangely self-pitying individual. John Proctor in particular despises him, and Parris is keen to establish himself as a respected member of the town.

During the witch trials in 1692–1693 in Salem Village, Samuel Parris served as the church's minister. He has been a contentious figure in the community since he first moved there several years earlier, and he actively supported the witch-hunts that had begun in his own home after his niece and daughter experienced unexplained fits.

Parris fears that Salem residents will do as Andover residents did and throw out the court. The townspeople are upset about Rebecca Nurse and John Proctor's impending execution, he tells Danforth.

Learn more about Parris here:

https://brainly.com/question/17116205

#SPJ1

Answer:

To be concise is to be very brief.

The rhyme schemes of this poem is D. aabbb

A rhyme scheme is the arrangement of rhymes at the end of each line in a poem or song. The traditional way to refer to it is to say that lines beginning with the same letter all rhyme.

the precise arrangement of rhymes within a poem's or stanza's lines. If it is one of several set rhyme patterns, it can be recognized by the name of the poet who is typically associated with that particular set rhyme.

For instance, if the final words of the first and third lines and the final words of the second and fourth lines rhyme.

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is;

Which option shows the rhyme scheme of this poem?

(There once was a woman named Soo whose library books were due. She always forgot since she was a tot and her fees were an awful lot.)

A. abcbc

B. aaabb

C. ababa

D. aabbb

To learn more about Rhyme Scheme here:

https://brainly.com/question/21456216

#SPJ1

Answer:

While both characters have their own quirks Dale gribble is objectively the weirder of the two. you can excuse Bobby's behavior to him being a child but Dave is an absolute maniac. He's a paranoid conspiracy theorist with a dash of sociopathy,, all of that could be forgiven if he wasn't 43 and still not paying taxes.

This research question is insightful because it explores the motivation behind Rachel Carson's decision to publish two books specifically focusing on creatures and places in and around the ocean.

1. The research question is insightful: The question delves into the specific aspect of Rachel Carson's motivation, which adds depth to the research paper.

2. The research question explores motivation: By inquiring about the motivation behind Rachel Carson's choice to publish books about oceanic creatures and places, the research question aims to uncover her underlying inspirations and reasons.

3. The research question focuses on two books: The question narrows down the scope to Carson's publication of two specific books, indicating a specific area of interest for the research paper.

4. The research question focuses on creatures and places in and around the ocean: By specifically mentioning creatures and places in and around the ocean, the question highlights Carson's thematic focus, providing a clear direction for the research paper.

5. The research question is open-ended: The question allows for a comprehensive exploration of Carson's motivations, enabling the researcher to analyze various factors that might have influenced her decision to write about oceanic creatures and places.

In summary, Abram's research question about Rachel Carson's motivation to publish two books about creatures and places in and around the ocean is insightful because it explores her specific motivations and provides a clear direction for the research paper.

For more such questions on motivation, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/11871721

#SPJ8

The margin of error (m) for the 95% confidence interval for μ, the mean waiting time in minutes is a measure of the accuracy of the statistical estimate that is created. the sample estimate is likely to differ from the true population parameter by ±0.525 units.

Margin of error (m) for the 95% confidence interval for μ, the mean waiting time in minutes is a measure of the accuracy of the statistical estimate that is created. The margin of error helps one define the range of values that lie on either side of the sample estimate and the population parameter. The margin of error formula is given by; E = z * σ / √n Where E is the margin of error, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size, and z is the standard normal critical value that corresponds to the level of confidence in the interval estimate.

For the 95% confidence interval, the value of z is 1.96.The formula can be rearranged to solve for σ which is given by;

σ = E * √n / z

If the margin of error (E) is known, and the sample size (n) and level of confidence (95%) is given, one can calculate the margin of error using the formula.

Therefore, the margin of error (m) for the 95% confidence interval for μ, the mean waiting time in minutes is given by;

m = E * √n / z

E = 0.35, z = 1.96,

and n = 225m = 0.35 * √225 / 1.96

m = 0.035 * 15m = 0.525

The margin of error for the 95% confidence interval for μ, the mean waiting time in minutes is 0.525. This means that the sample estimate is likely to differ from the true population parameter by ±0.525 units.

For more such questions on The margin of error, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29328438

#SPJ8

The sample questions for a seminar a from the book Anthem by Any are:

Anthem's central topic is individualism. The entire work is essentially a tale intended to emphasize the significance of Ayn Rand's concept of individual will.

 Anthem is a dystopian fiction book created by Russian-American writer Ayn in 1937    and first published in the United Kingdom in 1938.

The narrative   is set in an indeterminate future time when humanity has entered another Dark Age.

Learn more about Anthem at:

https://brainly.com/question/32146063

#SPJ1

Answer:

For the Gallagher Girls Series

Explanation:

Netflix and Disney,

I have an idea that I implore you to strongly consider. The six books of the Gallagher Girls series would make for a thrilling and captivating TV show. With so many students at home now during these strange times of the Coronavirus, they are looking for a new TV show to binge. These books would be binge-worthy indeed as a show. The six books that are told by Cammie Morgan, are filled with powerful girls, a captivating love story, along with so many surprises that will have viewers on the edge of their seats needing more. These books by Ally Carter are something that a lot of teens these days need, an escape from reality into the incredible world of espionage. Not only is the incredible plot enough to pull in viewers, but so are the characters. Mr. Solomon and Zach, for example, are described as so hot that "James bond would feel insecure" and "Indiana Jones would look like a mama's boy." The numerous fans of these books would devour this TV show and share it with everyone they know. So, with this, I strongly encourage you all to make this book series into a TV show.

Sincerely, y/n

Answer:

common: city.

proper: New York.

singular: banana.

plural: bananas.

collective: family.

compound: ice cream.

concrete: table.

abstract: anger.

Explanation:

Answer:A

Explanation: explaining why steaming music services are unfair there you go!

The author's argument that music streaming services are bad is made in the third response choice. The author then clarifies his position and justifies it.

To learn more about Explanatory thesis refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/2094985

#SPJ1

Answer:

which poem?

Explanation:

The line's meter that is iambic is I went to Boston Sunday morning. The correct option is B.

Iambic pentameter is the writing style of poems and dramas. In Iambic pattern, 10 syllables are used in a specific pattern.

The options are attached:

A. Pirouette for the folks in the back.

B. I went to Boston Sunday morning.

C. Martin isn't ever going fishing now.

D. Music is harmony, rhythm, and melody.

Thus, the correct option is B. I went to Boston Sunday morning.

Learn more about iambic pattern

https://brainly.com/question/1331994

#SPJ1

If the paragraph gives evidence that backs this claim, such an approach is called C: conclusion and support

As we can see in the paragraph above, the author began with a conclusion which is that his date with Kathleen was the most disastrous experience in his life.

At this point, the reader might want to know why this was the case. He will provide more points at this juncture to support his conclusion. Cause and effect is used when a problem is stated and the resultant effect follows. So, the thoughts in the paragraph above flow from conclusion to support.

Complete Question:

A paragraph starts with the sentence 'My date with Kathleen was the most disastrous experience of my life. Then the paragraph gives evidence that backs this claim Such an approach is called

A: classification

B: cause and effect

C: conclusion and support

D: definition

Learn more about claims here:

https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

Answer: A. He wants

Explanation:

Which one makes the most sense? Fill each word into the blank and see which one sounds right.

He spent a year studying chemistry, and he to look for an internship

He spent a year studying chemistry, and want to look for an internship

He spent a year studying chemistry, and he wants to look for an internship(correct)

Answer:

He tried to make us act plays and to enter Into

masquerades, In which the characters were drawn from the heroes of Roncesvalles, of the Round Table of King Arthur

Explanation: I just learned about this yesterday

Answer:

Reword if needed

Graham's statement was impactful because he appealed to the emotions and values of the jury, emphasizing the unique loyalty and devotion that a dog shows to its owner. He contrasted the fickleness and potential disloyalty of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog. This argument likely resonated with the jury and tapped into their sense of empathy and compassion. Additionally, Graham's eloquent language and vivid imagery helped to paint a powerful picture of the bond between a man and his dog. Overall, Graham's statement was a compelling argument that successfully convinced the jury of the importance of a dog's life and the responsibility that humans have in protecting and respecting that life.

Answer:

George Graham Vest's statement in defense of a man's dog was impactful because it appealed to the emotions of the jurors and the public. By contrasting the fickleness of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog, he created a powerful and relatable image that resonated with the jury. The use of vivid and evocative language, such as describing the dog sleeping on the cold ground and guarding its master even in death, helped to further strengthen the emotional impact of the statement. Additionally, the statement was delivered at the end of the trial, which allowed it to leave a lasting impression on the jurors as they deliberated on the case. As a result, the statement helped to win the case and has since become a memorable and iconic piece of American legal history.

Answer:

no no no, me me I'II HELP YOU

Explanation:

:)