The exclusionary rule was established to punish officers for their errors in collecting evidence by not allowing illegally obtained evidence to be admitted into a criminal hearing.
TrueFalse

Boatright’s analysis of the stakeholder theory depicts a positive evaluation of the theory, however, there are certain elements of the theory that he considers flawed.

This paper will examine the strengths and weaknesses of Boatright's analysis of the stakeholder theory and why it cannot be fully accepted.

According to Boatright, the stakeholder theory has been effective in business practices, although, it has not been taken seriously in theory. He argues that the theory is not just about corporate social responsibility but also about the management of corporations and the appropriate actions that should be taken to manage corporations and the stakeholders involved. He acknowledges that the stakeholder theory could still be improved by giving more clarity on its key concepts and how it should be incorporated into practice.

Boatright's strongest argument against his claim that all stakeholders are best served when managers focus on profit for shareholders is the impact of social capital. Social capital argues that companies need to be responsive to their surrounding communities to gain trust and better relationships with customers and stakeholders. In this view, profitability is not always the main goal. Social capital helps companies to gain social resources like trust, confidence, and loyalty. Hence, Boatright fails to acknowledge the impact of social capital, which is vital to building long-term sustainability and a positive reputation for companies.

Read more about stakeholder's theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/32536678

#SPJ11

Incomplete question. However, I inferred you are referring to the prescriptive Period for violation of special laws as enshrined under Act. No. 3326​ guiding the Philippines.

Explanation:

Note that the prescriptive period refers to a legal terminology that simply refers to the maximum period (time) after an event before legal proceedings may be initiated.

Here's a summary of the act;

Section 1. Violation of special laws should be:

"(a) after a year for offenses punished only by a fine or by imprisonment for not more than one month, or both;

(b) after four years for those punished by imprisonment for more than one month, but less than two years;

(c) after eight years for those punished by imprisonment for two years or more, but less than six years; and

(d) after twelve years for any other offense punished by imprisonment for six years or more, except the crime of treason, which shall prescribe after twenty years. Violations penalized by municipal ordinances shall prescribe after two months. .."

Section. 3 defines special laws as acts defining and penalizing violations of the law not included in the Penal Code.

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.

-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.

The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

Explanation:

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Visas and green cards...... ;-) mark brainliest... Thank you

Answer:

The answer is... A & B. if it's a two option question it's A & B, if it's not just choose one of them.

Explanation:

They had a great deal of responsibility and helped support their families. They were the only members of their family able to obtain employment.

Courts responded on the grounds that the burdens of nuisance abatement that would be placed on the polluter and the community required courts to set regulations that assured that polluters would never be required to abate their nuisances past the point where they could no longer be tolerated.  

The eradication of a problem by the party who has suffered without resorting to legal action is referred to as abatement of nuisance. The law does not favor this type of remedy, but is accessible in specific situations.

Occasionally, a plaintiff's latent sensitivity or susceptibility to more severe harm causes the plaintiff's injuries on abatement of nuisance to be far worse than those that would have been sustained by a typical individual.

Therefore, the nuisance abatement reassured that polluters wouldn't ever be obliged to stop their annoyances before they were intolerable.  

Learn more about the nuisance abatement, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17751112

#SPJ4

Answer:

Valid

Explanation:

From the question, the type of mistake described in which one party made the mistake, is known as Unilateral Mistake. However, Unilateral mistake rarely void or cause invalidation of a contract, except if the nonmistaken party is aware of the mistake or is the cause of the mistake.

However, in this case, the nonmistaken party is unaware of the mistake and is not the cause of the mistake, then it is generally expected that the court will hold that contract is VALID.

Answer: 3. Xây dựng các phương án tư vấn cho tình huống nói trên (dành cho tất cả sinh viên)

Explanation: Cả hai câu trả lời một và hai đều có thể áp dụng được. Do đó, câu trả lời thứ ba là câu trả lời chính xác.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/18468755

Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code

Explanation:

I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad  answer lol

Answer:

The exclusionary rule

Explanation:

the decision in Mappy v. Ohio declared that evidence that is obtained through an illegal search or seizure can not be used as evidence and must be excluded. This means that if an officer finds evidence of a crime on you but does not announce Miranda rights before searching you, then the evidence found from your crime can not be used against you in a court.

A comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.

This is the term that is used to refer to the system that takes cognition of the work that is done by the females and the minorities and tries to bridge the gap that existed with the pay that the men receive.

Hence we can say that the comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.

Read more on wage systems here: https://brainly.com/question/25863464

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. referral to mandatory drug treatment program

Explanation:

Brainliest?

The judicial branch may have numerous opportunities to interpret the Constitution thanks to the structure of federal courts and a Supreme Court.

Every individual accused of a crime is guaranteed the right to a fair trial by a judge and jury of their peers under Article III of the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court is the first and only Court to consider a case, which is referred to as original jurisdiction. The Constitution restricts matters with original jurisdiction to those involving disagreements between states or among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers.

To know more about judicial branch visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/17479440

#SPJ1

Answer:

it's the one on the top.

Answer:

A professional driver who is physically fit and trained in high-speed driving might have a reaction time of 0.2 seconds for a given situation, while the average motorist may have a slower reaction time of 0.5 seconds, 0.8 seconds or even 1 second.

Explanation:

Answer:

about a second or .5 a second

Explanation:

That is correct. Texas law requires voters to present an acceptable form of photo identification before they can cast their ballot.

The list of acceptable IDs includes options such as a Texas driver's license, election identification certificate, personal identification card, or license to carry a handgun. The ID must have the voter's photo, name, and date of birth, and it must have been issued by the state of Texas or another state, or by the federal government.

It is important for voters to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted. If a voter does not have an acceptable ID, they may cast a provisional ballot, which will be counted only if the voter presents a valid ID to the elections office within 72 hours after the election.

Overall, it is important for voters to be aware of the requirements for voting in Texas and to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted.  

Learn more about Texas visit: brainly.com/question/30504811

#SPJ11

Intellectual property can be legally protected even though it is not a physical object. This statement is true.

Intellectual property (IP) refers to the set of property rights that arise from the creation of the mind. Some examples of intellectual property include inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols and names.

The term intellectual property refers to creations of the mind such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. Intellectual property is intangible, meaning it cannot be touched or seen. However, it is protected by law. Intellectual property rights are rights given to individuals over the creations of their minds, allowing them to control the use of their creations for a limited time.

Learn more about Intellectual property

https://brainly.com/question/30554069

#SPJ11

Answer:

Identification: find the evidence, noting where it is stored.

Preservation: isolate, secure, and preserve the data.

Analysis: reconstruct fragments of data and draw conclusions based on the evidence found.

Documentation: create a record of all the data to recreate the crime scene.

Presentation: summarize and draw a conclusion.

Answer:

State-dependent

In Florida, theft that exceeds $100,000 is classified as grand theft in the first degree.

It is punishable up to a $10,000 fine and 30 years in prison.

Explanation:

The law, citizens, and community play vital roles in protecting and supporting victims of human rights violations through legal frameworks, advocacy, and fostering a culture of respect and support.

The law's essential role is to safeguard and assist victims of human rights violations by creating legal structures, outlawing offenses, and facilitating avenues for justice.

Citizens can aid victims through rights advocacy, awareness-raising, and support services, while the community can contribute by cultivating a climate of human rights respect, providing safe environments, and promoting inclusiveness.

These combined efforts establish a network of protection, support, and accountability that addresses violations, empowering victims to pursue justice and find healing.

Learn more about human rights violations on:

https://brainly.com/question/32209864

#SPJ1

Answer:

B The amount the borrower owes to the lender.

Answer:

u can check out that website.....I dont know how much it will help tho

This statement is True because When someone is bound against their will in a small area, it may be considered false imprisonment. The claimant is entitled to remuneration for lost time, for inconveniences incurred.

Particularly, life without parole raises concerns about the use of harsh, inhuman, and humiliating punishment and compromises the right to human decency by eliminating all possibility of release and thereby nullifying the rehabilitative intent of incarceration.

People who are incarcerated essentially have no influence over their daily life, including when they get up, what they eat, what occupations they have, and when they may engage in leisure activities. Feelings of dependency and powerlessness may result from this.

To know more about imprisonment  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9667067

#SPJ4

Answer:

By not hanging clothes over the left rear mirror. This maneuver blocked the blind spot of vehicle A. Given that they are parallel parked in an area of commerce, however, one could also argue vehicle C should have been paying more attention as well. Had Vehicle C reacted to the movement of Vehicle A in a swifter manner, there would also have been no collision. This, combined with lower residential speed limits implies C was distracted driving.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.

Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.

In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.

Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953

#SPJ11

Answer:

- recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill.

Explanation:

Recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill is NOT an option for committees to utilize with respect to a bill. Thus, option D is correct.

Committees keep an eye on existing government activities, spot problems that warrant legislative scrutiny, compile and assess data, and suggest actions to take.

The option for parties to use with regard to a bill is NOT to recommend that the state's highest court judge the measure's destiny. So when the original chamber declines to accept the revisions made by the opposing chamber.  

The preside executives of every house may create a panel made up of five senators from every chamber to address the disagreements between forms of the resolution that were passed by the legislature. Therefore, option D is the correct option.

Learn more about committee, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11621970

#SPJ6

Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury,

Answer:

How does population decline affect a country?

The possible impacts of a declining population that leads to permanent recession are Decline in basic services and infrastructure. If the GDP of a community declines, there is less demand for basic services such as hotels, restaurants and shops. The employment in these sectors then suffers.

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe your answer should be $950. Hope this helps.

Explanation: