The doctrine of comity holds that there must be mutual respect for the laws, institutions, and governments of other countries in the matter of jurisdiction over their own citizens.
a. True
b. False

Answer:

the right answer is A answer

Voter identity cards have the following benefits:

drawbacks

What are the more drawbacks of id?

To learn more about voter  id refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13895279

#SPJ2

FDR's foreign policy, shaped by the Great Depression and World War II, differed from the Progressive Era by emphasizing domestic recovery and international cooperation.

FDR's foreign policy approach aimed to address the economic crisis domestically while adopting a more pragmatic stance internationally. He implemented the Good Neighbor Policy, which sought to improve relations with Latin American countries, moving away from direct interventionism. FDR also emphasized collective security and international cooperation through initiatives like the establishment of the United Nations. His foreign policy focused on balancing global stability, advancing democratic values, and addressing economic and security challenges through diplomacy and alliances.

Learn more about FDR's foreign policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/9631442

#SPJ11

Answer: gender based voilence in the sence that either a woman can be a victim of voilence or a man as well

We shouldn't only see it that only women can be victims of voilence, in the sense that there are men with women's bone in them that the can't help but fall victim of those women who could be mistaken as men in the way they treat the opposite gender

Gender based violence isn't when the opposite gender raises his or her hands on you but on small cases like a woman who cherishes to be a landlord where as the husband has nothing to his name, this woman is voilating her husband's right which may cause the man to become violent to his wife

Explanation:

Answer:

no idea. b

Explanation:

sorry i dont no

The damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is obviously visible in long-term .

To know more about Drugs visit

https://brainly.com/question/4920246

#SPJ1

The Tim-related law that is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside, and has been enacted in every state, is Move Over Law.

What is the Move Over Law?

The Move Over Law requires that motorists change lanes or slow down if they are driving near a stopped emergency vehicle with its emergency lights activated. The law was established to safeguard emergency responders who are at risk of being hit by vehicles while working at the roadside.

In addition to emergency responders, the law often applies to other sorts of vehicles, such as sanitation, utility, and maintenance crews, among others. If drivers do not follow the Move Over Law, they risk receiving a ticket and, in some cases, having their license suspended.

In conclusion, the Move Over Law is designed to safeguard emergency responders and other personnel working on the roadside. The law requires motorists to change lanes or slow down when driving near stopped emergency vehicles with their emergency lights activated.

Learn more about the Move Over Law:

https://brainly.com/question/11470617

#SPJ11

Answer:

Most Whites don’t see themselves as having “White Privilege,” particularly Whites from working class or low-income backgrounds like myself, and yet few of us are ever stopped by a policeman simply because we’re driving, walking or jogging through a neighborhood, in which they perceive we don’t belong. All of this simply because of the color of one’s skin

A law that sets a time limit for starting a lawsuit is called a statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations vary depending on the type of lawsuit and the jurisdiction in which it is filed.

The purpose of a statute of limitations is to ensure that lawsuits are filed within a reasonable amount of time and to prevent individuals from being sued for actions that occurred so long ago that it would be difficult or impossible to defend against them. It is important to be aware of the statute of limitations in your jurisdiction and for your specific type of case, as failure to file within the time limit can result in the case being dismissed.

Learn more about jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/31093146

#SPJ11

Answer:

All of the Laws

Explanation:

Wyndham was accused of inadequate data protection practices and violating Section 5 of the FTC Act. List of items that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices include it did not maintain inventory, did not perform regular security audits, did not install firewalls etc.

List of items that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices:

1. Wyndham did not maintain an inventory of computers, servers, and other devices connected to its network.

2. Wyndham did not perform regular security audits or conduct vulnerability scans.

3. Wyndham did not install firewalls to protect its network.

4. Wyndham did not require complex passwords for its users or prohibit easy-to-guess passwords.

5. Wyndham did not restrict access to its network by using appropriate authentication controls.

6. Wyndham did not encrypt its stored data or payment card data during transmission.

7. Wyndham did not use a current and up-to-date operating system on its servers.

8. Wyndham did not update its security patches and software regularly.

9. Wyndham did not ensure that third-party vendors used secure protocols for connecting to its network.

10. Wyndham did not establish a formal incident response plan to address security breaches or train its employees on data security practices.

To know more about FTC act, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30084927#

#SPJ11

According to contemporary functionalists, ensuring positive interactions between political cliques is not one of the four main functions of government.

Thus the correct answer is option C.

The four important functions of the government as per the contemporary functionalists are planning and directing society handling international relations, including warfare. maintaining law and order and meeting social needs.

Politics and the government are seen as tools by functionalists for enforcing rules and controlling conflict.

Active social change, is seen negatively by functionalists since it drives change and may have unfavourable side effects that may need to be made up for.

Functionalists favour social harmony and order. Societal challenges brought on by dysfunction encourage social reform.

For instance, functionalists would view financial contributions to political campaigns as a tool to keep citizens engaged with the democratic process.

To know more about functionalists click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7787153

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. Support predictability

Explanation:

Predictable daily routines support young children in knowing what to expect and what is expected of them, leading to fewer disruptive behaviors. A consistent daily schedule and step-by-step routines give children a predictable day.

Answer:

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.), there are different requirements for serving a summons, subpoena, or complaint as opposed to serving pleadings and other documents such as motions. The following are the requirements for each type of document:

Summons: According to Rule 4 of the F.R.C.P., a summons must be served with a copy of the complaint. The summons must be served within 90 days after the complaint is filed with the court. The service of the summons must be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.

Subpoena: Rule 45 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of subpoenas. A subpoena must be served on the person named in the subpoena. The service of the subpoena may be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.

Complaint: Rule 5 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of complaints. A complaint must be served on each defendant along with a summons. The service of the complaint may be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.

Pleadings and other documents such as motions: Rule 5 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of pleadings and other documents such as motions. The service of these documents may be made by mail, electronic means, or in person. The service may be made by a party or a non-party.

Explanation:

It's important to note that the requirements for serving a summons, subpoena, or complaint are more stringent than those for serving pleadings and other documents such as motions. For example, the service of a summons must be made in person, while the service of pleadings and other documents may be made by mail or electronic means.

Overall, the F.R.C.P. provides detailed guidance on the proper methods for serving various legal documents in a civil action, and it's important to follow these rules to ensure that the service is legally valid.

Answer:

$14,750

Explanation:

Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.

Purchase Price = $112,500

Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875

Amount to be Paid by the buyer

= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost

=$16,875 + $4,375

=$21,250

Since the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,

The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing

=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit

=21250 - 6500

=$14,750

Cash is a form of legal cash than can be used to trade commodities or pay debts. The value of assets can be turned into cash quickly is commonly referred to as "cash".

Given Information:-

Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.

Purchase Price = $112,500

Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875

Amount to be Paid by the buyer:-

= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost

=$16,875 + $4,375

=$21,250

Since, the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,

The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing

=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit

=21250 - 6500

=$14,750

To know more about purchase price, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1698287

Answer:

Lobbyists help inform Congress and the public about problems and issues. Lobbyists provide technical information about legislative proposals. And lobbyists let lawmakers know whom a bill would help and whom it would hurt.

Explanation:

After receiving scathing comments from "Josh Evans" on My Space, Megan Meier committed. Later, it was determined that "Josh Evans" was a made-up character that two girls had constructed. This well-known instance of cyberbullying occurred.

Bullying that occurs on electronic platforms like social media, messaging apps, text messages, or email is known as cyberbullying. It entails the intentional use of communication technologies to annoy, degrade,  or threaten someone.

One of the traits of cyberbullying is that it can happen any time of day or night, making it challenging for victims to get away from it. Cyberbullying, in contrast to conventional bullying, has a wider audience and spreads quickly.

To know more about cyberbullying visit :

https://brainly.com/question/8142675

#SPJ4

Answer:

Its B and D

Explanation:

The term alternative dispute resolution (ADR) means any procedure, agreed to by the parties of a dispute, in which they use the services of a neutral party to assist them in reaching agreement and avoiding litigation. (litigation means legal action)

Answer:

federal government

I hope it's helps you

The argument for radicalism is preferable to achieve social justice is that:

Incremental change is one that makes effort to solve issues through the use of small, systematic steps that brings about or influence change over time.

Note that through the incremental method, governments can lower the risk and base their focus in working to make the system better instead of starting from the bottom and forming a new one.

The disadvantage of in radicalism is that it often begins from grassroots activism and most time it is always too spontaneous.

Learn more about radicalism  from

https://brainly.com/question/8952483

#SPJ2

Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body.  They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that

Explanation:

Workers have a right to refuse a job if they believe in good faith that the job exposes them to danger.

The concept of good faith tells us that the worker has had reasonable grounds to believe in the existent of danger.

They have the right to refuse any job that they consider to be dangerous and they are covered from any forms of reprisals for doing such.

Read more on good faith here:

https://brainly.com/question/24725464

Option (a), Agreements that do not impose legal duties and for which no remedy is provided are considered void contracts.

A void contract is one that was never meant to have legal force to begin with. Although void and voidable contracts are both null and void, a void contract cannot be ratified. Legally, a void contract is treated as though it never occurred and is no longer subject to judicial enforcement.

A contract that was void from the start, or at the time it was made, is void forever. A void contract is one that was originally valid but is now null and void as a result of unforeseeable events. It is not enforceable and neither of the parties are subject to any legal duties as a result.

Learn more about void contracts: https://brainly.com/question/30026669

#SPJ4

Answer:

i agree im abit of an artist

The judge's decision was grounded on the principle of  regard decisis, which is Latin for" let the decision stand".

This means that the judge was  obliged to follow the precedent set by the  analogous case from three times agone.This means that the judge was  obliged to reach the same conclusion as the court did in the  former case, anyhow of the data presented in the current case.   gawk decisis is a  foundation of the US legal system and is grounded on the idea that all cases should be decided the same way, anyhow of who the parties involved are. This ensures that the law remains  harmonious, and that people can calculate on it in making  opinions. It also allows people to  prognosticate the  outgrowth of their cases, which helps to  give a sense of fairness and justice.

To know more about prognosticate  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11554778?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.

Explanation:

Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

A. True Under the Privacy Act, agency disclosures of records retrievable by a person's name are generally forbidden to anyone other than the person to whom the record relates.

This means that agencies must generally obtain the written consent of an individual before disclosing their records to any third party, except in certain limited circumstances, such as when the disclosure is required by law or when the disclosure is made to other government agencies for authorized purposes.

The Privacy Act is a federal law that regulates the collection, use, and dissemination of personal information by federal agencies. The Act was enacted in 1974 to safeguard individual privacy from the misuse of personal information by the federal government.

Learn more about agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/10067107

#SPJ11