The diagonal of rectangle ABCD measures 2 inches in
length.
B
C
60°
2
30%
D
What is the length of line segment AB
O 1 inch
O√3 inches
O4 inches
O 4√3 inches

By examining the dotplot, you can see the frequency and distribution of the miles run by Roger. For example, there are 4 instances where Roger ran 0.5 miles, 3 instances where he ran 4 miles, and so on.

The dotplot that displays the data correctly is the one titled "Roger's Training" with a number line labeled "Miles Run" that goes from 0.5 to 5 in increments of 0.5. The dotplot should have the following data points:
0.5, 4
1, 1
1.5, 2
2, 2
2.5, 3
3, 2
3.5, 0
4, 3
4.5, 2
5, 1
This dotplot accurately represents the number of miles Roger ran each day over a 20-day period. Each dot represents a data point from the given list of miles run. The number line indicates the range of miles run, starting from 0.5 and ending at 5, with increments of 0.5.
By examining the dotplot, you can see the frequency and distribution of the miles run by Roger. For example, there are 4 instances where Roger ran 0.5 miles, 3 instances where he ran 4 miles, and so on. This visual representation allows you to easily interpret the data and observe any patterns or trends in Roger's training.

To learn more about dotplot

https://brainly.com/question/15853311

#SPJ11

A transformation is applied to a figure to create a new figure, the transformation does not preserve congruence is option C, A dilation by a scale factor of 5.

An isometry is a transformation that retains congruence. In other words, a transformation in which the side lengths and angle measurements of the Image and Pre-Image are the same. Isometries include translations, reflections, and rotations. A translation is a "direct isometry" since it not only maintains congruence but also, unlike reflections and rotations, maintains orientation.

A dilation, on the other hand, is not an isometry since its Image is not consistent with its Pre-Image.

A transformation composition indicates that two or more transformations will be executed on the same item. On the same point, for example, we may do a reflection and then a translation.

Learn more about Congruence;

https://brainly.com/question/9475847

#SPJ4

Taking a difference, we can see that the trip to city C is 482.6 mi longer.

Here we know that the distance from city a to city b is 256.8 miles, and the distance from city a to city c is 739.4 miles

To find how much farther is the trip to city c than the trip to city b, we just need to take the difference between the two distances above.

That means that we need to take the distance to city c and subtract the distance to city b.

We will get:

739.4 mi -  256.8 mi = 482.6 mi

The trip to city C is 482.6 mi more than the trip to city B.

Learn more about differences at:

https://brainly.com/question/17695139

#SPJ1

If a sample of 250 RDNS was randomly selected from a list of all RDNS in the state of California for a California policy study, then the sampling method was simple random sample

Here a sample of 250 RDNS was randomly selected from a list of all RDNS.

Sampling is defined as the selecting the individual members or the group that you will actually collect data from in your research. There are five types of sampling method. They are Random, Systematic, Convenience, Cluster, and Stratified.

In the simple random sampling the researchers select the random samples from the population. Here a sample of 250 RDNS was randomly selected from a list of all RDNS.

Therefore, the sampling method that used is simple random sample

Learn more about simple random sample here

brainly.com/question/13219833

#SPJ4

Therefore, In summary: a. Independent samples, b. Paired (dependent) samples.

In both situations, we need to determine if the samples are independent or paired (dependent).
a. The researcher gathers two random samples of GPAs from 100 men and 100 women. These samples are not related, as they are collected separately and do not depend on each other. Therefore, this situation has independent samples.
b. In this case, the researcher collects a sample of husbands and wives, and each person reports his or her GPA. The samples are related because they are taken from couples, where the GPA of one spouse may be influenced by the other spouse's GPA. This situation has paired (dependent) samples.

Therefore, In summary: a. Independent samples, b. Paired (dependent) samples.

To know more about probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The area of a shape is the amount of space it occupies.

The dimension of the paper is given as: 12-inch by 8-inch

So, its area is:

\(Area = 12 * 8\)

\(Area = 96\)

Hence, the area of the paper is 96 square inches

The dimensions of the 4 right triangles are: Two 2 inches by 9 inches, and two 3 inches by 6 inches

So, the combined area is:

\(Area = 0.5(2 * 2 * 9 + 2 * 3 * 6)\)

\(Area = 36\)

Hence, the combined area of the triangle cutouts is 36 square inches

The area of the parallelogram is the difference between the areas of the paper and the four right triangles.

So, we have:

\(Area = 96 - 36\)

\(Area = 60\)

Hence, the area of the parallelogram is 60 square inches

The base is given as 9.22

So, we have:

\(Area = Base * Altitude\)

This gives

\(60 = 9.22* Altitude\)

Divide both sides by 9.22

\(Altitude = 6.51\)

Hence, the altitude of the parallelogram is 6.51 inches

Read more about parallelograms at:

https://brainly.com/question/4459854

Answer:    The area of the paper is 96 square inches

   The combined area of the triangle cutouts is 36 square inches

   The area of the parallelogram is 60 square inches

   The altitude of the parallelogram is 6.51 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression cos (125°) - cos 55° cos 35° cos 55° can be written as cos (55°) + cos (55°) cos (35°) cos (55°).

cos (125°) can be rewritten as cos (180° - 125°). Similarly, cos (35°) can be rewritten as cos (180° - 35°). Therefore, the expression can be written as:

cos (180° - 125°) - cos (55°) cos (180° - 35°) cos (55°)

Simplifying further, we have:

cos (55°) - cos (55°) cos (145°) cos (55°)

Since 145° is the supplement of 35°, we can rewrite it as:

cos (55°) - cos (55°) cos (180° - 35°) cos (55°)

Now, cos (180° - 35°) is equal to -cos (35°). Therefore, the expression becomes:

cos (55°) + cos (55°) cos (35°) cos (55°)

Hence, the expression as a function of an acute angle is:

cos (55°) + cos (55°) cos (35°) cos (55°)

To know more about expression,

https://brainly.com/question/29082858

#SPJ11

Check the picture below.

\(\cfrac{17.5+14}{17.5}~~ = ~~\cfrac{x}{12.5}\implies \cfrac{(17.5+14)(12.5)}{17.5}~~ = ~~x\implies 22.5=x\)

The probability can be calculated using the binomial distribution formula, considering a preliminary polling result of approximately 52% of people voting in favor.

Identify the parameters:

- Probability of voting in favor: p = 0.52

- Sample size: n = 250

Determine the event of interest:

We want to calculate the probability of having more than half of the sample vote in favor of the congressman.

Calculate the probability using the binomial distribution formula:

The probability of having x successes in a binomial distribution with parameters n and p is given by the formula:

P(X = x) = (n choose x) * p^x * (1 - p)^(n - x)

In this case, we want to find the probability of having more than 125 successes (voters in favor), so we calculate:

P(X > 125) = P(X = 126) + P(X = 127) + ... + P(X = 250)

Calculate the cumulative probability:

To calculate the cumulative probability, we sum up the individual probabilities from Step 3:

P(X > 125) = P(X = 126) + P(X = 127) + ... + P(X = 250)

Calculate the final probability:

Using this cumulative probability, we can subtract it from 1 to find the probability of having more than half of the sample vote in favor:

P(X > 125) = 1 - [P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + ... + P(X = 125)]

Calculate the probability using a statistical calculator or software:

To obtain the precise probability, you can use a binomial probability calculator or statistical software that allows you to input the parameters (n and p) and calculate the desired probability.

By following the above steps and using the appropriate calculations, you can obtain the accurate probability value for the given scenario.

Learn more about parameters

brainly.com/question/29911057

#SPJ11

Answer:

4/15 = height of lamp/(15+5)

4/15 = height of lamp/20

20/15 = 1 5/15

1 5/15 times taller

Answer:

I do have extra points I can give.

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, the probability that in any given minute there will be 2 or fewer arrivals is approximately 0.4231 or 42.31%.

To find the probability of 2 or fewer arrivals in a given minute, we can use the Poisson distribution formula.

The formula for the Poisson distribution is:

P(X = k) = (e*(-λ) * λ\(^k\)) / k!

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of k arrivals,

e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828),

λ is the average rate of arrivals,

k is the number of arrivals.

In this case, the average rate of arrivals is given as 3 per minute.

Let's calculate the probabilities for k = 0, 1, and 2.

For k = 0:

P(X = 0) = (e⁻³ * 3⁰) / 0! = e⁻³ ≈ 0.0498

For k = 1:

P(X = 1) = (e⁻³ * 3¹) / 1! = 3e⁻³ ≈ 0.1493

For k = 2:

P(X = 2) = (e⁻³ * 3²) / 2! = 9e⁻³ / 2 ≈ 0.224

To find the probability of 2 or fewer arrivals, we sum up the probabilities for k = 0, 1, and 2:

P(X ≤ 2) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2)

= 0.0498 + 0.1493 + 0.224

≈ 0.4231

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/31113164

#SPJ11

The length of the curve is:

\(=\frac{(68)^\frac{3}{2}-8 }{3}\)

Using the arc length formula in terms of polar coordinates \(\int\limits\sqrt{r^2+(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^2 }\)

To find the length of the curve we will use the formula:

\(\int\limits\sqrt{r^2+(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^2 }\)

Now, Let us put it in the expression:

\(r = \theta^2\\\\\frac{dr}{d\thera} =2\theta\)

Now the integral becomes:

\(=\int\limits^8_0 \sqrt{(\theta)^4+(2\theta)^2} \, d\theta\\ \\=\int\limits^8_0\theta \sqrt{(\theta)^2+4} \, d\theta\\\)

Now using the substitution method:

\(\theta^2+4=t\\\\2\thetad\theta=dt\\\\=\int\limits\frac{\sqrt{t}dt }{2}\\ \\=\frac{t^\frac{3}{2} }{3}\\ \\=\frac{(\theta^2+4)^\frac{3}{2} }{3}\)

Now, Let us plug in the values:

\(=\frac{(68)^\frac{3}{2}-8 }{3}\)

Learn more about Arc length at:

https://brainly.com/question/31762064

#SPJ4

None of the statements A, B, or C can be determined to be true based on the given information. we do not have enough information to determine the values of P(A), P(A∩B), or P(B|A) from the given probabilities.

To determine which statement is true, let's analyze the given information.  We have:

P(B) = 4/1

P(A∪B) = 2/1

P(A|B) = 3/2

Let's evaluate each statement:

A) P(A) = 3/1

This statement is not directly supported by the given information. We cannot determine the value of P(A) solely based on the provided probabilities.

B) P(A∩B) = 12/1

This statement is also not supported by the given information. We do not have enough information to determine the value of P(A∩B).

C) P(B|A) = 5/1

This statement is not supported by the given information. We do not have any direct information about P(B|A), so we cannot determine its value.

D) A and B are not independent.

To determine whether A and B are independent, we can check if P(A∩B) = P(A) * P(B). However, as mentioned earlier, we do not have enough information to determine the value of P(A∩B). Therefore, we cannot conclude whether A and B are independent based on the given information.

In summary, none of the statements A, B, or C can be determined to be true based on the given information. The only conclusion we can draw is that we do not have enough information to determine the values of P(A), P(A∩B), or P(B|A) from the given probabilities.

Learn more about probabilities.

https://brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

Answer:

Its true

Step-by-step explanation:

make sure too look at the question you have and if its the same one, so if my answer was wrong for you then its because ur question was different from this one.

Answer:

I'm guessing A, but am not sure, as for any number can go there if it's over 9!

since the Both line have \(\boxed{2/5}\) , line q and v are parallel.

The slope of the q is \(\boxed{2/5}\) :

q pass though (0,2) and (5,0)

slope = 2/5

the slope of the line v is \(\boxed{2/5}\):

v pass though (0,-2) and (-5,0)

slope = -2/-5 = 2/5

since the Both line have \(\boxed{2/5}\) , line q and v are parallel.

To learn more about parallel lines refer,

https://brainly.com/question/13657035

#SPJ1

Never. Correlation coefficients are used to measure the strength of a linear relationship between two variables, not to prove cause and effect. To determine causation, it is necessary to conduct an experiment or study in which the independent variable is manipulated and the dependent variable is measured.

Correlation coefficients are used to measure the strength of a linear relationship between two variables. They can measure the degree to which variables move together, but they cannot be used to prove cause and effect. To determine causation, it is necessary to perform an experiment or study in which one variable is manipulated and the other is measured. This allows researchers to control for confounding variables and to determine if the manipulation of the independent variable had a direct effect on the dependent variable. Therefore, correlation coefficients cannot be used to support a claim of cause and effect.

Learn more about correlation here

https://brainly.com/question/28898177

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There would be 1,968 people who hold valid passports.

There is a contradiction, since these two values -10.5 ≠ -4.5 cannot be equal. Therefore, there is an error in the given problem statement or in the computation.

The given expression is an integral of a linear function of x, with the limits of integration set as 0 and 7.

We can evaluate this integral by using the fundamental theorem of calculus, which states that the integral of a function over a given interval is equal to the difference between the values of the antiderivative of the function at the endpoints of the interval.

In this case, we can find the antiderivative of the given function by applying the power rule of integration. We have:
∫(7(x - 3)) dx = (7/2)x^2 - (21/2)x + C

where C is the constant of integration. To evaluate the definite integral over the interval [0,7], we need to plug in the limits of integration into this antiderivative and subtract the results. Thus, we get:

∫[0,7](7(x - 3)) dx = [(7/2)(7^2) - (21/2)(7) + C] - [(7/2)(0^2) - (21/2)(0) + C]
= (171/2) - C

Now, we are given that this integral is equal to the difference of the areas of two triangles, with heights of 7 and base lengths of x-3 and x, respectively. Thus, we have:

(1/2)(7)(7-3) - (1/2)(7)(7) = -4.5

Simplifying this expression, we get:

(1/2)(28) - (1/2)(49) = -4.5
14 - 24.5 = -4.5
-10.5 = -4.5

but, -10.5 ≠ -4.5
Invalid result.

Know more about the linear function

https://brainly.com/question/2248255

#SPJ11

The correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To calculate the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000, we can use the standard deviation and assume a normal distribution.

We are given that the average cash flow is $14,000 with a standard deviation of $5,000. These values are necessary to calculate the probability.

The probability of a cash flow falling within a certain range can be determined by converting the values to z-scores, which represent the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

First, we calculate the z-score for $16,000 using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the cash flow value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we get z1 = (16,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z1 = 2,000 / 5,000 = 0.4.

Next, we calculate the z-score for $19,000: z2 = (19,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z2 = 5,000 / 5,000 = 1.

Now that we have the z-scores, we can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the corresponding probabilities.

Subtracting the probability corresponding to the lower z-score from the probability corresponding to the higher z-score will give us the probability of the cash flow falling between $16,000 and $19,000.

Looking up the z-scores in a standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find the probability for z1 is 0.6554 and the probability for z2 is 0.8413.

Therefore, the probability of the cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is 0.8413 - 0.6554 = 0.1859, which is approximately 18.59%.

So, the correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The probability of a cash flow between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To calculate the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000, we can use the standard deviation and assume a normal distribution.

We are given that the average cash flow is $14,000 with a standard deviation of $5,000. These values are necessary to calculate the probability.

The probability of a cash flow falling within a certain range can be determined by converting the values to z-scores, which represent the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

First, we calculate the z-score for $16,000 using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the cash flow value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we get z1 = (16,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z1 = 2,000 / 5,000 = 0.4.

Next, we calculate the z-score for $19,000: z2 = (19,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z2 = 5,000 / 5,000 = 1.

Now that we have the z-scores, we can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the corresponding probabilities.

Subtracting the probability corresponding to the lower z-score from the probability corresponding to the higher z-score will give us the probability of the cash flow falling between $16,000 and $19,000.

Looking up the z-scores in a standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find the probability for z1 is 0.6554 and the probability for z2 is 0.8413.

Therefore, the probability of the cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is 0.8413 - 0.6554 = 0.1859, which is approximately 18.59%.

So, the correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:not a lot

Step-by-step explanation:

Circle O is represented by the equation (x+7)² + (y + 7)² = 16. The length of the radius of Circle O is 4.

The equation of Circle O, (x+7)² + (y+7)² = 16, is in the standard form of a circle equation: (x - h)² + (y - k)² = r². Comparing it to the given equation, we can determine the values of h, k, and r.

In the given equation:

Center coordinates: (-7, -7) → h = -7, k = -7

Radius squared: 16 → r² = 16

To find the length of the radius, we need to take the square root of r²:

r = √(16)

Calculating the square root, we get:

r = 4

Therefore, the length of the radius of Circle O is 4.

Looking at the answer options, we see that the correct answer is Option B which is equal to 4.

The equation of a circle in the standard form (x - h)² + (y - k)² = r² represents a circle with center (h, k) and radius r. By comparing the given equation to the standard form, we can extract the values of h, k, and r. Taking the square root of r² gives us the length of the radius, which in this case is 4.

For more such questions on Circle, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28162977

#SPJ8

Answer:

1214 kilometers

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.4 is the whole number 5/12 is the fraction

Step-by-step explanation:

That would be, 45, 56, 67, and on, the sequence is to add 11.

The given system of differential equations can be analyzed using a Lyapunov function of the form ax^2 + cy^2, where a and c are to be determined. By computing the derivative of this function along the trajectory of the system, we can determine the stability properties of the critical point at the origin.

First, we compute the derivative of the Lyapunov function along the trajectory of the system:

V'(x,y) = 2ax(x^3 + xy^2) + 2cy(xy' - 2x^2y)

Using the second equation of the system, we can substitute y' = x^3 + xy^2 - 2x^2y to obtain:

V'(x,y) = 2ax(x^3 + xy^2) + 2cy(x^3 + xy^2 - 2x^2y - 2x^2y)

Simplifying this expression yields:

V'(x,y) = 2x(x^2 + y^2)(a + c - 4ac)

For the critical point at the origin to be asymptotically stable, we need V'(x,y) to be negative definite in a neighborhood of the origin. This can be achieved by choosing a and c such that a + c - 4ac < 0 and a, c > 0. For example, we can choose a = 1/4 and c = 1/2, which gives a + c - 4ac = -1/4.

Therefore, the critical point at the origin is asymptotically stable. This means that any trajectory that starts sufficiently close to the origin will converge to the origin as t approaches infinity. The Lyapunov function provides a way to analyze the stability of the critical point without solving the system explicitly, which can be useful for more complex systems.

To learn more about equations click here: brainly.com/question/24169758

#SPJ11

Answer:

Quadrant I (one).  73 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

See the attached image.

To get a coterminal angle, add 360 degrees.  360 + (-287) = 73.