Option A is correct. National Incident Based Reporting System catalog involves data on 22 offenses categories & include 46 specific crimes known as Group A offenses. Data on 11 lesser offenses (Group B offenses) are also collected.
About National Incident Based Reporting System
The National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS), which was implemented to enhance the quality of crime data gathered by law enforcement, collects information on each individual crime incident, as well as on distinct offences within the same incident, including details on victims, recognised offenders, relationships between offenders and victims arrestees, & property involved in crimes.
Because NIBRS can provide information about the circumstances and context of crimes, such as location, time of day, and if the incident was cleared, it provides data that is much more in-depth than that reported through the UCR Program's traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS), which is merely an overall monthly count of crimes.
To know more about National Incident Based Reporting System:
brainly.com/question/28061521
#SPJ4
Read Joshua’s scenario in the box below. Then, use the links provided to help you calculate his overdraft fees. The Scenario: ● When the day begins, Joshua has $116 in his checking account, and he has overdraft protection ● Before school he buys his cousin a round trip bus fare for $4 using his debit card ● He then uses the card to get gas in his car for $43 ● Once the banks open, a check he gave the school for his senior yearbook clears, and $75 comes out of his account ● Joshua’s Netflix account subscription is automatically debited today, too, so another $10 leaves the account ● After school he heads out with friends and uses his debit card to buy a $3 coffee ● He sends a person-to-person payment of $15 to his friend Bryant for his share of dinner ● Finally, he finishes out the day with some shopping to buy new soccer gear for $35 using his debit card at the store
The amount of Joshua’s overdraft on his account equals $65.
What is an overdraft fees?On a bank account, the overdraft fees means a limited loan that is provided by a bank that allows a customer to pay for bills and other expenses when the account reaches zero.
A very good example of a bank overdraft is when we write a check for $40 when you only have $20 in your account.
Data given
Joshua has $116 in his checking account (+)
Get a gas in his car for $43 (-)
For senior yearbook clears, $75 comes out of his account (-)
Netflix account subscription $10 (-)
Debit card used to buy a $3 coffee (-)
Payment to friend $15 for his share of dinner (-)
To buy new soccer gear for $35 (-)
Existing amount in account = $116
Total Expenses = $43 + $75 + $10 + $3 + $15 + $35 = $181
Hence, Overdraft fee = $65 ($181 - $116)
Therefore, the amount of Joshua’s overdraft on his account equals $65.
Read more about bank overdraft
brainly.com/question/25772671
#SPJ1
because they involve the shifting of scarce resources from haves to have nots, the most controversial government programs are usually those that center on
Because they involve the shifting of scarce resources from those who have to those who do not have, the most controversial government programs usually center on issues of wealth redistribution and social welfare.
Government programs that focus on wealth redistribution and social welfare aim to address economic inequalities and provide assistance to individuals or groups who are considered disadvantaged or in need. These programs often involve the collection of taxes or resources from the general population, including the wealthier individuals or businesses, and redirecting those resources towards social welfare initiatives such as healthcare, education, poverty alleviation, unemployment benefits, and social safety nets.
The controversial nature of these programs stems from differing ideological, political, and philosophical perspectives on the role of government and the distribution of resources. Advocates argue that these programs are necessary to promote social justice, reduce poverty, and provide equal opportunities for all members of society. They view them as essential for addressing systemic inequalities and ensuring a basic standard of living for vulnerable populations.
On the other hand, critics of these programs often raise concerns about the economic implications, such as the potential negative impact on productivity, economic growth, and individual incentives. They argue that excessive reliance on government assistance may create dependency, disincentivize work, and stifle innovation. Additionally, debates arise around the effectiveness, efficiency, and potential abuses associated with the administration and implementation of these programs.
Due to their significant impact on the distribution of resources and the societal values they reflect, government programs centered on wealth redistribution and social welfare often generate passionate and divisive discussions. Different perspectives on the role of government, individual rights, and social responsibilities contribute to the controversy surrounding these programs.
To learn more about resources Click Here: brainly.com/question/14289367
#SPJ11
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to take legal action and protect yourself.
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Joe was a respiratory therapist in a nursing home. He controlled the ventilation equipment that kept some of his patients breathing. One day, to show the importance of his job to his girlfriend, Joe, without permission or warning, completely cut off the ventilator support to a severely ill patient. Within a few moments, the patient began to gasp for air and nearly lost consciousness before a nurse ordered Joe to restore the ventilator’s function.
Did Joe violate civil law or criminal law or both?
Lauren is writing a small paragraph on main points of a text which reading phase this represents
Answer:
nonce hitting idiots
Explanation:
Lauren is writing a small paragraph on the main points of a text which the reading phase represents once-hitting fools.
What is a Paragraph?A paragraph is a stand-alone segment of writing that focuses on one idea. Typically, a paragraph will have many sentences. There will often be 5–7 sentences in each paragraph, however, this is not a requirement. The subject and the material will decide the length.
Depending on a variety of criteria, including the media, topic, audience, and aim, each paragraph may have two or three sentences, while others may only have one. However, a decent paragraph can often include no more than five phrases.
A strong topic phrase that quickly introduces the paragraph's subject should come first. A few phrases for development and assistance follow, further extending the subject. A conclusion sentence that summarizes the subject or offers one more piece of evidence to round out the paragraph serves as its last sentence.
To learn more about Paragraphs follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/24465045
#SPJ2
Steps in the bank reconciliation process
Answer:
Steps:
Explanation:
1: Compare the bank account balance to the cash balance on your books
2: Scrutinize your bank statement
3: Scrutinize your cash book
4: Adjust the balance of your bank account
5: Adjust the balance of your books
6: Record the reconciliation
(Hope this helps?)
if the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the securities act of 1933 requires that:
If the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the Securities Act of 1933 requires that the securities being offered must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unless they are exempt from registration.
The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the sale of securities in the United States. Its purpose is to ensure that investors are provided with sufficient information about securities being offered for sale so they can make informed investment decisions.
The act requires companies that offer securities for sale to the public to provide detailed financial and other information about the securities, the company, and its management.
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 prohibits the offer or sale of any security through the use of the mails or other means of interstate commerce unless a registration statement has been filed with the SEC or an exemption from registration applies.
The registration statement must contain detailed information about the securities being offered, the company, and its management, among other things.
By requiring securities to be registered with the SEC, the Securities Act of 1933 aims to ensure that investors have access to complete and accurate information about the securities they are considering purchasing. This promotes transparency and helps prevent fraudulent or misleading practices in the securities market.
To know more about Securities Act refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31227421
#SPJ11
Tony fell and injured himself in a Mega Toy Store. Mega Toy Store is incorporated in Delaware. Tony is a resident of Nevada but was injured in a Mega Toy Store located in Arizona. Mega Toy does not do business in Nevada. If Tony decides to sue Mega Toy Store:
a. he may file the lawsuit in an Arizona state court.
b. he may file the lawsuit in a Delaware state court.
c. he may file the lawsuit in a Nevada state court.
d. Either a or b.
Answer:
he may file a lawsuit in Arizona
On 3rd March, Amir and his friends decide to use the strip of land alongside the park to play a game of rugby. The strip of land has been covered in wood chip. During their game, the ball is kicked onto the lawn in the park on four occasions. How would the literal rule apply? Would Amir be guilty following a literal interpretation?
A rule of statutory interpretation is the literal rule, in which the courts simply apply the words of the statute as they are written, giving them their normal and natural meaning.
What is the literal rule?The courts use the literal rule because they assume that Parliament understands what it was trying to accomplish. As a result, the judges are not required to gloss over the words or attempt to make sense of the statute in any other way.
The courts use a variety of principles to better understand the principles in order to interpret statutes. The "Literal Rule of Interpretation" is one of the principles. The literal rule of interpretation has been referred to as the primary rule of interpretation. The literal rule of interpretation, as its name suggests, states that the judge literally interprets the statute. It is also known as the grammatical rule or the plain-meaning rule .
To learn more about interpretation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29323022
#SPJ1
What is the last stop for a typical new law before it becomes “official?”
A. president
B. congress
C. senate
D. supreme court
DESCRIPTION -
After a bill passes in the House, it goes to the Senate for consideration, similar to the path of a bill in the House (passed in US.)
Answer:B. Senate I hope this helps
Explanation:
The bill is sent to the President for review. A bill becomes law if signed by the President or if not signed within 10 days and Congress is in session. If Congress adjourns before the 10 days and the President has not signed the bill then it does not become law ("Pocket Veto.")After a measure has been passed in identical form by both the House and Senate, it is considered “enrolled.” The enrolled bill is sent to the President who may sign the measure into law, veto it and return it to Congress, let it become law without signature, or at the end of a session, pocket-veto it.The Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge. Since 1789 the Senate has tried 20 federal officials, including three presidents. Congress has conducted investigations of malfeasance in the executive branch—and elsewhere in American society—since 1792.
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
Alcohol is a factor in _______ % of Florida crash costs.
Alcohol is a factor in
A. 15
B. 20
C. 30
D. 40
The correct option is C). 30. Alcohol is a factor in 30% of Florida crash costs.
What is the major factor in Florida crash?Alcohol is the major factor that contributes in 25% of Florida's crash costs.
Alcohol-related crashes in Florida cost estimated around $7.8 billion to the public in 2000, including $3.5 billion in terms of monetary costs and around $4.3 billion in terms of life losses.
However, Florida has adopted "no-fault" car insurance state, that makes insurance claim process more efficient after a car accident.
Learn more about the Florida crash here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13378093
#SPJ2
After several robberies in a city, the government deploys a number of police personnel and provides helpline numbers to the residents of the city. This is done because recent research conducted by a team of criminologists showed that the increase of security in crime-prone areas helps in the reduction of crime. This conversion of research into practice is known as ________. A: Evidence Based Criminology B: Translational criminology C: Knowledge-based criminology D:Experimental criminology
which court represents the highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried?
The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.
When a legal case involves a question of state law, the state's highest court, often called the supreme court, is the highest level to which it can be taken.
This court is the ultimate judicial authority in the state and has the final say on all legal matters that fall under its jurisdiction.
As the highest court in the state, the supreme court has the power to review lower court decisions and determine whether they conform to state law.
The court's rulings on these matters are considered binding and final, and they establish legal precedents that lower courts must follow in the future.
The supreme court's decisions have far-reaching implications for the state, as they impact the interpretation and application of state law.
Therefore, the decisions made by the state's highest court have significant legal and practical consequences for citizens, businesses, and government entities within the state.
The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.
Read more about court
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ11
Why did rogue states become more prominent following the Soviet Union's collapse?
a. The Soviet Union's collapse led to power vacuums in certain regions.
b. Rogue states sought to assert their dominance in the post-Soviet era.
c. The fall of the Soviet Union weakened global security measures.
d. Rogue states were emboldened by the absence of a major superpower.
Rogue states became more prominent following the Soviet Union's collapse because the Soviet Union's collapse led to power vacuums in certain regions. Thus, option (a) is correct.
Since the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991, its former client states have been far less isolated internationally. Rogue states' primary source of assistance had been cut off, leaving countries like North Korea, Iran, and Iraq to fend for themselves.
The collapse of the Soviet Union also compromised international security protocols, which gave rogue regimes additional leeway. In the post-Soviet era, rogue states felt empowered to establish their domination because there was no big superpower.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on Soviet Union's, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31565617
#SPJ1
who created individual rights
Answer:
The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
Hope this helps :) <3
Answer:james madison
Explanation:The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
the declaration of independence intented to end the british rule in the colonies ,and grant citizens
The Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 1776, was a pivotal document in American history that aimed to sever the political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain. Its primary purpose was to declare the colonies' intention to form an independent nation, free from British rule. While the declaration marked the beginning of a revolution, it also laid the groundwork for the fundamental rights and principles that would shape the newly emerging United States of America.
The Declaration of Independence outlined the grievances of the colonists against the British government, asserting that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It stated that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that when a government fails to protect the rights of its citizens, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.
By declaring independence, the Founding Fathers aimed to establish a government based on the principles of self-governance, equality, and individual rights. The declaration was a bold assertion of the colonists' determination to create a society where citizens had the freedom to govern themselves and pursue their own happiness. It laid the foundation for the formation of a democratic republic and inspired future movements for liberty and equality around the world.
While the immediate impact of the Declaration of Independence was the severance of ties with Britain and the initiation of the American Revolutionary War, its long-term significance was in shaping the principles that would guide the American nation. It influenced the drafting of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which enshrined the rights and liberties of American citizens, including freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial.
Overall, the Declaration of Independence was a revolutionary document that set forth the principles of self-determination, individual rights, and government by consent that formed the basis for the United States of America and continues to resonate as a symbol of freedom and independence.
for more questions on Great Britain
https://brainly.com/question/30054989
#SPJ11
In how many states were correctional officers represented by unions in 2012
What law prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business?
The law that prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business is the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).
The AKS is a federal law that makes it a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive any remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program, such as Medicare or Medicaid.
The purpose of the AKS is to prevent fraud and abuse in federal health care programs by ensuring that referrals are based on the best interests of patients and not on financial incentives. The AKS applies to a wide range of healthcare providers, suppliers, and vendors who do business with the federal government.
To learn more about business here
https://brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
By what means are the civil and legal rights of individuals respected in a trial?
Answer:
It means due process, which is the fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially a citizen's entitlement to notice of a charge and a hearing before an impartial judge.
Hope this helps :)
What is a contract that has been concluded as a result of undue influence
Explanation:
A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
Please explain the concept of the Burden of Proof? Please include how the Burden shifts throughout the proceedings.
Burden of proof is the obligation to provide evidence and prove a case, which may shift between parties in different stages.
In a court case, it is the burden of the party presenting the evidence to establish their case. First and foremost, it is the plaintiff's responsibility to prove their case through a preponderance of the available evidence. In criminal cases, it is the prosecution's responsibility to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However in some circumstances the burden might change.
For instance, when the plaintiff presents enough proof, the onus may shift to the defendant to offer a convincing counterargument. A fundamental principle known as the burden of proof requires that the party asserting a claim provide evidence to support it with the burden of proof potentially shifting at various points throughout the course of the proceedings.
Learn more about Burden of proof at:
brainly.com/question/30765922
#SPJ4
A program manager implemented a new policy designed to increase productivity. Productivity went up after the new policy was implemented. on Based on the above statements, is the following conclusion true, false, or is there not enough information to determine? The new policy designed to increase productivity worked. O True O False O Not Enough Information
True, the new policy designed to increase productivity worked. Based solely on the information given, we can conclude that the new policy was successful in increasing productivity.
The given statements suggest that a program manager implemented a new policy aimed at increasing productivity. After the implementation of the new policy, productivity went up. From these statements, we can infer that the new policy had a positive impact on productivity.
While it's possible that other factors could have contributed to the increase in productivity, the information provided supports the conclusion that the new policy was effective in achieving its intended goal of increasing productivity.
Of course, there may be additional details or data that could shed further light on the situation. For example, it would be useful to know more about the specific policy that was implemented, as well as how the program manager measured productivity before and after the policy was put in place.
Learn more about productivity: https://brainly.com/question/30333196.
#SPJ11
Silas thinks that a personality is made up of characteristics that can be described on a dimension from low to high. Silas most likely agrees with the ________ approach to personality.
Answer:
Silas most likely agrees with the trait approach to personality.
Explanation:
Which of the following is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case?
O It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts
O It may be the basis for establishing facts in a later civil case
O It will occur as a part of the trial portion of a criminal prosecution
O It is legally equivalent to a “no contest” plea
The one that is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts. Hence, the correct answer is option A
A criminal case is the one that is liable to sentence punishment. A case that is punishable under law of any country. Hence, one is set to be in a criminal case when one is involved in any form of crime. The severity of the crime determines the gravity of the punishment.
What does guilty plea mean?To plead guilty implies that one accepts that one did the crime charged. If one pleads guilty, the court will decide what should happen next, which could be a fine or a prison sentence.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts.
learn more about guilty plea: https://brainly.com/question/14334271
#SPJ1
Is an assertion of authority by a peace officer that would cause a reasonable person to believe they are not free to leave?
Lawful detention is an assertion of authority by a peace officer that would cause a reasonable person to believe they are not free to leave.
Detention requires a reasonable suspicion of a criminal activity. It is less than a arrest and more substantial than a consented meeting. It is a restraint order exercised by the law authorities such as the police with a lawful authority of a warrant. A lawful detention is very different from a false imprisonment. The detainee is accused of some criminal offences and is still not convicted in those cases the legal authorities can direct the police to keep such a person in lawful detention in the prisons, such person cannot be treated as a criminal and holds the right to life and liberty to contact legal help and family. For a person to be detained the police must share the cause of detention and should produce a warrant for such a detention from the state law authorities.
To know more about " detention" visit-
brainly.com/question/26767950
#SPJ4
Which of the following is the lowest category for an offense resulting in the death of another person?
- Manslaughter
- Murder
- Capital murder
- Criminally negligent homicide
Answer:
Criminally negligent Homicide
Hope this helps
Explanation:
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4