The attempted assassination of President Teddy Roosevelt caused so much public outrage that the insanity defense was greatly restricted.

True
Or
False

Answer:

Explanation:

It will be unable to successfully assert the waiver as a defense because it was given by Charles prior to his job offer. Option (c) is correct.

There are circumstances in the workplace where an employer might infringe on an employee's right to privacy. For instance, the Fourth Amendment's ban on unjustified search and seizure may be far stricter for a public employer than for a private employer where the latter is also permitted some discretion.

Employee consent should be necessary whenever an employer has to conduct a workplace search, especially if the search is not conducted in a public area. You don't have the right to bring your entirely personal ideas into the workplace in a way that makes the employer more liable if your employer hires someone you don't like but you decide to stay with the employer. Employees' right to privacy would be violated in direct proportion to any searches conducted without their authorization. Charles may file a lawsuit since he first agreed to waive his right to object to workplace searches before receiving a job offer.

To learn more about workplace searches, refer: brainly.com/question/29305382

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

As a condition of being allowed to apply for a job with Good Hands Industries, Charles is asked to waive his right to object to workplace searches. After signing the waiver, he is offered a job, and he accepts it. Sometime later, he is subjected to a search. If Charles seeks legal redress on the grounds that the search violated his privacy rights, his employer:_________-

A. will be unable to successfully assert the waiver as a defense because it was not given voluntarily.

B. will be unable to successfully assert the waiver as a defense because Charles did not grant it intentionally.

C. will be unable to successfully assert the waiver as a defense because it was given by Charles prior to his job offer.

D. will be able to successfully assert the waiver as a defense because it was given in exchange for valuable consideration.

Answer:

Domestic Violence Act and Criminal Law Act

Explanation: the Domestic Violence Act No 116 of 1998 and Criminal Law Act No 32 of 2007. Both are framed to protect women against any form of violence in South Africa

The reason why a matriculant has to achieve a pass in their bachelor's regardless of the plans that they have in 2023 are:

This is the degree that students who are able to fulfill all of the university requirements are awarded at the end of their school.

The person who is awarded this degree must be able to fulfill all of the school requirements by passing all of the required courses.

Read more on bachelors here:

https://brainly.com/question/17496239

Based on the judiciary branch of government, and the available options, by dragging each label to the correct location on the chart we have the Supreme Court = Highest level of the federal judiciary, Established in the Constitution.

The Judiciary branch of government is a government branch whose duty is the definitive adjudication of controversies over the application of laws in specific situations.

Judiciary is one of the three main branches of government and it has various structures from the magistrate court to the Supreme Court.

Other labels and their correct location are:

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Judiciary has different aspects that are governed by different rules and regulations.

Learn more about the Judiciary branch here: https://brainly.com/question/141524

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Bangko Sentral has supervision over the operations of banks and exercises such regulatory powers as provided in the New Central Bank Act and other pertinent laws over the operations offinance companies and non-bank financial institutions performing quasi-banking functions.

Explanation:

Is this the answer you were looking for

Answer:

27

Explanation:

One year at the prestigious Yale University will cost an average of $38,300.  Many students who deserve to go to this school may miss out because of the cost and lack of financial aid. The rising cost of college may put higher education out of reach for the average American. This paper will look into the reasons behind the steady rise in prices, the legitimacy of a college education, and why recent graduates are struggling to find jobs in this tough economy.  

A college education is now as necessary for success as a high school education was in the 1970’s according to the job industry. In 1970, only 40 percent of high school graduates went to college.

Other reasons for the raise in prices could be the health benefits or the rising utility costs the school has to pay. Some schools promise the families a compact plan. In this plan they will pay the same amount of tuition for all four years. The downfall of this plan is that they take the average of all four years so you could end up overpaying for your freshman year.

Will the average student receive enough financial aid for college to truly make a difference? 63 percent of students receive some form of financial aid (whether it is loans or grants). However, because so many students are applying for financial aid there is less to be given. This leaves many students with some form of financial aid still in debt or taking out loans. Federal grant aid has increased by $8,000,000,000 over the past decade and state grant aid is up 78 percent over the last 10 years.

Hope this helps! i didn't really look at what I had to put o it but there you go

The given statement "policy claims advocate changing or strengthening fundamental religious " is true Policy because claims do not advocate changing or strengthening fundamental religious or philosophical beliefs.

A policy claims advocate is a professional who assists claimants in navigating the process of filing and resolving insurance claims. They are experts in handling complex insurance policies and can help claimants understand their rights and options under their insurance policy.

An advocate will review the claim, assess coverage and advise on the best course of action when dealing with insurers. They can review settlement offers to ensure they are fair and negotiate with insurers to get a better outcome for the claimant.

To know more about insurance policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24984403

#SPJ4

The way that Common Law was imposed on Commonwealth Countries was that the Commonwealth Countries were under the control of the British who used common law.

Commonwealth countries are those countries who were once ruled by, or colonized by the English/ British. These nations were made to abide by the laws of the British as the British functioned as their effective government.

As a result of this, the Commonwealth countries gained a foundation in Common Law, which was the law being used by the English/ British.

Find out more on Common Law at https://brainly.com/question/8068423

#SPJ1

The rise of radicals in France had a significant impact on WWI. The radicalization of French politics resulted in a more aggressive and interventionist foreign policy, which led to France's participation in the war.

The radicals also played a key role in shaping the social and economic policies of France during the war, which in turn influenced the country's military strategy and ability to fight.

Additionally, the radicalization of French society led to a rise in political extremism and social unrest, which further complicated the country's ability to effectively wage war.

Overall, the rise of radicals in France had both positive and negative impacts on the country's involvement in WWI.

Read more about World War 1 at https://brainly.com/question/12233146

#SPJ11

The BEST way to gather needed information to sell alcohol responsibly is through careful C. Observation.

Communicate with the buyer and make observations to satisfy that the person demanding to buy alcohol is sober.

Alcoholism has been found to be a chronic disease that demands treatment at rehabilitation clinics and support groups, including Alcohol Anonymous.

However, the alcohol seller does not need to antagonize their customers when refusing to sell.  But they can offer customers help when they ask. Diligence is required to avoid alcohol sale offenses.

In gathering information to sell alcohol responsibly, you do not require careful coordination, questioning, or communication but Option C.

Learn more about selling alcohol responsibly at https://brainly.com/question/4818130

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.

The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.

The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.

To know more about University of California here

https://brainly.com/question/16551247

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The belief associated with social disorganization theory is that crimes often arise from society with destructive ecological conditions. Crime in itself is measured differently among societies. So crime rates are often linked and associated with some neighborhood because of their ecological characteristics. Weak housing, language barrier, unemployment, and other factors could affect the crime rate in certain societies depending on the law of that society.

"Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens because society sets up an acceptable behavior that is used as laid down rules for acceptable behavior. Deviance is any behavior that is good or bad depending on how it is socially constructed and considered as acceptable behaviors.

Now, to the set of questions above:

Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes?

ANS:

Yes. Society views location as instrumental in influencing people's behavior. Since for instance, criminal behaviors are mostly learned behaviors, people from disorganized communities are generally considered capable of getting involved in illegal activities.

What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"?

ANS:

1. Sometimes, the label given to someone could increase their tendencies for making mistakes.

2. It could impact their self-esteem.

3. It could make them start getting involved in crime.

4. It could affect their employment eligibility if they desire to seek employment out of their neighborhood.

5. It could affect how their peers see them and relate to them.

Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?

ANS:

NO. Since it is perceived that people of the same age group, language and other factors may share similar characteristics because they are in the same society, that would generally affect and limit opportunities and limit their fair treatment in the society.

Answer:

Under federal hate crime legislation, bias-motivated violence is punishable by ten years to life in prison, and some bias-motivated crimes are punishable by the death penalty. (18 U.S.C. §§ 245, 249.) For more information on federal prosecutions, see Federal Prosecutions for Civil Rights Violations. Civil Remedies

Explanation:

Once you find the court's decisions made during this current term, choose one of the cases to find the answers to the questions given below. The case may be lengthy so pay close attention to the

From an objective perspective, it would be safe to say that a police officer, as a citizen, could be the victim any conceivable crime. In practice, however, exceptions do arise. Here are just a few examples from my experience: From the PA Crimes Code: Section 3127. Indecent Exposure.

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court system of the United States.

The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and disputes originating under the US Constitution and other US laws. Supreme Court has final court of appeal jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving an argument of federal law.

As the ultimate authority of the law, the Supreme Court is tasked with assuring the American people of the commitment of equal justice under law, and thus serves as the Constitution's guardian and interpreter.

Learn more on Supreme Court -

https://brainly.com/question/14411708

#SPJ9

Answer:

I need to someone explain me

passive voice and .

&

Some example about part of speech .

Adverb . with example

please

Vladimir Putin decided to invade Ukraine as Russia didn't want Ukraine to join NATO. The Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky is most likely to agree with,"I need ammunition, not a ride"

What is the current situation in Ukraine?

Recently President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed it Ukraine public in the war situation and to motivate the army and the public he was dressed in the army uniform and said," You are indomitable,” he added. “You are Ukrainians.”

He also quash the rumor of fleeing from the country in this war situation by walking down the streets and addressing the his countrymen and all other countries who assured to help Ukraine," I need more ammunition not a ride."

Hence with war situation turned the president of Ukraine in stronger man  and repealed the opinion about him which was a comedian turned into politician and he more likely to agree with in need of more ammunition statement and the countrymen are indomitable.

Learn more about Valdimir Putin here:

https://brainly.com/question/873757

Political Ideology provides a framework for thinking about politics, thinking about policy issues, and considering the role of government in everyone's lives (OPTION E).

A social movement, institution, or major group's set of ethical goals, beliefs, doctrines, myths, or symbols are referred to as its political ideology. These political ideologies provide a blueprint for a certain social order and describe how society should operate.

Numerous studies reveal that ideologies differ along a left-to-right (liberal-conservative) axis (Bobbio 1996; for a review, see Jost, Federica, and Napier 2009).

Types of Political Ideologies:

1) Fascism.

2) Libertarianism.

3) Monarchism.

4) Separatism.

5) Socialism.

To learn more about Political Ideology, visit the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/1470181

#SPJ13

The matching law suggests that the reinforcement schedules used for behavior modification should be based on the principle of matching Therefore, the answer is: a. Concurrent

which means that the relative rate of reinforcement for different behaviors should match the relative rate of occurrence of those behaviors. This principle applies to concurrent schedules of reinforcement. In addition to concurrent schedules of reinforcement, the matching law also has implications for two other types of reinforcement schedules used in behavior modification:

Ratio Schedules: Ratio schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the number of times the behavior is performed. The matching law suggests that the ratio of reinforcement should match the ratio of behavior. For example, if a particular behavior occurs more frequently than another behavior, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement.

Interval Schedules: Interval schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the passage of time or the first occurrence of the behavior after a certain time interval has elapsed. The matching law suggests that the duration of the interval should match the relative occurrence of the behavior. If a behavior occurs more frequently during a specific time interval, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement within that interval.

To learn more about  reinforcement

brainly.com/question/5162646

#SPJ4

Answer:

Religious equality is the idea that all people should have an equal right to believe or not believe in the religion they choose, and that they should not be discriminated against because of their religious beliefs. Religious discrimination, on the other hand, refers to the unfavorable treatment given to someone because of their religion, either knowingly or unknowingly. This can take many forms, such as denying them employment or educational opportunities, denying them building permits for places of worship, or socially marginalizing them. A practical example of religious equality would be in a workplace where employees have the option of taking days off for religious reasons. If all employees have the same opportunity to request these days off, then religious equality would be exercised. On the other hand, an example of religious discrimination could be denying someone the opportunity to work at a company just because they practice a different religion than the employer. In this case, the individual would be being discriminated against based on their religion.

Answer:

the answer is Colton is now interested in being an architect for Team Architect in Macon, Georgia.

Explanation:

Religious authority and political authority are two different types of authority that exist in society. Religious authority is the power and influence held by religious leaders within a particular faith or community, while political authority is the power and influence held by elected or appointed officials within a government or state.

An example of religious authority is the Pope in the Roman Catholic Church. The Pope is considered to be the highest authority in the Church and his decisions on matters of doctrine and practice are seen as binding for Catholics around the world. The Pope's authority is derived from his position as the Bishop of Rome, as well as his appointment by the College of Cardinals.

An example of political authority is the President of the United States. The President is the highest elected official in the United States government and has the power to make decisions on behalf of the country. The President's authority is derived from the Constitution, which outlines the powers and responsibilities of the executive branch of government.

In summary, religious authority and political authority are two distinct types of authority with different sources and functions. While religious authority is based on faith and belief, political authority is based on legal and constitutional frameworks.

to know more about political authority click this link

brainly.com/question/17128108

#SPJ11

Answer:

The title of the poem The Leader and the Led by Niyi Osundare speaks to the various dimensions of attitude within the ambit of Leadership.

It speaks to the indivisible union between leadership and followership.

In the first line, he opens up the poem by describing the attribute of the Leader as a lion who is unafraid to stake his claim. He contrasts that with the Antelope who is always fearful and reminded of the paws of the Lion.

It speaks therefore to the requirement of the Leader to be strong when he or she has to be. It also indicates that the leader cannot always be nice.

By an Ironic statement in line 9, he points out the reason why a duplicitous person cannot lead. He likens such a person to a Zebra. Duplicity equals the inability to inspire trust. Trust is an essential and critical quality for a leader. In line 10 he communicates that the followers are not as powerless as they have been painted to be in line 6 as fearful Impalas, for they also have the ability to finger the flaws of a leader to limelight and remove their following from he or she.

Lines 19 and 20 suffices in the description of a balanced leader as one who must be firm when it is required and gentle when the occasion calls for it.

The entire imagery painted by the poem is a fine depiction of leadership using metaphorical analogies of the animal kingdom.

For as in the animal kingdom, animals have leadership and following, so also do humans.

Slavery's growth into the western territories was addressed by John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision.

This bloody struggle, which ravaged Kansas, gave national attention to John Brown, who would escalate sectional tensions over slavery to unprecedented heights in 1859 with his Harpers Ferry Raid, an effort to incite a huge slave uprising.

Prior to Brown's invasion, the United States Supreme Court had added fuel to the flames of sectionalism in 1857 with its decision in the Dred Scott case, which included an enslaved person who claimed freedom on the grounds that he had been taken to live in free territory.

Check out the link below to learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act;

https://brainly.com/question/14315904

#SPJ4

Answer:

Never park, leave, or abandon your car on a railroad track or within 7-1⁄2 feet of one. Never park, leave or abandon your car on a bridge or in a tunnel.

Answer:

a) deputy warden

Mark me as brainliest

Explanation:

Answer:

Because the amendments are created to bring about changes in federal laws.

Explanation:

The amendments cause changes in the constitution, which means that a law will be modified, where elements of its constitution will be added or removed, thus modifying various social, political or economic factors. Amendments are a very delicate process and they must be discussed a lot by the power they have, for this reason, the creation of a demand must have the capacity to explain itself and to promote a democratic process.