Taylor (47) is unmarried. Taylor's wife, Michelle, died on May 30, 2019. For 2019, he filed a joint return. He has not remarried. His daughter, Karen (16), is a student and lived with him for all of 2020 and 2021. They are both U.S. citizens and have social security numbers valid for employment. Taylor provides more than 50% of the household support. Taylor's 2021 income consisted of $37,298 in wages and $898 in dividends and his 2019 wages were $39,594 with $742 in dividends. Karen's wages were $5,783. She spent $800 of her wages on herself and the rest was put away for college. Taylor had no other income, including any foreign income.
What is Taylor's correct and most favorable 2021 filing status?
What is Karen's dependency status for Taylor?
Is Taylor eligible to claim the Child Tax Credit and/or the Other Dependent Credit for any potential dependent? Choose the best response.
Is Taylor eligible to claim and receive the Earned Income Credit for 2021?
Is Taylor eligible to utilize the 2019 lookback provision for the Earned Income Credit?

Hampton v. United States (1970) is a lesser-known Supreme Court case that dealt with the admissibility of evidence obtained through a warrantless search. In this case, the defendant, Hampton, was arrested and charged with transporting stolen goods across state lines. The arrest was based on information obtained by an FBI agent during a warrantless search of a warehouse where the stolen goods were stored.

The main issue in Hampton v. United States was whether the officer had probable cause to conduct the warrantless search of the warehouse. The Court found that the officer did have probable cause, based on the information available to him at the time of the search. The officer knew that the warehouse contained items that were recently stolen, and he had reason to believe that the defendant was involved in the theft.

The Court held that the warrantless search of the warehouse was justified because the officer had probable cause to believe that the stolen goods were inside the warehouse and that they would be moved or destroyed if he waited to obtain a warrant. The Court also noted that the officer's actions were reasonable, given the circumstances.

In summary, Hampton v. United States dealt with the admissibility of evidence obtained through a warrantless search based on probable cause. The Court held that the officer had probable cause to conduct the search and that the evidence obtained was admissible in court.

Answer:

Option D, Voter Turnout by Income Group, 2008​

Explanation:

The graph has two variable - at x axis  - income of the voters and at the other i.e the Y axis - Percentage of voters in a given income group.

Hence, the graph is a depiction of total % of people voting in a given income group.

The best title of the graph could be something which indicates the variation of % voting with respect to the income of the voters.

Hence, option D is the correct choice of answer

Answer:

see up my answer is also same

Answer:

Its D. social contract

Explanation:

Just did the quiz and C was incorrect

Answer:

Devisee

Explanation:

Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.

Is unique beneath the contract Act, of 1872 which needs to be fulfilled to make binding settlement decisions. option A In February 2014, Raheel promised to pay Rs. 300,000 to Sameer in opposition to debt of Rs. 500,000 which turned into a due fee in March 2010.

The Indian agreement Act of 1872 presents proper personnel to the parties who have certain guarantees in an agreement. accordingly, the parties in any such situation can most effectively implement their contractual rights against every different most effective and no longer against the sector at big.

Section 28 of the Indian settlement Act, of 1872 states that an agreement in absolute restraint of criminal proceedings is void. phase 28 (a) of the Indian contract Act, of 1872 states that: No agreement can debar the enforcement of rights via a courtroom of law. No settlement can oust the jurisdiction of a court docket.

Learn more about contracts here

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ1

Answer:

Well if we didn't have them we would be screwed!!

Answer:

Explanation:

If the U.S. Navy needed a new warship, the Cabinet department head who would most likely make the case to Congress or to the President would be the Secretary of Defense. This is because the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for the defense of the United States, and the Secretary of Defense is the head of the DoD.

As the head of the DoD, the Secretary of Defense is responsible for overseeing the U.S. Navy and all other branches of the military. The Secretary of Defense would work closely with the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and other military leaders to determine the need for a new warship and to develop a plan for its design and construction.

Once a plan is developed, the Secretary of Defense would make the case to Congress or to the President for funding and authorization to proceed with the construction of the new warship. This could include requesting funds through the annual defense budget, seeking congressional authorization for the Navy to enter into contracts with shipbuilders, or seeking presidential approval for specific aspects of the project.

Overall, the Secretary of Defense would be the key Cabinet department head involved in making the case for a new warship for the U.S. Navy, given the Department of Defense's primary responsibility for the nation's defense and the Secretary's role as its head.

Answer:

The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects

Explanation:

Trust me

The primary arguments Attorney General Ken Paxton and other opponents of the DACA program have made against it consist of. President Obama acted unconstitutionally.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA as it is more commonly known, is a United States immigration policy that grants some people who have been living illegally in the country since they were brought there as children a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and makes them eligible for a work permit in the country. Recipients cannot have felony convictions or major misdemeanors on their records in order to be eligible for the program. In contrast to the planned DREAM Act, DACA does not provide individuals a route to citizenship. [1] [2] President Barack Obama made the executive branch memorandum's announcement on June 15, 2012. On August 15, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) started accepting applications for the scheme.

To know more about DACA program visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28317381
#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

This is a very hard choice for many people because they have been raised in a consumer culture. For these individuals, happiness is buying the latest technology, clothing, or other accessories that is trending. They also want to live life to the fullest that they can afford. It all depends on your mentality towards what is happiness to you. For me personally, It was like this when I was younger but not anymore. When I turned 23 and found out what was possible through compound interest investing and other forms of investments, it became a no brainer to invest all I could at a younger age to have the peace of mind that comes with financial freedom later in life.

In the majority of people, the likelihood of collision / crash rate decreases over time.

When a vehicle collides with another vehicle, a pedestrian, an animal, road debris, or another stationary barrier like a tree, pole, or structure, the result is a traffic collision, also known as a motor vehicle collision, car accident, or car crash.

Energy is transferred during an automobile accident from the vehicle to whatever it strikes, whether it be another car or a stationary object. Depending on factors that change states of motion, this energy transfer may result in injury or damage to vehicles and other objects.

To learn more about crash rate refer here:

brainly.com/question/13946688

#SPJ4

The False Claims Act (FCA) provides that anyone who knowingly makes a false claim against the government is liable to pay double the amount of the government's damages, plus a fine of $2,000 for each false claim. doing.

The FCA has been amended several times and now stipulates that violations are punishable by three times her damages and a fine. Federal law enacted in 1863 in response to fraud by defense contractors during the American Civil War. FCA stipulates that anyone who knowingly makes a false claim against the government will be liable to pay double her amount of government damages, plus he will be fined $2,000 for each false claim.

Similar to federal law, the California FCA specifically exempts tax claims, records, or statements, but the California FCA also specifically exempts disputes of less than $500 (US$500) and labor It does not apply to claims for compensation by third parties or claims against public authorities. Civil servant.

Learn more about false claims visit : brainly.com/question/24322083

#SPJ4

Answer:

B to prevent citizen from discussing the party policies and rising up against the government

The Party in George Orwell's novel 1984 tries to isolate citizens from each other mainly to prevent them from discussing the Party's policies and rising up against the government. The correct option is B

This is because the Party's ultimate goal is to maintain absolute control over the population and any form of dissent or rebellion is seen as a threat to its power.

Additionally, the Party discourages romantic relationships as they may distract citizens from their loyalty to the Party and potentially create a sense of loyalty towards their partner instead.

Maintaining class separation is also a tactic used by the Party to prevent unity among citizens and maintain the hierarchical structure of society.

The prevention of a deadly pandemic is not a primary reason for the Party's isolation tactics in the novel.

To know more about George Orwell's refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12380617#

#SPJ11

There are 12 regional circuit courts of appeal are in the federal system of United States.

The united states has 12 regional level circuit courts that sit below the supreme court of United States. There are 94 federal districts which are divided into 12 regional circuits, with an accompanying appeals court. These courts of appeal here to judgements from other court and interpret it whether the decision given is correct or not. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals in specialty issues, such as those concerning patent laws, and decisions determined by the Supreme Court. The court of appeal hears cases from the district court and its other regional circuit courts.

To know more about "regional circuit courts" visit-

brainly.com/question/2487611

#SPJ4

Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.

1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.

2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.

3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.

4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.

5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.

It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.

Know more about Enforcing laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/28173975

#SPJ11

True. The Pen/Trace statute is a federal law that regulates the collection of communication content.

It allows law enforcement agencies to obtain information related to the communication activities of individuals such as the content of their phone calls or text messages. The Pen/Trace statute has been updated several times over the years to reflect advancements in technology and changes in the way people communicate. However, it is important to note that the law requires agencies to follow specific procedures and obtain court orders before collecting communication content to ensure that privacy rights are protected. Overall, the Pen/Trace statute plays an important role in regulating the collection of communication content and balancing the needs of law enforcement with individual privacy rights.

To know more about communication visit:

brainly.com/question/29811467

#SPJ11

A correctional facility is a municipal or regional facility that houses pretrial individuals believed to present a risk of danger or flight, those awaiting probation or parole revocation, and those sentenced to less than one year incarceration.

A correctional facility is a place where criminals are kept and punished. Correctional facilities are used as a place of detention for inmates in the legal process. This refers to pre-trial inmates or inmates awaiting sentencing. The goal of the prison is to separate the offenders from the rest of society and rehabilitate them so they can reintegrate and be functional members of society.

Correctional facilities are often operated by the government, with the state or federal government responsible for the majority of them. Private correctional facilities, on the other hand, are managed by for-profit firms that may house inmates for governments. Despite being owned by private corporations, private prisons are still subject to government regulation and must adhere to the same laws as public prisons.

To know more about Correctional facility visit-

brainly.com/question/14666606

#SPJ11

The courts consider the subjective intention of the parties when determining whether or not a contract was formed. This statement is False.

whether a contract exists based on a subjective or objective standard?

The objective standard test governs terms and conditions, which asks if a reasonable person observing the interaction would surmise that an acceptance and an offer had occurred.

Which of the four considerations is taken into account by courts in evaluating whether an argument is a term or solely a depiction?

The rule of parol evidence

A court's starting point in deciding whether a written term is a term or a misrepresentation is that it is a term and the only term.

To know more about parol evidence click here brainly.com/question/29679663

#SPJ4

Under USERRA, emergency service or mandatory training by a member of the National Disaster Medical System is deemed service in the uniformed services.

Therefore, an employee who takes emergency service or required training in the National Disaster Medical System is considered to be serving in the uniformed services. Emergency service or training performed by a member of the National Disaster Medical System is defined as "service in the uniformed services" under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).

The National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) is a federally sponsored medical response program that involves a network of healthcare professionals from throughout the United States. Members of the NDMS can be summoned to perform emergency medical services or training anywhere in the country.

Such service by the NDMS members are treated as active duty and are considered as service in the uniformed services under USERRA. As a result, a NDMS member is qualified for the protections provided by USERRA including reemployment rights, health plan continuation coverage, and protection from discrimination and retaliation.

Know more about Disaster here:

https://brainly.com/question/33535003

#SPJ11

Criminal law focuses on the rules for making arrests and reasons to detain suspects.

Criminal law is a body of laws that deals with crimes and the punishment of those who commit them, as opposed to civil law. Therefore, in a criminal prosecution, the government must decide whether to punish a person for either an act or an omission when two parties in a civil matter disagree about their rights.

To learn more about  arrest

brainly.com/question/13833866

#SPJ4

Answer:

Brainliest please

Explanation:

For police departments that decide to use reserve officers, the added help can condense full- time police officers but also pose arrears. The key is to minimize the pitfalls and duly manage the reserves.

State law extends the authority to use reserve officers to cosmopolises. All of theS.C. Criminal Justice Academy's Reserve Officer Program Norms must first be met.

A reserve police officer is an overdue levy who assists a law enforcement agency in administering the law. The agency head, with the blessing of the governing body or its principal operating officer, appoints reserve officers. Just like their full- time counterparts, reserve officers are concentrated on the weal of the people, the protection of property in their community, and the just and indifferent enforcement of the law.

The implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.

This kind of contract of one where the obligations arose from the mutual agreement and promise whereas the agreement and promise have not been expressed in words.

Therefore, the implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.

Read more about implied-in-fact contract

brainly.com/question/17201056

#SPJ1

The Judge was likely concerned with the release of the records because they could make certain people look bad, or could be used to manipulate people for personal gain, rather than solely for the pursuit of justice.

The sensitive nature of the documents could create privacy issues for those involved, and some documents may contain false information or be leaked without the permission of all parties involved. Furthermore, many documents may contain information regarding protected classes, which could create potential legal issues.

Lastly, the release of the records would be a departure from precedent, as some documents in public files may not have been meant to be widely distributed. Therefore, the Judge was likely hesitant with the release of the records due to these ethical considerations.

To know more about Judge , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16726610

#SPJ4

Answer:

billie Jean is a Chrysler car dealership located

Answer:

As a policy to reduce racial profiling during parades and frisks, it would create a system whereby the imputation of a certain ethnic minority (African-American, Latino, Asian, etc.) should be carried out with the presence of at least one witness and one member. police belonging to said minority, who can attest that the situation attributed to the person is real. Thus, for example, if a firearm or drugs is found in a routine search carried out on an African American, this situation must be corroborated by a witness and an African American policeman. This would create a framework of legitimacy for police action, since their procedures would not be classified as racial profiling, but would be much more transparent given the presence of people from the same ethnic group corroborating the criminal situation.

Answer:

the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.

Explanation:

they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps