suppose a pepperoni is positioned 10 cm from the center of a nasty pizza, which is rotating at 28 hz. what is the tangential velocity of this abomination (pepperoni) in m/s?

Wegener's theory of continental drift was an important early step in our understanding of how the continents move, but it lacked a complete explanation for the forces driving their movement.

Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift proposed that the continents were once joined together as a single landmass, which he called Pangaea, and that they gradually moved apart over time. He suggested that the continents moved due to the forces of tides, centrifugal forces, and other factors. Although Wegener's theory was met with skepticism when it was first proposed in the early 20th century, it is now widely accepted as a valid explanation for the movement of continents.

Wegener based his theory on several lines of evidence, including the fit of the continents, the distribution of rocks and fossils, and the presence of glacial deposits in areas that are now too warm for glaciers. However, his explanation for the forces driving the movement of the continents was incomplete and lacked a plausible mechanism. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that a more complete explanation for continental drift was provided.

Plate tectonics explains the movement of the continents by the movement of the plates that make up the Earth's crust. The plates are driven by convection currents in the mantle, which move material up from the hot interior of the Earth, causing the plates to move apart, slide past each other, or collide. As the plates move, they carry the continents with them, causing them to drift apart or come together.

Learn more about continental drift here https://brainly.com/question/15122129

#SPJ4

Indeed, Alfred Wegener's assertions make logical. His hypothesis of continental drift, which is backed by a variety of geological and paleontological data, postulated that the continents were originally united together in a single landmass before drifting apart.

According to Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift, Pangaea, all the continents previously belonged to a single supercontinent. He thought the continents drifted to their present locations over millions of years after the supercontinent started to disintegrate some 200 million years ago. The matching of geological characteristics and fossils across continents, the resemblance of rock formations and mountain ranges, and the discovery of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor have all been used to support this idea, which was previously viewed with suspicion. In light of this, Wegener's assertions that the continents were originally linked and then drifted apart make sense, and his hypothesis has completely changed how we think about the Earth's past and current dynamics.

learn more about Alfred Wegener's here:

https://brainly.com/question/29547747

#SPJ4

Answer:The moon does not have its own light. It shines by reflecting the sunlight.

Explanation:

The average power developed by the boy during the climb is approximately 29.4 W.

In physics, the amount of energy transferred or converted per unit time is called power.

total height = number of steps x height of each step

total height = 30 x 0.15 m = 4.5 m

Given, time = 60 s

As power = work done / time

work done = force x distance

force = mass x gravity

mass is boy's mass (40 kg) and gravity is acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²).

force = 40 kg x 9.81 m/s² = 392.4 N

The distance that the boy moves is equal to the total height that he has climbed: distance = total height = 4.5 m

work done = force x distance

work done = 392.4 N x 4.5 m = 1765.8 J

power = work done / time

power = 1765.8 J / 60 s

power ≈ 29.4 W

Therefore, the average power developed by the boy during the climb is approximately 29.4 W.

As for the anomalous behavior of water, water has a higher boiling point and melting point as compared to other substances with similar molecular weight. This is due to the strong hydrogen bonding between water molecules, which requires more energy to break the bonds and change the state of water from solid to liquid to gas.

To know more about power, refer

https://brainly.com/question/1634438

#SPJ9

Answer:

Gases, liquids and solids are all made up of microscopic particles, but the behaviors of these particles differ in the three phases. ... gas are well separated with no regular arrangement. liquid are close together with no regular arrangement. solid are tightly packed, usually in a regular pattern.

Answer:

a

 \(a = 21.7 \ m/s^2\)

b

\(F = 108.5 \ N\)  

Explanation:

From the question we told that

   The mass is  m  =  5 kg

    The initial speed \(u = 5 m/s\)

    The time taken to attain \(v = 70 \ m/s\) is  t =  3 s

Generally from kinematic equation we have that

     \(v = u + at\)

=> \(70 = 5 + a * 3\)

=>  \(a = 21.7 \ m/s^2\)

Generally  the force acting is mathematically represented

        \(F = m * a\)

=>      \(F = 5 * 21.7\)  

=>      \(F = 108.5 \ N\)  

Answer:

a: True centrifuge works on centripetal force.

b: False separating funnel can't be used to separate blood cells from samples.

e: False separating funnel cannot separate milk and water.

f: Condenser receives high pressure gas from the compressor and convert this gas to a liquid.

The true statement is B: "If one object has twice as much mass as the other, its wavelength is one-half the wavelength of the other".

This is because the de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the mass of the object. This means that as the mass of an object increases, its wavelength decreases, and vice versa. Therefore, if one object has twice as much mass as the other, its wavelength will be one-half the wavelength of the other object.

Option a is incorrect because the de Broglie wavelength of the heavier object is shorter, not longer, than that of the lighter one.

Option c is also incorrect because doubling the velocity of one of the objects will have a different effect on its wavelength than doubling its mass. Doubling the velocity will cause the wavelength to be halved, while doubling the mass will cause the wavelength to be quartered.

So, the correct answer is: B:. If one object has twice as much mass as the other, its wavelength is one-half the wavelength of the other.

You can learn more about velocity at

https://brainly.com/question/24681896

#SPJ11

Supermassive galaxies are often found at the cores of rich galaxy clusters because of the immense gravitational potential well of the cluster.

The mass of a galaxy cluster is dominated by dark matter, and the strong gravitational field of the cluster causes galaxies to move towards its center.

As galaxies fall towards the center, they interact and merge, resulting in the formation of a supermassive galaxy.

Additionally, the gas and dust in the cluster can also be accreted onto the central galaxy, contributing to its growth.

The supermassive galaxy then continues to grow by merging with other galaxies and accreting gas and dust from the environment.

The environment of a rich galaxy cluster provides a steady supply of material for the central galaxy to continue growing, leading to the formation of the massive elliptical galaxies often found at the centers of clusters.

Therefore, the strong gravitational pull of the cluster environment plays a crucial role in the formation and growth of supermassive galaxies at the centers of rich galaxy clusters.

To know more about "Galaxy cluster" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31806519#

#SPJ11

Answer:

For how long must an object travel at 29.8km/s to cover 940Gm? t = 940 Gm 29.8 km/s = 940 ⋅ 1 0 9 m 29.8 ⋅ 1 0 3 m s = 9.4 ⋅ 1 0 11 m 2.98 ⋅ 1 0 4 m s ≈ 3.154 ⋅ 1 0 7 s .

Explanation:

It will take 3,15,43,674 sec to cover a distance of 940 Gm with a speed of 29.8 km/s.

Speed [s], distance [d] and time [t] are related to each other by the following relation -

s = d/t

Given is an object travelling at 29.8 km/s in order to cover 940 Gm.

In 1 Gm(Gigameter) there are 1000000000 m or 10⁹ m

Speed of object [s] = 29.8 km/s = 29800 m/s.

Distance to be covered [d] = 940 x 10⁹ m

Time taken to cover the distance of 1 Gm will be -

t = 1 Gm / 29800

t = (10⁷ x 100) / 29800

t = 10⁷/ 298

t = 33557.1 seconds

Therefore, in order to travel 940 Gm, it will take -

940 x 33557.1 = 3,15,43,674 sec

Therefore, it will take 3,15,43,674 sec to cover a distance of 940 Gm with a speed of 29.8 km/s.

To solve more questions on Kinematics, visit the link below-

https://brainly.com/question/6424849

#SPJ5

Answer:

Explanation:

The power delivered completing this task can be calculated using the formula Power = Work/Time. In this case, the power is equal to 30 J/15 s, which simplifies to 2 J/s. This can also be expressed as 2 Watts (W).

Important Formulas:

\(p=\dfrac{w}{t}\)

power(measured in watts) = work(measured in joules) / time(measured in seconds)

__________________________________________________________

Given:

\(w=30J\)

\(t=15s\)

\(p=?\)

__________________________________________________________

Finding power:

\(p=\dfrac{w}{t}\)

\(p=\dfrac{30}{15}\)

__________________________________________________________

\(\fbox{p = 2 watts}\)

Speed, distance, and position are scalar quantities, while velocity, displacement, average velocity, and acceleration are vector quantities.

Speed refers to how fast an object is moving and is a scalar quantity, with only magnitude, without direction. Distance is a scalar quantity that refers to the amount of space between two points, also having only magnitude.

Position is a scalar quantity that refers to the location of an object in space and also has only magnitude.

Velocity, on the other hand, is a vector quantity, as it has both magnitude and direction. It is the rate of change of an object's position over time.

Displacement is another vector quantity, and it refers to the change in position of an object from its starting point.

Average velocity is a vector quantity that is the average of all velocity changes during a certain time interval.

Acceleration is also a vector quantity and refers to the rate of change of velocity. It measures how quickly the velocity of an object changes, and like velocity, it has both magnitude and direction.

Learn more about scalar here:

https://brainly.com/question/24853230

#SPJ4

No atomic  model is a picture of an atom but only helps explain the behavior of one

We know that the atom is the smallest particle of a substance that is able to take part in a chemical reaction. We know that in the atom there are certain smaller particles that we can be able to refer to as the subatomic particles.

In this case, we are talking about the different models that we can be able to use to show the atom. None of these models can be said to show the atom exactly but can approximate how the atom behaves.

Learn more about atom:https://brainly.com/question/1566330

#SPJ1

Answer:

The particle is defined as the small quantity of matter under the consideration. ... The wave is defined as the propagating dynamic distrubance. The energy of the wave is calculated based on the wavelength and velocity

Explanation:

In Physics, we distinguish between wave motion and particle motion. Wave motion refers to the movement of a wave-like pattern from one location on the medium to another. ... When you observe the motion of these points, you are observing particle motion - the motion of particles of the rope.

Answer:

45000cm

Explanation:

volume of sphere= volume of cylanders wire

4/3^2 x 22/7^11 x 15/10^5 x 15/10 x 15/10 = 22/7^2 x 0.1/10 x 0.1/10 x h

---> 2 x 15 x 15/ 0.1 x 0.1 = h

---> h = 450 x 10 x 10

                    =

               45000cm

To determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the floor, we can use the following formula:
friction force = coefficient of friction * normal force

In this case, since the box comes to rest, the friction force acting on the box is equal to the force applied to the box in the opposite direction. The normal force is the force exerted by the floor on the box, which is equal to the weight of the box.The formula for the force applied is:
force applied = mass * acceleration
Since the box comes to rest, the friction force is zero. Therefore, the force applied is also zero. Now, we can rewrite the equation for the friction force as:
0 = coefficient of friction * weight
The weight of the box is equal to the mass of the box multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2). Now, we can determine the coefficient of kinetic friction by rearranging the equation:
coefficient of friction = 0 / weight
coefficient of friction = 0 / (mass * acceleration due to gravity)
Since the box has mass, we cannot divide by zero. Therefore, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the floor is zero. Please note that a coefficient of kinetic friction of zero implies that there is no friction between the box and the floor, which may not be realistic in most scenarios.

To know more about friction force, click here https://brainly.com/question/13707283

#SPJ11

The power of lens is 55.55 D (diopter).

The ability of a lens to bend the light falling on it is called the power of a lens.

                                   Power = 1/ Focal length

Given focal length is 18 mm = \(18 * 10^{-3} m\)

Putting this value in above equation we get Power = 55.55 D

So the power of lens is 55.55 D (diopter).

To know more about optics visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2297282

#SPJ1

The weight of an object would be the least at the center of the Earth. 2000 miles above earth's surface at the equator at the south pole at the north pole at the center of earth.

The weight of an object depends on the gravitational force acting on it. The gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the object and the center of the Earth. As the object moves farther away from the center of the Earth, the gravitational force decreases.

At the center of the Earth, the distance between the object and the center is at its minimum. Therefore, the gravitational force and consequently the weight of the object would be the least at the center of the Earth.

In contrast, as the object moves further away from the center of the Earth, such as 2000 miles above the Earth's surface, the distance between the object and the center increases, resulting in a stronger gravitational force and a greater weight.

Thus, of the options provided, the weight of an object would be the least at the center of the Earth.

Learn more about center of the Earth here

https://brainly.com/question/11393189

#SPJ11

Answer:

take any of them

Explanation:

mechanisms that convert mechanical energy to electrical energy are turbine steam engines, internal combustion engines, and wind turbines (Electric Generator

The answer is option (b) irreflexive, i.e., "is not married to." Therefore, we can conclude that the irreflexive is "is not married to".

Here are two relations: "is married to" and "is not married to." Supposing the universe is the set of all living human beings, which of these is irreflexive.

The irreflexive is "is not married to".What is irreflexive. In Mathematics, a binary relation R over a set X is irreflexive if and only if no element of X is associated with itself under the relation. Symbolically, ∀x ∈ X, ¬(xRx).

For example, the "greater than" relation is irreflexive on the real numbers because no real number is ever greater than itself.

What is a binary relation A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset of the Cartesian product A × B, where A and B are arbitrary sets.In this case, the universe is the set of all living human beings.

Therefore, the relation "is married to" is not irreflexive. However, the relation "is not married to" is irreflexive since no human being is not married to themselves.

Thus, the answer is option (b) irreflexive, i.e., "is not married to."Therefore, we can conclude that the irreflexive is "is not married to".

to learn more about irreflexive.

https://brainly.com/question/30425683

#SPJ11

The relation "is married to" is reflexive, while the relation "is not married to" is irreflexive. Neither relation is symmetric, asymmetric, or antisymmetric.

The relation "is married to" is an example of a reflexive relation, while the relation "is not married to" is an example of an irreflexive relation.

(a) Reflexive: A relation is reflexive if every element in the set is related to itself. In the case of the relation "is married to," every person in the universe of all living human beings is married to themselves. For example, John is married to John, Mary is married to Mary, and so on. This satisfies the condition of reflexivity.

(b) Irreflexive: A relation is irreflexive if no element in the set is related to itself. In the case of the relation "is not married to," no person in the universe of all living human beings is not married to themselves. This means that everyone is married to themselves, which contradicts the condition of irreflexivity.

The relations "is married to" and "is not married to" are not symmetric, asymmetric, or antisymmetric because they do not satisfy the respective conditions for these properties.

(c) Symmetric: A relation is symmetric if for every element (x, y) in the relation, the element (y, x) is also in the relation. In the case of the relation "is married to," if John is married to Mary, it does not necessarily mean that Mary is married to John. Therefore, the relation is not symmetric.

(d) Asymmetric: A relation is asymmetric if for every element (x, y) in the relation, the element (y, x) is not in the relation. In the case of the relation "is married to," if John is married to Mary, it is not possible for Mary to be married to John. Therefore, the relation is not asymmetric.

(e) Antisymmetric: A relation is antisymmetric if for every element (x, y) in the relation, where x is not equal to y, if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) is not in the relation. In the case of the relation "is married to," if John is married to Mary, it is not possible for Mary to be married to John. Therefore, the relation is antisymmetric.

In summary, the relation "is married to" is reflexive, while the relation "is not married to" is irreflexive. Neither relation is symmetric, asymmetric, or antisymmetric.

Learn more about relation:

https://brainly.com/question/14817505

#SPJ11

Answer:

  first 31        second 69

Explanation:

Answer:

Refer to the diagram and use the drop-down menus to answer each question. How much energy is reflected by the Earth system? How much energy is absorbed ...

Explanation:

they delted our page

Answer:

Below

Explanation:

Your mass is irrelevant....here is why:

All of your POTENTIAL energy (mgh)

           will be converted to KINETIC energy  ( 1/2 m v^2)

so

mgh = 1/2 m v^2     divide both sides by 'm' <====then 'm' is gone !

gh = 1/2 v^2            now multiply by 2

2 gh  = v^2              sqrt both sides

v = sqrt (2gh)     = sqrt  [ 2 ( 9.81)(3.4)]   = 8.2 m/s

The macro scale look of the lake is determined by water molecules.

The macro scale refers to the broad scale motion of the gas, while the micro scale refers to individual molecule movements.

The macroscale is defined as geometry on the order of millimeters and beyond, whereas the microscale is concerned with length scales down to the micrometer range.

The biggest circulation patterns in the earth's lower atmosphere are represented by macroscale winds. These wind patterns can endure from days to months and span distances of hundreds to thousands of kilometers.

The jet stream and trade winds are two examples of planetary scale wind patterns.

Learn more about molecular scale at:

https://brainly.com/question/20341686

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

How can the change that the molecular scale affect the Lakes Macro scale appearance

The best describes the image of a concave mirror when the object is at a distance greater than twice the focal point distance from the mirror is (c) virtual, upright, and magnification less than one.

When the object is placed beyond twice the focal length of a concave mirror, the image formed is virtual, meaning it cannot be projected onto a screen. The image is also upright, having the same orientation as the object.

In addition, the magnification of the image is less than one, indicating that the image is smaller in size compared to the object. This is because the concave mirror forms a reduced and virtual image when the object is located beyond the focal point.

The distance between the object and the mirror affects the size and position of the virtual image formed.

To know more about the concave mirror refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/13101215#

#SPJ11

Answer:41xm/s

Explanation:

Answer:41xm/s

Explanation:

I found this for you hope it helps.

Answer:

solids

Explanation:

Sound travels fastest through solids. This is because molecules in a solid medium are much closer together than those in a liquid or gas, allowing sound waves to travel more quickly through it. In fact, sound waves travel over 17 times faster through steel than through air

No, the elastic potential energy stored in the pole of a pole vaulter is not the only type of potential energy involved in pole-vaulting.

In pole-vaulting, there are multiple forms of potential energy involved. While the elastic potential energy stored in the pole plays a crucial role, other forms of potential energy include gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

1. Elastic Potential Energy: The pole used in pole-vaulting is typically made of flexible materials, such as fiberglass or carbon fiber, which store elastic potential energy when bent or compressed. This stored energy is then released, propelling the vaulter upwards.

2. Gravitational Potential Energy: As the vaulter reaches the highest point of their vault, they have gained gravitational potential energy due to their increased height above the ground. This potential energy is converted into other forms of energy as the vaulter descends.

3. Kinetic Energy: Throughout the vaulting process, the vaulter's body also possesses kinetic energy, which is the energy of motion. The vaulter's initial speed and subsequent acceleration contribute to their kinetic energy, allowing them to gain momentum and clear the bar.

Therefore, while the elastic potential energy stored in the pole is an important component, there are other forms of potential energy involved in pole-vaulting, namely gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

To learn more about pole-vaulting , visit :

brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

Answer:

a = 0.5m.s²

Explanation:

Fnet = m×a

50 = 100×a

a = 0.5

Answer:

Galileo performed a famous experiment where he used a ball rolling on a ramp (inclined plane) to study the motion of objects under the influence of gravity. The ramp allowed him to make more precise measurements because the ball moved more slowly along the ramp than if it were simply dropped. Galileo discovered through this experiment that the objects fell with the same acceleration, proving his prediction true, while at the same time disproving Aristotle's theory of gravity (which states that objects fall at speed proportional to their mass). Galileo's conclusion from this thought experiment was that no force is needed to keep an object moving with constant velocity. Newton took this as his first law of motion. One result of the experiment surprised Galileo, and one surprises us. Galileo found that the heavy ball hit the ground first, but only by a little bit. Except for a small difference caused by air resistance, both balls reached nearly the same speed. And that surprised him. According to history, Galileo’s experiment on falling bodies largely contributed to Isaac Newton’s Law of Gravity. In Galileo’s experiment, he is said to have dropped balls from the Leaning Tower of Pisa. The balls were made of the same material but had different masses. Galileo set out to prove that the time it took for these objects to reach the ground would be the same. Galileo proved that objects reached the ground at the same time,

Explanation:

I think this is right & I hope this helped