Solve the equation v² = 36. What’s the value of v?

Answer:

hmm..

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4 B 61 (By-13) (3y + 7) Kley A 43 (4x - 1) (2x +17) c What are the measures of LADC and DCB in the figure below? ZADC = DCB = Enter your…

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2%

Step-by-step explanation:

True measurements = 400 meters

Observed measurements = 392 meters

% error = change in measurements / true measurements × 100/1

= (400 - 392) / 400 × 100

= 8/400 × 100

= 0.02 × 100

= 2%

Percentage error of Beth measurements = 2%

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y=9 so x-3(9)=-5

x-27=-5

x=22

Step-by-step explanation:

5a+4a=180

a=20

5a=X

X=5×20

=100°

Answer:

100 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

The opposite angle will always be the same. since the opposite is 5a, then x = 5a.  x is 5a, and 9a is 180 degrees so x=180(5/9), which is equal to 100 degrees.

Answer:33.1

Step-by-step explanation: 3.61 × 10-3 =33.1

Step-by-step explanation:

429 × 10⁷

hopefully it will help you

Based on the given information, Jolene's behavior is suggestive of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD) is a mental health condition characterized by the presence of obsessions and/or compulsions. Obsessions are intrusive and unwanted thoughts, images, or urges that cause distress and anxiety.

In Jolene's case, her obsession revolves around the fear of miscounting the cracks in the sidewalk. Compulsions, on the other hand, are repetitive behaviors or mental acts performed in response to obsessions, with the goal of reducing anxiety or preventing a feared outcome.

Jolene's compulsion is the urge to return home to recount the cracks, driven by her fear of having miscounted them.

To know more about OCD:

https://brainly.com/question/7276679

#SPJ11

In this triangle, the product of tan A and tan C is `(BC)^2/(AB)^2`.

The given triangle ABC has angle A measuring 45 degrees, angle B measuring 90 degrees, and angle C measuring 45 degrees , Answer: `(BC)^2/(AB)^2`.

We have to find the product of tan A and tan C.

In triangle ABC, tan A and tan C are equal as the opposite and adjacent sides of angles A and C are the same.

So, we have, tan A = tan C

Therefore, the product of tan A and tan C will be equal to (tan A)^2 or (tan C)^2.

Using the formula of tan: tan A = opposite/adjacent=BC/A Band, tan C = opposite/adjacent=AB/BC.

Thus, tan A = BC/AB tan C = AB/BC Taking the ratio of these two equations, we have: tan A/tan C = BC/AB ÷ AB/BC Tan A * tan C = BC^2/AB^2So, the product of tan A and tan C is equal to `(BC)^2/(AB)^2`.

Answer: `(BC)^2/(AB)^2`.

For more questions on adjacent sides, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28394984

#SPJ8

Therefore, the point on the parabola closest to (5, 20) is approximately (95.5952, 31.0137).

To find the point on the parabola that is closest to the point (5, 20), we need to minimize the distance between the two points. The distance formula between two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is given by:

d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

For the given problem, the point on the parabola can be represented as (x, y) where y^2 = 10x. Substituting this into the distance formula, we get:

d = sqrt((x - 5)^2 + (y - 20)^2)

= sqrt((x - 5)^2 + (10x - 20)^2)

To minimize d, we take the derivative of d with respect to x and set it equal to zero:

d' = (1/2) * (2x - 10)(x - 5) + 2(10x - 20)^2

= 42x^2 - 840x + 4015

d' = 0 when x = 4015/42 = 95.5952 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Substituting x = 95.5952 into y^2 = 10x, we get y ≈ 31.0137 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

To know more about parabola,

https://brainly.com/question/1979730

#SPJ11

Answer:

(0,-1)

Step-by-step explanation:

x point is 6, and the translation is x - 6

6 - 6 = 0

x = 0

y point is 0 and translation is y - 1

0 - 1 = -1

y = -1

Coordinates are (0,-1)

If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!

If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!

-Chetan K

======================================================

Explanation:

The given translation rule will have us do two things (in either order)

The given point is P(6,0). So x = 6 and y = 0 here.

Since x = 6, we then have x-6 turn into x - 6 = 6-6 = 0

Because y = 0, we have y-1 turn into y-1 = 0-1 = -1

So that's how (6,0) moves to (0,-1)

-----------------

Or you could write out the steps like this

\((x,y) \to (x-6,y-1)\\\\(6,0) \to (6-6,0-1)\\\\(6,0) \to (0,-1)\\\\\)

The diagram below shows that we've moved 6 units to the left and 1 unit down.

Answer:

8962

Step-by-step explanation:

8×1+9...etc..etc

= 8962

Answer:

8.962

Step-by-step explanation:

ICD-10 code for vomiting is R11.0. This code is part of the R10-R19 symptom codes which are used to classify symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified. Specifically, R11.0 is used to classify the symptom of vomiting without the presence of nausea.

Vomiting is the forcible emptying of the stomach contents through the mouth. It is usually related to gastrointestinal issues, but can be caused by a wide range of conditions, including those that are not related to the gastrointestinal tract. Common causes of vomiting include food poisoning, infection, motion sickness, pregnancy, and certain medications. Vomiting can also be a symptom of more serious conditions, such as appendicitis, brain tumors, and certain forms of cancer.Vomiting is typically accompanied by nausea, but can occur without nausea in certain cases. While nausea affects the entire digestive system, vomiting affects only the stomach. Nausea is often a precursor to vomiting, as it is usually in response to a feeling of discomfort in the stomach. It is important to get medical attention for vomiting that persists for more than 12 hours or is accompanied by fever, abdominal pain, or other concerning symptoms.

Learn more about symptoms here:

https://brainly.com/question/14170278

#SPJ4

Answer:

430 cm squared

Step-by-step explanation:

SA= 2(Length x Base, Base x Height, Height x Length)

15cm x 5cm +

15cm x 7xm +

7cm x 15cm =

215cm

215cm x 2 = 430 cm squared.

(it's perimeter of a 3D object so it must be squared, then volume would be cubed)

I hope this helps <3

The distance between the two towns is 165 kilometers

The initial speed = 100 kilometer per hour

Time taken = t hours

We know,

Speed = Distance / Time

Distance = Speed × t

Distance = 100 × t

New speed = 110 kilometer per hours

He saves 9 minutes

9 minutes = 9/60 hours

The time taken = t - 9/60

The distance = 110 × (t - 9/60)

= 110t - 33/2

Then the equation will be

100t = 110t - 33/2

110t - 100t = 33/2

10t = 33/2

t = 33/2 ÷ 10

t = 33/2 × 1/10

t = 1.65 hours

Then the distance = 100 × t

= 100 × 1.65

= 165 kilometers

Hence, the distance between the two towns is 165 kilometers

Learn more about speed here

brainly.com/question/12759408

#SPJ4

1 gram is equal to 0.001 kilogram.
To convert grams to kilograms, divide grams by 1000.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

I cant explain it but its B

\(x = 2 \\ y = 7\)

is the answer to:

\(y = 11 - 2x \\ 4x - 3y = - 13\)

_________________________________________

\(x = 5 \\ y = 2\)

is the answer to:

\(2x + y = 12 \\ x = 9 - 2y\)

_________________________________________

\(x = 3 \\ y = 5\)

is the answer to:

\(2x + y = 11 \\ x - 2y = - 7\)

_________________________________________

\(x = 7 \\ y = 3\)

is the answer to:

\(x + 3y = 16 \\ 2x - y = 11\)

TRUE. As one performs multiple separate hypothesis tests, the risk of committing a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis) accumulates.

This overall risk is referred to as the experiment-wise alpha level or family-wise error rate (FWER). It represents the probability of making at least one Type I error among all the conducted tests.

When multiple hypothesis tests are performed simultaneously or sequentially, the individual alpha levels (typically set at 0.05) for each test may no longer be appropriate. This is because if we conduct, for example, 20 separate tests with an alpha level of 0.05 for each test, the cumulative chance of committing at least one Type I error can be much higher than the desired 5%.

To control the experiment-wise error rate, various multiple comparison procedures and adjustments can be employed, such as the Bonferroni correction or the Holm-Bonferroni method. These methods aim to maintain a desired level of significance for the entire set of tests, reducing the risk of accumulating Type I errors.

Learn more  about hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/30899146

#SPJ11

Using the Fundamental Counting Theorem, it is found that 1,835,008 numbers are possible.

It is a theorem that states that if there are n things, each with \(n_1, n_2, \cdots, n_n\) ways to be done, each thing independent of the other, the number of ways they can be done is:

\(N = n_1 \times n_2 \times \cdots \times n_n\)

In this problem, we have that:

Hence:

N = 7 x 8 x 8 x 8 x 8 x 8 x 8 = 1,835,008.

1,835,008 numbers are possible.

More can be learned about the Fundamental Counting Theorem at https://brainly.com/question/24314866

#SPJ1

a) For chi-squared distribution with v=3 degrees of freedom, the statistic that can be constructed using Xi's is:

X2 = Σ i=1 3 (Xi − i)2 / 3.

X2 has chi-squared distribution with 3 degrees of freedom.

b) For t-distribution with v=2 degrees of freedom, the statistic that can be constructed using Xi's is:

T = (X1 − 1) / [(X2/2)0.5].

T has t-distribution with 2 degrees of freedom.

c) For F-distribution with v1=1 and v=2 degrees of freedom, the statistic that can be constructed using Xi's is:

F = [(X1 − 1)/1] / [(Σi=2 to 3 Xi2) / 2].

F has F-distribution with 1 and 2 degrees of freedom.

#SPJ11

Let us know more about distribution : https://brainly.com/question/32696998.

Answer:

2.23 this the answer use the calculator

decimal form

119.571428571

fraction form

119571428571/1000000000

Have a nice day

hope this attachment relates to you

By showing that the corresponding sides are not proportional we know that the Triangles △fgh and △jih are not similar.

To prove that triangles △fgh and △jih are not similar, we need to show that at least one pair of corresponding sides is not proportional.
Let's compare the side lengths:

Side fg does not have a corresponding side in △jih.
Side gh in △fgh corresponds to side hi in △jih.
Side fh in △fgh corresponds to side ij in △jih.

By comparing the side lengths, we can see that side gh/hj and side fh/ij are not proportional.

Therefore, triangles △fgh and △jih are not similar.

Know more about Triangles  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ11

Triangle FGH (△FGH) is not similar to triangle JIH (△JIH) because their corresponding angles are not congruent and their corresponding sides are not proportional.

To prove that triangle FGH (△FGH) is not similar to triangle JIH (△JIH), we need to show that their corresponding angles and corresponding sides are not proportional.

1. Corresponding angles: In similar triangles, corresponding angles are congruent. If we compare the angles of △FGH and △JIH, we find that angle F in △FGH corresponds to angle J in △JIH, angle G corresponds to angle I, and angle H corresponds to angle H. Since the corresponding angles in both triangles are not congruent, we can conclude that the triangles are not similar.

2. Corresponding sides: In similar triangles, corresponding sides are proportional. Let's compare the sides of △FGH and △JIH. Side FG corresponds to side JI, side GH corresponds to side IH, and side FH corresponds to side HJ. If we measure the lengths of these sides, we can see that they are not proportional. Therefore, the triangles are not similar.

Learn more about corresponding angles :

https://brainly.com/question/28175118

#SPJ11

Jody has created a systematic sampling error by forgetting to include a segment of the population that is relevant to the study.

Systematic sampling is a sampling method where every nth member of a population is selected to be part of the sample. In Jody's case, she forgot to include a specific segment of the population, which means that the sampling process was not systematic. This error can introduce bias and affect the representativeness of the sample.

No calculations are required for this type of error.

Jody's mistake in not including a relevant segment of the population has resulted in a systematic sampling error. To ensure the accuracy and validity of the study, it is important to rectify this error by including the missing segment or adjusting the sampling method accordingly.

To know more about sampling error follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/30765764

#SPJ11

Answer:

I beleave its 27

Step-by-step explanation:

There are five possibilities for whole numbers such that radical expression 4 ≤ √3 + √x ≤ 5: {6, 7, 8, 9, 10}

In this problem we have the case of a radical expression, from which we need to determine at least a whole number such that following inequality is fulfilled:

4 ≤ √3 + √x ≤ 5

This can be done by algebra properties. First, determine the limits of the inequality:

4 ≤ √3 + √x

4 - √3 ≤ √x

(4 - √3)² ≤ x

x ≥ (4 - √3)²

x ≥ 16 - 8√3 + 3

x ≥ 19 - 8√3

√3 + √x ≤ 5

√x ≤ 5 - √3

x ≤ (5 - √3)²

x ≤ 25 - 10√3 + 3

x ≤ 28 - 10√3

There are five possibilities for five whole numbers: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

To learn more on radical expressions: https://brainly.com/question/27847549

#SPJ1

A. The appropriate inference procedure to test if the M&M color distribution changed from 2008 to 2017 is a goodness-of-fit chi-squared test.

B. The appropriate hypotheses for the test are:

H0: The observed color distribution of the M&M sample collected in 2016-2017 is equal to the M&M color distribution reported by the company in 2008.

Ha: The observed color distribution of the M&M sample collected in 2016-2017 is different from the M&M color distribution reported by the company in 2008.

C. The intermediate components of the chi-squared goodness-of-fit test are:

Expected count: Calculate the expected count of each color based on the M&M color distribution reported by the company in 2008.

Observed count: Observe the actual count of each color in the sample collected in 2016-2017.

Deviation: Calculate the deviation between the observed and expected count for each color.

Chi-squared statistic: Calculate the chi-squared statistic as the sum of the squared deviations, divided by the expected count.

P-value: Find the p-value by comparing the calculated chi-squared statistic to a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the number of colors minus one.

D. The conclusion from the test is not reliable. A p-value of 0.05 is usually used as a threshold for significance, and if the p-value is more significant than 0.05, the conclusion is that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. However, in this case, the sample size is too small (712 candies) to make a reliable conclusion about the population, and the conclusion should be treated with caution.

To know more about Chi-square tests visit :

https://brainly.com/question/14082240?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The total volume of the square prism with a side length of 3m, height of 4m, and width of 5m is 60 cubic meters.

To calculate the volume of a prism, we multiply the area of the base by the height. In this case, the base of the prism is a square with a side length of 3m.

1. Calculate the area of the base:

  The area of a square is given by the formula A = side^2. So, the area of the base is 3m * 3m = 9 square meters.

2. Calculate the volume:

  The volume of the prism is obtained by multiplying the area of the base by the height. In this case, the height is 4m.

  Volume = Area of base * Height = 9 square meters * 4m = 36 cubic meters.

Therefore, the total volume of the square prism with a side length of 3m, height of 4m, and width of 5m is 36 cubic meters.

Learn more about area  : brainly.com/question/16151549

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. 900

2. 975

3. 75 feet below sea level? which makes no sense but that's what the math says.